Program Review Support Tool - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Program Review Support Tool

Description:

Riverside. San Diego. Santa Barbara. Santa Cruz. PRIVATE . Otis College of Art and Design ... access all processing is performed on the server so it does not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: jane281
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Program Review Support Tool


1
Program ReviewSupport Tool
Nathan Pellegrin Research Analyst
2
Goals
  • Background and purpose of the tool
  • Demonstration
  • Cal-PASS update
  • OLAP Development at Cal-PASS
  • OLAP Success Story SSPIRE Cube
  • Future development

3
The Program Review Support Tool
  • Funded by Hewlett.
  • Currently being tested by several colleges.
  • All data is from MIS.
  • Caveat figures may not match what is found in
    locally produced reports due to differences in
    master data sources and formulae used to derive
    figures.
  • Like a data smorgasbord and includes
  • student demographics
  • course grades
  • TOP code course hierarchy
  • the menu will be expanding !

4
Purpose
  • Not the product of a mandate or requirement from
    the Chancellors office.
  • Not intended to take the place of local tools.
  • Not intended to drive evaluation activities.
  • Intended for use by colleges as an optional FREE
    tool in their program review process.
  • Obtain feedback from users to scale and improve
    our data model and OLAP infrastructure.

5
Cal-PASS Statistics
  • Over 300,000,000 records
  • Up to 15 years of data in some regions
  • Over 7,000 schools, colleges and university
    members
  • Over 150 research studies conducted in the last
    two years
  • Sixty-six Professional Learning Councils (1,200
    faculty)

6
Universities (23)
  • UC .
  • Davis
  • Merced
  • Riverside
  • San Diego
  • Santa Barbara
  • Santa Cruz
  • CSU .
  • Channel Islands
  • Dominguez Hills
  • Fresno
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Monterey Bay
  • Pomona
  • Sacramento
  • San Bernardino
  • San Marcos
  • Stanislaus
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
  • Sonoma
  • PRIVATE .
  • Otis College of Art and Design
  • National University
  • University of the Pacific

7
Changing the ParadigmOLAP Applications
  • OLAP On-Line Analytical Processing
  • Like Excel pivot tables, except Excel handles
    only two dimensional data.
  • Stores pre-computed aggregations of data with
    B-Tree indexing for delivering fast retrieval
    times and fast calculation.
  • Enables users to perform analysis of data quickly
    with drag-and-drop manipulation of variables and
    dynamic visualization.
  • Web-based for easy access all processing is
    performed on the server so it does not tie up
    your work station (zero footprint).
  • Big time savings!
  • Ideal for the action research paradigm and design
    research.

8
3 Layers of the Application
User Interface - Dundas
MDX
OLAP Cube - SSAS
SQL
Database(s) SQL Server
9
Development Process of the OLAP project is a
technical collaboration between IT and Research
  • Server Architecture/O.R. Alex Zakharenkov (IT)
  • Submission Processes/User Interface Nick Wade
    (IT)
  • Data Model/ETL Nathan Pellegrin (Research)
  • Design/Feedback of OLAP cubes - All IT and
    Research Staff, including Terrence Willett and
    Mary Kay Patton

10
Development times
  • Development of initial Dim Model started in July
    2008 incremental additions/changes congealed
    into a (basic) model by February, 2009.
  • Initial development of Program Review, including
    feedback and changes 8 weeks.
  • Dim model ETL execution 15 hours.
  • Processing of OLAP cube 20 min./300K rows .
  • Initial deployment of UI 3 weeks. Several
    changes since then.
  • UI required tweaks to OLAP cube design.

11
Development Tools
  • .NET
  • SQL Server
  • storage
  • Integration Services
  • Analysis Services
  • BIDS
  • Dundas

12
  • Analytical
  • Integrated K-12/CC/Univ
  • Time-dependent
  • 2NF (Redundant CK)
  • Optimized Indexing

Dimensional Model
Cal-PASS Data Flow
ETL
Object Repository
  • Storage
  • Application Integration
  • Key-value pairs (KVP) design

0607,01612590000001,0000179441,U,,12,ABARCA,CARLOS
,09091988,M,500,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01,15,1,,,,,,N,0
10,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01
,10032006,N,275,0,0,4,24,0,0,0,0,0,0,,10032006,X,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,Y,,,8,,,,,,,,,, 0607,016125
90000001,0000154281,9107510861,,11,BLACK,BRITNI,11
291990,F,600,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,00,13,1,,,,,,N,000,
N,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01,10
032006,N,302,1,8,6,35,3,15,5,28,4,33,01,10032006,N
,340,5,71,12,67,18,90,0,0,7,47,2.5,,,,,,,,,,,N,N,U
,72,80,,,,,,,,,, 0607,01612590000001,0000159553,U,
,11,BOWIE,EARLISHA,10231988,F,999,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,00,14,1,,,,,,Y,060,Y,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01,10032006,N,278,3,23,4,24,4,20
,0,0,0,0,,10032006,A,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,N,,,4
0,,,,,,,,,, 0607,01612590000001,0000161233,U,,
0607,01612590000001,0000179441,U,,12,ABARCA,CARLOS
,09091988,M,500,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01,15,1,,,,,,N,0
10,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
9107510861,,11,BLACK,BRITNI,11291990,F,600,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,00,13,1,,,,,,N,000,N,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01,10032006,N,302,1,8,6,3
5,3,15,5,28,4,33,01,10032006,N,340,5,71,12,67,18,9
0,0,0,7,47,2.5,,,,,,,,,,,N,N,U,72,80,,,,,,,,,, 060
7,01612590000001,0000159553,U,,11,BOWIE,EARLISHA,1
0231988,F,999,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,00,14,1,,,,,,Y,060
,Y,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,01
,10032006,N,278,3,23,4,24,4,20,0,0,0,0,,10032006,A
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,N,,,40,,,,,,,,,, 0607,016
12590000001,0000161233,U,,
ETL
CUSTOM FILES
Cal-PASS Submission
  • Semistructured data
  • Format/value Validation

Universities
K-12
CSU
UC
UC
UC
CCCCOMIS
LA
CSU
Private
13
What does a dimensional data model do for
Cal-PASS?
UNIFY Data from across segments is
integrated into a unified dataset.
STANDARDIZE Table and field names, data
types and value coding systems are standardized
to be the same for all segments.
SIMPLIFY The number of tables and fields
used to store the data is reduced. Granularity
of tables are at the units of analysis. Table
relationships reflect analytical relationships
between entities.
IMPROVE DATA QUALITY Merging data brings
data quality issues to light so they can be
noted and/or resolved. Establishing primary and
foreign key relationships enforces referential
integrity. Multiple student identifiers are
unified to produce a single metakey Missing
course CBEDS classifications imputed using
machine learning.
REDUCE RISK Without it, in order to produce
one metric for all segments separate analytical
data processing pathways are required for each
segment, which means more maintenance and
increased risk of inconsistent results. Using a
dimensional model the analytical computations and
services are centralized.
BOOST PRODUCTIVITY The simpler, cleaner data
model makes it easier to develop cubes with
re-usable components, generalized for all
segments. Currently, analytical data processing
must be developed separately for each segment.
Using a dimensional model, only one pathway needs
to be developed that applies to all segments.
14
Cal-PASS Unified Dimensional Data Model (Selected
Tables)
Organization
Student Status
Student
Course
Course Taxonomy
Course Outcome
Award
Fact Table
Dimension Table
Term
Foreign Key Relationship
15
The Ideal Centralization of analytical query
processing
Each statistic can emerge at multiple
presentation points, but there is only one
logical control point.
Presentation User Engagement
OLAP
Views and Stored Procs
Dimensional Model Tables
User-defined cohorts model outputs
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Student identifiers from each source system are
mapped to a new identifier through transitive
closure of all connected values (using a modified
version of the FloydWarshall algorithm).
Name gender DOB
Local district student id
CCCCO SID (SB00)
CSIS SSID
n1
d1
o1
n2
m1
c1
d2
d3
Each edge represents a record linking two values
of different identifiers in submitted student
records.
19
OLAP Success Story SSPIRE Cube
  • Funded by Irvine Foundation.
  • Currently used by nine colleges.
  • Incorporates MIS data with data submitted by
    colleges (custom files).
  • Tracks cohorts of students.
  • Demonstrate using Merced college (thank you Dr.
    Duran!)

20
Program Review Support Tool
21
This is only the beginning
  • Provide access to K-12 districts and Universities
  • Inter-segmental OLAP Cubes
  • Link non-academic outcomes (Employment
    Development Department, Child Welfare Data
    System)

Success at Every Level
22
Education Data and Information Act of 2008SB
1298 1. convene a high-level working group to
decide the best the governance structure for the
comprehensive education data system 2.
directs the State Chief Information Office (CIO),
in consultation with educators and education
policymakers, to prepare a strategy plan
outlining a clear path for technical
implementation and3. requires the various
education segments to begin using a common
student identifier, so that once a governance
structure and technical architecture are in place
we can begin linking records from pre-k through
the university with relative ease and speed.
Source http//www.senatorsimitian.com/legislatio
n/entry/sb_1298_education_information_system/
23
High level cross-agency systems map of key
collections
WORKING DRAFT NOT EXHAUSTIVE
Source http//www.senatorsimitian.com/legislatio
n/entry/sb_1298_education_information_system/
Direct data sharing
In development

Data sharing through local agencies
Planned/ potential
Existing

CDE Data Systems
Non CDE Data Systems
National Student Clearinghouse
AYP/API
CASEMIS
CASAS TOPS Pro
CSU ERS
CCC COMIS
CALTIDES
Assessments
CPEC
CALPADS
CALPASS
Prisons, Census
Migrant
CCTC CASE
UC CSS
ConApps
SACS
CDPH
EDD
Other CDE systems/ units including CDS, Charter
schools
Other CDE units including Homeless, CALSAFE,
Title 3, Private Schools etc.
From Franchise tax, benefits system etc.
Does not imply direct data linkages. Only
state system linkages shown CALPADS is
envisioned to replace much of the CBEDS, Language
Census, Student National Origin Report and select
Consolidated Application data CALTIDES is
envisioned to collect data primarily from CALPADS
and Commission on Teacher Credentialings CCTCs
Credential Automation System Enterprise CASE
system Source Interviews with respective
agencies, RAND, team analysis
24
High level system profiles of key CDE collections
(1/2)
DRAFT
Source http//www.senatorsimitian.com/legislatio
n/entry/sb_1298_education_information_system/
System name
Description
Key identifier
Data categories
Granularity
Data sharing
CALPADS
California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data
System. System (under development) for tracking
K12 students longitudinally, that will replace
CBEDS collections
SSID
Student demographic, program participation, grade
level, enrollment, course enrollment and
completion, discipline, and statewide assessment
Student
Planned include- Assessments, API/AYP, Migrant,
ConApps,
CALTIDES
California Longitudinal Teacher Integrated Data
Education System. Iintegrated data system for
teacher data based on unique SEID
SEID
Teacher credentials, authorizations, teacher
participation program, alternative routes,
participation in Beginning Teacher Support and
intern program, SEID, Salary
Student
Planned include- CALPADS, CCTC CASE
CASEMIS
California Special Education Management
Information System. Integrated data system for
special education students on students, services
and provider programs
SSID
Attendance/Enrollment, Disciplinary, Education
Agency, Mobility, Special Education, Staffing
Data, Student Demographic, Other (services, age,
gender, race/ethnicity)
Student, School district, School, county, region
None at state level
Assessments
California High School Exit Exam CAHSEE,
Standardized Testing and Reporting STAR and CELDT
SSID
Attendance/Enrollment, Education Agency, Food and
Nutrition, Parent Data, Special Education,
Student Demographic
Student, School District, School, County
CASAS, Migrant, AYP/API, CALPADS (planned)
API/ AYP
Accountability related information based on
California's Public Schools Accountability Act of
1999 as well as No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
CDS code
AYP/API score by student characteristics
School
Assessments
Source Respective CDE departments
25
High level system profiles of key CDE collections
(2/2)
DRAFT
Source http//www.senatorsimitian.com/legislatio
n/entry/sb_1298_education_information_system/
System name
Description
Key identifier
Data categories
Granularity
Data sharing
Migrant
Student enrollments in migrant education
programs. Includes migrant education forms and
a directory of offices providing services
Migrant ID, COE number, CDS code
Student demographics, educational programs,
counseling, health and support services,
emergency health, clothing, food, transportation
Student
Assessments, CALPADS (planned)
SACS
Standardized Account Code Structure. Offers LEAs
with a means of reporting financial information
CDS code
For every general ledger accounting transaction-
information on funds, resources, project year,
goal, function, and object. Includes information
on Attendance/Enrollment, Education Agency,
Fiscal, Transportation
School, District
CDS, Charter schools
ConAPPS
Consolidated applications. Includes information
on categorical programs e.g., Title I, II, V etc.
CDS code
Student demographic, Title I, III, V, Part A,
Immigrant, LEP, funding model, charter status,
Gradespan, participants
School, District, County
CALPADS (planned)
Early Childcare Systems
CD-801A,B, CDMIS, Special Education Desired
Result System SEDRS, and CD 9600
SSID
Child demographics, IEP flag, family
identification/case number, household name, type
of program, DRDP Desired Result Development
Profile, Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
ECERS
Student
None
CASAS TOPSPro
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Systems.
System for tracking Students in Adult Education
Programs
ADA ID, SSID, CASAS no
Student demographics, Agency, instruction level
and program, assessment scores, date of entry,
reason for exit, class number, attainable goal
within program year
Student
Assessments
Source Respective CDE departments
26
High level system profiles of non-CDE collections
DRAFT
Source http//www.senatorsimitian.com/legislatio
n/entry/sb_1298_education_information_system/
System name
Description
Key identifier
Data categories
Granularity
Data sharing
CPEC
California Post Secondary Education Commission.
Data system for Higher Ed- post secondary systems
Student ID based of SSN
Demographic, IEP, grade level, program,
Graduation rate, teacher, institution
Student
CDE, CSU, UC,CCC, prison, census
UC CSS
Corporate Student System provides information on
student enrollment and performance for University
of California campuses
SSN
Student demographic, income, financial aid,
education history, assessment
Student
CDE, CCC, CALPASS
CCC COMIS
California Community Colleges Management
Information System. COMIS data is used to
prepare reports for Federal and State reports
including Integrated Postsecondary Education Data
System (IPEDS) and to track student outcomes
SSN, Student ID
student demographic, income, financial aid,
education history, assessment, teacher,
institution
Student
CALPASS, CPEC, CSU, EDD, National Student
Clearinghouse
CSU ERS
Enrollment Recording System is used by Cal State
to track student retention and graduation to
support regular term reports, IPEDS, and state
budget requests
SSN
Student demographic, financial aid, education
history, assessment
Student
CPEC, CALPASS, CCC
CDPH
California Department of Public Health. System
use to track
CDPH ID
Case ID and demographics, clinical and diagnostic
data
Case
None
EDD
Employment Development Database
ID based of SSN
Wages, payroll taxes, unemployment tracking, job
matching, job training
Employee
Franchise tax, benefits system, CCC
Source Respective agencies, RAND
27
HAPPY DATA!
Thank you! Have fun .
Data
Data
28
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com