Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements

Description:

At the IEP meeting, we discussed how my child would participate in statewide assessments. ... Teachers and Administrators seek out parental input. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: christin310
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements


1
Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements
2
Todays Agenda
  • Parent Survey Results
  • Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results

3
Predictions
  • http//dpi.wi.gov/sped/doc/iep-top-ten-errors-self
    assmt.doc

4
Parent Survey
5
Areas To Work On
  • At the IEP meeting, we discussed how my child
    would participate in statewide assessments.
  • Written justification was given for the extent
    that my child would not receive services in the
    regular classroom.
  • Teachers and Administrators seek out parental
    input.
  • The School communicates regularly with me
    regarding my childs progress on IEP goals.
  • The School explains what options parents have if
    they disagree with a decision of the school.

6
Participation in Statewide Assessment
  • Individual test accommodations are required
    component of the students IEP
  • Alternate assessment
  • IEP meeting or agreement to change IEP without
    meeting

7
Participation Outside The Regular Education
Classroom
  • Statement about childs participation outside
    the
  • -regular class
  • Must be in the IEP
  • DPI form I-9
  • INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM PROGRAM
    SUMMARY
  • Form I-9 (Rev. 10/06)
  • V. Participation in Regular Education Classes
  •  
  • ? The student will participate full-time with
    non-disabled peers in regular education classes,
    or for preschoolers, in age-appropriate settings.
  • ? The student will not participate full-time
    with non-disabled peers in regular education
    classes, or for preschoolers, in age-appropriate
    settings. (If you have indicated a location
    other than regular education classes or
    age-appropriate settings in the case of a
    preschooler in I, II, or III above, you must
    check this box and explain why full-time
    participation with non-disabled peers is not
    appropriate.)

8
Schools Solicit Parental Input
  • Federal and state law
  • IEP team meetings placement decisions
  • Ensuring FAPE
  • Draft vs. final IEPs before the meeting

9
Communication on IEP Goals
  • INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM ANNUAL GOAL
  • Form I-6 (Rev. 10/06)
  • Name of Student ________________________________
  • Measurable annual academic or functional goal to
    enable the student to be involved in and progress
    in the general education curriculum, and to meet
    other educational needs that result from the
    students disability. (Note present levels of
    academic achievement and functional performance
    must include information that corresponds with
    each annual goal)
  • Upon review ? Goal met ? Goal not met
  • Procedures for measuring the students progress
    toward meeting the annual goal.
  • Will the student participate in an alternate
    assessment aligned with alternate achievement
    standards for students with disabilities in any
    subject area?
  • ? Yes ? No
  • (If yes, include benchmarks or short-term
    objectives for the student)
  • When will reports about the students progress
    toward meeting the annual goal be provided to
    parents?
  • Changes in IDEA 2004
  • Requirements
  • -goal
  • -how measured
  • -when reported

10
School Explains Dispute Resolution Options
  • Procedural safeguards notice
  • Native language
  • Easily understood
  • Posting on web site

11
Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment
12
The Top Ten Errors
  • 1. Transition related goals and services
  • 2. Review of existing evaluation data included at
    least one regular education teacher.
  • 3. The statement of supplementary aids and
    services included anticipated frequency including
    the amount.
  • 4. Review of existing evaluation data included a
    local education agency rep.
  • 5. The statement of program modifications or
    supports for school personnel included
    anticipated frequency including the amount.

13
The Top Ten Errors
  • 6. Review of existing evaluation data included at
    least one special educator or special education
    provider of the child.
  • 7. IEP team reviewed previous interventions and
    the effects when they determined whether the
    child is a child with a disability.
  • 8. IEP included a description of how the childs
    disability affects the childs involvement and
    progress in the general curriculum.
  • 9. IEP included measurable annual goals for the
    child.
  • 10. Notice was given to parents before an update
    or change to the IEP.

14
Review of Existing Evaluation Data (2,4 6)
  • IEP team must review existing evaluation data and
    determine if additional data is needed.
  • Review does not have to take place at a meeting.

15
Amount and Frequency (3 5)
  • LEAs level of commitment of resources must be
    clear
  • Appropriate and stated in a way that is clear to
    all developing and implementing the IEP
  • For each item
  • Frequency (How much and how often)
  • Location (Which classroom or other place)
  • Duration (How long)
  • As needed and upon student request

16
Previous Interventions (7)
  • Subset of review of existing data
  • Instructional methodologies
  • In any environment
  • Doesnt apply to charter schools
  • EVALUATION REPORT
  • Form ER-1 (Rev. 10/06)
  • TYPE OF EVALUATION ? Initial ?
    Reevaluation
  • DATE ON WHICH ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION WAS MADE
    _________________(month/day/year)
  • THIS EVALUATION REPORT AND DETERMINATION OF
    ELIGIBILITY INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING (check all
    that apply)
  • ? Information from review of existing data
  • ? Additional documentation required when child is
    evaluated for a specific learning disability
  • ? Information from assessments and other source
  • ? Documentation for determining Braille needs for
    a child with a visual impairment
  • ? Determination of eligibility for special
    education
  • INFORMATION FROM REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA
  • A. Summary of previous evaluations
  • B. Information provided by parents
  • C. Previous interventions and the effects of
    those interventions

17
Involvement/Progress in General Curriculum (8)
  • Statement in the IEP about the extent, if any, to
    which the child will not participate with
    non-disabled children in the
  • -general curriculum
  • Form I-4
  • Will the student be involved full-time in the
    general education curriculum or, for
    preschoolers, in age-appropriate activities?
  • ? Yes ? No
  • (If no, describe the extent to which the student
    will not be involved full-time in the general
    curriculum or, for preschoolers, in
    age-appropriate activities)

18
Measurable Annual Goals (9)
  • Measurable
  • Level of attainment
  • Address the disability-related needs
  • Benchmark and short-term objectives

19
Written Prior Notice (10)
  • After annual IEP or any revision
  • A reasonable time prior to the IEPs
    implementation
  • DPI forms P-1 or P-2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com