Title: Managing Risk at Big School
1Managing Risk at Big School
- Professor Edward P. Borodzicz
- Portsmouth Business School
2About me!
- Trained as Anthropologist and Psychologist.
- Began studies looking at human behaviour in
crisis and disasters. - Designed and Evaluated Simulation Exercises for
Emergency Services in UK, France and China. - Set up two MScs at Leicester and Southampton
Universities. - Interested in the Design and Evaluation of Crisis
Management Training for Business Risk
Continuity Games.
3The Context
- More people
- Inter-connectivity
- Different ways of living
- Greater expectation of a risk free environment
- Regulation, Business Continuity and Hefce
4A Brief History of Risk
- Risk As old as the oldest trade?
- Ancient philosophers of East and West
-
- Traditional/primitive societies - Oracles
-
- Documented among academics for over a Century
- (Todhunter, 1865)
-
- Speculative Risk and Capitalism
-
5- Risk and Social Sciences
- Risk and Irrationality
- Systemic Failure
- Homeostatic Risks
6Some Theoretical Perspectives 1 Psychology
- Decision making theorists question the notion of
human rationality. -
- Humans regularly make irrational choices on a
regular basis, even when future events have a
known probability. - Dispositional factors can be found to mediate
risk taking in experimental settings. -
- It is difficult to measure the difference in
peoples behaviour in real and simulated risk
situations.
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Some Theoretical Perspectives 2Systems Theory
- Theory originates from the work of Von
Bertalanffy in the 1920s. -
- Von Bertalanffy looked at Organic Systems.
-
- Outwardly variant systems display common internal
similarities. -
- Theory has been applied in a number of diverse
contexts. - Interest from Theorists Studying Disaster
Causation and Management
11Some Theoretical Perspectives 2Systems Theory
- Perrow's Normal Accident Theory
- Turners Model
-
- Isomorphic Learning
-
- The Resident Pathogen Metaphor
- High Reliability Systems
12Some Theoretical Perspectives 3 Risk Homeostasis
- Probability of risk is always 1
-
- Road safety
-
- Child proof bottle tops!
-
- Legislation and regulation should be considered
in its Meaningful Context -
- Fix a steel spike to the steering wheel
13(No Transcript)
14A Summary of Contemporary Risk
- Risk means different things to different people
in different contexts. -
- It is familiar risks that cause the most problems
-
- There is an apparent irrationality in the way
people perceive risks -
- It is more difficult to distinguish between pure
and speculative risk for insurance purposes. -
- The Organisation is the risk!
15Risk Strategies
- Risk Identification
- registers and matrixes
- Risk Avoidance
- Transfer
- Risk Retention
- Risk Reduction
16Human Issues
- Whistleblowers
- Reputation Risk
- Poor HRM
17Threats to Universities 1
- Fire and Flood
-
- Fraud and embezzlement
-
- System failures (human and technical)
-
- Litigation Culture (Both students and staff)
-
- Nutters
-
- Whistleblowers
-
- Corporate Manslaughter
18Threats to Universities 2
- Terrorism
- Rapid Fluctuation in World Markets
-
- Secrecy
-
- Compartmentalised approach to risk management
-
- Trial by committee
-
- Dealing with Impossible Workloads
19Some (Anonymous!) Case Studies
- The Visiting Research fellow from Hell
-
- The Naughty Professor
-
- Nasty Problem with the computer
-
- The VCs travel arrangements
- Racing
-
- Pedro de Lanuza!
20 High Principles at Big School!
-
- Reasons Pathogenic Model
- Schizophrenia
21At Departmental Levels
- 1. Tribunals/grievance procedures by teaching and
research staff over discrimination - 2. Academic staff turnover
- 3. High levels of sickness/absence/stress
- 4. Administrative staff turnover
- 5. High number of appeals or cases of litigation
brought by students - 6. Poor levels of course completions
- 7. High number of internal Staff PhDs by
publication. - 8. Low number of PhDs qualifications from other
universities.
22At Departmental Levels
- 9. Teaching staff administering their own course
evaluations or no course evaluations - 10. Reports of a poor working culture
- 11.High outputs of research despite poor level of
research income or vice versa! - 12.Lack of transparent processes for distributing
travel and conference budgets. - 13. Checking that minuted meetings were actually
attended - 14 Failure to conduct exit interviews for staff
independently of the department - 15. Failure to conduct exit interviews for
students administered independently of the
department - 16. High sickness/stress/grievance levels
reported after QAA examinations
23At faculty levels
- 1. Low usage of Whistle-blowing procedures
despite high numbers of the above - 2. Health and Safety complaints
- 3. A failure to resolve grievance procedures by
teaching and research staff without recourse to
Unions or outside representation. - 4. A failure to resolve grievance procedures
without at least a threat of litigation. - 5. Litigation
- 6. Failure to check staff CVs systematically -
do these relate to verifiable qualifications. - 7.Failure to check student CVs systematically -
do these relate to verifiable qualifications. - 8. Transparency distributions of research funding
within faculty. - 9. Distribution of sabbaticals
24If all risks cannot be managed, then we need to
know how to respond ?
- Generic Crisis Training
- Risk Management through Joined up thinking!
25Crisis Management
- Understand event quality
- Improve communication
- Be prepared to break rules
- Become your own terrorist!
26Resilience understand and manage crises
27Some tips for good simulation practice
- First, simulations should display an external
simplicity which masks their internal complexity.
- Second, games should have some theoretical
underpinning. Simulations should be designed
with some clear purpose. - Third, games should contain 'an element of
surprise'. - Fourth, the social structure of the group of
players may conflict too strongly with the
desired power structure in the game.
28Some tips for good simulation practice
- First, simulations should display an external
simplicity which masks their internal complexity.
- Second, games should have some theoretical
underpinning. Simulations should be designed
with some clear purpose. - Third, games should contain 'an element of
surprise'. - Fourth, the social structure of the group of
players may conflict too strongly with the
desired power structure in the game.
29Some tips for good simulation practice
- Fifth, in management training, 'verisimilitude'
is valued more highly than realism. - Sixth, there is a difference between running and
merely administering a game. - Seventh, games are culture sensitive.
- Eighth, all simulation games will display an
emotional impact.