Lecture pack - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture pack

Description:

spoilage often not observed/recorded; - interaction of parameters (e.g. spoilage ... Spoilage: Delay & prevent growth, inactivation. e.g. Yeast, lactobacilli ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: int116
Category:
Tags: lecture | pack | spoilage

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture pack


1
MRA in practice Application of MRA in the industry
Suzanne van Gerwen
Leon Gorris
UNILEVER SEAC - Risk Analysis Group Colworth
House, Sharnbrook, UK, MK44 1LQ LEON.GORRIS_at_UNILEV
ER.COM
UNILEVER Unilever RD Vlaardingen Olivier van
Noortlaan 120 Vlaardingen, The Netherlands SUZANNE
-VAN.GERWEN_at_UNILEVER.COM
2
People in food safety management control
Government
Industry
Research institutes/universities
3
  • Food Industry
  • Producers, manufacturers, processors, handlers,
    vendors etc. of all sizes and in all phases of
    the supply chain

4
Supply chain of food production
X
5
Where to control a Hazard?
  • At different levels
  • farm
  • production
  • preparation
  • consumption

Control is the responsibility of the different
stakeholders
6
Risk assessment - government level
7
HACCP - industry level
8
Application of MRA in the industry
But how does Risk Analysis impact on food safety
management by food industry in practice?
  • How can MRA studies by FAO/WHO, FDA, etc. support
    food safety control in the industry?
  • How can the tool MRA be applied by the industry?

9
MRA by FAO/WHO etc. support
POLICY
POLICY
PLANNING
RISK ANALYSIS
IMPLEMENTATION
Derived from ILSI-Europe, 1998
10
MRA by FAO/WHO etc. support
  • Language and terminology
  • Understanding governmental risk management
    interventions
  • Transparency, auditability
  • Recording knowledge/data and rationale for
    use/disregard
  • Analysis of risk management options
  • Analysing equivalence between food
    products/categories

Presented at FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 18 -22
March 2002
11
MRA by FAO/WHO etc. support
  • Sharing of risk assessment tools and data
  • Tools predictive modelling included in MRA
  • Tools deterministic/probabilistic modelling
    techniques
  • Use of MRA elements/tools may help industry to
    become increasingly more pro-active
  • Depending on an industrys or producers
    capabilities and capacities

Presented at FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 18 -22
March 2002
12
Differences in PURPOSE between Governmental MRA
and use of MRA tools in industry
  • Governmental MRA
  • Consumer health and safety protection common
    concept for world trade issues
  • Basis for Risk Management decision on ALOP/TL and
    FSO
  • Means to re-evaluate current food safety
    practices on the market
  • MRA tools in Industry
  • Aid to built in safety and to engineer out
    hazards in new food products before marketing by
    using similar tools as used in MRA
  • Transparency and auditability of the assessment
    study and the resulting HACCP plan
  • Basis to re-evaluate food safety status of a
    product in future when necessary and for changing
    the HACCP plan accordingly

Presented at FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 18 -22
March 2002
13
Differences in SCOPE between Governmental MRA and
use of MRA tools in industry
  • Governmental MRA
  • Consumer population nationally, regionally or
    globally
  • Pathogen-pathway for a range of similar food
    products on a market made by different producers
  • Risk Ranking, comparison risk of potential
    hazards in a foods/category or of a specific
    hazard in different foods/categories on the
    market
  • Often a complete food chain (primary production
    to consumption) is covered
  • MRA tools in Industry
  • Consumer population in the intended market for a
    new product
  • Pathogen-pathway for a specific product produced
    by or for a specific company
  • Mostly covering hazard levels from raw material
    up to consumption

Presented at FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 18 -22
March 2002
14
Differences in INPUT between Governmental MRA and
use of MRA tools in industry
  • Governmental MRA
  • Detailed data/knowledge on hazard dose-response
    effect in consumers, epidemiology and
    pathogenicity of hazard
  • Typical or simulated data/knowledge on effect of
    producing, processing/product formulation/handling
    during and after manufacture
  • MRA tools in Industry
  • No detailed data/knowledge on hazard
    dose-response effect in consumers, but generic
    epidemiology and pathogenicity of hazard, when
    available for the specific product - pathogen
    combination
  • Typical/specific operational or simulated
    data/knowledge on raw material, effect of
    processing/product formulation and handling
    during and after manufacture, recontamination
    etc.

Presented at FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 18 -22
March 2002
15
Differences in OUTPUT between Governmental MRA
and use of MRA tools in industry
  • Governmental MRA
  • A risk estimate in absolute or relative term
  • e.g. an estimation of the number of people in a
    population that may get a certain illness as the
    consequence of consuming a certain food
    containing a (certain level of a) certain
    pathogen
  • e.g. a categorisation of different foods in order
    of increasing or decreasing relative risk
  • MRA tools in Industry
  • The endpoint in general is the exposure
    assessment
  • Food safety benchmarking is used to compare an
    estimated level of a certain pathogen in the food
    to be marketed with a similar food already on the
    market with a good safety record.

Presented at FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 18 -22
March 2002
16
Industry
  • Safe and stable product and process design
  • HACCP plan
  • Implementation
  • Monitoring, verification

17
Outbreak due to unsafe design
  • 1998
  • 27 cases of botulism in Preston and
  • Blackpool
  • Reformulated canned hazelnut
  • conserve used to manufacture diet
  • yoghurt

18
Outbreak due to unsafe design
  • Cause
  • reformulated conserve received the same
  • pasteurization treatment
  • ....but.....
  • spores were now able to germinate
  • and grow in final product

19
Basic principle
  • Identification Control of
  • microbial hazards
  • at Product Process design
  • is first step to
  • Ensure quality
  • and
  • realise consumer safety
  • From QC to QA

20
Risk Characterisation - how to interpret outcome?
Hypothetical production process
21
MRA predictive modelling
  • Rapid new product development
  • Product diversification
  • Prevent long shelf life testing
  • Efficient product innovation
  • process optimisation
  • Pro-active prediction of microbial behaviour
  • Less experiments
  • Risk assessment exposure assessment

22
MRA predictive modelling
  • In a product development expert system
  • Consider.....
  • - experimental set up often inadequate
  • - media
  • - type of microorganisms used
  • - little information on food composition
  • - little information on specific preservation
    parameters
  • - no confidence intervals
  • - spoilage often not observed/recorded
  • - interaction of parameters (e.g.
    spoilage/pathogens)

23
MRA predictive modelling
  • Does it matter which type of model
  • is chosen?
  • Yes what do we want to know?
  • 1. growth/no growth boundaries
  • 2. inactivation in formulation
  • 3. Lag time, growth rate
  • 4. Inactivation by heat

24
MRA predictive modelling
  • Infectious pathogens
  • Inactivation
  • e.g. Listeria, Salmonella, E.coli
  • Toxigenic pathogens
  • Prevent growth, inactivation
  • e.g. Staphylococcus, C. botulinum
  • Spoilage
  • Delay prevent growth, inactivation
    e.g. Yeast, lactobacilli

25
MRA predictive modelling

temperature
Growth.xls,Ecoli garlic,pH7,aw0.99
26
MRA predictive modelling

Growth.xls,Lmono garlic,pH7,aw0.99
27
Models are never perfect
28
Overcome the problems
  • careful choice in experimental set up
  • validate the model predictions in real
    products!!
  • ask expert opinion and apply additional rules

29
Example of application
  • Unilever expert system, systematic approach
  • Identification of microbial hazards
  • Procedure to design out the identified hazards
  • 5 design stages identified formulation,
    pack, process, storage/distrib. consumer use
  • Display of results in hazard matrix

30
Specific and generic knowledge
Product type 3
Product type 1
Product type 2
Product type 1
Product type 2
Expert system
Expert system
Ingredient rules
Generic rules
31
E.g. specific knowledge water droplets in oil
physical barrier micro. growth

32
Objective expert system
  • Help the operating companies
  • design
  • microbiological safety and stability
  • into their products and processes
  • Thus
  • Consumer safety re microbiology
  • Increase speed to market

33
Sums up, Thumbs up
  • MRA currently not a tool for most players in food
    supply chain
  • Useful as a basis for advice for improvement and
    optimisation
  • Comparison of risks of various products and
    product categories
  • Relevance of various phases of supply chain for
    risk
  • Biggest uncertainties in supply chain wrt risks

Structured analysis of product safety and
stability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com