Aligning Serious Case Reviews and Serious Untoward Incidents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Aligning Serious Case Reviews and Serious Untoward Incidents

Description:

SUI Co-ordinator informs NHS London and relevant PCT of potential SUIs ... Co-investigate Level 1b SUIs if significant issues re children ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: pea126
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aligning Serious Case Reviews and Serious Untoward Incidents


1
Aligning Serious Case Reviews and Serious
Untoward Incidents
  • Jan Pearson, Associate Director for Safeguarding
    Children and
  • Eirlys Evans, Associate Director for Assurance
  • East London NHS Foundation Trust
  • London Mini-Conference February 2008

2
Trust Incident Policy has Responded to
Independent Recommendations
  • The Trust should review its SUI process including
    how it links with the LSCB SCR process, creating
    clear lines of accountability, policy, procedures
    and guidelines for panel members, staff and the
    public. Specialist note takers should assist them
    in the process.
  • The Trust should take steps to conform with your
    policy that follows any serious incident, those
    involved in both the incident and its management
    should be thoroughly debriefed and any lessons
    should be widely disseminated.

3
Level 1a investigation
SUIs / SCRs
SUIs affecting children or parents
SUIs
Level 1a or Level 1b investigation
Clinical Reviews affecting children or parents
Clinical Reviews
Level 2 investigation
Incidents reported not involving
children/parents/ pregnant women No further action
All incidents involving children/parents/
pregnant women Brief follow-up by SCT
4
Summary of Trust Incident Process
  • Electronic reporting form on Datix used by all
    services
  • Completed form sent to Assurance Dept
    electronically
  • - Within 2 hours for a potential SUI
  • - Within 24 hours for all other incidents
  • Incidents with children/parent boxes ticked
    forwarded automatically to Safeguarding Children
    Team (SCT) (see later slide) - SUI Coordinator
    alerts SCT to the most serious and staff may have
    also alerted SCT
  • SUI Co-ordinator informs NHS London and relevant
    PCT of potential SUIs
  • Service must provide a 72 hour report for
    potential SUIs

5
Level of Investigations
  • Level of investigation determined by Medical
    Director/Head of Nursing if implications for
    children may be discussed with SCT
  • Level 1a or 1b (graded 8-25) are SUIs and are
    reported to NHS London
  • Level 2 (graded 2-7) clinical or
    incident/non-clinical review
  • Level 1a is SCR level so SUI report is also an
    IMR
  • Level 1a panels determined by Medical
    Director/Head of Nursing
  • Level 1b Borough Director commissions
    investigators from outside the service area
  • Level 2 Borough Director allocates one or more
    local investigators
  • SCT could be involved in investigations at all
    levels

6
Excerpt from Incident Form
7
The Safeguarding Children Team (SCT)
  • Full time Associate Director for Safeguarding
    Children
  • 3 full time Named Nurses/Professionals one in
    each borough
  • - City and Hackney
  • - Newham
  • - Tower Hamlets
  • 3 sessional Named Doctors (all CAMHS) one per
    borough

8
Role of Safeguarding Children Team
  • Follow up all incidents where relevant boxes are
    ticked
  • Send brief findings to SUI Co-ordinator and NFA
    or use info for further investigation
  • Sit on all Level 1a SUI panels which are also SCR
    IMRs
  • Involve Childrens Social Care/LSCB rep on panel
    if appropriate
  • Co-investigate Level 1b SUIs if significant
    issues re children
  • Co-investigate or offer advice for Level 2
    Clinical Reviews if significant issues re
    children
  • Often prepare chronology
  • Often write IMR/SUI Report
  • Sit on LSCB SCR Panel
  • Liaise with key Trust personnel in Assurance,
    Legal, Corporate, Communications etc
  • Liaise between Trust and LSCB
  • Provide feedback from LSCB for NHS London if
    required

9
Timescale Issues for Level 1 SUIs/IMRs
  • 72 hour report to NHS London written by service
  • 60 working days (ie 12 weeks or 3 months) for
    final IMR/SUI Report
  • Allocating panel members should happen within 2
    weeks of incident
  • Convening panel after that can cause delay
  • Aligning timeframe with LSCB deadlines
  • Report has to go to Trust Board before released
    to LSCB

10
Written Report Issues
  • 3 LSCB and 1 Trust format for chronology/report/ac
    tion plan
  • Enabling report to serve two purposes
  • Font
  • Date style
  • Word or excel spreadsheet
  • Turn final report from word into pdf so it cannot
    be changed

11
IMR Investigation Process
  • Look at case files only or interview staff?
  • Panel or one investigator only?
  • Contacting family direct or via police family
    liaison officers
  • If and when interview family members?
  • Providing ongoing information about process to
    staff and family
  • Do staff have access to the case notes before and
    at interview?
  • Do staff prepare a written statement for panel?
  • Are staff given a copy of the chronology for
    clarification at interview?
  • Are interviews minuted?
  • Are minutes shared with interviewees for
    correcting?
  • Should panel meet with clinical teams as well as
    interview individuals?
  • Is draft report shared with interviewees
    individually or as a group for accuracy/tone?
  • Is the report emailed or copy given out and taken
    back in on day?

12
LSCB Process
  • Planning at outset crucial
  • Clarity of tasks/decisions at LSCB SCR Panel
    meetings
  • Opportunity for individual agencies to discuss
    their reports with overview authors?
  • Timescales for releasing IMR to LSCB

13
Report Recommendations
  • Making them SMART so services can implement an
    Action Plan
  • Should all IMR/SUI recommendations be
    incorporated into the SCR Overview report?
  • Ensuring Trust has a system for monitoring
    internal and external recommendations

14
Action Plans
  • Service should draw up action plan to respond to
    recommendations some are service specific some
    are corporate
  • Service and SCT provides progress reports
  • AP Progress Report monitored by Borough Clinical
    Governance Committee and Trust Safeguarding
    Children Committee
  • SCT takes progress report to LSCB SCR Committee
    for sign off
  • Some PCTs also monitor at inter health trust
    Safeguarding Children Strategy Group

15
External Monitoring
  • If PCT reports an SCR incident to NHS London on
    behalf of all local health trusts how to ensure
    own Trust has it logged in own system is the
    fact of doing an SCR the incident to be reported?
  • Closed cases are not covered by our SUI policy so
    technically LSCB needs to formally request Trust
    involvement in SCR
  • NHS London receives Trusts IMR/SUI Report and
    Chronology who should send them the SCR
    Overview report?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com