Title: CORE STABILITY An Introduction
1CORE STABILITY An Introduction
By Donna Sanderson-Hull
2Objectives
- Definitions
- Origins
- Benefits
- Theory/Posture and anatomy
- Research
- Practical
3WHAT IS CORE STABILITY?
The system the body uses to give spinal support
and maintain muscular balance while at the same
time providing a firm base of support from which
other muscles can work to enable the body to
undertake its daily tasks. It is through this
system of joint integrity and support that the
body is able to maintain its posture the
position from which all movement begins and
ends Chek P. 2000
4CORE STABILITY
- The ability to maintain neutral spine using the
abdominal, back, neck and shoulder girdle muscles
as stabilisers rather than movers
5Orthopaedic view
That state of muscular and skeletal balance
which protects the supporting structures of the
body against injury or progressive deformity,
irrespective of the attitude in which these
structures are working or resting Academy of
Orthopaedic Surgeons 1947.
6NOT A NEW CONCEPT
- STATIC
- Alexander Technique
- Pilates
- DYNAMIC
- Tai-chi/Karate
- Swiss ball training
7ALEXANDER TECHNIQUE 1869-1955
- PRINCIPLES
- RE-EDUCATION OF KINAESTHETIC SENSE
- QUIETING THE MIND TO FOCUS ON THE MIND/BODY
CONNECTION - ESTABLISHING A GOOD HEAD AND NECK POSITION
8JOSEPH PILATES 1880-1967
- PRINCIPLES
- CONCENTRATION
- ALIGNMENT
- BREATHING
- CO-ORDINATION
- STAMINA
9FITNESS PARAMETERS
- CARDIOVASCULAR
- STRENGTH / POWER/SPEED
- ENDURANCE
- FLEXIBILITY
- CORE STABILITY
- PROPRIOCEPTION / NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL
10Paradigm Shift No longer looking to improve
strength in one muscle but improvement in
multidirectional multidimensional neuromuscular
efficiency (firing patterns in entire kinetic
chain within complex motor patterns).
11The Theories
- Spinal Stability
- The passively supported spine (bone and ligament
will collapse under 20lb (9kg) of load. - Muscular components that contribute to
lumbo-pelvic stability which take up the slack
12Control subsystem (Neural)
Spinal stability
Active subsystem (spinal muscles)
Passive subsystem (spinal column)
Adapted from Panjabi (1992)
13Neutral Zone Concept
- Every joint has a neutral zone or position
- Overall internal stresses and muscular efforts
are minimal - A region of intervertebral motion around the
neutral position where little resistance is
offered by the passive spinal column (Panjabi
1992) - Movement outside this region is limited by the
ligamentous structures providing restraint
14 Control of the Neutral Zone
- Ligaments - support end of range only
- - Can be unstable/over-stretched
- Muscle - Can compensate for instability
- - Increase the stiffness of the
spine - - Decrease the neutral zone
- - Form basis for therapeutic
intervention - in treatment of spinal stability
15Clinical instability
- A significant decrease in the capacity of the
stabilising system of the spine to maintain the
internal neutral zones within physiological
limits which results in pain and disability
(Panjabi)
16Patho-Kinesiological model(Shirley Sarhmann)
- Muscular system
- Articular system
- Neural system
- All three must work as an integrated unit
- The movement system requires optimum function of
the core stabilisers resulting in precise
arthokinematics and osteokinematics (Sarhmann
2000)
17Spinal Stability
- Demonstrated that submaximal levels of muscle
activation adequate to provide effective spinal
stabilisation - Continuous submaximal muscle activation crucial
in maintaining lumbopelvic stability for most
daily tasks.
18Benefits of Spinal Stability
- Improve Posture and prevent deformities
- More stable Centre of Gravity and control during
dynamic movements - contribute to optimal movement patterns
- breathing efficiency
- Distribution of forces and absorption of forces
- Reduce stress on joint surfaces and pain
- Injury prevention and rehabilitation
19Improved PostureRe-education of
stabilisersReduced stress on
jointsReduced injuryIncrease function and
sports performance.
20For Sporting Performance
- Forces transmitted - trunk to the limbs
- Core muscles support the spine to transmit power
from the trunk. - Power is transferred for kicking and throwing
activities - If the peripheral limbs are too heavy this will
cause stress on the chassis
21ANATOMY OVERVIEW
- LOCAL STABILISERS
- Intertransversarii
- Interspinales
- Multifidus
- TrA
- Longissimus thoracis pars lumborum
- Illiocostalis lumborum pars lumborum
- Quadratus lumborum medial fibres
- IO (insertion into TLF)
-
- GLOBAL STABILISERS
- Longissimus thoracis pars thoracis
- Illiocostalis lumborum pars thoracis
- Quadratus lumborum lateral fibres
- External obliques (Bergmark 1989)
Comerford and Mottram, 2001
22STABILISING CORE MUSCLES
- THE INNER CORE
- Transversus abdominus
- Multifidus
- Pelvic Floor Muscles
- Diaphragm
23The Outer Core Systems
-
- Anterior Oblique ext and int obliques and
contralateral hip adductors connected by anterior
abdominal fascia - Posterior Oblique Lat Dorsi and contralateral
Glut Max connected by T/L fascia - Deep Longitudinal Erector spinae and c/l
sacrotubrous ligament and biceps femoris
(connected by T/L fascia) - Lateral Glut med and min and c/l adductors
24TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINUS
25Transversus Abdominus
26(No Transcript)
27FUNCTION TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINUS
- SUPPORT OF ABDOMINAL CONTENTS VIA CIRCUMFERENTIAL
ARRANGEMENT - BILATERAL CONTRACTION CAUSES DRAWING IN OF
ABDOMINAL WALL - CAN WORK WITH MULTIFIDUS VIA TENSION OF
THORACOLUMBAR FASCIA - CONTRIBUTES TO BOTH SUPPORTING AND TORQUE ROLES
(JULL, RICHARDSON ET AL 1999)
28MULTIFIDUS
29(No Transcript)
30Multifidus
31FUNCTION (MULTIFIDUS)
- Provides control of shearing forces of
intervertebral motion segments - Unique segmental arrangement of multifidus
suggests capacity for fine control of movement - Control anterior rotation translation in trunk
flexion - Continuously active in upright posture compared
with recumbency - Provides anti gravity support
- Active in both ipsilateral and controlateral
trunk rotation - Stabiliser rather than prime mover (Richardson,
Jull et al 1999)
32Gluteal Stabilisers
33- Gluteus medius provides frontal plane
stabilization, decelerate femoral adduction ,
assist in deceleration femoral internal rotation
(during closed chain activity)
34Gluteus Medius
- Provides frontal plane stabilisation in walking
cycle - Prevents downward rotation of the pelvis
(Trendelenburg) - Allows unsupported leg to swing clear of the
ground - Decelerates femoral adduction and internal
rotation - Anterior fibres assist the iliotibial tract to
flex hip and stabilise the extended knee
35Optimum Dynamic Function
- Integrated proprioceptively enriched
multi-directional movement controlled by an
efficient neuromuscular system
36PROPRIOCEPTION
- Nerve impulses originating from the joints,
muscles, tendons and associated deep tissues
which are then processed in the central nervous
system to provide information about joint
position, motion, vibration and pressure.
(Bruckner Khan 1999)
37WHY IS PROPRIOCEPTION IMPORTANT?
- Sub-cortical systems are not under conscious
control - Stabilisation response needs to be second nature.
- Sub-cortical systems act faster - rapid muscle
reaction times. - More rapid reaction times can be learnt which may
lead to increased stability of the lumbar spine.
38- To improve the proprioceptive system in dynamic
joint stability it must be challenged. - Pain-free does not mean cured.
- If the proprioceptive deficit has not been
addressed a complete rehabilitation has not been
accomplished. - Mechanically stable joints are not necessarily
functionally stable ( eg. ACL reconstruction)
39WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE SYSTEM GOES WRONG?
40MUSCLE PAIN SYNDROMES ARE SELDOM CAUSED BY
ISOLATED PRECITATING FACTORS AND EVENTS BUT ARE
THE CONSEQUENCES OF HABITUAL IMBALANCES IN THE
MOVEMENT SYSTEM (Sahrmann 1993)
41REPEATED MOVEMENTSSUSTAINED POSTURES
- ALTERS MUSCLE LENGTH
- ALTERS STRENGTH
- ALTERS STIFFNESS
- ALTERS FLEXIBILITY
- ALTERS CARTILAGE AND BONE STRUCTURE BY
OVERLOADING AT COMPENSATORY SITES OF MOVEMENT
42PAIN
MUSCULAR DYSFUNCTION
POSTURAL DYSFUNCTION
STRUCTURAL/SEGMENTAL DYSFUNCTION
43POSTURE AND PAIN
- Poor posture can lead to increased stress on the
stabilising system of the joints (Chek P 1999) - Multifidus dysfunction occurs after first episode
acute unilateral LBP (Hides et al 1994) - Multifidus dysfunction does not spontaneously
restore following resolution of pain and
disability (Hides et al 1996) - Specific retraining does restore dysfunction
(Hides et al 1996)
44- TrA contraction is delayed during normal
movements in subjects with low back pain
(Richardson et al 1999) - Mulifidus function can be affected by spinal
surgery - Atrophy of multifidus has been shown to be more
prevalent in post operative patients (Jull, et al
1999)
45- Sheringtons Law of Reciprocal Inhibition
- Tight Muscles inhibit the functional
antagonist. - Leads to Positive Cross Syndromes of the lower
or upper limb
46-
- Gluteus Maximus and minimus are inhibited in
most athletes due to tight psoas (Summer, 1988).
47 Poor recruitment in the local stabilisers can
lead to over- activity of the global stabilisers
to compensate.
48Lack of flexibility is often a phenomenon created
by lack of stability in an attempt to stabilize
the body for activity.
- Hamstrings become tight in an attempt to create
posterior stability of the pelvis - Instead of focusing on hamstring flexibility,
work on pelvic stabilization and flexibility will
return
49- If the glutei's are inhibited or weak
- Lateral pelvic stability reduced
- Femur adducts
- 29 muscles connected to each side of pelvisWork
synergistically with entire kinetic
chainMaintain center of gravity over base of
support during dynamic movements - gait cycle - loss of balance
50Compensations for Weak Glut Med
- Adaptations
Effects - Excessive lateral pelvis tilt
O/L of TFL, SIJ, Lsp - Medial knee drift
P/f jt, ITB, Pt, Kn jt - Lateral knee drift
Pop, Lat compt - Lateral flexion of trunk
Facet jts, SIJ
-
51Lower Cross System Anterior Pelvic Tilt/Increase
lumbar lordosis
- Tight - ES, IP, upper rectus, RF, sartorius,TFL,
adductors - Weaker -TA, internal oblique, multifidus,
erector spinae biceps femoris, glut
med/max - Joint dysfunction - sacral rotations, SI,
L-spine, - Injury Patterns - plantar faciitis, AKP, Tib Post
52Upper Cross System Rounded Back/Forward Head
- Tight - pec mj/min, lat dorsi, upper trap
levator, subscap, teres major,
rnocleidomastoid, rectus capitus and
scalenes - Weak - rhomboids, middle trap/lower trap, teres
minor, infraspinatus, post deltoid, deep neck
flexors - Joint Dysfunction - Upper cervical, cervical
thoracic, SC joint, rotator cuff problems
53Pronation Distortion Syndrome Flat feet
- Tight - Peroneals, lateral gastroc IT-band, Psoas
- Weak - Intrinsic foot muscles, Anterior/posterior
tibialis, VMO, bicep femoris, piriformis,
glut medius - Injury Pattern - muscles that control pronation
are inhibited and weak causing overuse
injuries
54Muscle Fatigue
- Decreased ability to maintain dynamic muscle
force - Fatigue running
- Unable to stabilise core
- Shear forces and compressive forces in lumbar
spine - Hamstring strains
55Pelvo-Occular Reflex (Vlatemeir Yanda)
- Running
- Head Extension (Fatigue or weakness)
- Visual compromise
- Compensation Anterior tilt pelvis
- Changes of length tension ratio lower limb
muscles
56The Critics
- Standaert et al. review
- Lumbar stabilisation exercises no more
effective than a less specific exercise
programme - Eyal Lederman
- Core stability exercises do not help
functionality and conflicts with so many areas of
science in context of research into motor
control..Offering simple answers to complex
problems
57- BJSM Transversus Abdominus and Core Stability
Has the pendulum Swung? Allison et al. - (VMO and PFPS)
- BJSM Claims for the effectiveness of these
modalities has been touted well beyond what the
research has shown Cook Jill - (isokinetics, reformers, vibration plates,
kinesiotaping, nintendo wii, wii fit!)
58ASSESSMENT
- Posture, ROM, control
- Alignment
- Single knee bend
- Forward flexion
- Seated knee extension
- Thomas test
- Prone knee bend
- Post glut medius
59Rules of Stability Training
- Differentiate hypermobility, instability,
normal movement and hypomobility - Safe
- Must be challenging/multisensory
- Progressive several stages
- Offer variety
- All planes of motion
- Integration into functional activity
- Make it fun not bore stability!
60Progression and Variety
- Floor work Static
- Floor work Dynamic
61- Swiss ball Static
- Swiss ball Dynamic
62- Cables
- Medicine Balls, dumbells
- Open and closed chain, speed
- Standing, kneeling, lying, one leg etc
63Progression of training
- progress from slow to fast
- simple to complex
- known to unknown
- low force to high force
- static to dynamic
64Breathing
- Correct inspiration underrated and critical for
stability - Allows the diaphragm help stabilise trunk
- Increased intra-abdo pressure
- Helps to activate Trans Abs (modulates with
respn) - Inhibits use of external obliques
- Helps maintain thorax posture
- Increases breathing efficiency and performance
65Swiss Ball Systems
66HYPOTHESIS FOR SWISS BALL TRAINING
- Reactive training with a Swiss Ball may encourage
activation of the spinal stabilisers. Carrier B
(1998) - Swiss ball exercises may help to re-educate TrA
and multifidus due to the unstable environment.
Carrier B (1998) - Multifidus is very difficult to activate
voluntarily. Janda V (1996) - Sub-cortical control of stabilisation can be
learnt through proprioceptive exercises on labile
surfaces such as exercise balls. Saxton et al
(1993), Saal Saal (1998)
67De-stabilising the training environmentChallen
ges the neuro muscular systemImproves
proprioceptionimproves equilibrium /
co-ordinationImproves functional
skillGreater sporting performance.
68Swiss Ball
- Optimal dynamic stabilisation at right joint,
right time, right plane of movement - With any movement all three planes are working
together concurrently - Producing force in one plane whilst stabilising
or controlling in other 2 planes eccentrically
69Benefits
- Proprioception
- Postural re-education
- Improves balance / co-ordination
- Challenges the CNS - improve joint stability and
sports performance
70References
- Shirley Sahrmann (2002) Treatment and Diagnosis
of Movement Impairment Syndromes. Mosby St.
Louis - Diane Lee (2000) The Pelvic Girdle An approach
to the examination and treatment of the
lumbo-pelvic-hip region. Churchill Livingstone
Edinburgh - M.J Comerford and S.L Mottram (2001) Functional
Stability Retraining Principles and strategies
for Managing Mechanical Dysfunction. Manual
Therapy 6(1) 3-14 - Hides, Julie A. Richardson, Carolyn A. Jull,
Gwendolen A (1996).. Multifidus Muscle Recovery
Is Not Automatic After Resolution of Acute,
First-Episode Low Back Pain Spine.
21(23)2763-2769 1996 - Richardson, Carolyn A. Snijders, Chris J.
Hides, Julie A. Damen, Léonie Pas, Martijn S.
Storm, Joop. (2002). The Relation Between the
Transversus Abdominis Muscles, Sacroiliac Joint
Mechanics, and Low Back Pain Spine. 27(4)399-405
- Standaert et al. (2008). Evidence-informed
management of chronic low back pain with lumbar
stabilization exercises. The Spine Journal 8(1)
114. - Allison et al. (2008) Transversus Abdominus and
Core Stability Has the pendulum swung? British
Journal of Sports Medicine 42930 - Lederman. E The myth of core stability. www.
Cpdo.net/myth_of_core_stabiity.doc - Cook (2008) Jumping on bandwagons taking the
right clinical message from research. British
Journal of Sports Medicine 42 (11) 563 - Goldby et al. (2006) A randomized control led
trial investigating the efficiency of
musculoskeletal physiotherapy for chronic low
back disorder. Spine 31 1083 - Cairns, Mindy C. Foster, Nadine E. Wright,
Chris (2006) Randomized Controlled Trial of
Specific Spinal Stabilization Exercises and
Conventional Physiotherapy for Recurrent Low Back
Pain Spine. 31(19)E670-E681 - Trueland. J (2009) Core Values Frontline 15 6