A practitioner review of reflective practices in programmes for new academic staff - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

A practitioner review of reflective practices in programmes for new academic staff

Description:

A practitioner review. of reflective practices. in programmes. for new ... Acceptance of practitioner-based research. Outline of review. Focus on ... Practitioner ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: communicat75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A practitioner review of reflective practices in programmes for new academic staff


1
A practitioner review of reflective practices
in programmes for new academic staff
  • Dr Peter Kahn
  • University of Manchester
  • Dr Richard Young
  • University of Newcastle

2
Context for review
  • Indications that there is a widespread use of
    reflective practices in programmes for new
    academics
  • Professional standards set to incorporate the
    notion of reflective practice
  • Drive towards evidence based practice in HE,
    although this has proved difficult to effect
  • Acceptance of practitioner-based research

3
Outline of review
  • Focus on reflective practices
  • to cover what practices are used and any evidence
    of their impact
  • Review process
  • process derived from systematic reviews, a
    practitioner focus, and the need for
    collaboration.
  • a concurrent evaluation will look at the review
    process

4
Theory and practice
  • Origins of action research
  • experiments in the field
  • direct application of theory within practice
  • New perspectives
  • theory alone has little power to change practice
  • experience from dissemination and modern theories
    of learning
  • need for a mediating discourse between theory and
    practice (Gustavsen, 2001)

5
Mediating discourse
  • Change in practice is generated by the density
    and richness of social relationships
  • this affects the capacity for developing ideas
  • Role for communities of practice, supported by
    reified practices
  • An agreed process for carrying out some practice
    can provide the basis for exchanges between
    colleagues, and critical collaborations

6
Characteristics of the review
  • Review process derived in part from systematic
    reviews
  • Practitioner focus
  • coverage of review involvement of practitioners
    appraisal of studies incorporates scope for
    influencing practice
  • Community of practice
  • collaboration based on sub-reviews online
    collaborative work environment peripheral
    participation

7
Further reading
  • Gustavsen B (2001) Theory and Practice the
    mediating discourse, in Reason P and Bradbury H
    (eds) Handbook of Action Research, Sage
    Publications, London, pp17-26
  • Kahn P E and Macdonald R (2005) A systematic
    approach for staff and educational developers who
    would like evidence to inform their practice,
    Educational Developments, 6(2), pp17-20
  • Kahn P E and Walsh L (in press, 2006) Developing
    your Teaching, RoutlegeFalmer, London
  • Saunders M (2000) Beginning an evaluation with
    RUFDATA theorising an approach to evaluation
    planning, Evaluation, 6(1) pp 7-21 Online,
    accessed August 2005, http//www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/
    projects/edres/ltsn-eval/docs.htm
  • Wenger E (2002) Cultivating communities of
    practice, Harvard Business School Press, Boston,
    Mass
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com