Title: Options for Participation and Related IEP Decisions
1Options for Participationand Related IEP
Decisions
- http//www.osepideasthatwork.org/toolkit/index.asp
2Options for Participation inCurrent Federal
RegulationsOption of the General Assessment
3Option of Alternate AssessmentsType 1- Grade
Level Achievement
4Option of Alternate AssessmentsType 2- Modified
Achievement
See the U.S. Department of Educations interim
policy on modified achievement standards at
http//www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/raising/disab-
options.html (retrieved October 20, 2005).
5Option of Alternate AssessmentType 3- Alternate
Achievement
6Options Summary
Some states make this option available to other
students.
7The Decision Framework
- IEP teams must determine how students with
disabilities participate in statewide assessments
for accountability, not whether they participate.
8Premise
- All students with or without disabilities, should
participate in the general assessment without
accommodations unless the IEP team determines
otherwise.
9Implications for IEP Teams In Choosing Assessment
Option
10What is Not Relevant for the IEP Teams Decision
- Exemption
- All students participate
- Separate, Specialized Curriculum
- All options are aligned with general curriculum/
grade level content standards - Placement
- Disability Label
- Boosting Schools Outcomes on AYP
11What is Relevant
- Prerequisite Considerations
- Has the student had access to grade level
content? - Has the student had evidence-based instruction?
- Was instruction by highly qualified teacher?
- IF answer to above is NO, continue to apply
grade level achievement standards and evaluate
response to intervention
12What is Relevant
- Students Educational Needs
- How does the student access the general
curriculum? - What has been the students response to academic
interventions? - How does this student interact with text?
- Do the supports the student requires change the
complexity of grade level material? - What inferences can be made about generalization?
13 When an option for test participation is
selected what will it mean?
14What Inferences can Be Made
- When the team chooses grade level achievement
standards - Inferences from test results can be made to the
breadth, depth, and complexity of the standards
in the test specification for the general
assessment with the - general assessment,
- general assessment with accommodations, or
- alternate assessment-grade level achievement
15What Inferences can Be Made
- When the team chooses modified achievement
standards - Inferences from test results can be made to grade
level expectations with specified level of
breadth, depth, and complexity - Alternate assessment judged against modified
achievement standards
16What Inferences can Be Made
- When the team chooses alternate achievement
standards - Inferences from test results can be made to grade
level content that is extensively prioritized but
maintains expectation for progress in general
curriculum - And assumes student performance is contingent on
having the supports specified for the assessment - Alternate assessment judged against alternate
achievement standards
17Who might take the
- Alternate Assessment
- Judged Against
- Modified Achievement Standards?
No final regulations had been established at the
time this paper was released.
18What are Modified Achievement Standards?
- Designed to enable inferences about grade level
content expectations - somewhat reduced in
- breadth,
- depth, or
- complexity
- Inferences are constrained
19Who are the 2 students?
- Students with IEPs who are very, very, very hard
to teach
20Who are the 2 students?
- Students who can learn grade level content, but
in the time available - Cannot cover as much content
- Cannot cover the content in as much depth
- Cannot learn the content to the same degree of
cognitive complexity
21Grade Level Content
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for the general assessment.
22Content reduced in breadth
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for grade level content with reduced
breadth.
23Content reduced in depth
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for grade level content with reduced
depth.
24Content reduced in cognitive complexity
Content Standards and Achievement Standards
specified for grade level content with reduced
cognitive complexity.
25Who are the 2 students?
- Have persistent academic difficulties
- Despite intensive, appropriate, relentless,
evidence-based interventions - Over sufficient length of time
- Cannot close the achievement gap
26The time there is to learn it!
Start lower Work harder and longer Achieve
the same amount?
All there is to learn
27The time there is to learn it!
Most Students
All there is to learn
Start lower Work hard to maintain pace
Achieve less.
28Decision Framework applied to 2
- 1. In what way does the student access the
general curriculum? - S can learn a streamlined version of the
content - 2. What has been the students response to
academic interventions - S has persistent academic problems despite
appropriate, intensive interventions
29Decision Framework
- 3. How does the student interact with text?
- Controlled vocabulary reduced reading levels
- May need text reader
- 4. Do the supports needed by this student to
perform or participate meaningfully change the
complexity or cognitive demand of the material? - Needs supports that reduce complexity, breadth,
depth of the content - Teacher scaffolding Fewer choices
30Decision Framework
- 5. What inferences can be made about students
generalization/transfer of learning - Inferences constrained
- Transfer of learning more limited
- May transfer only to similar or familiar contexts
31Who are the 2 students?
- Simply stated, they are students for whom
- The alternate assessment judged against alternate
achievement standards is too easy - The general assessment judged against grade level
achievement standards is too hard