B Physics Review: Part II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

B Physics Review: Part II

Description:

Old style: Di-muon trigger: 2 muons Pt 1.5 GeV (RunI Pt 2 GeV) charmonium physics ... old (Y.B.) prediction. Donatella Lucchesi. 18. Offline Trigger confirmation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Donatella9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: B Physics Review: Part II


1
B Physics Review Part II
Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of
Padova RTN Workshop The 3rd generation as a
probe for new physics Bratislava, 4 6
July, 2003
  • Review of Tevatron measurements
  • B and ?b lifetimes and masses
  • Bs Mixing
  • New CDF results
  • Bs and ?b yields
  • J/? cross section
  • D0 branching ratio and CP
  • asymmetries

2
How do we collect b?
  • Old style
  • Di-muon trigger
  • 2 muons Pt gt 1.5 GeV
  • (RunI Pt gt 2 GeV)
  • charmonium physics
  • B lifetime, B mass, rare decays Bs???
  • New era
  • Multi-bodies Hadronic trigger (SVT)
  • 2 tracks Ptgt2 GeV, dgt120 ?m, ?Ptgt5.5 GeV,
    Lxygt200 ?m
  • All you can imagine with B?X where Xgt2
  • A combination of Old and New
  • Lepton Ptgt4 GeV (Run I Ptgt8 GeV) track Ptgt2 GeV
    dgt120 ?m
  • B?lDX decays, flavor tagging optimization

3

D0 Results from J/? trigger
4

D0 Results from J/? trigger
5
B Mesons Mass Measurements
Decay modes
The current results
Best in the world
6
b Hadrons Lifetime Measurements
Is it still interesting?
Several decays channels are available at Tevatron
good test of the theory
7
b Hadrons Lifetime Measurement
  • Experimental needs
  • calibrate resolution
  • understand the alignments
  • ?? correction if not fully reconstructed decays
  • Inclusive b lifetime b? J/? X

CDF result
? 1.527?0.033?0.033 ps
8
Inclusive B ? J/y X Lifetime at D0
D0 Run II Preliminary
First time at D0 Use the same technique of CDF
MC
D0 Result t 1.561?0.024?0.074 ps
D0 Run II Preliminary
PDG 2003 t 1.564?0.014 ps
9
b Hadrons Lifetime Measurement
  • Exclusive lifetime with J/?

?? well measured
Simultaneous fitting of MB Extract signal
fraction ct Extract the lifetime
CDF Results
10
News about ?b
?b ? J/? ?
  • Exclusive ?b lifetime
  • (pre-blessed)
  • Mass measurement
  • (pre-blessed)

11
News about ?b contd
?b ? ?cl? ? pK? l?
  • Semi-exclusive lifetime
  • Branching ratio

Difficult to disentangle from decays through
excited baryons
And dE/dX
12

B Lifetime measurement semi-leptonic decays
Useful to optimize B mixing and flavor tagging
13
Flavor tagging
  • Lepton (muon and electron) tagging under
    optimization in
  • the huge sample of B ? lDX
  • Same Side Tagging (SST) B0 (B0) accompanied by
    ?- (?)

B0 A(t) Dcos(?mt)
B A(t) cost
14

Bs Lifetime measurement semi-leptonic decays
Muons
Electrons
Signal to noise ratio better than expected !
Observed yield RunI?5
15
Lifetime and DG Perspectives
  • CDF lifetime expectation in 2 fb-1 are
  • Bs?J/?? and Bs?lDsX combined ? s(DG/G)?few
  • for both CDF and D0
  • CP asymmetry in Bs?J/?? expected small in S. M.
  • If bigger ? new physics
  • If Dms larger
  • difficult to measure also with high statistics
    sample
  • DG/G sizeable ? easy to measure
  • Dms DGC where C can be calculated inside the
    S. M.

16
XsDms??Bs measurement semi-leptonic decays
Decays included Bs ? Ds?l, Ds?l (Ds?????,
K0K?, ?????) 40K events in 2 fb-1 Proper time
resolution ?t 60 fs ? t ? ?K/K ?K/K
14 Tagging ?D2 11.3 (all taggers)
CDF
Current limit Xsgt 20.6
Sensitive up to xs ? 30
17
D0 Bs mixing in fully hadronic decays
D0
Fully reconstructed decays
Decays included Bs? Ds???, Ds???????
(Ds?????, K0K?, K?K0) Bs?J/?K0 Proper time
resolution 0.40 ps Tagging ?D2 3.1 Jet
Charge ?D2 4.7 Lepton S/B 12
CDF sensitive up to xs ? 60 old (Y.B.)
prediction
18
Bs Yield Study the cuts applied
  • Offline Trigger confirmation
  • 3D Vertex for D and B vertices
  • 1.013ltm(KK)lt1.028 GeV
  • Ds Mass constraint
  • DR(Ds-p)lt1.5
  • cxyB lt 15 and cxyD lt 10
  • PDsgt 4 GeV and PtBgt6 GeV
  • LxyDgt400 mm
  • LxyBgt100 mm
  • dBlt100 mm

19
Bs Yield Study the signal
First observation !
  • Can we measure the yield?
  • fs/fd discrepancy LEP - CDF
  • Branching Fraction unknown
  • Cross section big uncertainty

20
Bs Yield Study the technique

Br(Bs?Ds-p) Br(Ds-???-) Br(??kk-)

Br(Bd?D-?) Br(D-?k?-?-)
PDG
Monte Carlo
Big effort in a full detector and trigger
simulation optimization a la LEP to measure
the efficiencies
21
Bs Yield Study Normalization mode
  • Same mode for
  • Similar cuts to signal
  • also visible.

22
Bs Yield Study Systematic
Uncertainty in due to fit.
Uncertainty in
23
Bs Yield Study Result
24
Bs Yield Measurement where we are
Signal to noise optimization S/?B is optimized
with ?gt60
  • Offline Trigger confirmation
  • 3D Vertex for D and B vertices
  • 1.010ltm(KK)lt1.028 GeV (only for Bs)
  • D Mass constraint
  • DR(D-p)lt1.5
  • cxyB lt 15 and cxyD lt 10
  • PDgt 3 GeV (3.5 for Bs) and PtBgt6 GeV (5.5 for
    Bs)
  • LxyDgt-150 mm
  • LxyBgt250 mm (400 for Bs)
  • dBlt80 mm
  • Pt(?B)gt1.6 (1.9 for Bs)

25
Bs Yield Measurement where we are
Signal to noise optimization
26
?b? ?c? Relative Yield Measurement
Same technique used for Bs
  • Confirm trigger cuts
  • Pt(proton)gt2 GeV
  • Pt(? from ?b)gt2 GeV
  • Pt(?c)gt4.5 GeV
  • Pt(?b)gt7.5 GeV
  • c?(?b)gt 225 ?m
  • c?(?cfrom ?b)gt -65 ?m
  • d0(?b)lt85 ?m
  • Pt(proton)gtPt(? from ?c)
  • 2.269ltm(?c)lt2.302 GeV
  • ?xy(?b)lt30
  • ?xy(?c)lt20

27
?b? ?c? Relative Yield Measurement
28
The Normalization Channel
B0?D-? same cuts optimized for ?b are applied
29
?b? ?c? Relative Yield Measurement
30
?b? ?c? Relative Yield Measurement
31
Many other B decays
32
CP violation in Standard Model g at CDF
  • R. Aleksan et al. Z Phys. C54 653 (1992)
    proposal
  • Bs?Ds?K? time dependent decay rate depends
    on
  • sin(d?g) and cos(d?g)
  • Theoretically clean
  • Reasonable Branching ratio
  • Background Bs?Dsp
  • Need tagging
  • Need time dependent analysis

1000 events in RunIIa 3500 events in
RunIIb
33
J/? cross section
Pt?gt1.5 ?Pt(J/?)?0 First time at Tevatron
34
CP Asymmetries and Decays Ratios of D0?hh-
Two Tracks Trigger open CDF to a new field, charm
physics
  • Pure D0 samples are required ? D tag used
  • The charge of the slow pion gives the D0 flavor

35
CP Asymmetries and Decays Ratios of D0?hh-
36
CP Asymmetries and Decays Ratios of D0?hh-
9.38 0.18 (stat) 0.10 (syst)
3.686 0.076 (stat) 0.036 (syst)
Results competitive with dedicated experiments
and ee- machines i.e. CLEO FOCUS
ACP
ACP(??) 2.0 1.7 (stat) 0.6 (syst)
ACP(KK) 3.0 1.9 (stat) 0.6 (syst)
37
Summary
  • CDF is starting doing competitive B physics
    measurements
  • D0 need more time since the new detector
  • In Italy many activities
  • Bs branching ratio
  • analysis
  • D0 branching ratio
  • CP measurements
  • No contribution on
  • J/? analysis
  • Many opportunities
  • for students !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com