CORE STABILITY An Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

CORE STABILITY An Introduction

Description:

'The system the body uses to give spinal support and maintain muscular balance ... Snijders, Chris J.; Hides, Julie A.; Damen, L onie; Pas, Martijn S.; Storm, Joop. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3007
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: wcs5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CORE STABILITY An Introduction


1
CORE STABILITY An Introduction
By Donna Sanderson-Hull
2
Objectives
  • Definitions
  • Origins
  • Benefits
  • Theory/Posture and anatomy
  • Research
  • Practical

3
WHAT IS CORE STABILITY?
The system the body uses to give spinal support
and maintain muscular balance while at the same
time providing a firm base of support from which
other muscles can work to enable the body to
undertake its daily tasks. It is through this
system of joint integrity and support that the
body is able to maintain its posture the
position from which all movement begins and
ends Chek P. 2000
4
CORE STABILITY
  • The ability to maintain neutral spine using the
    abdominal, back, neck and shoulder girdle muscles
    as stabilisers rather than movers

5
Orthopaedic view
That state of muscular and skeletal balance
which protects the supporting structures of the
body against injury or progressive deformity,
irrespective of the attitude in which these
structures are working or resting Academy of
Orthopaedic Surgeons 1947.
6
NOT A NEW CONCEPT
  • STATIC
  • Alexander Technique
  • Pilates
  • DYNAMIC
  • Tai-chi/Karate
  • Swiss ball training

7
ALEXANDER TECHNIQUE 1869-1955
  • PRINCIPLES
  • RE-EDUCATION OF KINAESTHETIC SENSE
  • QUIETING THE MIND TO FOCUS ON THE MIND/BODY
    CONNECTION
  • ESTABLISHING A GOOD HEAD AND NECK POSITION

8
JOSEPH PILATES 1880-1967
  • PRINCIPLES
  • CONCENTRATION
  • ALIGNMENT
  • BREATHING
  • CO-ORDINATION
  • STAMINA

9
FITNESS PARAMETERS
  • CARDIOVASCULAR
  • STRENGTH / POWER/SPEED
  • ENDURANCE
  • FLEXIBILITY
  • CORE STABILITY
  • PROPRIOCEPTION / NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL

10
Paradigm Shift No longer looking to improve
strength in one muscle but improvement in
multidirectional multidimensional neuromuscular
efficiency (firing patterns in entire kinetic
chain within complex motor patterns).
11
The Theories
  • Spinal Stability
  • The passively supported spine (bone and ligament
    will collapse under 20lb (9kg) of load.
  • Muscular components that contribute to
    lumbo-pelvic stability which take up the slack

12
Control subsystem (Neural)
Spinal stability
Active subsystem (spinal muscles)
Passive subsystem (spinal column)
Adapted from Panjabi (1992)
13
Neutral Zone Concept
  • Every joint has a neutral zone or position
  • Overall internal stresses and muscular efforts
    are minimal
  • A region of intervertebral motion around the
    neutral position where little resistance is
    offered by the passive spinal column (Panjabi
    1992)
  • Movement outside this region is limited by the
    ligamentous structures providing restraint

14
Control of the Neutral Zone
  • Ligaments - support end of range only
  • - Can be unstable/over-stretched
  • Muscle - Can compensate for instability
  • - Increase the stiffness of the
    spine
  • - Decrease the neutral zone
  • - Form basis for therapeutic
    intervention
  • in treatment of spinal stability

15
Clinical instability
  • A significant decrease in the capacity of the
    stabilising system of the spine to maintain the
    internal neutral zones within physiological
    limits which results in pain and disability
    (Panjabi)

16
Patho-Kinesiological model(Shirley Sarhmann)
  • Muscular system
  • Articular system
  • Neural system
  • All three must work as an integrated unit
  • The movement system requires optimum function of
    the core stabilisers resulting in precise
    arthokinematics and osteokinematics (Sarhmann
    2000)

17
Spinal Stability
  • Demonstrated that submaximal levels of muscle
    activation adequate to provide effective spinal
    stabilisation
  • Continuous submaximal muscle activation crucial
    in maintaining lumbopelvic stability for most
    daily tasks.

18
Benefits of Spinal Stability
  • Improve Posture and prevent deformities
  • More stable Centre of Gravity and control during
    dynamic movements
  • contribute to optimal movement patterns
  • breathing efficiency
  • Distribution of forces and absorption of forces
  • Reduce stress on joint surfaces and pain
  • Injury prevention and rehabilitation

19
Improved PostureRe-education of
stabilisersReduced stress on
jointsReduced injuryIncrease function and
sports performance.
20
For Sporting Performance
  • Forces transmitted - trunk to the limbs
  • Core muscles support the spine to transmit power
    from the trunk.
  • Power is transferred for kicking and throwing
    activities
  • If the peripheral limbs are too heavy this will
    cause stress on the chassis

21
ANATOMY OVERVIEW
  • LOCAL STABILISERS
  • Intertransversarii
  • Interspinales
  • Multifidus
  • TrA
  • Longissimus thoracis pars lumborum
  • Illiocostalis lumborum pars lumborum
  • Quadratus lumborum medial fibres
  • IO (insertion into TLF)
  • GLOBAL STABILISERS
  • Longissimus thoracis pars thoracis
  • Illiocostalis lumborum pars thoracis
  • Quadratus lumborum lateral fibres
  • External obliques (Bergmark 1989)

Comerford and Mottram, 2001
22
STABILISING CORE MUSCLES
  • THE INNER CORE
  • Transversus abdominus
  • Multifidus
  • Pelvic Floor Muscles
  • Diaphragm

23
The Outer Core Systems
  • Anterior Oblique ext and int obliques and
    contralateral hip adductors connected by anterior
    abdominal fascia
  • Posterior Oblique Lat Dorsi and contralateral
    Glut Max connected by T/L fascia
  • Deep Longitudinal Erector spinae and c/l
    sacrotubrous ligament and biceps femoris
    (connected by T/L fascia)
  • Lateral Glut med and min and c/l adductors

24
TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINUS
25
Transversus Abdominus
26
(No Transcript)
27
FUNCTION TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINUS
  • SUPPORT OF ABDOMINAL CONTENTS VIA CIRCUMFERENTIAL
    ARRANGEMENT
  • BILATERAL CONTRACTION CAUSES DRAWING IN OF
    ABDOMINAL WALL
  • CAN WORK WITH MULTIFIDUS VIA TENSION OF
    THORACOLUMBAR FASCIA
  • CONTRIBUTES TO BOTH SUPPORTING AND TORQUE ROLES
    (JULL, RICHARDSON ET AL 1999)

28
MULTIFIDUS
29
(No Transcript)
30
Multifidus
31
FUNCTION (MULTIFIDUS)
  • Provides control of shearing forces of
    intervertebral motion segments
  • Unique segmental arrangement of multifidus
    suggests capacity for fine control of movement
  • Control anterior rotation translation in trunk
    flexion
  • Continuously active in upright posture compared
    with recumbency
  • Provides anti gravity support
  • Active in both ipsilateral and controlateral
    trunk rotation
  • Stabiliser rather than prime mover (Richardson,
    Jull et al 1999)

32
Gluteal Stabilisers
33
  • Gluteus medius provides frontal plane
    stabilization, decelerate femoral adduction ,
    assist in deceleration femoral internal rotation
    (during closed chain activity)

34
Gluteus Medius
  • Provides frontal plane stabilisation in walking
    cycle
  • Prevents downward rotation of the pelvis
    (Trendelenburg)
  • Allows unsupported leg to swing clear of the
    ground
  • Decelerates femoral adduction and internal
    rotation
  • Anterior fibres assist the iliotibial tract to
    flex hip and stabilise the extended knee

35
Optimum Dynamic Function
  • Integrated proprioceptively enriched
    multi-directional movement controlled by an
    efficient neuromuscular system

36
PROPRIOCEPTION
  • Nerve impulses originating from the joints,
    muscles, tendons and associated deep tissues
    which are then processed in the central nervous
    system to provide information about joint
    position, motion, vibration and pressure.
    (Bruckner Khan 1999)

37
WHY IS PROPRIOCEPTION IMPORTANT?
  • Sub-cortical systems are not under conscious
    control
  • Stabilisation response needs to be second nature.
  • Sub-cortical systems act faster - rapid muscle
    reaction times.
  • More rapid reaction times can be learnt which may
    lead to increased stability of the lumbar spine.

38
  • To improve the proprioceptive system in dynamic
    joint stability it must be challenged.
  • Pain-free does not mean cured.
  • If the proprioceptive deficit has not been
    addressed a complete rehabilitation has not been
    accomplished.
  • Mechanically stable joints are not necessarily
    functionally stable ( eg. ACL reconstruction)

39
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE SYSTEM GOES WRONG?
  • The Theories

40
MUSCLE PAIN SYNDROMES ARE SELDOM CAUSED BY
ISOLATED PRECITATING FACTORS AND EVENTS BUT ARE
THE CONSEQUENCES OF HABITUAL IMBALANCES IN THE
MOVEMENT SYSTEM (Sahrmann 1993)
41
REPEATED MOVEMENTSSUSTAINED POSTURES
  • ALTERS MUSCLE LENGTH
  • ALTERS STRENGTH
  • ALTERS STIFFNESS
  • ALTERS FLEXIBILITY
  • ALTERS CARTILAGE AND BONE STRUCTURE BY
    OVERLOADING AT COMPENSATORY SITES OF MOVEMENT

42
PAIN
MUSCULAR DYSFUNCTION
POSTURAL DYSFUNCTION
STRUCTURAL/SEGMENTAL DYSFUNCTION
43
POSTURE AND PAIN
  • Poor posture can lead to increased stress on the
    stabilising system of the joints (Chek P 1999)
  • Multifidus dysfunction occurs after first episode
    acute unilateral LBP (Hides et al 1994)
  • Multifidus dysfunction does not spontaneously
    restore following resolution of pain and
    disability (Hides et al 1996)
  • Specific retraining does restore dysfunction
    (Hides et al 1996)

44
  • TrA contraction is delayed during normal
    movements in subjects with low back pain
    (Richardson et al 1999)
  • Mulifidus function can be affected by spinal
    surgery
  • Atrophy of multifidus has been shown to be more
    prevalent in post operative patients (Jull, et al
    1999)

45
  • Sheringtons Law of Reciprocal Inhibition
  • Tight Muscles inhibit the functional
    antagonist.
  • Leads to Positive Cross Syndromes of the lower
    or upper limb

46
  • Gluteus Maximus and minimus are inhibited in
    most athletes due to tight psoas (Summer, 1988).

47
Poor recruitment in the local stabilisers can
lead to over- activity of the global stabilisers
to compensate.
48
Lack of flexibility is often a phenomenon created
by lack of stability in an attempt to stabilize
the body for activity.
  • Hamstrings become tight in an attempt to create
    posterior stability of the pelvis
  • Instead of focusing on hamstring flexibility,
    work on pelvic stabilization and flexibility will
    return

49
  • If the glutei's are inhibited or weak
  • Lateral pelvic stability reduced
  • Femur adducts
  • 29 muscles connected to each side of pelvisWork
    synergistically with entire kinetic
    chainMaintain center of gravity over base of
    support during dynamic movements
  • gait cycle - loss of balance

50
Compensations for Weak Glut Med
  • Adaptations
    Effects
  • Excessive lateral pelvis tilt
    O/L of TFL, SIJ, Lsp
  • Medial knee drift
    P/f jt, ITB, Pt, Kn jt
  • Lateral knee drift
    Pop, Lat compt
  • Lateral flexion of trunk
    Facet jts, SIJ


51
Lower Cross System Anterior Pelvic Tilt/Increase
lumbar lordosis
  • Tight - ES, IP, upper rectus, RF, sartorius,TFL,
    adductors
  • Weaker -TA, internal oblique, multifidus,
    erector spinae biceps femoris, glut
    med/max
  • Joint dysfunction - sacral rotations, SI,
    L-spine,
  • Injury Patterns - plantar faciitis, AKP, Tib Post

52
Upper Cross System Rounded Back/Forward Head
  • Tight - pec mj/min, lat dorsi, upper trap
    levator, subscap, teres major,
    rnocleidomastoid, rectus capitus and
    scalenes
  • Weak - rhomboids, middle trap/lower trap, teres
    minor, infraspinatus, post deltoid, deep neck
    flexors
  • Joint Dysfunction - Upper cervical, cervical
    thoracic, SC joint, rotator cuff problems

53
Pronation Distortion Syndrome Flat feet
  • Tight - Peroneals, lateral gastroc IT-band, Psoas
  • Weak - Intrinsic foot muscles, Anterior/posterior
    tibialis, VMO, bicep femoris, piriformis,
    glut medius
  • Injury Pattern - muscles that control pronation
    are inhibited and weak causing overuse
    injuries

54
Muscle Fatigue
  • Decreased ability to maintain dynamic muscle
    force
  • Fatigue running
  • Unable to stabilise core
  • Shear forces and compressive forces in lumbar
    spine
  • Hamstring strains

55
Pelvo-Occular Reflex (Vlatemeir Yanda)
  • Running
  • Head Extension (Fatigue or weakness)
  • Visual compromise
  • Compensation Anterior tilt pelvis
  • Changes of length tension ratio lower limb
    muscles

56
The Critics
  • Standaert et al. review
  • Lumbar stabilisation exercises no more
    effective than a less specific exercise
    programme
  • Eyal Lederman
  • Core stability exercises do not help
    functionality and conflicts with so many areas of
    science in context of research into motor
    control..Offering simple answers to complex
    problems

57
  • BJSM Transversus Abdominus and Core Stability
    Has the pendulum Swung? Allison et al.
  • (VMO and PFPS)
  • BJSM Claims for the effectiveness of these
    modalities has been touted well beyond what the
    research has shown Cook Jill
  • (isokinetics, reformers, vibration plates,
    kinesiotaping, nintendo wii, wii fit!)

58
ASSESSMENT
  • Posture, ROM, control
  • Alignment
  • Single knee bend
  • Forward flexion
  • Seated knee extension
  • Thomas test
  • Prone knee bend
  • Post glut medius

59
Rules of Stability Training
  • Differentiate hypermobility, instability,
    normal movement and hypomobility
  • Safe
  • Must be challenging/multisensory
  • Progressive several stages
  • Offer variety
  • All planes of motion
  • Integration into functional activity
  • Make it fun not bore stability!

60
Progression and Variety
  • Floor work Static
  • Floor work Dynamic

61
  • Swiss ball Static
  • Swiss ball Dynamic

62
  • Cables
  • Medicine Balls, dumbells
  • Open and closed chain, speed
  • Standing, kneeling, lying, one leg etc

63
Progression of training
  • progress from slow to fast
  • simple to complex
  • known to unknown
  • low force to high force
  • static to dynamic

64
Breathing
  • Correct inspiration underrated and critical for
    stability
  • Allows the diaphragm help stabilise trunk
  • Increased intra-abdo pressure
  • Helps to activate Trans Abs (modulates with
    respn)
  • Inhibits use of external obliques
  • Helps maintain thorax posture
  • Increases breathing efficiency and performance

65
Swiss Ball Systems
66
HYPOTHESIS FOR SWISS BALL TRAINING
  • Reactive training with a Swiss Ball may encourage
    activation of the spinal stabilisers. Carrier B
    (1998)
  • Swiss ball exercises may help to re-educate TrA
    and multifidus due to the unstable environment.
    Carrier B (1998)
  • Multifidus is very difficult to activate
    voluntarily. Janda V (1996)
  • Sub-cortical control of stabilisation can be
    learnt through proprioceptive exercises on labile
    surfaces such as exercise balls. Saxton et al
    (1993), Saal Saal (1998)

67
De-stabilising the training environmentChallen
ges the neuro muscular systemImproves
proprioceptionimproves equilibrium /
co-ordinationImproves functional
skillGreater sporting performance.
68
Swiss Ball
  • Optimal dynamic stabilisation at right joint,
    right time, right plane of movement
  • With any movement all three planes are working
    together concurrently
  • Producing force in one plane whilst stabilising
    or controlling in other 2 planes eccentrically

69
Benefits
  • Proprioception
  • Postural re-education
  • Improves balance / co-ordination
  • Challenges the CNS - improve joint stability and
    sports performance

70
References
  • Shirley Sahrmann (2002) Treatment and Diagnosis
    of Movement Impairment Syndromes. Mosby St.
    Louis
  • Diane Lee (2000) The Pelvic Girdle An approach
    to the examination and treatment of the
    lumbo-pelvic-hip region. Churchill Livingstone
    Edinburgh
  • M.J Comerford and S.L Mottram (2001) Functional
    Stability Retraining Principles and strategies
    for Managing Mechanical Dysfunction. Manual
    Therapy 6(1) 3-14
  • Hides, Julie A. Richardson, Carolyn A. Jull,
    Gwendolen A (1996).. Multifidus Muscle Recovery
    Is Not Automatic After Resolution of Acute,
    First-Episode Low Back Pain Spine.
    21(23)2763-2769 1996
  • Richardson, Carolyn A. Snijders, Chris J.
    Hides, Julie A. Damen, Léonie Pas, Martijn S.
    Storm, Joop. (2002). The Relation Between the
    Transversus Abdominis Muscles, Sacroiliac Joint
    Mechanics, and Low Back Pain Spine. 27(4)399-405
  • Standaert et al. (2008). Evidence-informed
    management of chronic low back pain with lumbar
    stabilization exercises. The Spine Journal 8(1)
    114.
  • Allison et al. (2008) Transversus Abdominus and
    Core Stability Has the pendulum swung? British
    Journal of Sports Medicine 42930
  • Lederman. E The myth of core stability. www.
    Cpdo.net/myth_of_core_stabiity.doc
  • Cook (2008) Jumping on bandwagons taking the
    right clinical message from research. British
    Journal of Sports Medicine 42 (11) 563
  • Goldby et al. (2006) A randomized control led
    trial investigating the efficiency of
    musculoskeletal physiotherapy for chronic low
    back disorder. Spine 31 1083
  • Cairns, Mindy C. Foster, Nadine E. Wright,
    Chris (2006) Randomized Controlled Trial of
    Specific Spinal Stabilization Exercises and
    Conventional Physiotherapy for Recurrent Low Back
    Pain Spine. 31(19)E670-E681
  • Trueland. J (2009) Core Values Frontline 15 6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com