Managing Risk at Big School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Managing Risk at Big School

Description:

Risk and Irrationality. Systemic Failure. Homeostatic Risks. Some Theoretical Perspectives 1 ... There is an apparent irrationality in the way people perceive risks ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: aue3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing Risk at Big School


1
Managing Risk at Big School
  • Professor Edward P. Borodzicz
  • Portsmouth Business School

2
About me!
  • Trained as Anthropologist and Psychologist.
  • Began studies looking at human behaviour in
    crisis and disasters.
  • Designed and Evaluated Simulation Exercises for
    Emergency Services in UK, France and China.
  • Set up two MScs at Leicester and Southampton
    Universities.
  • Interested in the Design and Evaluation of Crisis
    Management Training for Business Risk
    Continuity Games.

3
The Context
  • More people
  • Inter-connectivity
  • Different ways of living
  • Greater expectation of a risk free environment
  • Regulation, Business Continuity and Hefce

4
A Brief History of Risk
  • Risk As old as the oldest trade?
  • Ancient philosophers of East and West
  •  
  • Traditional/primitive societies - Oracles
  •  
  • Documented among academics for over a Century
  • (Todhunter, 1865)
  •  
  • Speculative Risk and Capitalism

5
  • Risk and Social Sciences
  • Risk and Irrationality
  • Systemic Failure
  • Homeostatic Risks

6
Some Theoretical Perspectives 1 Psychology
  • Decision making theorists question the notion of
    human rationality.
  •  
  • Humans regularly make irrational choices on a
    regular basis, even when future events have a
    known probability.
  • Dispositional factors can be found to mediate
    risk taking in experimental settings.
  •  
  • It is difficult to measure the difference in
    peoples behaviour in real and simulated risk
    situations.

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Some Theoretical Perspectives 2Systems Theory
  • Theory originates from the work of Von
    Bertalanffy in the 1920s.
  •  
  • Von Bertalanffy looked at Organic Systems.
  •  
  • Outwardly variant systems display common internal
    similarities.
  •  
  • Theory has been applied in a number of diverse
    contexts.
  • Interest from Theorists Studying Disaster
    Causation and Management

11
Some Theoretical Perspectives 2Systems Theory
  • Perrow's Normal Accident Theory
  • Turners Model
  • Isomorphic Learning
  • The Resident Pathogen Metaphor
  • High Reliability Systems

12
Some Theoretical Perspectives 3 Risk Homeostasis
  • Probability of risk is always 1
  •  
  • Road safety
  •  
  • Child proof bottle tops!
  •  
  • Legislation and regulation should be considered
    in its Meaningful Context
  •  
  • Fix a steel spike to the steering wheel

13
(No Transcript)
14
A Summary of Contemporary Risk
  • Risk means different things to different people
    in different contexts.
  •  
  • It is familiar risks that cause the most problems
  •  
  • There is an apparent irrationality in the way
    people perceive risks
  •  
  • It is more difficult to distinguish between pure
    and speculative risk for insurance purposes.
  •  
  • The Organisation is the risk!

15
Risk Strategies
  • Risk Identification
  • registers and matrixes
  • Risk Avoidance
  • Transfer
  • Risk Retention
  • Risk Reduction

16
Human Issues
  • Whistleblowers
  • Reputation Risk
  • Poor HRM

17
Threats to Universities 1
  • Fire and Flood
  •  
  • Fraud and embezzlement
  •  
  • System failures (human and technical)
  •  
  • Litigation Culture (Both students and staff)
  •  
  • Nutters
  •  
  • Whistleblowers
  •  
  • Corporate Manslaughter

18
Threats to Universities 2
  • Terrorism
  • Rapid Fluctuation in World Markets
  •  
  • Secrecy
  •  
  • Compartmentalised approach to risk management
  •  
  • Trial by committee
  •  
  • Dealing with Impossible Workloads

19
Some (Anonymous!) Case Studies
  • The Visiting Research fellow from Hell
  •  
  • The Naughty Professor
  •  
  • Nasty Problem with the computer
  •  
  • The VCs travel arrangements
  • Racing
  •  
  • Pedro de Lanuza!

20
High Principles at Big School!
  •  
  • Reasons Pathogenic Model
  • Schizophrenia

21
At Departmental Levels
  • 1. Tribunals/grievance procedures by teaching and
    research staff over discrimination
  • 2. Academic staff turnover
  • 3. High levels of sickness/absence/stress
  • 4. Administrative staff turnover
  • 5. High number of appeals or cases of litigation
    brought by students
  • 6. Poor levels of course completions
  • 7. High number of internal Staff PhDs by
    publication.
  • 8. Low number of PhDs qualifications from other
    universities.

22
At Departmental Levels
  • 9. Teaching staff administering their own course
    evaluations or no course evaluations
  • 10. Reports of a poor working culture
  • 11.High outputs of research despite poor level of
    research income or vice versa!
  • 12.Lack of transparent processes for distributing
    travel and conference budgets.
  • 13. Checking that minuted meetings were actually
    attended
  • 14 Failure to conduct exit interviews for staff
    independently of the department
  • 15. Failure to conduct exit interviews for
    students administered independently of the
    department
  • 16. High sickness/stress/grievance levels
    reported after QAA examinations

23
At faculty levels
  • 1. Low usage of Whistle-blowing procedures
    despite high numbers of the above
  • 2. Health and Safety complaints
  • 3. A failure to resolve grievance procedures by
    teaching and research staff without recourse to
    Unions or outside representation.
  • 4. A failure to resolve grievance procedures
    without at least a threat of litigation.
  • 5. Litigation
  • 6. Failure to check staff CVs systematically -
    do these relate to verifiable qualifications.
  • 7.Failure to check student CVs systematically -
    do these relate to verifiable qualifications.
  • 8. Transparency distributions of research funding
    within faculty.
  • 9. Distribution of sabbaticals

24
If all risks cannot be managed, then we need to
know how to respond ?
  • Generic Crisis Training
  • Risk Management through Joined up thinking!

25
Crisis Management
  • Understand event quality
  • Improve communication
  • Be prepared to break rules
  • Become your own terrorist!

26
Resilience understand and manage crises

27
Some tips for good simulation practice
  • First, simulations should display an external
    simplicity which masks their internal complexity.
  • Second, games should have some theoretical
    underpinning. Simulations should be designed
    with some clear purpose.
  • Third, games should contain 'an element of
    surprise'.
  • Fourth, the social structure of the group of
    players may conflict too strongly with the
    desired power structure in the game.

28
Some tips for good simulation practice
  • First, simulations should display an external
    simplicity which masks their internal complexity.
  • Second, games should have some theoretical
    underpinning. Simulations should be designed
    with some clear purpose.
  • Third, games should contain 'an element of
    surprise'.
  • Fourth, the social structure of the group of
    players may conflict too strongly with the
    desired power structure in the game.

29
Some tips for good simulation practice
  • Fifth, in management training, 'verisimilitude'
    is valued more highly than realism.
  • Sixth, there is a difference between running and
    merely administering a game.
  • Seventh, games are culture sensitive.
  • Eighth, all simulation games will display an
    emotional impact.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com