Charm dynamics from transport models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Charm dynamics from transport models

Description:

Note: comover dissociation as well as DDbar recombination can occure only if the ... Dissociation energy density: e(J/Y )=16 GeV/fm3, e(cc ) =2 GeV/fm3, e(Y ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: elena117
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Charm dynamics from transport models


1
Charm dynamics from transport models
Elena Bratkovskaya 28.05.2009 , Workshop Heavy
Quarkonium Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions,
Trento, May 25-29, 2009
2
Introduction
  • Heavy ion collisions are well suited to study
    dense and hot nuclear matter
  • a phase transition to QGP ,
  • chiral symmetry restoration,
  • in-medium effects
  • Observables
  • Excitation function of particle yields and ratios
  • Transverse mass spectra
  • Collective flow
  • Dileptons
  • Open and hidden charm
  • Fluctuations and correlations
  • ...
  • The way to study
  • Experimental energy scan of different observables
    in order to find an anomalous behaviour in
    comparison with theory

Microscopic transport models provide a unique
dynamical description of nonequilibrium effects
in heavy-ion collisions
3
Basic concept of HSD
  • HSD Hadron-String-Dynamics transport
    approach
  • for each particle species i (i N, R, Y, p, r,
    K, ) the phase-space density fi follows the
    transport equations
  • with collision terms Icoll describing
  • elastic and inelastic hadronic reactions
  • baryon-baryon, meson-baryon, meson-meson
  • formation and decay of
  • baryonic and mesonic resonances
  • and strings - excited color singlet states
    (qq - q) or (q qbar) -
  • (for inclusive particle production BB -gt X
    , mB -gtX, X many particles)
  • implementation of detailed balance on the level
    of 1lt-gt2
  • and 2lt-gt2 reactions ( 2lt-gtn multi-particle
    reactions in HSD !)
  • off-shell dynamics for short-lived states

BB lt-gt BB, BB lt-gt BBm mB lt-gt mB, mB lt-gt B
Baryons B(p, n, D(1232), N(1440), N(1535),
...) Mesons m(p, h, r, w, f, ...)
4
HSD a microscopic model for heavy-ion reactions
  • very good description of particle production in
    pp, pA reactions
  • unique description of nuclear dynamics from low
    (100 MeV) to ultrarelativistic (20 TeV) energies

HSD
1999 predictions
5
Open and hidden charm
Heavy flavor sector reflects the early dynamics
since heavy hadrons can only be formed in the
very early phase of heavy-ion collisions !
  • Hidden charm J/Y , Y Anomalous J/Y suppression
    in AA (NA38/NA50/NA60)

J/Y normal absorption by nucleons (Glauber
model) Experimental observation extra
suppression in AA collisions increasing with
centrality
6
I.-II. Scenarios for charmonium suppression in AA
  • I. QGP threshold melting
  • Satz et al03
  • II. Comover absorption
  • Gavin Vogt, Capella et al.97
  • charmonium absorption by low energy inelastic
    scattering with comoving mesons (mp,h,r,...)
  • J/Ym lt-gt DDbar
  • Ym lt-gt DDbar
  • cCm lt-gt DDbar

Quarkonium dissociation temperatures
Dissociation energy density ed 2(Td/Tc)4

7
Charm and Charmonium production and absorption in
HSD
  • Charmonium hard probe
  • gt binary scaling!
  • Production s(J/Y) and s(Y ) in NN and pN
    collsions parametrization of the available exp.
    data

Coupled channel problem sJ/Yexp sJ/Y
B(cc?J/Y) scc B(Y?J/Y) sY
  • Charmonia-baryon dissociation cross
  • sections can be fixed from pA data
  • scc B sJ/Y Bsc B 4.18 mb, sY B 7.6 mb
  • (adopting a
    Glauber fit from NA50)

J/Y (cc,Y) B ? DDbar X

8
II. Modelling of the comover scenario in HSD
1. Charmonia dissociation cross sections with
formed p, r,K and K mesons J/Y (cc,Y) meson
(p, r, K , K) lt-gt DDbar
  • Phase-space model for charmonium meson
    dissociation

constant matrix element
2. J/Y recombination cross sections by DDbar
annihilation DDbar ? J/Y (cc,Y) meson (p,
r, K , K) are determined by detailed balance!
Note comover dissociation as well as DDbar
recombination can occure only if the local energy
density at the collision point e lt 1GeV/fm3
PRC 67 (2003) 054903
9
Charmonium recombination by D-Dbar annihilation
At SPS recreation of J/Y by DDbar annihilation
is negligible
NDD16
but at RHIC recreation of J/Y by DDbar
annihilation is strong!
PRC 67 (2003) 054903
10
Suppression in dA at RHIC
Charmonium is absorbed by scattering on baryons
Effect of shadowing at forward y
O. Linnyk et al., arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod
Phys E17 (2008) 1367
11
I. Modelling of the QGP melting scenario in HSD
Energy density e (x0,y0,zt) from HSD for
PbPb collisions at 160 A GeV
Energy density e (x0,y0,zt) from HSD for
AuAu collisions at 21300 A GeV
Dissociation threshold energy densities J/Y
melting e(J/Y )16 GeV/fm3 cc melting
e(cc ) 2 GeV/fm3 Y melting e(Y ) 2
GeV/fm3
Melting temperature T(J/Y) lt 1.6-2 TC T(cc)
lt 1-1.2 TC T(Y ) lt 1-1.2 TC
12
(I.) Local energy density e versus Bjorken
energy density eBj
  • transient time for central AuAu at 200 GeV
  • tr 2RA/gcm 0.13 fm/c
  • c-cbar formation time
  • tC 1/MT 1/4GeV 0.05 fm/c
    lt tr
  • c-cbar pairs are produced in the initial hard NN
  • collisions in time period tr

Y
J/Y
cc
  • Bjorken energy density

AT is the nuclei transverse overlap area t is
the formation time of the medium
  • at RHIC eBj t 5 GeV/fm2/c

Local energy density e during transient time tr
e 5GeV/fm2/c / 0.13 fm/c 30
GeV/fm3 accounting tC e 28 GeV/fm3
  • HSD reproduces PHENIX data for Bjorken energy
    density very well
  • HSD results are consistent with simple estimates
    for the energy density

13
J/Y and Y suppression in InIn and PbPb at
SPS (II.) Comover absorption ( recombination
by D-Dbar annihilation)
  • Exp. data (NA50/NA60) for J/Y and Y suppression
    for PbPb and InIn at 160 A GeV are consistent
    with the comover absorption model for the same
    set of parameters!

Olena Linnyk et al., nucl-th/0612049, NPA 786
(2007) 183
14
J/Y and Y suppression in InIn and PbPb at
SPS (I.) QGP threshold melting scenario
Dissociation energy density e(J/Y )16 GeV/fm3,
e(cc ) 2 GeV/fm3, e(Y ) 2 GeV/fm3
  • J/Y suppression is qualitatively described, but
    QGP threshold melting scenario shows a too strong
    Y absorption, which contradicts the NA50 data!

Olena Linnyk et al., nucl-th/0612049, NPA 786
(2007) 183
15
J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC (II.)
Comover absorption ( recombination by D-Dbar
annihilation)
Olena Linnyk et al., nucl-th/0612049, NPA 786
(2007) 183 arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807 (2008) 79
In the comover scenario the J/Y suppression at
mid-rapidity is stronger than at forward
rapidity, unlike the data!
Pure comover scenario is ruled out by PHENIX data!
16
J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC (I.)
QGP threshold melting scenario
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0705.4443, PRC 76
(2007) 041901
Melting model complete dissociation of initial
J/Y and Y due to the huge local energy
densities !
Charmonia recombination by D-Dbar annihilation is
important, however, it can not generate enough
charmonia, especially for peripheral collisions!
QGP threshold melting scenario is ruled out by
PHENIX data!
17
Summary (I.-II. )
I. QGP threshold melting versus
experimental data
SPS RHIC J/Y survival -
Y / J/Y ratio - ?
  • II. Hadronic comover absorption
  • ( recombination by D-Dbar annihilation)
  • versus experimental data
  • SPS RHIC
  • J/Y survival -
  • Y / J/Y ratio ?

Comover absorption and threshold melting
scenarios are ruled out by experimental data
evidence for non-hadronic interaction ?!

18
III. Scenarios for charmonium suppression in AA
  • III. Pre-hadronic interaction scenario
  • early interactions of charmonium (ccbar) and
    D-mesons with unformed (i.e. under formation time
    t g tF , tF 0.8 fm/c in the hadron rest frame)
    baryons and mesons - pre-hadrons
  • comover absorption with recombination by
    D-Dbar annihilation
  • Dissociation cross sections of charmonium by
    pre-hadrons
  • sdiscc pre-Baryon 5.8 mb,
  • sdiscc pre-meson 2/3 sdiscc pre-Baryon
  • Elastic cross sections with prehadrons
  • Charmonium - prehadrons D-meson - prehadrons
  • selcc pre-Baryon 1.9 mb,
    selD pre-Baryon 3.9 mb,
  • selcc pre-meson 2/3 selcc pre-Baryon
    selD pre-meson 2/3 selcc
    pre-Baryon
  • Pre-hadronic interaction scenario only
    simulates the interactions in the QGP in the
    Hadron-String model without (!) explicit partonic
    interactions and phase transition gt NOT (yet!)
    a consistent description ! gt PHSD

Fitted to PHENIX data

19
J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC (III.)
Pre-hadronic interaction scenario
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807
(2008) 79
In the prehadronic interaction scenario the J/Y
rapidity distribution has the right shape like
the PHENIX data! gt can describe the RHIC data
at s1/2200 GeV for AuAu at mid- and
forward-rapidities simultaneously.
20
J/Y and Y suppression in AuAu at RHIC
Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807
(2008) 79
PHENIX data ? evidence for non-hadronic
interactions of charm degrees of freedom !
21
HSD v2 of DDbar and J/Y from AuAu versus pT
and y at RHIC
  • Pre-hadronic interactions lead to an increase of
    the elliptic flow v2
  • The pre-hadronic interaction scenario is
    consistent with the preliminary PHENIX data on
    the D-mesons v2
  • gt strong initial flow of
    non-hadronic nature!

Olena Linnyk et al., arXiv0801.4282, NPA 807
(2008) 79
22
Quenching of D mesons at RHIC
Evidence of additional high pT suppression in
the most central collisions. Suppression of D
mesons in peripheral collisions is consistent
with a purely hadronic scenario.
O. Linnyk et al., arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod
Phys E17 (2008) 1367
23
Quenching of J/Y at RHIC
  • Strong suppression at low pT observed
    experimentally cannot be explained
  • by hadronic absorption of initially produced
    J/Ys
  • as weel as by DDbar recombination since
    D-mesons follow a similar RAA pattern as J/Y.

Possible indication of J/Y formation by parton
coalescence!
O. Linnyk et al., arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod
Phys E17 (2008) 1367
24
Summary
  • J/Y probes early stages of fireball and HSD is
    the tool to model it.
  • Comover absorption and threshold melting both
    reproduce J/Y survival in PbPb as well as in
    InIn at SPS, while Y/J/Y data appear to be in
    conflict with the melting scenario.
  • Comover absorption and threshold melting fail to
    describe the RHIC data at s1/2200 GeV for AuAu
    at mid- and forward-rapidities simultaneously
  • Prehadronic interaction scenario can describe the
    RHIC data at s1/2200 GeV for AuAu at mid- and
    forward-rapidities simultaneously
  • STAR data on v2 of high pT charged hadrons and
    charm D mesons are not reproduced in the
    hadron-string picture gt evidence for a plasma
    pressure ?!

25
Outlook open problems
  • Energy, rapidity, pT - dependent hadronic
    absorption cross sections
  • from experiments systematic energy and
    system scan for pA
  • Explicit dynamics of c-cbar in the QGP phase !
  • Theory modeling of parton-hadron phase
    transition based on lQCD EoS and off-shell parton
    transport ?
  • Parton-Hadron-String-Dynamics (PHSD)

26
Thanks to
Olena Linnyk Wolfgang Cassing

O. Linnyk, E.L. Bratkovskaya and W. Cassing,
arXiv0808.1504 Int J Mod Phys E17 (2008) 1367
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com