Title: Chapter 11: The Economics of Global Climate Change
1Chapter 11 The Economics of Global Climate Change
- Professor Steven C. Hackett
- Humboldt State University
2Global Climate Change - Science
- Overview
- Science
- Impacts
- Economics
- Kyoto Protocol
- AB 32, WCI, RGGI, EU ETS
3Global Climate Change - Science
-
- What is the greenhouse effect and how does it
work?
4Global Climate Change - Science
5Global Climate Change - Science
6Global Climate Change - Science
- Absorbed by land, oceans, and vegetation at the
surface, the visible light is transformed into
heat and re-radiates in the form of invisible
infrared radiation. If that was all there was to
the story, then during the day earth would heat
up, but at night, all the accumulated energy
would radiate back into space and the planet's
surface temperature would fall far below zero
very rapidly.
7Global Climate Change - Science
- The reason this doesn't happen is that earth's
atmosphere contains molecules that absorb the
heat and re-radiate the heat in all directions.
This reduces the heat radiated out to space.
Called 'greenhouse gases' because they serve to
hold heat in like the glass walls of a
greenhouse, these molecules are responsible for
the fact that the earth enjoys temperatures
suitable for our active and complex biosphere.
8Global Climate Change - Science
What are greenhouse gases?
- Carbon dioxide Released to the atmosphere when
solid waste, fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and
coal), and wood and wood products are burned. - Methane Emitted during the production and
transport of coal, natural gas, and oil. Methane
emissions also result from the decomposition of
organic wastes in municipal solid waste
landfills, and the raising of livestock.
9Global Climate Change - Science
Greenhouse gases, continued
- Nitrous oxide Emitted during agricultural and
industrial activities, as well as during
combustion of solid waste and fossil fuels. - Very powerful greenhouse gases that are not
naturally occurring include hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur
hexafluoride (SF6), which are generated in a
variety of industrial processes.
10Global Climate Change - Science
- Each greenhouse gas differs in its ability to
absorb heat in the atmosphere. HFCs and PFCs are
the most heat-absorbent. Methane traps over 21
times more heat per molecule than carbon dioxide,
and nitrous oxide absorbs 270 times more heat per
molecule than carbon dioxide. Often, estimates of
greenhouse gas emissions are presented in units
of millions of metric tons of carbon equivalents
(MMT of CO2e), which weights each gas by its GWP
value, or Global Warming Potential.
11Global Climate Change - Science
- Carbon dioxide, water vapor, methane, nitrous
oxide, and other greenhouse gases are all
molecules composed of more than two component
atoms, bound loosely enough together to be able
to vibrate with the absorption of heat. -
12Global Climate Change - Science
- The major components of the atmosphere (oxygen O2
and nitrogen N2) are two-atom molecules too
tightly bound together to vibrate and thus they
do not absorb heat and contribute to the
greenhouse effect.
13Global Climate Change - Science
- Carbon dioxide is one of the most important
greenhouse gases. It consists of one carbon atom
with an oxygen atom bonded to each side. When its
atoms are bonded tightly together, the carbon
dioxide molecule can absorb infrared radiation
and the molecule starts to vibrate.
14Global Climate Change - Science
- Eventually, the vibrating molecule will emit the
radiation again, and it will likely be absorbed
by yet another greenhouse gas molecule. This
absorption-emission-absorption cycle serves to
keep the heat near the surface, effectively
insulating the surface from the cold of space.
15Global Climate Change - Science
16Global Warming Potential and CO2e
17Global Climate Change - Science
- What has been the trend in atmospheric carbon
dioxide concentrations?
18Change in Greenhouse Gas Concentrations in the
Atmosphere
Source IPCC, 2007
19GHG Emissions
- How do greenhouse gas emissions in the US compare
to other industrialized countries around the
world?
20Source EPA
21Top GHG-Emitting Countries
22Top 10 Global Energy Consumers
Source BP Statistical Review of World Energy,
2006.
23CO2 Emissions Trends 2005 - 2030
Source IEA WEO, 2006
24Global Climate Change - Science
- What has been the observed relationship between
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and
global average temperature?
25Global Climate Change - Science
26Global Temperature Anomalies
27Global Temperature Anomalies
28Global Climate Change - Science
- Hansen (Sci. Am. Mar 04) Natural millennial
climate swings are associated with slow
variations of the earths orbit induced by the
gravity of other planets.
29Global Climate Change - Science
- Hansen (Sci. Am. Mar 04) Precise measurement of
ice age atmospheric gases from bubbles in the
Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets indicates that
the change of climate forcing (from these
gases) between the ice age and the present was
about 6.5 watts per square meter.
30Global Climate Change - Science
- Hansen (Sci. Am. Mar 04) Anthropogenic effects
now exceed the natural effects from orbital
perturbations.
31Global Climate Change - Science
- Hansen (Sci. Am. Mar 04) Because of the large
capacity of the worlds oceans to absorb heat, it
takes the earth about a century to approach a new
thermal balance (radiation in radiation out)
from a given amount of forcing, but re-set at a
higher temperature. - Meanwhile, more forcings occur.
32Global Climate Change - Science
- Hansen (Sci. Am. Mar 04) The net value of
forcings since 1850 is 1.6 /- 1.0 watt per
square meter. - The earth is out of energy balance by 0.5 to 1.0
watts per m2 (more in than out), implying that
even if no new greenhouse gases were emitted by
human activity, the earths surface would warm by
0.4 0.7 degrees C.
33Global Climate Change - Science
- Hansen (Sci. Am. Mar 04) The growth rate of
greenhouse gas forcing has slowed since the
1980s due to fewer chlorofluorocarbon emissions
and a slower growth rate in methane emissions. - NOAA in 2004 found that CO2 concentrations in the
atmosphere increased by 3 parts per million in
2003, considerably faster than the average rate
of 1.8 ppm over the past decade.
34Global Climate Change - Science
- If current trends continue, what will happen to
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, and
how might that affect global average temperatures?
35Global Climate Change - Science
- If nothing is done to slow greenhouse gas
emissions - CO2 concentrations will likely be more than 700
ppm by 2100 - Global average temperatures projected to
increase between 2.5 - 10.4F
36Stern Review (2006) Trends
- At current annual flow emissions rates, the stock
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will reach
double pre-industrial levels by 2050 - that is
550ppm CO2e - and will continue growing
thereafter. - But the annual flow of emissions is accelerating,
as fast-growing economies invest in high carbon
infrastructure and as demand for energy and
transport increases around the world. - Thus the level of 550ppm CO2e could be reached
before 2035. At this level there is at least a
77 chance - and perhaps up to a 99 chance,
depending on the climate model used - of a global
average temperature rise exceeding 2C.
37Stern Review (2006) Forecast
38Stern Review (2006) Forecast
39Global Climate Change - Science
- In April 2000 the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change stated "that there has been a
discernible human influence on global climate."
40Global Climate Change - Science
- A warming trend of about 1F has been recorded
since the late 19th century. The IPCC projects
further global warming of 2.2-10F (1.4-5.8C) by
the year 2100. This range results from
uncertainties in greenhouse gas emissions, the
possible cooling effects of atmospheric particles
such as sulfates, and the climate's response to
changes in the atmosphere.
41Global Climate Change - Science
- The IPCC states that even the low end of this
warming projection "would probably be greater
than any seen in the last 10,000 years, but the
actual annual to decadal changes would include
considerable natural variability."
42Sectoral Emissions
- What are greenhouse gas emissions by sector?
43Global Climate Change - Science
44US Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector
45Global Climate Change - Science
- For the last 150 years or so, approximately 20 to
25 percent of the increase in atmospheric carbon
dioxide concentrations have come from changes in
land use. - Examples include the clearing of forests and the
cultivation of soil for agriculture.
46Global Climate Change - Science
- When forests are cleared and cultivated, some
carbon stored in the woody matter of the trees is
emitted immediately due to burning. Other carbon
is released more slowly due to decay.
47Global Climate Change - Science
What are carbon dioxide sinks?
- Oceans (phytoplankton, coral reefs, other sea
plants and animals) - Land sequestration in trees, soil, etc.
48Global Climate Change - Science
- According to the Woods Hole Research Center,
about 100 Pg (one petagram 1 billion metric
tons) of carbon (not carbon dioxide, which is
much heavier) were released into the atmosphere
from changes in land use world-wide between 1860
and 1990.
49Global Climate Change - Science
- The annual emissions of carbon from changes in
land use have been increasing, and by the late
1980s stood at 1.6 Pg per year.
50Kaya Identity
- IPAT Impact Popul AffluenceTech
- Kaya Identity (aka Kaya Equation), a more
sophisticated version of IPAT - Anthropogenic
- CO2 emissions E A x B x C x D
http//www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_sr/?sr
c/climate/ipcc/emission/050.htm
51Kaya Identity
- Kaya Identity E A x B x C x D, where
- A Population.
- B Per capita GDP (standard of living)
- C Energy intensity (energy consumed per unit of
GDP). Reflects energy efficiency and the
sectorial make up of the economy. - D Carbon intensity (carbon emitted per unit of
energy consumed). This quantity reflects the fuel
mix of a given society.
52Kaya Identity
- Kaya Identity E A x B x C x D
- Totally differentiating this equation yields
- ?E ?A ?B ?C ?D
- Where ? means percent change in
53Kaya Identity
- Kaya Identity ?E ?A ?B ?C ?D
- Simply means that the percentage change in
anthropogenic emissions equals the sum of the
percentage changes in population, per-capita GDP,
energy intensity, and carbon intensity.
54Kaya Identity
Average Annual Percent Change 1980-1999
Source Tester et al. 2005. Sustainable Energy
Choosing Among Options (MIT Press)
55Global Climate Change - Stabilization
Stern Report (2006) Stabilizing at or below
550ppm CO2e would require global emissions to
peak in the next 10 - 20 years, and then fall at
a rate of at least 1 - 3 per year. By 2050,
global emissions would need to be around 25
below current levels. These cuts will have to be
made in the context of a world economy in 2050
that may be 3 - 4 times larger than today - so
emissions per dollar of GDP would need to be just
one quarter of current levels by 2050.
56IMPACTS Excerpts from Preparing for Change
Sept. 2002 Report by the California Regional
Assessment Group for the US Global Change
Research Program.
- The number of threatened and endangered species
in the state, already the largest in the
contiguous 48 states, could rise significantly
due these combined stresses. Extreme events, such
as floods, droughts, and wildfires may become
more frequent and intense.
57Emissions Pathways, Climate Change, and Impacts
on California Katherine Hayhoe et al. 2004
(Proceedings of the Nat. Acad. Of Sci.)
- Used two global climate models
- NCAR/DoE Parallel Climate Model (PCM)
- UK Hadley Centre Climate Model v. 3 (Had)
- Applied a high emissions A (970 ppm) and a low
emissions B (550 ppm) scenario, through 2100,
drawn from the IPCC
58Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
- Temperature
- All simulations show increases in statewide
annual average temperatures. - Avg. annual increase of 1.35 2 degrees C. by
2050. - Avg. annual increase of 2.3 5.8 degrees C. by
2100. - Summer temp. increases gt winter.
59Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
- Precipitation
- Three of four simulations project winter precip.
decreases of 15 30 , with reductions
concentrated on the North Coast and the Central
Valley, by 2100. - These results differ from previous projections
showing () precip.
60Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
Fig. 6. Winter (DJF) and summer (JJA) precip.
change for 2070-2099, relative to 1961-1990.
Geographical patterns of precipitation change are
consistent across models and scenarios, with the
greatest decreases occurring on the northwest
coast and along the eastern Central Valley and
western Sierras
61Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
- Extreme Heat and Heat-Related Mortality
- Temperature extremes increase in frequency and
magnitude, with high emissions scenario A
having the most dramatic increases. - Annual number of heatwave conditions days (3
days of temp. gt 32 degrees C.) increases under
all simulations.
62Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
Fig. 13. Change in number of days with heatwave
conditions occurring in Los Angeles, Sacramento,
Fresno and El Centro in 2070-2099 relative to the
1961-1990 average.
63Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
- Impact on CA snowpack, runoff, and water supply
- Rising temps less winter precip ? less
snowpack. - Total surface water equiv. (SWE) losses by 2100
range from 29-72 for low emissions scenario to
73-89 for high emissions scenario. - Length, severity, and frequency of extreme
droughts in the Sac R. system by 2100 increases
substantially. - Near doubling in percentage of dry years (from
32 historically to 50-64 by 2100)
64Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
Table 2. Percentage of years classified as wet,
above normal, below normal, dry, and critical for
the 19061996 historical period and simulated for
the years 20702099 for the Sacramento River
system (the 40-30-30 Four River Index)
65Emissions Pathways/CA Impacts (2004), Cont
66Global Climate Change Forecasts
Source IPCC, 2007
67Forecasted Impacts Crop Yields
Source IPCC TAR
68Risks Associated With from Global Warming
Source Parry (2001)
69Economics Supply curve for liquid fossil fuels
Peak oil is a red herring a false message of
hope that we will run out of oil, thereby
restricting consumption and greenhouse gas
emissions from liquid fossil fuels.
70Supply will not constrain consumption
Previous slide EOR Enhanced oil recovery GTL
Gas to liquid (i.e., convert natural gas to
liquid fuel) CTL Coal to liquid (i.e.,
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis) The point of the
previous slide is that there is a very large,
upward-sloping supply curve of existing liquid
fossil fuels that go well beyond conventional
oil. Most of these imply much more carbon dioxide
emissions than conventional oil. Supply will not
constrain consumption we must use economic
instruments such as taxes or cap and trade to
limit consumption of liquid fossil fuels.
71Liquid fossil fuels have big greenhouse gas
emissions
72Economics
Estimated effect of different carbon charges on
the price-competitiveness of renewable energy.
Source EPRI, in NYT 07 Nov 2007.
73Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review (UK Govt sponsored
independent report) on the economics of climate
change - Examines the evidence on the economic impacts of
climate change. - Explores the economics of stabilizing greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere.
74Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review key finding
- The benefits of strong, early action on climate
change outweigh the costs.
75Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review key finding
- It is not possible to predict the consequences
of climate change with complete certainty, but
enough is known to understand the risks. - Mitigation - taking strong action to reduce
emissions should be viewed as an investment, a
cost incurred now and in the coming few decades
to avoid the risks of very severe consequences in
the future.
76Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Ignoring climate change will eventually damage
economic growth. - Our actions over the coming few decades could
create risks of major disruption to economic and
social activity, later in this century and in the
next, on a scale similar to those associated with
the great wars and the economic depression of the
first half of the 20th century. - It will be difficult or impossible to reverse
these changes.
77Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Climate change poses a grave threat to lower
income countries due to - Geography (already in warm areas).
- Ag dependent economies, and ag will be heavily
impacted by climate change. - Lack money for mitigations.
78Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Climate change may initially have small positive
effects for a few rich countries in high
latitudes, but is likely to be very damaging for
the much higher temperature increases expected by
mid- to late-century under BAU scenarios.
79Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- With 5-6C warming - which is a real possibility
for the next century - existing models that
include the risk of abrupt and large-scale
climate change estimate an average 5-10 loss in
global GDP, with poor countries suffering costs
in excess of 10 of GDP.
80Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Estimate that the total cost over the next two
centuries of climate change associated under BAU
emissions involves impacts and risks that are
equivalent to an average reduction in global
per-capita consumption of at least 5, now and
forever.
81Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Including direct impacts on the environment and
human health (non-market impacts) increases the
estimate of the total cost of climate change on
this path from 5 to 11 of global per-capita
consumption.
82Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- A disproportionate share of the climate-change
burden falls on poor regions of the world. If we
weight this unequal burden appropriately, the
estimated global cost of climate change at 5-6C
warming could be more than one-quarter higher
than without such weights.
83Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Estimates that the annual costs of stabilization
at 500-550ppm CO2e to be around 1 of GDP by 2050
- a level that is significant but manageable.
84Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Four ways to reduce emissions
- Reduced demand for emissions-intensive goods and
services - Increased efficiency, which can save both money
and emissions
85Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Four ways to reduce emissions
- Action on non-energy emissions, such as avoiding
deforestation - Switching to lower-carbon technologies for power,
heat and transport
86Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Studies by the International Energy Agency show
that, by 2050, energy efficiency has the
potential to be the biggest single source of
emissions savings in the energy sector. This
would have both environmental and economic
benefits energy-efficiency measures cut waste
and often save money.
87Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Action to prevent further deforestation would be
relatively cheap compared with other types of
mitigation. - The power sector around the world will have to
be least 60, and perhaps as much as 75,
decarbonized by 2050 to stabilize at or below
550ppm CO2e. - Deep cuts in the transport sector are likely to
be more difficult in the shorter term, but will
ultimately be needed.
88Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- Estimates based on the likely costs of these
methods of emissions reduction show that the
annual costs of stabilizing at around 550ppm CO2e
are likely to be around 1 of global GDP by 2050,
with a range from 1 (net gains) to 3.5 of GDP.
89Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review detailed findings
- This range of estimated costs was largely
validated by macroeconomic modeling (the range of
cost there was also centered on 1 of annual GDP,
with a range of -2 (i.e., a benefit) to 5 of
annual GDP).
90Global Climate Change Economics
- 2006 Stern Review critique
- Many economists criticize the Stern Reviews use
of a zero percent discount rate ie., valuing
future impacts the same as today.
91California Climate Risk and Response
Fredrich Kahrl and David Roland-Holst, Dept Ag
and NR Econ Research Paper No. 08102801,
UC-Berkeley, Nov 2008
92California Climate Risk and Response
- Climate response mitigation to prevent the
worst impacts and adaptation to climate change
that is unavoidable on the other hand, can be
executed for a fraction of these net costs by
strategic deployment of existing resources for
infrastructure renewal/replacement and
significant private investments that would
enhance both employment and productivity.
Fredrich Kahrl and David Roland-Holst, Dept Ag
and NR Econ Research Paper No. 08102801,
UC-Berkeley, Nov 2008
93California Climate Risk and Response
- At the sector level, there will be some very
significant adjustment challenges, requiring as
much foresight and policy discipline as the state
can mobilize. In this context, the political
challenges may be much greater than the economic
ones. - The states adaptation capacity depends upon
flexibility, but divergence between public and
private interests may limit this flexibility. As
in the current financial dilemma, resolving this
will require determined leadership.
Fredrich Kahrl and David Roland-Holst, Dept Ag
and NR Econ Research Paper No. 08102801,
UC-Berkeley, Nov 2008
94California Climate Risk and Response
- Despite the extent and high quality of existing
climate research reviewed in this document, the
degree of uncertainty regarding many important
adjustment challenges remains very high. - This uncertainly is costly, increasing the risk
of both public and private mistakes and the
deferral of necessary adaptation decisions. - Improving research and understanding of climate
effects may itself be costly and difficult, but
policymakers must have better visibility
regarding climate risk and response options.
Fredrich Kahrl and David Roland-Holst, Dept Ag
and NR Econ Research Paper No. 08102801,
UC-Berkeley, Nov 2008
95Global Climate Change Economics
96Global Climate Change Economics
- According to a study by Burtraw and Toman (1998),
climate change policy to reduce emissions of
greenhouse gases (GHGs) may also reap
environmental co-benefits by reducing emissions
of other conventional pollutants. - These co-benefits, are realized immediately and
could be on the order of 30 percent of the
incremental cost of GHG reduction.
97Global Climate Change Economics
- De Leo et al. (Nature 413 478-79, 2001)
- They evaluated the economic cost of Italy
meeting the Kyoto Protocol (6.5 reduction in CO2
by 2010). - They included in their analysis the current or
co-benefits from reducing CO2 less sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide,
mercury, etc., based on estimates of average
external cost per unit of pollutant.
98Global Climate Change Economics
- De Leo et al. (Nature 413 478-79, 2001)
- They identified the mix of fuel and energy
sources that would meet Italys Kyoto target at
minimum social cost. - In evaluating Italys current fuel mix versus
the mix that meets the Kyoto target, they
included avoided external costs to human health,
agriculture, material goods, and ecosystems.
99Global Climate Change Economics
- De Leo et al. (Nature 413 478-79, 2001)
- Based on an average global cost of 30 euros per
ton of carbon dioxide, it would be advantageous
economically for Italy to change its power
generation strategy to comply with Kyoto.
Scenario BAU Kyoto implies a 17 reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions and 1800 x 106 in
external cost savings, but a private cost
increase of 300 x 106 to industry, yielding a net
cost saving of 1500 x 106.
100Global Climate Change Economics
- De Leo et al. (Nature 413 478-79, 2001)
- This is achieved with a fuel mix using more gas,
less coal, more renewable sources, and more
co-generation (combining electric and formerly
waste thermal energy). - Implementing the MSC scenario would entail an
even larger social cost savings, 2 billion euros
per year.
101Global Climate Change Economics
- De Leo et al. (Nature 413 478-79, 2001)
- Note Even if one totally excludes the 30 euros
per ton of carbon dioxide from external cost,
there is still a net social cost savings of 918 x
106 per year, as the increase in private costs
(548 x 106) is more than offset by the decrease
in external cost (1466 x 106).
102Global Climate Change Economics
- De Leo et al. (Nature 413 478-79, 2001)
- Conclusion Co-benefits of reducing local and
regional air pollution and related external costs
is a sufficient reason to cut the combustion of
fuels responsible for global warming to the
extent necessary to meet Kyoto targets for Italy.
103Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- In December 1997 the Third Conference of Parties
adopted the Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change in Kyoto, Japan. The
Kyoto Protocol commits Annex I Parties to
individual, legally-binding targets to limit or
reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, adding up
to a total cut of at least 5 from 1990 levels in
the period 2008-2012. The individual targets for
Annex I Parties are listed in the Kyoto
Protocol's Annex B, and range from an 8 percent
cut for the European Union (EU) and several other
countries, to a 10 percent increase for Iceland.
104Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- The rules for entry into force of the Kyoto
Protocol require 55 Parties to the Convention to
ratify (or approve, accept, or accede to) the
Protocol, including Annex I Parties accounting
for 55 of that groups carbon dioxide emissions
in 1990.
105Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- 4 November 2004 -- President Vladimir Putin of
Russia signed the federal law to ratify the Kyoto
Protocol. This follows ratification of the
Protocol by the State Duma (22 October) and the
Federation Council (27 October). The Kyoto
Protocol entered into force 90 days after
Russia's instrument of ratification was received.
106Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- The Kyoto Protocol also establishes three
incentive-based economic instruments that are
designed to help Annex B countries reduce the
cost of meeting their emissions targets. These
instruments are joint implementation, emissions
trading, and the clean development mechanism.
These instruments allow Annex I countries to meet
their emissions target by either producing or
acquiring emissions reductions in other
countries, most commonly lower-income developing
countries.
107Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- In brief, Joint Implementation occurs when a
donor country invests in pollution abatement
measures in a host country in return for
credits which it may use in meeting its own
pollution abatement targets. In the Kyoto
Protocol, JI occurs between Annex I countries
(industrialized countries) that have emissions
reduction targets.
108Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), where
hosts do not have emissions targets (non-Annex I
countries).
109Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- The Clean Development Mechanism was envisioned to
perform a three-fold function - To assist non-Annex 1 countries in achieving
sustainable development - To contribute to the ultimate goal of the
convention i.e., stabilization of greenhouse gas
concentrations in the atmosphere - To help Annex 1 countries comply with their
emission reduction commitments.
110Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
- Results in buyer receiving Certified Emissions
Reductions (CERs) from the seller.
111Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- The International Rivers Network and CDM Watch
produced a report in October 2002 on the use of
hydropower projects in the CDM. The report
Damming the CDM shows that big hydro
threatens the effectiveness and credibility of
the CDM, and risks undermining the entire Kyoto
Protocol by providing carbon reduction credits
for projects that dont actually reduce emissions.
112Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- Recent examples of CDM deals brokered by CO2e (a
div. of Cantor) - Oct 04 Three sugarcane waste-fired electricity
generation facilities in Brazil generated CERs
to a European company that funded the facility
through the CDM, for use in the EUs emission
trading scheme (ETS). - Aug 04 A swine waste digester/methane
combustion facility in Chile generated CERs to
Canadian and Japanese utilities that funded the
facility through the CDM. Reduced over 400,000
tonnes of greenhouse gases reduced per year.
113Global Climate Change Kyoto Protocol
- Emissions Trading
- The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme up
and running in Jan. 2005 - Mandatory emissions limits on all big
industrial and energy intensive businesses by
2005 - These limits were too small too many carbon
credits initially granted. - Exploring long-term rules for trading outside
EU
114Global Climate Change Economic Policies
- The Stern Report (2006) suggests three economic
policies are required to shift away from
business-as-usual and stabilize carbon equivalent
emissions
115Stern Report Economic Policies
- 1. Establishing a carbon price, either directly
through a tax or through a cap-and-trade program,
or indirectly through command-and-control
regulation, is an essential foundation for
climate-change policy.
116Stern Report Economic Policies
- A stable carbon price policy will be necessary
for companies (and consumers) to invest in new
more carbon-efficient products and technologies.
And the knowledge gained from research and
development is a public good companies may
under-invest in projects with a big social payoff
if they fear they will be unable to capture the
full benefits. Thus there are good economic
reasons to promote new technology directly.
117Stern Report Economic Policies
- There are likely to be high returns to a doubling
of investments in this area to around 20 billion
per annum globally, to support the development of
a diverse portfolio of technologies.
118Stern Report Economic Policies
- 2. The second element of climate-change policy is
technology policy, covering the full spectrum
from research and development, to demonstration
and early stage deployment.
119Stern Report Economic Policies
- 3. The third element is the removal of barriers
to behavioral change. Even where measures to
reduce emissions are cost-effective, there may be
barriers preventing action. These include a lack
of reliable information, transaction costs, and
behavioral and organizational inertia. The impact
of these barriers can be most clearly seen in the
frequent failure to realize the potential for
cost-effective energy efficiency measures.
120Stern Report Economic Policies
- Minimum efficiency standards for buildings and
appliances have proved a cost-effective way to
improve performance, where price signals alone
may be too muted to have a significant impact. - Information policies, including labeling and the
sharing of best practice, can help consumers and
businesses make sound decisions.
121Vehicle Energy Efficiency Standards
Source WRI, 2006
122Stern Report Economic Policies
- An effective response to climate change will
depend on creating the conditions for
international collective action. - Creating a broadly similar carbon price signal
around the world, and using carbon finance to
accelerate action in developing countries, are
urgent priorities for international co-operation.
123GHG Proposals in 110th Congress
124Europe
- The EU aims to commit itself, as part of an
international climate protection agreement, to a
30 reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions by
2020 (compared with 1990). - Until a new agreement is concluded, and without
prejudice to its position in international
negotiations, the EU will reduce its emissions by
at least 20 by 2020 (compared with 1990).
EU GHG Trends and Projections (1990 100)
125EU Country Distance to Target
Source EU Environment Agency
126Californias AB 32
The Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32), which
was signed into law September 2006 and mandates a
first-in-the-nation limit on emissions that cause
global warming, requires that the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) put an implementation plan
(Scoping Plan) in place by January 2009.
Scoping Plan A policy roadmap to meet the
annual emissions reduction target of 169 Million
Metric Tons of Carbon equivalent (MMTCO2e) by
2020 to stabilize annual emissions at 427 MMTCO2e
overall.
127Economic Impacts of Scoping Plan
Multiple studies have been conducted assessing
the economic impacts of CARBs Scoping Plan.
CARBs own economic analysis using the
Environmental Dynamic Revenue Assessment (E-DRAM)
model projects that the states proposed package
of policies will increase overall CA personal
income by 14 billion, overall gross state
product by 4 billion, and result in the creation
of 100,000 additional CA jobs.
Fredrich Kahrl and David Roland-Holst, Dept Ag
and NR Econ Research Paper No. 08102801,
UC-Berkeley, Nov 2008
128Economic Impacts of Scoping Plan
Using the Berkeley Energy and Resources (BEAR)
Model, we find that if California improves energy
efficiency by just 1 percent per year, proposed
state climate policies will increase the Gross
State Product (GSP) by approximately 76 billion,
increase real household incomes by up to 48
billion and create as many as 403,000 new jobs.
Fredrich Kahrl and David Roland-Holst, Dept Ag
and NR Econ Research Paper No. 08102801,
UC-Berkeley, Nov 2008
129AB 32 and Regional Partnerships
Problem Leakage of CO2e-intensive production to
other states or countries. Solution
Ultimately, a world-wide CO2e emissions
reduction. Intermediate step A region-wide
(Western Climate Initiative) CO2e reduction
strategy. Plan WCI region-wide cap and trade
program http//www.westernclimateinitiative.org/e
webeditpro/items/O104F18808.PDF
130(No Transcript)
131Other Regional Initiatives
EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) First regional
CO2e initiative. Operates under auspices of Kyoto
Protocol. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
(RGGI) First regional CO2e initiative in US.
Began in Sept. 2008. Ten states participate in
RGGI Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
132RGGI
Through laws and/or rules, each state limits
emissions of CO2 from electric power plants,
creates CO2 allowances and establishes the
state's participation in CO2 allowance auctions.
A "Model Rule" drafted jointly by the states
provided a coordinating framework as individual
states developed their laws, rules or
regulations. Regulated power plants will be able
to use a CO2 allowance issued by any of the ten
participating states to demonstrate compliance
with an individual state program. In this manner,
the ten individual state programs, in aggregate,
will function as a single regional compliance
market for CO2 emissions.
133RGGI
The majority of CO2 allowances issued by each
participating state are distributed through
quarterly auctions. Cap and Auction is a
hybrid of cap and trade and a carbon tax. The
regulatory agency auctions allowances to
regulated emitters. Revenue from auction can be
used to offset adverse impacts on lower-income
people, to subsidize renewable energy or energy
efficiency programs, etc.