LARP Accelerator Systems: The Meeting Outcome unpolished view - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

LARP Accelerator Systems: The Meeting Outcome unpolished view

Description:

LARP. Accelerator Systems: The Meeting Outcome ('unpolished' view) Vladimir Shiltsev ... Lumi-Monitors: construct, install, start commissioning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: MichaelB240
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LARP Accelerator Systems: The Meeting Outcome unpolished view


1
LARPAccelerator SystemsThe Meeting
Outcome(unpolished view)
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac
  • Vladimir Shiltsev

2
FY07 AS Priorities Goals
  • Lumi-Monitors construct, install, start
    commissioning
  • TuneCoupling FB deliver design, participate in
    installation and commissioning
  • Schottky participate in installation and
    commissioning
  • Hardware Commissioning execute the plan (5-7
    people)
  • Beam Commissioning develop detailed Long Term
    Visitors TV plan for FY08 by mid-FY07
  • Other tasks execute Task Sheets Plans
  • 51 develop FY08 plan (incl. new tasks) by
    June07

3
1.1.1 Tune Coupling FB (310k)
  • Excellent progress with design and tests in RHIC
    with protons (Run 6)
  • Many new phenomena in Run 7 Gold-Gold
  • Not clear whether relevant to LHC but shows
    possible areas of concern
  • Successful Proof-of-principle continuous
    head-tail Q with BBQ at Tevatron
  • Of interest for CERN, still some qs remain
  • The task could be wrapped up in FY07
  • commissioning efforts and costs could be moved
    to Commissioning task
  • Very importants to participate in commissioning
    (one of deliverables LARP subscribed into, also
    excellent plug-in to beam commissioning, LHC
    beam physics, etc)
  • New Quadrupole mode analysis proposed (below)
  • LAFS is going to develop saftware for tune msmnt
    system

4
1.1.2 Luminometer (994k)
  • No delays, everything more or less on track
  • Thanks to RHIC Run 7 important tests
  • Installation in LHC will start in Oct07
  • No gas flow thru ionization chambers initially
    (only when L will be high)
  • Reference transistors added to quantify dark
    current vs rad dose
  • DAQ and control system development to be done
    later
  • Estimated FY08 need 880k
  • About half of that can be qualified as
    commissioning
  • About 400k will be needed in FY09
  • Pulse shaping, commissioning, etc
  • Getting extra funds in 2nd half of FY07
    (contigency funds) will reduce FY08 budget
    request

5
1.1.4 4.8 GHz Schottky (122k)
  • Everything is on budget and on-time
  • May 1-11 visit to CERN
  • Starts commissioning period no beam ? with beam
  • Tevatron is already interested in the new
    electronics developed for LHC (ordered the same
    for operation better S/N)
  • RHIC is interested, too!
  • The task is essentially finished
  • formal sign-offs after first beam tests
  • commissioning efforts and costs could be moved
    to Commissioning task
  • Very importants to participate in commissioning
    (one of deliverables LARP subscribed into,
    another excellent plug-in to beam
    commissioning, LHC beam physics)
  • Overall promise to become a success story
  • Can LAFS took over data processing software?

6
1.1.5 AC Dipole (80k)
  • Figured out the way to do that inexpensively
    using existing kicker (pinger) magnets and
    commercially available high-power audio
    amplifiers
  • Excellent results in the Tevatron
  • 3sigma oscillations for gt8000 turns
  • Deeper insight into physics processes
  • Beta-functions agree with other methods
  • Some 20k of MS and 140k will be requested for
    FY08
  • Also, has significant commissioning component

7
2.1 Commissioning (540k)
  • Hardware and IR commissioning go as planned
  • Three more HW commissioners scheduled
  • First HW commissioners will start to return
  • FY08 plans to be reconsidered to incl Shutdown
    work
  • Beam Commissioning
  • LTVAC came out with 12 real names of LTVs and 5
    possible substitutes/later names (out of 70
    expressed interest)
  • Thanks to Mike S. and the Committee!
  • Now on me and, later, Steve, to take into
    account
  • CERNs input (names are being considered, input
    next week)
  • Balance Junior/Senior, Labs, tasks, LTV/Short
    term Visitors, HW comm.,need of a local
    coordinator, budget (with Mikes input/analysis)
  • and come out with a plan and backup option(s)
    for FY08 and (in part) FY09 by June (?)

8
LHC_at_FNAL and LAFS (0k)
  • Will define how to use LHC_at_FNAL (Tan and Rama) in
    2 weeks
  • draft wish list of functions for remore
    participation in SPS commissioning and MDs in
    June-July 2007
  • Pre-CERN training
  • (Dave McGinnis) are there rookie books?
  • (Alex Chao) how SLAC people can benefit from the
    LHC_at_FNAL?
  • (Oliver) start plugging in short term
    visits and then continue training/participating
    here
  • LARP/other labs to support LAFS - ?
  • (Dave McGinnis, Hermann and Steve P. to talk)

9
3.1.1 Cleaning Eff Studies (50k)
  • Compare RHIC loss maps with code prediction
  • To benchmark the code used for the LHC
    Collimation system design
  • Obvious progress
  • Guillaume Robert-Demolaize
  • 4-6 mos needed to comlete the first round of
    analysis
  • If no outstanding problems found close the task
    and move on new initiatives? (TBD)

10
3.2.1 Rotating Collimator (783k)
  • Goes as planned
  • CERN strategy for Phase II
  • Compare 3 competing technologies at the SPS
    beamline
  • RC is one of them
  • No good idea yet for ion primaries (secondaries?)
  • Will need same funds in FY08 (and 09)

11
3.2.2 Tertiary Collimators (15k)
  • A lot of results reported/ delivered to CERN
  • (more results, more interest, more questions,
    more details to explore)
  • Might be a never-ending story
  • Can the task be finished in FY07? (TBD)
  • (remaining small efforts can be buried in a
    bigger task)

12
3.2.3 Irradiation Studies (82k)
  • A lot of results reported
  • Very thorough studies (as usual), tons of data
    analysis
  • No bad surprises (contrary to Carbon-carbon)
  • Can the task be finished in FY07? (TBD)
  • Can BLIP facility be used for other tasks or new
    initiatives? (TBD)

13
4.1 Accelerator Physics (635k)
  • E-cloud
  • new results, still of interest and importance
  • Focus shifting from LHC to inectors
  • IR and beam-beam
  • Too many IR upgrade options on the table, a lot
    of effort needed to consider main 4 (Olivers
    lists) on systematic basis
  • Available US resources 1.5 lattice-ists at
    FNAL, 1-2 at SLAC(?)
  • Are slim magnets needed? Magnet people waiting
    for answer (may take another year before the dust
    will settle)
  • Important reliable(!) beam-beam
    simulations/predictions
  • B-B-wires construction is over, studies started
  • Some funds can be redirected into (similar) new
    initiative(s)

14
New Initiatives (list)
  • Collider Instrumentation
  • BBQ-based Quadrupole Monitor
  • Synch light based diagnostics
  • Physics
  • LHC Crystal Collimation Scheme
  • LHC Electron Lenses
  • Modeling of LLRF Limitations on LHC Performance
  • Crab Cavities
  • LHC Injectors
  • The Low-Energy Transverse Emittance Project
  • Super-Ferric Fast Cycling Injector in the SPS
    Tunnel
  • LHC injectors Upgrades, space-charge effects

15
QMM-based e measurement (P.Cameron et al)
monopole (sum) (LRUD) dipole
(difference) (L-R) / (LR) (U-D) /
(UD) quadrupole m (LR)-(UD) / (LRUD)
sx2 - sy2 x2 y2 for xy0 (and
dispersion 0) m exbx eyby
given the b functions, we have one equation with
2 unknowns use two locations/pickups (with
differing b functions!)
16
Quadrupole Moment Monitor
  • Novel developments combined
  • Employ BBQ with its hude dynamics range
  • Use Quadrupole Transfer Function (ATF) method
  • Excite at 2xf_betatron and observe emittances on
    ramp
  • Complement SyncLite and IPMs
  • Could be tested in RHIC
  • Requested 0.3FTE support and little (15k) MS
    funds

17
Longitudinal Density Monitor(S.DeSantis et al)
  • Couple SyncLite to optical fiber, deliver signal
    upstairs and process it there with
    electro-optical modulator

18
LDM
  • Encouraging tests at the ALS
  • -5dB coupling
  • Of interest for the LHC
  • There is transverse SyncLite diagnostics
  • Longitudinal diagnostics Resistive Wall Monitor
  • LDM promises 25-50 ps slice diagnostics? tails
    and abort gap dynamics, etc phenomena of
    importance for operations
  • Smth like LDM is in LHC Phase II wish list

19
LLRF Modeling (J.Fox)
  • Bring PEP-II experinece in the LHC RF
    optimization
  • Nonlinear implementations of klystron, RF
    amplifiers, filters and FB loop optimizations,
    etc
  • Optimization and participation in commissioning

20
Longitudinal Density Monitor(S.DeSantis et al)
  • Couple SyncLite to optical fiber, deliver signal
    upstairs and process it there with
    electro-optical modulator

21
Crab Cavities KEK-B 22mrad
  • Successful Operation
  • 10s for KEK
  • Stable enough for LHC

22
Crab Cavities for LHC
  • Some 10-100 luminosity gain (beta25cm?10cm)
  • Phase I
  • Realistic simulations for emittances and RF
    curvature
  • Prototype 800Mhz cavity (2 cell) - ?
  • Small crossing angle consideration 400 urad
  • 10-15MV 2x2 cell cavity
  • Scale 3.7M
  • Can get a lot of knowledge/input/help from KEK
    and US labs
  • KEK is interested in LHC crab cavities (postdoc
    coming to CERN)
  • Synergy possible with ILC crab-cavity
  • Moderately difficult, large benefit! (R.Calaga)

23
Two-Stage Collimation Crystal as Primary
Courtesy R. Assmann
24
Crystal Collimator
  • Two plane proton collimation system test at
    Tevatron in FY08-09 (68 hrs of study time)
  • SLAC-BNL-FNAL
  • CERN-INFN-IHEP-Gatchina
  • CERN supportive (endorsed by R.Assmann)
  • Italy can deliver 2nd goniometer (vert)
  • Long list of studies
  • Deliverables
  • Demonstration of predicated background reduction
    in Tevatron (better than W primaries)
  • Answer operation-related questins (volume
    reflection vs channeling, radiation effects on
    crystals, etc.)

25
LHC Electron Lenses
Tevatron Electron-Lenses demonstrated
Beam-beam compensation
1.2A DC e-beam can compensate head-on tune spread
in LHC
26
LHC Electron Lens(es) Proposal
  • BNL-FNAL-SLAC and CERN
  • Of highest priority explore feasibility of
    head-on beam-beam compensation
  • Proposed 5 yr plan explain TEV results ?
    simulate BBC for RHIC and LHC ? build and test
    RHIC EL ? proceed with LEL
  • LARP plays role at initial stage (modeling ,
    simulations
  • 1.5-2 FTE postdoc)
  • Construction to be supported from different
    funds
  • REL by BNL
  • LEL - by IRUP or CERN or both
  • Other uses to be considered in detail
  • Hollow beam collimator (Vladimir and Ralph)
  • Short-long-range compensation (Jean-Pierre)
  • Pulsed beam bunch-by-bunch compensation (JPK and
    Vladimir)

27
Low Energy Transverse Emittance Project (D.Moehs)
Propose to build a standard candle
At 50-100kV emittance measurement is not
simple! But very important
28
LETEP
  • A lot of interest from CERN (new 3MeV test
    facility)
  • LBNL and FNAL can design and build the monitor
  • 1.7FTE and 50k in FY08 (09?)
  • Proposed plan
  • Design
  • Build
  • Test and compare at FNAL (with 2 other monitors)
  • Test at CERN 3MeV facility
  • Build another one to test at other
    labs/facilities in US

29
SuperFerric Magnets for LHC Injectors
Can help not only collider but Neutrino program
as well (2 sec cycle)
SPS upgrade for 300M!
30
SuperFerric Magnets for LHC Injectors
Can help not only collider but Neutrino program
as well (2 sec cycle)
SPS upgrade for 300M! (H.Piekarz). Not from
LARP funds !!
31
Space-Charge Effects for LHC Injectors Upgrages
  • FNAL (M.Popovic, et al) and CERN
  • Benchmark ORBIT code and simulate SC effects in
    all relevant machines in the LHC injector chain
  • Experiments in FNAL Booster (400MeV), CERN
    Booster (50 MeV and 160 MeV)
  • Results to be reported in reports, ORBIT
    modifications may follow

32
Summary
  • Very efficient Collaboration meeting
  • Many open friendly discussions, like workshop
  • Thanks to
  • L2 task leaders for organizing working sessions
  • People presented new proposals, reported progress
  • LTV advisory committee delivered what was asked
  • Our CERN colleagues for coming and playing
    important role in discussions and help in setting
    directions for the next year(s)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com