Section 404 Permits and Determining Jurisdictional Waters - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Section 404 Permits and Determining Jurisdictional Waters

Description:

Section 404 Permits and Determining Jurisdictional Waters – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: tul78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Section 404 Permits and Determining Jurisdictional Waters


1
Section 404 Permits and Determining
Jurisdictional Waters
  • Department of the Army
  • Regulatory Permit Program

Tulsa District Building Strong!
2
a Multi-discipline Engineering Agency That
Devises Solutions
3
Regulatory Program Mission
  • To protect the Nations aquatic resources while
    allowing reasonable and appropriate development
    through fair, flexible, and balanced permit
    decisions

Tulsa District Building Strong!
4
Regulatory Program Annual Facts
  • - Over 220 billion of economic development is
    affected by 1,200 Corps regulators
  • - 60,000 authorizations affecting waters of the
    U.S., including wetlands
  • 75 on private property vs. 25 on government,
    tribal, NGO lands
  • Variety from complex-controversial to
    simple-routine projects
  • - 70,000 jurisdictional determinations
  • - About 2,000 enforcement cases
  • About 60 appeals (permit denials, jurisdictional
    determinations)
  • 79 of actions are authorized under general
    permits

Tulsa District Building Strong!
5
Regulatory Challenges
  • Timeliness
  • Predictability
  • Consistency
  • Transparency


Tulsa District Building Strong!
6
Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
  • Where is the limit of the Corps jurisdiction?
  • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County SWANCC
    Case navigable has to mean something
  • Rapanos Case is a hydrologic connection
    through a man-made ditch sufficient to establish
    jurisdiction in a wetland?
  • Carabell Case is separation by a berm
    sufficient to sever jurisdiction in a wetland?

Tulsa District Building Strong!
7
Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
  • - Jurisdiction applies to relatively permanent
    waters (plurality test) and to waters/wetlands
    that significantly affect the chemical, physical,
    and biological integrity of traditional navigable
    waters (Kennedy test)

Tulsa District Building Strong!
8
Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
  • Waters of the United States includes
  • 1. Navigable waters / Traditional navigable
    waters (TNW)
  • 2. Wetland adjacent to TNWs
  • 3. Relatively Permanent Waters (RPW) that
    flow year-round directly or indirectly to TNWs
  • 4. Relatively Permanent Waters that flow
    at least seasonally directly or indirectly to
    TNWs
  • 5. Wetlands directly abutting RPWs
  • 6. Wetlands adjacent to RPWs
  • 7. Non-RPWs that flow directly or
    indirectly to TNW
  • 8. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs
  • 9. Impoundments of
    jurisdictional waters
  • 10. Isolated waters and
    wetlands, only where there is a proven
    interstate commerce nexus
  • Requires a Significant Nexus Evaluation and
    concurrence by EPA

Tulsa District Building Strong!
9
Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
  • Significant Nexus Evaluation
  • Determine if physical indicators of flow are
    present
  • Determine if hydrologic connection to TNW exists
  • - Assess aquatic functions performed by the
    tributary or wetland with regard to chemical,
    physical, and/or biological integrity of
    downstream waters (ecological factors)
  • Significant is more than speculative or
    insubstantial
  • - SNE requires concurrence from EPA that
    jurisdiction is appropriate

Tulsa District Building Strong!
10
Aquatic Resource Mitigation
  • First, Avoid Impacts
  • Then, Minimize Impacts
  • Lastly, think Compensation
  • (Off-sets and Replacement)
  • only for Unavoidable Impacts

Tulsa District Building Strong!
11
Mitigation Rule
  • Responds to NRC recommendations
  • Endorses Goal of No Net Loss of Wetlands
  • Mitigation must be science-based and
    results-oriented
  • Emphasis on Avoidance, Minimization, then
    Compensation
  • Watershed-based decisions un-do harm
  • Mitigation must be proposed at time of
    application
  • Application must include an Avoidance and
    Minimization statement

Tulsa District Building Strong!
12
Mitigation Rule
  • Hierarchy of Mitigation Preference
  • 1. Mitigation Banks
  • 2. In-Lieu Fee Mitigation
  • 3. Permittee-Responsible Mitigation
    (Project-Specific)

Tulsa District Building Strong!
13
Mitigation Rule
  • 12 Fundamental Components of ALL Mitigation
    Plans
  • Objectives
  • Site Selection Criteria
  • Site Protection Instruments
  • Baseline Environmental Information
  • Credit Determination Method
  • Mitigation Work Plan
  • Maintenance Plan
  • Ecological Performance Standards
  • Monitoring Requirements
  • Long-Term Management Plan
  • Adaptive Management Plan
  • Financial Assurances
  • Stream Mitigation Plans may require Additional
    Items
  • planform geometry watershed characterization
  • design discharge riparian plantings

Tulsa District Building Strong!
14
Aquatic Resource Functions
  • Water quality maintenance
  • Fish and wildlife habitat
  • Food web support
  • Organic matter prey export
  • Flood storage flood flow dampening
  • Stream flow maintenance
  • Sediment export transport
  • Nutrient conversion
  • Contaminant uptake

Tulsa District Building Strong!
15
Stream Mitigation Credit Options
  • Restoration of previously channelized streams
  • Enhance stream aquatic habitat
  • Restoring or establishing natural buffers and
    riparian corridors
  • Increase canopy and effective shading
  • Exclude livestock disturbances from stream
    channel
  • Reduce excess sediment sources in watershed
  • Restore dynamic relationship between stream and
    floodplain

Tulsa District Building Strong!
16
Working with the Corps
  • Plan ahead
  • Integrate aquatic resource protection into your
    planning process
  • Demonstrate avoidance and minimization of
    impacts
  • Develop specific plan to replace (compensate)
    for expected unavoidable impacts
  • Pre-application consultation with the Corps
  • Develop good project descriptions
  • Develop good supplemental materials
    (delineations, maps, drawings, alternatives
    considerations)
  • Remember certain waters have special status
    issues
  • (wetlands, scenic rivers and tributaries)

Tulsa District Building Strong!
17
What do you see?
Tulsa District Building Strong!
18
Tulsa District Building Strong!
19
Tulsa District Building Strong!
20
Tulsa District Building Strong!
21
Tulsa District Building Strong!
22
Tulsa District Building Strong!
23
  • Of the Earths water
  • Only 2.8 is freshwater
  • 2.2 is in ice
  • 0.6 is in groundwater
  • 0.01 is in lakes
  • Less than 0.001 is in rivers and streams

Tulsa District Building Strong!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com