Quality, benchmarking and accreditation in technology enhanced higher education

1
Quality, benchmarking and accreditation in
technology enhanced higher education

• Walter F. Kugemann
• FIM-NewLearningUniversity of Erlangen-Nuremberg
• www.fim.uni-erlangen.de

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Steps toward a conceptual framework for elearning
Quality Dialogue
RLE
Role
Vision Values
Sector
LS
LP
LC
Perception
Object
Quality of Learning experience
Stakeholder
6
Visions of the World(adapted from Boltanski and
Thévenot) 1/2
7
Visions of the World(adapted from Boltanski and
Thévenot) 2/2
8
Learning experience
9

• Example of area specific criteria
• Pedagogical quality
• Content updatedness/reliability
• Technical quality
• Portability (tech)
• Integrability (context/org)
• Adaptability (context/indiv.)
• Aestethic quality/Attractiveness/Empathy
• IPR conformance

• Learning Sources
• Teachers CV/Qualification
• L. Materials
• Reference Materials
• Components

10

• Example of area specific criteria
• Trackability
• Interaction
• Activation of L. Motivation
• Open endedness
• Collaboration
• Production of change
• Effectiveness (Ped)
• Efficiency (Ec)

• Core Learning Process
• Guide/Recruitment/TNA
• Design (Guidance principle)
• Delivery (TL)
• Evaluation

11

• L. context
• Institutional setting
• Centralised/ decentralised curriculum
• Culture (nat., org., prof., gen.)
• Equipment and connectivity
• L. Environments
• Legislation
• Financial rules
• Values system

• Examples of area specific criteria
• Supportiveness (climate service)
• Openmindedness
• Tolerance to mistakes
• Valorisation Learning results
• Encouragement to implementation

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Thank you very much for your attention

• Walter F. Kugemann
• FIM-NeuesLernenUniversity of Erlangen-Nuremberg
• www.fim.uni-erlangen.de