Title: Wanless 1 and 2
1Wanless 1 and 2
- John Powles
- Spring Training Workshop
- Eastern Deanery Public Health Training Programme
2Wanless Report(s), UK 2002-
- March 2001 Chancellor asks Derek Wanless to
report by April 2002 on - technological, demographic and medical trends
over the next two decades that may affect the
health service - In the light of 1. needs for resources
3http//www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/Consultations_and_Le
gislation/wanless/consult_wanless_final.cfm?
4time
5Main influences on resource requirements
- Commitments already made
- Changing expectations
- Advances in medical technologies
- Changing health needs
- Prices
- Productivity improvement
63 scenarios
- Solid progress
- Slow uptake
- Fully engaged
7(No Transcript)
8Lubitz et al, NEJM, 2003
9(No Transcript)
10Projected spending on health services (including
private)
Chancellor One of these please
Wanless part 2 Securing good health for the
whole population
11Public engagement with health and the level of
medical expenditure
- But suppose public engagement with health
matters, leads (of itself) to greater use of
medical services.
Public engagement
Levels of health
Medical expenditure
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16Broadens definition of public health
- The science and art of preventing disease,
prolonging life and promoting health through the
organised efforts and informed choices of
society, organisations, public and private,
communities and individuals
17Provides some useful road maps
- Ch 2 lesssons
- Actually a chronological narrative
- Ch 3 delivery
- Useful summaries of organisations involved,
workforce etc - Ch 4 case studies
- Smoking, inequalities, salt, obesity, inactivity,
falls
18Ch 5 PH evidence
- Weakness of evidence base, under-investment
(and lack of capacity in) ph research - the paucity of health economists and
mathematical modellers within the public health
sciences has been of specific concern. (5.48)
19Ch 6 Investing in ph
- Issues in economic evaluation
- Inc discounting
- Case study of diabetes
20Ch 7 Roles and responsibilities
- Authodox economic liberalism
- (maximising utility based on individual choice)
- stretched by addition of social context
failures - Becker is cited but Sen is not
21Ch 8 Government levers
- Information
- Taxes / subsidies
- Regulation / voluntary agreement
- Regionalism?
- Democratic process?
22(No Transcript)
23Ch 9 Recommendations
- Public health policy making
- Needs consistent framework
- Review of Arms length bodies
- Research and evaluation
- Need for a strong overall public health research
strategy - Full engagement
- Weak on democratic deliberation and iteration
- Structure and roles
- Strategic coordination
24Overall
- Part of the gathering momentum around public
health - Emphasises weakness of knowledge base
- Despite review of other countries experience
actually draws little from outside UK - Though notes that Netherlands and Australia more
advanced in economic evaluation
25Limitations
- Little discussion about how to deal better with
uncertainty (ie need to quantify it) - Little real clarification of issues around
attributing risks and costs - Eg of the need to be clear about counterfactuals
- No reference to concept of avoidable risk
- Only partly grasps importance of time in public
health analysis
26Some other perspectives
27Using data from Peto et al, http//www.ctsu.ox.ac.
uk/tobacco/
28WHO Five basic principles to inform the
generation and dissemination of evidence (in
public health)
- Validity
- Quantified reliability
- Comparability
- Consultation
- Explicit data audit trail
-
- Murray CJL, Mathers C, Salomon JA. Towards
evidence-based public health. In Murray CJL,
Evans DB, eds, editors. Health systems
performance assessment debates, methods and
empiricism. Geneva World Health Organization
2003 p. 715-26. - http//whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/924
1562455_(part4)_(chp50-60).pdf
29http//www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/publicat/document
/metadata/roi_eea.htm
30(No Transcript)