Title: Section 404 Permits and Determining Jurisdictional Waters
1Section 404 Permits and Determining
Jurisdictional Waters
- Department of the Army
- Regulatory Permit Program
Tulsa District Building Strong!
2a Multi-discipline Engineering Agency That
Devises Solutions
3Regulatory Program Mission
- To protect the Nations aquatic resources while
allowing reasonable and appropriate development
through fair, flexible, and balanced permit
decisions
Tulsa District Building Strong!
4Regulatory Program Annual Facts
- - Over 220 billion of economic development is
affected by 1,200 Corps regulators - - 60,000 authorizations affecting waters of the
U.S., including wetlands - 75 on private property vs. 25 on government,
tribal, NGO lands - Variety from complex-controversial to
simple-routine projects - - 70,000 jurisdictional determinations
- - About 2,000 enforcement cases
- About 60 appeals (permit denials, jurisdictional
determinations) - 79 of actions are authorized under general
permits
Tulsa District Building Strong!
5Regulatory Challenges
- Timeliness
- Predictability
- Consistency
- Transparency
Tulsa District Building Strong!
6Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
- Where is the limit of the Corps jurisdiction?
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County SWANCC
Case navigable has to mean something - Rapanos Case is a hydrologic connection
through a man-made ditch sufficient to establish
jurisdiction in a wetland? - Carabell Case is separation by a berm
sufficient to sever jurisdiction in a wetland?
Tulsa District Building Strong!
7Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
- - Jurisdiction applies to relatively permanent
waters (plurality test) and to waters/wetlands
that significantly affect the chemical, physical,
and biological integrity of traditional navigable
waters (Kennedy test)
Tulsa District Building Strong!
8Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
- Waters of the United States includes
- 1. Navigable waters / Traditional navigable
waters (TNW) - 2. Wetland adjacent to TNWs
- 3. Relatively Permanent Waters (RPW) that
flow year-round directly or indirectly to TNWs - 4. Relatively Permanent Waters that flow
at least seasonally directly or indirectly to
TNWs - 5. Wetlands directly abutting RPWs
- 6. Wetlands adjacent to RPWs
- 7. Non-RPWs that flow directly or
indirectly to TNW - 8. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs
- 9. Impoundments of
jurisdictional waters - 10. Isolated waters and
wetlands, only where there is a proven
interstate commerce nexus - Requires a Significant Nexus Evaluation and
concurrence by EPA
Tulsa District Building Strong!
9Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
- Significant Nexus Evaluation
- Determine if physical indicators of flow are
present - Determine if hydrologic connection to TNW exists
- - Assess aquatic functions performed by the
tributary or wetland with regard to chemical,
physical, and/or biological integrity of
downstream waters (ecological factors) - Significant is more than speculative or
insubstantial - - SNE requires concurrence from EPA that
jurisdiction is appropriate
Tulsa District Building Strong!
10Aquatic Resource Mitigation
- First, Avoid Impacts
- Then, Minimize Impacts
- Lastly, think Compensation
- (Off-sets and Replacement)
- only for Unavoidable Impacts
Tulsa District Building Strong!
11Mitigation Rule
- Responds to NRC recommendations
- Endorses Goal of No Net Loss of Wetlands
- Mitigation must be science-based and
results-oriented - Emphasis on Avoidance, Minimization, then
Compensation - Watershed-based decisions un-do harm
- Mitigation must be proposed at time of
application - Application must include an Avoidance and
Minimization statement
Tulsa District Building Strong!
12Mitigation Rule
- Hierarchy of Mitigation Preference
- 1. Mitigation Banks
- 2. In-Lieu Fee Mitigation
- 3. Permittee-Responsible Mitigation
(Project-Specific)
Tulsa District Building Strong!
13Mitigation Rule
- 12 Fundamental Components of ALL Mitigation
Plans - Objectives
- Site Selection Criteria
- Site Protection Instruments
- Baseline Environmental Information
- Credit Determination Method
- Mitigation Work Plan
- Maintenance Plan
- Ecological Performance Standards
- Monitoring Requirements
- Long-Term Management Plan
- Adaptive Management Plan
- Financial Assurances
- Stream Mitigation Plans may require Additional
Items - planform geometry watershed characterization
- design discharge riparian plantings
Tulsa District Building Strong!
14Aquatic Resource Functions
- Water quality maintenance
- Fish and wildlife habitat
- Food web support
- Organic matter prey export
- Flood storage flood flow dampening
- Stream flow maintenance
- Sediment export transport
- Nutrient conversion
- Contaminant uptake
Tulsa District Building Strong!
15Stream Mitigation Credit Options
- Restoration of previously channelized streams
- Enhance stream aquatic habitat
- Restoring or establishing natural buffers and
riparian corridors - Increase canopy and effective shading
- Exclude livestock disturbances from stream
channel - Reduce excess sediment sources in watershed
- Restore dynamic relationship between stream and
floodplain -
Tulsa District Building Strong!
16Working with the Corps
- Plan ahead
- Integrate aquatic resource protection into your
planning process - Demonstrate avoidance and minimization of
impacts - Develop specific plan to replace (compensate)
for expected unavoidable impacts - Pre-application consultation with the Corps
- Develop good project descriptions
- Develop good supplemental materials
(delineations, maps, drawings, alternatives
considerations) - Remember certain waters have special status
issues - (wetlands, scenic rivers and tributaries)
-
Tulsa District Building Strong!
17What do you see?
Tulsa District Building Strong!
18Tulsa District Building Strong!
19Tulsa District Building Strong!
20Tulsa District Building Strong!
21Tulsa District Building Strong!
22Tulsa District Building Strong!
23- Of the Earths water
- Only 2.8 is freshwater
- 2.2 is in ice
- 0.6 is in groundwater
- 0.01 is in lakes
- Less than 0.001 is in rivers and streams
Tulsa District Building Strong!