Title: Emotions
1Emotions
2I. What is an emotion?
3II. What are the 6 basic emotions?
- Sadness
- Happiness
- Anger
- Disgust
- Surprise
- Fear
4III. How do we define emotions?
- We often describe our emotions by the
physiological sensations we experience at the
time of the emotions. - E.g., if you feel fear, you may describe this
fear response by describing how fast your heart
is racing.
5Why use physiology to describe emotions?
- Our bodies undergo significant changes while we
are experiencing different emotions. We can use
this information to describe what were feeling. - Theories of emotion incorporate both
parasympathetic sympathetic NS responses in
defining emotions.
6IV. Theories of emotion
- 1. James-Lange theory of emotion argues we
experience physiological sensations in response
to an event our perception of these changes
defines the emotion. - (E.g., We feel sad because we cry, we feel angry
because hour heart races!!!) - Problem Similar patterns of autonomic activity
are produced for different emotions (fear,
anger). - For example, how do you tell the difference
between anxiety anger? The pattern of activity
is similar, but the emotions are distinctly
different.
72. Cannon-Bard Theory
- Cognitive aspect of emotion is independent
- from physiological aspects of emotion.
- Problem Theoretically, changes in the intensity
of autonomic arousal should have no effect on
emotional experience, but they do. - E.g., While spinal cord injury patients report
being able to experience emotions, they report
the emotions are perceived less intensely than
before the injuries.
83. Schachter and Singers Theory of Emotions
- Argues we experience a given emotion based on our
cognitive appraisal (label) of our physiological
sensations. - Were interested in determinants of anger, fear,
euphoria. They explored interdependence between - External environment
- Internal events (e.g., adrenaline)
- Subjective feelings
9Schachter Singers Classic Study
- Four groups of Ss participated in the study.
- Three groups of Ss were given a shot of
epinephrine (activates sympathetic arousal for
20-30 min.), whereas the fourth group was given a
placebo injection. - All Ss were told they received suproxin, a
harmless drug.
10Experimental groups in Schacter Singer study
(1962)
- Group 1 Epinephrine informed- were told side
effects of drug (those relating to epinephrine
such as increased HR). - Group 2 Epinephrine uninformed- those told
nothing of possible side effects. - Group 3 Epinephrine Misinformed- those
misinformed of possible side effects (e.g., numb
feed, headache).
11Changing the social context of emotion.
- Following injections instructions, each subject
was placed in a situation that was designed to
promote either euphoria or anger. - Note Ss in the misinformed group did not
particular in the anger condition (see next
slide).
12Creating euphoria or anger
- Anger conditionSs were placed in a room with an
angry confederate required to fill out a
questionnaire. The angry confederate was surly,
used obscenities, was generally annoying. - Euphoria condition-Ss were placed in a room with
a happy confederate who did silly things
(building paper planes, throwing wads of paper,
jumping up on desk, etc.)
13Results of study
- Euphoria Anger
- Placebo Euphoria Anger
- E-informed Little emotion Little emotion
- E-uninformed Euphoria Anger
- E-misinformed Euphoria XXX
14Summary of Results
- 1. Ss who knew they were feeling the effects of
the drug, showed less intense emotional
responses in both conditions. They didnt
attribute their physiological activity to the
situation, but to the drug. - 2. Ss who were either uninformed or misinformed
appeared to rely on the contextual cues from the
situation (euphoric or angry) to label their
physiological sensations hence emotions.
15Serious Flaw of Schacter Singer Study
- Ss who were given placebo injections instead of
epinephrine, showed about as much euphoria in the
euphoria condition as much anger in the anger
condition as did Ss given epinephrine. - If epinephrine had nothing to do with the results
of the study, then the data dont support the
theory. The jury is still out on this one!!!
16V. Violent or attacking behavior
- The emotion of anger elicits a sympathetic
response that increases the organisms likelihood
of attack. - In animals (nonhuman human) attacking behavior
will either be calculated or affective. - Affective attacking- Cats threatened by other
cats shriek hiss, show piloerection, increased
posture. - Non-affective attacking- A cat attacking
- a mouse, will attack kill the mouse in
- a smooth swift fashion.
17Why do we usually attack others?
- We attack usually because of pain or a
perceived threat. - E.g., Hamsters in home cage will attack intruding
hamsters (over territorial issues). - Hamster will be likely to attack intruder for up
to 30 min. following intrusion. - Biologically this is linked with increased
activity in the corticomedial area of the
amygdala.
18Does genetics play a role in whether attacking
behavior will occur?
- Yes!!! Studies of twins adopted kids show that
genetics contributes to aggressive behavior
(antisocial, criminal). - Adopted kids most likely to engage in
aggressive behaviors-- had biological parents
with criminal records AND adoptive parents with
marital discord, depression, substance abuse,
etc. - A biological predisposition or a troubled
- adoptive family by itself produced only
- moderate effects (Cadoret et al., 1995).
19Do hormones play a role in aggressive behaviors?
- Yes!!!
- Most violent or attacking behavior occurs in
males (in humans nonhumans), implicating
testosterone in aggressive behavior.
20Evidence that testosterone is linked with
aggression
- 1. Castrated males males during
non-reproductive seasons fight significantly less
than males higher in testosterone. - 2. Men arrested for committing violent crimes
have higher testosterone levels than men
committing non-violent crimes. - 3. Highest incidence of violence is in men 15-25
years of age, when testosterone is at highest
level.
21Neurophysiological basis of aggression
- Stimulation of an animals corticomedial amygdala
will increase the probability of attack against
an intruder. - Stimulation of the ventromedial nucleus of the
hypothalamus also leads to violent behavior. - (Rabies is caused by a virus that attacks the
brain especially the temporal lobe (amygdala)). - Stimulating the amygdala may lead to aggressive
responses (cats), whereas removing it leads to
tameness placidity (monkeys).
22VI. Fear, enhanced fears, and the Amygdala
- All animals humans have a startle reflex to
loud noises. - This is an unlearned fear, but can be
conditioned. - We jump or react more vigorously to
- loud noise when we are already tense
- (walking to car in dark).
23Startle Response
- We can measure enhancement of startle reflex to
index fear or anxiety. - A baseline measure of startle is first obtained.
This is done by measuring an organisms response
to a loud noise. - Then an external stimulus (light) is repeatedly
paired with a shock or loud noise. - This will enhance or increase the startle reflex.
-
24What does the amygdala do during startle?
- Output from the amygdala goes to the hypothalamus
which controls autonomic fear responses. - Projections are then sent to the pons to control
the reflex. - Evidence animals with damage to the amygdala
will show reduced or no learning of enhanced
fears (and social relationships will be
impaired).
25Frontal cortex and emotions
- The frontal lobes may play a role in regulating
our emotions in given social contexts. - Left frontal activation appears to be related to
behavioral approach. Emotions regulated by this
area may be anger, joy, happiness. - Right frontal activation appears to be related to
behavioral withdrawal. Emotions regulated by
this area may be fear, sadness, depression.