Donald R. Simon, J.D./LL.M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Donald R. Simon, J.D./LL.M.

Description:

Introduction to the course. Website, syllabus and classroom policies. Get acquainted. ... Taken very seriously; only in rare instances will a court overrule itself. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: pamel106
Category:
Tags: donald | overrule | simon

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Donald R. Simon, J.D./LL.M.


1
Business Law I
  • Donald R. Simon, J.D./LL.M.
  • Adjunct Faculty
  • KCKCC - Leavenworth Center

2
Business Law I
  • Week 1
  • Introduction to the course.
  • Website, syllabus and classroom policies.
  • Get acquainted.
  • Citizenship test.
  • Lecture Nature of the law.

3
Business Law I
  • Chap. 1
  • The Nature of Law

4
Chapter 1
  • Where does the law all come from?
  • Constitutions federal and state.
  • U.S. Constitution sets out the framework of the
    federal government, how each branch will work,
    etc.
  • Each state has its own constitution patterned to
    a large extent after the federal constitution.
    State constitutions may not limit freedoms
    guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, but they can
    guarantee greater liberties.
  • Statutes enacted by legislatures and interpreted
    by the courts.

5
Chapter 1
  • Where does the law all come from?
  • Administrative rules and regulations laws
    passed, enforced, and adjudicated by
    administrative agencies, like the FCC, FTC, SEC,
    IRS, and EPA.
  • Congress delegates authority to agencies.
  • Agencies are part of the executive branch.
  • Case law judicial interpretation of statutes and
    administrative regulations.

6
Chapter 1
  • Categorizing the law

7
Chapter 1
  • Categorizing the law
  • Is the wrongdoer held accountable to a private,
    injured part or to society?
  • Civil law
  • Private disputes where an individuals,
    corporations, or government sue another
    individual, corporation, or government in order
    to get some legal remedy, usually money.
  • Plaintiff has the burden of proof ?
    preponderance of the EV lt 50.
  • Two sub-categories contracts and torts.

8
Chapter 1
  • Categorizing the law
  • Contract law enforcing rights and obligations
    that arise when people enter into contracts.
  • 1) lease of office space between landlord and
    tenant 2) 5-year license for the use of
    point-of-sale software or 3) employment
    agreement between an employer and an employee.
  • If someone doesnt own up to their contractual
    obligations, they can be sued for breach of
    contract for money damages. No criminal
    prosecution for breach of contract.

9
Chapter 1
  • Categorizing the law
  • Torts every other civil wrong, other than breach
    of contract.
  • e.g., defamation, invasion of privacy,
    intentional infliction of emotional distress, etc.

10
Chapter 1
  • Categorizing the law
  • Criminal law
  • Government prosecutes a crime on behalf of
    society.
  • Purpose is to impose punishment, not to
    compensate an injured party.
  • In criminal cases, government has the burden of
    proof ? preponderance of the EV lt 99.99 much
    greater than in civil cases.
  • O.J. ? found not guilty of murder in the criminal
    trial, but liable for wrongful death in the civil
    suit.

11
Chapter 1
  • Functions of the law
  • Peacekeeping criminal law and private dispute
    resolution.
  • Checking government power and promoting personal
    freedom checks-and-balances and the 1st
    Amendment.
  • Promoting economic growth through free
    competition antitrust laws and deregulation.

12
Chapter 1
  • Functions of the law
  • Promoting social justice give citizens equal
    access to lifes basic goods.
  • Protecting the environment federal
    environmental statutes.

13
Chapter 1
  • Functions of the law
  • The laws various functions can and do clash.
  • Economic growth vs. environmental protection.
  • Right to a fair trial vs. freedom of the press.
  • Lawmakers and judges attempt to strike a balance
    between conflicting interests.

14
Chapter 1
  • Precedent
  • A prior judicial decision serves as a governing
    model for future cases under similar facts.
  • Is binding only for courts in the same
    jurisdiction or system ? Supreme Court of KS
    binding on all lower KS courts, but is only
    persuasive in e.g., MO.
  • Taken very seriously only in rare instances will
    a court overrule itself. If this were done too
    often, it would jeopardize legal stability.

15
Chapter 1
  • Legal reasoning
  • Basically deductive, with legal rule as a major
    premise and the facts as a minor premise.
  • Result is a product of the two.
  • Court may stand on precedent or distinguish prior
    case from current one.
  • In precedent inapplicable, new rule developed.

16
Chapter 1
  • Legal reasoning - Case Law
  • Case law law extracted from decided cases.
  • E.g., employment-at-will rule.
  • Under this rule, an employee may be fired at any
    time for any reason or no reason at all.
  • Exception a contract between the parties
    detailing employment duration or reasons for
    dismissal.
  • Firing must also not violate various civil rights
    law.

17
Chapter 1
  • Legal reasoning - Case Law
  • E.g., employment-at-will rule.
  • Assume in a precedent case, that an employee who
    had been doing a good job was fired.
  • In a wrongful termination case, court ruled
    against him on the basis of the
    employment-at-will rule.
  • Later case, employee was fired in retaliation
    blowing the whistle on employers improper biz
    conduct.
  • Court deciding this later case would not be bound
    by the rule and would be free to develop a public
    policy exception for whistleblowing.

18
Chapter 1
  • Legal reasoning - Statutes
  • Statutes law enacted by the legislative branch
    of a government.
  • Natural ambiguity of language serves as one
    reason courts face difficulties when interpreting
    statutes.
  • Difficulties arise when statutory words are
    applied to situations the legislature did not
    foresee.
  • Legislatures may deliberately use ambiguous
    language when they are unwilling or unable to
    deal specifically with each situation the statute
    was enacted to regulate.

19
Chapter 1
  • Legal reasoning - Statutes
  • Statutes law enacted by the legislative branch
    of a government.
  • When this happens, the legislature expects courts
    and/or administrative agencies to fill in the
    details on a case-by-case basis.
  • Courts use various techniques of statutory
    interpretation.

20
Chapter 1
  • Legal reasoning - Statutes
  • Plain meaning rule court applies statute
    according to usual meaning of words.
  • Legislative history materials generated in the
    course of creating legislation.
  • Committee reports, bills and their amendments,
    hearing transcripts, and floor debates.
  • Used for discovering legislative intent by
    determining the specific meaning of statutory
    language and the overall goal of the legislation.

21
Chapter 1
  • Limits on the power of courts
  • Courts are limited to deciding only cases or
    controversies that are brought before them.
  • Plaintiffs must also have standing to sue.
  • Some direct, tangible, and substantial stake in
    outcome of the litigation.

22
Chapter 1
  • Reading and briefing cases
  • You will encounter casesjudicial opinions
    accompanying court decisions.
  • Opinions are generally part of the appeals
    process in a case.
  • The losing side at trial files an appeal.
  • Party filing the appeal is called the appellant
    and the other side is called the appellee.

23
Chapter 1
  • Reading and briefing cases
  • Each case has a case name with some of the
    parties of the case.
  • Each case also has a citationthe volume and page
    number of the legal reporter in which the full
    case appears, plus the court name and the
    decision year.
  • E.g., 540 U.S. 581 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 2004)

24
Chapter 1
  • Reading and briefing cases
  • At the beginning, there will be a statement of
    facts, which contains important facts that gave
    rise to the case.
  • Next, a procedural history will detail what other
    courts have handled the case.
  • Then comes the courts opinion where the court
    details the applicable law and applies it to the
    facts.

25
Chapter 1
  • Reading and briefing cases
  • Opinions
  • Majority opinion represents the views of a
    majority of judges who considered the appeal.
    Becomes the law.
  • Concurring opinion agree with the ultimate
    outcome of the case, but not with how the
    majority reached its decision.
  • Dissenting opinion a disagreement altogether
    with the majoritys ruling.

26
Chapter 1
  • Reading and briefing cases
  • At the very end of the case, youll find the
    courts decision. You may see
  • Judgment reversed.
  • Reversed and remanded.
  • Affirmed.
  • Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

27
Chapter 1
  • Reading and briefing cases
  • You may find it helpful to brief cases.
  • Brief statement of facts and legal reasoning.
  • It may contain
  • A short statement of facts
  • Cases prior history
  • Question(s) or issue(s) the court had to decide
  • Answer to those question(s)
  • Reasoning the court used to justify its decision
  • The final result

28
Business Law I
  • Week 2
  • Resolution of disputes.
  • Court systems.
  • Types of jurisdiction.
  • Civil and criminal procedure.
  • ADR
  • Quiz Chaps. 1 and 2.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com