Title: Kingdom of Macedonia was north of Greece
1This was a deserved reputation for a long
time Plagued by periodic barbarian invasions from
the Balkans and by frequent civil wars, Macedonia
remained a minor kingdom too troubled by its own
problems to be a major source of concern for the
Greeks
Greek city-states considered Macedonia to be
outside the Greek world and inhabited by a bunch
of barbarians Not worthy of serious consideration
unless their help was needed in a war
Kingdom of Macedonia was north of Greece
2PHILIP II
- Situation changed in 359 BC
- When Philip II became king
- Educated in Thebes , familiar with Greek military
techniques, and a very skillful politician - Genius at sizing up a situation and figuring out
how to exploit it for his own advantage - Recognized that the Greek city-states would be
easy pickings for anyone bold enough to attack
them
3MACEDONIAN ADVANTAGES
- No single city-state was strong enough to resist
him and it was unlikely that they would be able
to form any sort of alliance against him - The Macedonian army had become a formidable
fighting force - Based on heavily armed cavalry units,
supplemented by light cavalry and hoplite
infantry - More mobile and more effective than anything the
Greeks had - Also possessed strong esprit-de-corps
4DEATH OF PHILIP II
- By playing one city-state off against the other
and through the basic superiority of his army,
Philip had taken control of Greece by 338 BC - Imposed lenient terms on the defeated city-states
and even tried to win their support by vowing to
attack Persia to avenge all the trouble the
Persians had caused Greece in the past - But he was the midst of planning this campaign
when he was assassinated at his daughters
wedding - Succeeded by his 20-year old son, Alexander
5ALEXANDER CREATES AN ARMY
- Determined to carry out his fathers planned
invasion of Persian Empire - Already had extensive military experience as his
fathers chief general - Needed Greek soldiers but Greeks did not deliver
promised numbers - Attacked Thebes in 335 and burned it to the
ground - Slaughtered entire population or sold them into
slavery - Taught Greeks a lesson and Greek recruitment into
his army skyrocketed - had final force of 30,000 soldiers and 5000
horsemen
6START OF ALEXANDERS CONQUESTS
- Invaded Persia through Asia Minor in 334
- Defeated Persian army every time they met
- Then headed into Syria and took over the entire
Mediterranean coast without any real resistance - Invaded Egypt where he was proclaimed pharaoh
- Built city of Alexandria to celebrate event at
the mouth of the Niles - Would become one of the greatest cities in the
ancient world
Lighthouse at Alexandria
7END OF THE PERSIAN EMPIRE
- Left Egypt in 331 and headed for Babylon
- Persians tried to block him but were beaten again
- Persian emperor Darius was now on the run
- Fleeing to Persiapolis
- Alexander attacks and destroys the city
- Alexander finally caught Darius and his army at
Ecbatana in July 330 - Darius is killed by his own men as Alexander
approaches - Persian Empire collapses
Darius
8ALEXANDERS AMBITION
- Alexander continues to conquer eastward
- Convinced that it was his destiny to conquer all
territory up to the edge of the world - Some Macedonian advisors were against this plan
- Also did not like the way Alexander had gone
native - Wearing Persian clothes, adopting Persian
rituals, appointing Persians to important
positions, adding Persian contingents to the
army, and marrying a Persian princess - Several conspiracies were launched to overthrow
Alexander - He discovered all of them and killed all those
involved
9TO THE EDGE OF THE WORLD
- Marched east through Armenia, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan and then crossed the Indus River into
India - Involved in some terrible battles in India but
kept moving east - At the Hyphasis River, his men refused to move
any further - Simply worn out and homesick
- Alexander ultimately gave in and agreed to return
home
10PUNISHMENT
- Took southern route home through the horrible
desert of southern Pakistan - For reasons of revenge
- Felt betrayed by mutiny in India and decided to
punish his men by marching them through the
desert - 50 of the army died during this march and those
who survived suffered terribly - Finally made it back to Babylon in 324
11ALEXANDERS PLAN
- Was not interested in organizing an
administration to govern his empire - Obsessed with creating a Macedonian/Persian
master race - Ordered officers to marry Persian women
- Wanted to create a new Macedonian/Persian ruling
class which would permanently join East and West - By blending conquered and conqueror, he hoped to
install an element of stability in his empire
12DEATH OF ALEXANDER
- In June 323, Alexander died at the age of 32
- In the midst of planning the invasion of Arabia
- Exact cause of death is unknown
- Maybe pneumonia, malaria, alcoholic poisoning, or
food poisoning - No one will ever know for sure
13LEGACY
- Brilliant general and leader
- Seems at time to be a hero come to life from one
of Homers poems - Major contribution was the destruction of the
Persian Empire - Opened the door for the penetration of Greek
culture into the Middle East - Big weakness was lack of concern for
administrative matters - Liked to conquer, not consolidate
- Liked to fight, not govern
- Empire died with him as a result
- Virtually guaranteed by absence of any sort of
centralized administrative structure
14CIVIL WAR
- Half-brother Philip III (mildly retarded) and son
by Persian wife, Alexander IV set up as dual
rulers - Real power was in hands of Alexander IVs mother,
Roxanne, and a group of generals - Factions developed among ruling clique
- Quickly turned into a bloodbath in which all the
major contenders were murdered - Generals, Alexander IV, Philip III, and Roxanne
Roxanne
15SUCCESSOR KINGDOMS
Antigonus Gonatus took Macedonia and part of
Greece He and his successors would rule it until
the Romans displaced them in the second century BC
Ptolemy took over Egypt, Cyprus, Palestine, and
Phoencia Ptolemies would lose everything but
Egypt but would hang on to it until last of the
Ptolemies, Cleopatra, took wrong side in Roman
civil war and was forced to commit suicide in 31
BC
Second line of contenders finally came to a
semblance of a settlement
Selecus took over Syria, most of Asia Minor,
Mesopotamia, and western Persia Seleucid Kingdon
would later divide in half and incorporated into
the Roman and Parthian empires
Alexanders empire would become permanently
divided into independent, frequently hostile,
kingdoms ruled by the descendants of his
Macedonian officers
16SUCCESSOR KINGDOM RULERS
- Successor kings were not native rulers governing
with local support - They were outsiders who depended on the support
of large bureaucracies and mercenary armies - Turned to Greece for these bureaucrats and
soldiers - Became a special elite sitting on the top of
native populations who supported them with heavy
taxes - Always remained a foreign element, both outside
and above the native populations they ruled - Never won the hearts and minds of their subjects
Ptolemy of Egypt
17HELLENISTIC AGE
- Certain degree of unity to the post-Alexander
world - Greek culture had spread from Aegean world to
rest of known world - Same political institutions, educational systems,
art forms could be found everywhere - Uniform coinage, systems of finance, laws and
even language caused development of local and
international commerce - Civilized world had become unified in a cultural
and economic sense - Mainly Greek in origin and operation but also
contained doses of Mesopotamian influences - Mixture of Greek and Mesopotamian elements into a
worldwide, unifying, hybrid civilization is known
as Hellenistic Civilization
18GREEK GODS
- Greek gods were closely identified with
particular cities and places - Athena with Athens, for example
- Greeks regarded individual gods as their special
protective deities - No way in which this kind of association could be
transplanted elsewhere - New cities of the successor kingdoms were filled
with people from all over the world - Not a closed population who all believed together
in a single protective god or goddess - If Greeks still wanted to worship their special
god or goddess, they now had to do so on their
own or in small groups - Worship of the gods was no longer a part of civic
and public life - It now became a matter of private devotion for
the individual
Aphrodite
Athena
19HYBRID GODS
- Religion of transplanted Greeks mingled with
native religions - Result was often fusion of Greek gods with native
gods - Serapis
- Fusion of Egyptian god Osiris with minor Greek
god Apis - Invented by Ptolemies and proved to be very
popular - Viewed as a kind and gentle god
- Believed to have some control over healing the
sick and injured - Generally worshipped in small groups (or cults)
20MYSTERIES OF ISIS
- Cult of Serapis operated on two levels
- For majority of worshippers, he was an attractive
universal god prayed to in numerous private
shrines - For small devout minority, there was a side-cult
to his worship - The Mysteries of Isis
- Ceremonies and rituals which were believed to
grant followers immortality if done regularly and
correctly - Did not believe that a person could escape
physical death - But did believe the soul would live on if a
person devoted their life to the Mysteries
21OTHER HYBRID GODS
- Serapis just one example of hybrid god
- Others included
- Cybele the Great Mother
- Adonis
- Reflection of the growing personalization of
religion - Its retreat from the public realm to the sphere
of the individual - And when religion entered the individual or
private sphere, then questions such immortality
and divine compassions became important
Cybele
Adonis
22POPULAR PHILOSOPHIES
- They developed partly in response to the mixture
of Greek and non-Greek culture - But also partly due to increased concern for the
importance of the individual as opposed to the
group - As Greeks settled throughout the world and were
cut off from the stability, security, and sense
of community that membership in their old native
city-states had given them, many turned to these
popular philosophies to give them a sense of
permanence and worth as individuals
23CYNICISM I
- Taught that the main source of unhappiness was
that men were too attached to society, its
conventions, and material possessions - Taught that being attached to wife, children,
native country, or any sort of material
possession was dangerous because fate could wipe
them out at any time - Argued that in order to be truly free and happy,
a person had to liberate himself from his
attachment to things of the material world
24CYNICISM II
- Teles argued that citizenship was a form of
slavery - All its obligations and duties weighed men down
with unnecessary burdens and made them unhappy - Better to be a woman or a slave since they were
excluded from the burdens of political
involvement - Teles even claimed the poor were happier than the
rich because they did not have to worry about
property or possessions - Only way to achieve true happiness was to cut
yourself off from the world, give up all material
possessions, family, citizenship, etc and find
happiness in the mere fact of being alive
25EPICUREANISM I
- Believed that the main sources of unhappiness
were fear and desire - These emotions should be avoided or eliminated to
achieve true happiness - And replaced with the pursuit of pleasure
- Not just hedonistic self-indulgence
- Because excessive pleasure was no better than
pain and fear - Men should pursue simple and attainable pleasure
- Pleasure that could be obtained without much
effort - Too much effort in the pursuit of pleasure would
cause anxiety, excessive desire, and even pain - Pursue simple pleasures with moderation and life
will become happier and better
26EPICUREANISM II
- The best way to overcome fear was through
knowledge - Pursuit of knowledge for its own sake was selfish
vanity - Man should only know as much as was necessary to
be free from fear of all natural phenomena and
from the gods - Believed that all natural phenomena had a
physical explanation - Once man understood these explanations, his fear
(which was based on ignorance and/or
superstition) would disappear - And man would be closer to true happiness
27STOICISM I
- Believed that the universe ran according to
natural laws - Which fit into a divine master plan for mankind
- Every living thing had a predestined part to play
in this master plan - To be happy, one had to find out and understand
precisely what mans role was in this plan - The soul was the thing that brought order to the
body and which brought the body into harmony with
the universe and the divine master plan - Men needed to follow the dictates of their souls
to live according to the master plan and
understand it - Since men had the power to think, they also had
the power to accept or reject their role in the
master plan - Rejecting ones role would lead to unhappiness
because you were rejecting your own true nature - Men should therefore cheerfully and willingly
accept their part in the divine place and Not
resist or struggle against it
28STOCISM II
- Each individual has his unique place in the
universe and his duty lay in performing whatever
functions were attached to that place - Not striving to change it
- Stoics therefore accepted, without complaint,
everything that happened to them in life - The only way to preserve inner calm and
tranquility - Taught that virtue should always be practiced
- Not because of its outcome but because it was the
essential ingredient in the divine plan - A person should do good because he was supposed
to - Not because he might benefit materially from
doing so
29SUMMARY
- All the popular philosophies developed at least
partly in response to the emphasis on the
individual during the Hellenistic Age - Each was concerned with personal behavior and
happiness - Each was unconcerned with, even hostile to, such
collective entities as the state - Entities that had been of prime importance during
the days of the Greek polis but which had
declined with the dispersion of Greeks and Greek
culture throughout the civilized world - Growing individualism was the most important
psychological development of the Hellenistic Age
and a great step towards the development of
modern attitudes towards the individual and his
relationship with society