Title: FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
1FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- SOME HINTS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROCESS
IN THE BACAU COUNTY - Presentation by Sorin Brasoveanu
2FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Deinstitutionalization requires the most radical
changes in attitude, a systematic approach of the
local planning through identifying and
assessing the problems encountered at a certain
time, analysis of the opportunities as well as
weaknesses, but also requires the creation of a
system based on alternative service, focused on
the identified needs, a system which should
ensure the continuation of the reform.
3FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- In the Bacau county, even starting with 1993,
there was a specialized social service whose aim
was to promote respecting child rights, to assess
the weaknesses of the existing system and to make
suggestions for restructuring it.
4FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Still since 1991, in Bacau county, in cooperation
with the British NGO Romanian Orphanage Trust
the programme Pro-Familia was developed in
Romania 12 houses have been built, organized in
groups of 4 , where a number of about 80 children
(6 8) children in each house) would benefit
from conditions very similar to a family
environment.
5FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- In 1996 a public-private partnership was
developed a foster-care system, and later this
led to the increase of the number of foster care
workers. - Starting with 1997, when the child protection
system is being thoroughly re-organized, also the
idea of closing the big units is emerging.
6THE PROCESS OF CLOSING DOWN THE INSTITUTIONS
- The process of closing down these institutions
took into consideration - A The evaluation of the needs of the
institutionalised children - involved some
aspects like - To present a real, comprehensive picture of each
child level of development, socializing,
desires, self-esteem, etc. - To present a prognostic of the future needs of
that child - To offer, going from the individual needs of
each institutionalised child, a picture of the
alternative services, necessary at the community
level, meant to facilitate his re-integration/inte
gration.
7THE PROCESS OF CLOSING DOWN THE INSTITUTIONS
- B Promoting and creating some alternative
services which led to - Reducing the number of the institutionalized
children by - Preventing the child abandonment and
institutionalization by providing families in
difficulty with services - Supporting the reintegration in the birth or
extended family through services of counselling
or material and financial support.
8THE PROCESS OF CLOSING DOWN THE INSTITUTIONS
- C Development of alternative family type systems
of child protection through - Developing in our country a network of
foster-care workers (with a nucleus in each
place, which should prevent a separation of the
child from his natural way of life).
9THE PROCESS OF CLOSING DOWN THE INSTITUTIONS
- D Direct and responsible implication of the
decision factors from the local communities
through - Setting-up the family council, which at the
moment is called in the Child Law as Consulting
Community Council - Forming and developing a network of referent
social workers and coordinating their work - Increasing the contribution of the local
communities to supporting the child protection - Co-financing through PHARE programs or Structural
Funds some primary services, according to the
needs identified for each community or according
to the objectives in the County Plan for
deinstitutionalization
10FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Between 1997 2002, the financing of the child
protection system and of the development of the
alternative services was achieved, as follows - County Council Budget 25
- Local Councils contributions 25
- ANPCA (National Agency for Child Protection and
Adoptions) 50 - World Bank development projects of the
alternative services - Extra-budget funds projects achieved together
with NGOs, like The Maternal Centre, The Centre
for HIV children.
11FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- The EU program PHARE Children First - the
opportunity to have a well-planned approach of
the deinstitutionalization processes and of the
closing down the huge institutions. - This program became a source of financing for
alternative services development, for
decentralization and structural reorganization
emphasizing a planning of services development,
county level coordination and concentrating these
services on the child and family welfare.
12FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- 2003 - there were issued two documents, very
important for the continuation, on a well-planned
basis, of the process of deinstitutionalization - The County Strategy in Child Protection
- The Program for Deinstitutionalization.
13FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- The objectives of these two documents are
- Identifying and developing the services necessary
at the local community level in order to prevent
new entries in the child protection system - Analysis of the situation of each classical
residential unit and planning the process of
closing it down, taking into account its
beneficiaries characteristics. - Development of partnerships with the
non-governmental sector in order to develop the
system, according to the identified needs
14FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Approaching the development of the services as
project-type activities. - Identifying the supplementary sources of
financing, necessary for the development of the
services - Insuring the sustainability of the services that
are going to be developed.
15FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- One of the points of reference in the
Deinstitutionalization Program is considered to
be the one connected with the financing of the
process, because - a. Deinstitutionalization does not imply simply
closing an institution from an administrative
point of view. It is a process which should be
accepted as an option both by the beneficiaries
and the decision factors. - b. What finances are necessary for the services
that are going to be developed and what sources
can be approached. - c. While the process is being developed, there
will be two co-existing systems which, at least
for a while, must be financed in parallel. - d. Of the sustainability of the new services
if they imply new providers, how they are going
to be sustained.
16FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- A major change in considering deinstitutionalizati
on was brought by Law 272/2004 regarding child
protection and promoting child rights, as well as
the Law of the National Social Assistance System. - Law 272/2004 says that the principle of the best
interest of the child will guide all the actions
and decisions concerning children, a principle
which needs to be taken into account also when it
comes to the vital problem of allocating the
resources. When local budgets are discussed, the
right resources will be allocated for childrens
needs, these needs being considered now a
priority in any budget analysis. There should be
a proper analysis of the relevant budgets, in
order to establish the percentage and the quantum
of the sums allocated for children.
17FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Article 118, paragraph 1 of the Law 272/2004
says preventing the separation of a child from
his family, as well as a special protection of
the child lacking, temporarily or permanently,
his parents will be financed from the following
sources - local budget of the villages, towns or cities
- local budgets of the counties/sectors of
Bucharest city. - state budget
- donations, sponsorships and other private forms
of financial contributions, legally allowed. - National Agency for Child Protection and
Adoptions (ANPCA) can finance national programmes
for child protection and promoting child rights
from external reimbursable/ none-reimbursable
funds or other sources.
18FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- These sources of financing referred exclusively
to the local services preventing the separation
of a child from his family and to county services
protection for the child lacking (temporarily
or permanently) his parents care.
19FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- According to paragraph 17, a) of the Government
Ordinance no. 12/2001, amended, the local council
- where the child who the special protection
measure needs to be taken for lives - must have a
financial contribution to support the protection
system. - In the Bacau county, the amount established
through a Decision of the Local Council is 35
percent for the village local councils and 50
percent for towns and cities.
20FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Article 118, paragraph 1 is completed by Law
705/2001 concerning the National Social
Assistance System, amended by and completed by
Law 47/2007 and the Government Ordinance 68 /
2003 with the later amendments concerning social
services - meaning that, from the local budgets
of the counties, Bucharest city respectively,
funds are allocated for - - financing of the specialized social services
- - co- financing, up to 50 percent of the primary
social services provided by the local councils - - financing (fully or co-financing) the
organization and development of some social
assistance institutions.
21FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- From the local budgets of the villages, towns or
cities funds are allocated for - - financing primary social services preventing
separation of the child from his family. - - subsidizing the social services achieved by
the accredited suppliers. - - financing or co-financing the organization and
development of some community social assistance
institutions.
22FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- We should mention that the main sources of
finances of the deinstitutionalization program
come from extra-budget sources projects
financed by PHARE, respectively, in different
ways, National programs, Projects implemented in
partnership with NGOs involved in the
Deinstitutionalization Program.
23FINANCING THE DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
- Deinstitutionalization involves a long process.
- In Bacau County this process started right in
1993 by creating a social service whose mission
was to promote the child rights. - The experience accumulated all this way and the
stages we went through took time, needed a change
in mentalities, involved the civil society, and,
especially needed community involvement.