Title: Charm dynamics from transport models
1Charm dynamics from transport models
Elena Bratkovskaya 28.05.2009 , Workshop Heavy
Quarkonium Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions,
Trento, May 25-29, 2009
2Introduction
- Heavy ion collisions are well suited to study
dense and hot nuclear matter - a phase transition to QGP ,
- chiral symmetry restoration,
- in-medium effects
- Observables
- Excitation function of particle yields and ratios
- Transverse mass spectra
- Collective flow
- Dileptons
- Open and hidden charm
- Fluctuations and correlations
- ...
- The way to study
- Experimental energy scan of different observables
in order to find an anomalous behaviour in
comparison with theory
Microscopic transport models provide a unique
dynamical description of nonequilibrium effects
in heavy-ion collisions
3Basic concept of HSD
- HSD Hadron-String-Dynamics transport
approach - for each particle species i (i N, R, Y, p, r,
K, ) the phase-space density fi follows the
transport equations - with collision terms Icoll describing
- elastic and inelastic hadronic reactions
- baryon-baryon, meson-baryon, meson-meson
- formation and decay of
- baryonic and mesonic resonances
- and strings - excited color singlet states
(qq - q) or (q qbar) - - (for inclusive particle production BB -gt X
, mB -gtX, X many particles) - implementation of detailed balance on the level
of 1lt-gt2 - and 2lt-gt2 reactions ( 2lt-gtn multi-particle
reactions in HSD !) - off-shell dynamics for short-lived states
BB lt-gt BB, BB lt-gt BBm mB lt-gt mB, mB lt-gt B
Baryons B(p, n, D(1232), N(1440), N(1535),
...) Mesons m(p, h, r, w, f, ...)
4HSD a microscopic model for heavy-ion reactions
- very good description of particle production in
pp, pA reactions - unique description of nuclear dynamics from low
(100 MeV) to ultrarelativistic (20 TeV) energies
HSD
1999 predictions
5Open and hidden charm
Heavy flavor sector reflects the early dynamics
since heavy hadrons can only be formed in the
very early phase of heavy-ion collisions !
- Hidden charm J/Y , Y Anomalous J/Y suppression
in AA (NA38/NA50/NA60)
J/Y normal absorption by nucleons (Glauber
model) Experimental observation extra
suppression in AA collisions increasing with
centrality
6I.-II. Scenarios for charmonium suppression in AA
- I. QGP threshold melting
- Satz et al03
- II. Comover absorption
- Gavin Vogt, Capella et al.97
- charmonium absorption by low energy inelastic
scattering with comoving mesons (mp,h,r,...) - J/Ym lt-gt DDbar
- Ym lt-gt DDbar
- cCm lt-gt DDbar
Quarkonium dissociation temperatures
Dissociation energy density ed 2(Td/Tc)4
7Charm and Charmonium production and absorption in
HSD
- Charmonium hard probe
- gt binary scaling!
- Production s(J/Y) and s(Y ) in NN and pN
collsions parametrization of the available exp.
data
Coupled channel problem sJ/Yexp sJ/Y
B(cc?J/Y) scc B(Y?J/Y) sY
- Charmonia-baryon dissociation cross
- sections can be fixed from pA data
-
- scc B sJ/Y Bsc B 4.18 mb, sY B 7.6 mb
- (adopting a
Glauber fit from NA50)
J/Y (cc,Y) B ? DDbar X
8II. Modelling of the comover scenario in HSD
1. Charmonia dissociation cross sections with
formed p, r,K and K mesons J/Y (cc,Y) meson
(p, r, K , K) lt-gt DDbar
- Phase-space model for charmonium meson
dissociation
constant matrix element
2. J/Y recombination cross sections by DDbar
annihilation DDbar ? J/Y (cc,Y) meson (p,
r, K , K) are determined by detailed balance!
Note comover dissociation as well as DDbar
recombination can occure only if the local energy
density at the collision point e lt 1GeV/fm3
PRC 67 (2003) 054903
9 Charmonium recombination by D-Dbar annihilation
At SPS recreation of J/Y by DDbar annihilation
is negligible
NDD16
but at RHIC recreation of J/Y by DDbar
annihilation is strong!
PRC 67 (2003) 054903
10Suppression in dA at RHIC
Charmonium is absorbed by scattering on baryons
Effect of shadowing at forward y
O. Linnyk et al., arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod
Phys E17 (2008) 1367
11I. Modelling of the QGP melting scenario in HSD
Energy density e (x0,y0,zt) from HSD for
PbPb collisions at 160 A GeV
Energy density e (x0,y0,zt) from HSD for
AuAu collisions at 21300 A GeV
Dissociation threshold energy densities J/Y
melting e(J/Y )16 GeV/fm3 cc melting
e(cc ) 2 GeV/fm3 Y melting e(Y ) 2
GeV/fm3
Melting temperature T(J/Y) lt 1.6-2 TC T(cc)
lt 1-1.2 TC T(Y ) lt 1-1.2 TC
12(I.) Local energy density e versus Bjorken
energy density eBj
- transient time for central AuAu at 200 GeV
- tr 2RA/gcm 0.13 fm/c
- c-cbar formation time
- tC 1/MT 1/4GeV 0.05 fm/c
lt tr - c-cbar pairs are produced in the initial hard NN
- collisions in time period tr
Y
J/Y
cc
AT is the nuclei transverse overlap area t is
the formation time of the medium
- at RHIC eBj t 5 GeV/fm2/c
Local energy density e during transient time tr
e 5GeV/fm2/c / 0.13 fm/c 30
GeV/fm3 accounting tC e 28 GeV/fm3
- HSD reproduces PHENIX data for Bjorken energy
density very well - HSD results are consistent with simple estimates
for the energy density
13J/Y and Y suppression in InIn and PbPb at
SPS (II.) Comover absorption ( recombination
by D-Dbar annihilation)
- Exp. data (NA50/NA60) for J/Y and Y suppression
for PbPb and InIn at 160 A GeV are consistent
with the comover absorption model for the same
set of parameters!
Olena Linnyk et al., nucl-th/0612049, NPA 786
(2007) 183
14J/Y and Y suppression in InIn and PbPb at
SPS (I.) QGP threshold melting scenario
Dissociation energy density e(J/Y )16 GeV/fm3,
e(cc ) 2 GeV/fm3, e(Y ) 2 GeV/fm3
- J/Y suppression is qualitatively described, but
QGP threshold melting scenario shows a too strong
Y absorption, which contradicts the NA50 data!
Olena Linnyk et al., nucl-th/0612049, NPA 786
(2007) 183
15J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC (II.)
Comover absorption ( recombination by D-Dbar
annihilation)
Olena Linnyk et al., nucl-th/0612049, NPA 786
(2007) 183 arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807 (2008) 79
In the comover scenario the J/Y suppression at
mid-rapidity is stronger than at forward
rapidity, unlike the data!
Pure comover scenario is ruled out by PHENIX data!
16J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC (I.)
QGP threshold melting scenario
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0705.4443, PRC 76
(2007) 041901
Melting model complete dissociation of initial
J/Y and Y due to the huge local energy
densities !
Charmonia recombination by D-Dbar annihilation is
important, however, it can not generate enough
charmonia, especially for peripheral collisions!
QGP threshold melting scenario is ruled out by
PHENIX data!
17Summary (I.-II. )
I. QGP threshold melting versus
experimental data
SPS RHIC J/Y survival -
Y / J/Y ratio - ?
- II. Hadronic comover absorption
- ( recombination by D-Dbar annihilation)
- versus experimental data
- SPS RHIC
- J/Y survival -
- Y / J/Y ratio ?
Comover absorption and threshold melting
scenarios are ruled out by experimental data
evidence for non-hadronic interaction ?!
18III. Scenarios for charmonium suppression in AA
- III. Pre-hadronic interaction scenario
- early interactions of charmonium (ccbar) and
D-mesons with unformed (i.e. under formation time
t g tF , tF 0.8 fm/c in the hadron rest frame)
baryons and mesons - pre-hadrons - comover absorption with recombination by
D-Dbar annihilation
- Dissociation cross sections of charmonium by
pre-hadrons - sdiscc pre-Baryon 5.8 mb,
- sdiscc pre-meson 2/3 sdiscc pre-Baryon
- Elastic cross sections with prehadrons
- Charmonium - prehadrons D-meson - prehadrons
- selcc pre-Baryon 1.9 mb,
selD pre-Baryon 3.9 mb, - selcc pre-meson 2/3 selcc pre-Baryon
selD pre-meson 2/3 selcc
pre-Baryon - Pre-hadronic interaction scenario only
simulates the interactions in the QGP in the
Hadron-String model without (!) explicit partonic
interactions and phase transition gt NOT (yet!)
a consistent description ! gt PHSD
Fitted to PHENIX data
19J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC (III.)
Pre-hadronic interaction scenario
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807
(2008) 79
In the prehadronic interaction scenario the J/Y
rapidity distribution has the right shape like
the PHENIX data! gt can describe the RHIC data
at s1/2200 GeV for AuAu at mid- and
forward-rapidities simultaneously.
20J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807
(2008) 79
PHENIX data ? evidence for non-hadronic
interactions of charm degrees of freedom !
21HSD v2 of DDbar and J/Y from AuAu versus pT
and y at RHIC
- Pre-hadronic interactions lead to an increase of
the elliptic flow v2 - The pre-hadronic interaction scenario is
consistent with the preliminary PHENIX data on
the D-mesons v2 - gt strong initial flow of
non-hadronic nature!
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807
(2008) 79
22Quenching of D mesons at RHIC
Evidence of additional high pT suppression in
the most central collisions. Suppression of D
mesons in peripheral collisions is consistent
with a purely hadronic scenario.
O. Linnyk et al., arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod
Phys E17 (2008) 1367
23Quenching of J/Y at RHIC
- Strong suppression at low pT observed
experimentally cannot be explained - by hadronic absorption of initially produced
J/Ys - as weel as by DDbar recombination since
D-mesons follow a similar RAA pattern as J/Y.
Possible indication of J/Y formation by parton
coalescence!
O. Linnyk et al., arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod
Phys E17 (2008) 1367
24Summary
- J/Y probes early stages of fireball and HSD is
the tool to model it. - Comover absorption and threshold melting both
reproduce J/Y survival in PbPb as well as in
InIn at SPS, while Y/J/Y data appear to be in
conflict with the melting scenario. - Comover absorption and threshold melting fail to
describe the RHIC data at s1/2200 GeV for AuAu
at mid- and forward-rapidities simultaneously - Prehadronic interaction scenario can describe the
RHIC data at s1/2200 GeV for AuAu at mid- and
forward-rapidities simultaneously - STAR data on v2 of high pT charged hadrons and
charm D mesons are not reproduced in the
hadron-string picture gt evidence for a plasma
pressure ?!
25Outlook open problems
- Energy, rapidity, pT - dependent hadronic
absorption cross sections - from experiments systematic energy and
system scan for pA - Explicit dynamics of c-cbar in the QGP phase !
- Theory modeling of parton-hadron phase
transition based on lQCD EoS and off-shell parton
transport ? - Parton-Hadron-String-Dynamics (PHSD)
26Thanks to
Olena Linnyk Wolfgang Cassing
O. Linnyk, E.L. Bratkovskaya and W. Cassing,
arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod Phys E17 (2008) 1367