Open Market Price Searchers or Monopolistic Competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Open Market Price Searchers or Monopolistic Competition

Description:

Open Market Price Searchers or 'Monopolistic Competition' Description ... Essentially the same as 'closed-market price searchers' or monopolies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: tims61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Open Market Price Searchers or Monopolistic Competition


1
Lecture 17
2
Open Market Price Searchers or Monopolistic
Competition
  • Description
  • markets characterized by relatively large number
    of independent price searchers, each with some
    locational or product advantage
  • no restrictions on entry in the long run
  • Examples
  • Toothpaste
  • Soap
  • Cold remedies

3
Price and Output in the Short Run
  • Essentially the same as closed-market price
    searchers or monopolies
  • equate MR and MC to maximize profit
  • Because there are many firms producing relatively
    close substitutes demand tends to be more elastic
  • less of a difference between demand and marginal
    revenue

4
Price and Output in the Short Run
5
Price and output in the long run
  • Since there are no restrictions on entry, new
    firms will enter if existing firms are making
    positive profits in the short run
  • Entry of new firms increases the substitutes
    available to consumers
  • new firms offer slightly different products or
    locations
  • each firms demand curve becomes more elastic

6
Price and Output in the Long Run
  • With more firms in the market, less demanded from
    each individual firm
  • each firms demand curve shifts down (to the
    left)
  • Increase in number of firms bids up prices of
    inputs
  • ATC and MC increase
  • Entry continues until firms are making zero
    economic profit
  • as long as firms can do better than their
    next-bet alternative they will enter the industry

7
Comparison of Short-Run and Long-Run Price and
Output
Short Run
Long Run
P
P
MC
Profit
MC
ATC
ATC
P
P
DAR
DAR
MR
MR
Q
Q
Q
Q
  • As new firms enter, demand facing each firm is
    reduced and is more elastic.
  • Assuming an increasing cost industry, entry of
    new firms also bids up the price of
  • inputs, raising average and marginal costs.
  • Entry continues until economic profit is zero,
    so price equals ATC.
  • Even though economic profit is zero, there is
    still a welfare loss since price is
  • greater than MC.

8
Open-Market Price-SearchersLong-Run Price and
Output
Price
MC
  • Because entry and exit are free, competition
    will eventually drive prices down to the
    level of ATC. When profits (losses) are
    present, the demand curve will shift inward
    (outward) until the zero profit equilibrium
    is restored.

ATC
P
  • Again, the price searcher establishes its
    output level where MC MR.
  • At q the average total cost is equal to the
    market price. Zero economic profit is present.
    There is no tendency for firms to either
    enter or exit the market.

d
MR
q
Quantity /Time
9
Price and Output in the Long Run
  • Comparison of open-market price searcher long-run
    equilibrium with price taker long-run equilibrium
  • since there are no restrictions on entry, in both
    cases make zero profit
  • price searcher does not operate at minimum ATC
  • even though price searcher does not operate at
    min. ATC, not necessarily true that output is
    inefficient
  • must weigh higher production cost against
    increased value from variety

10
Comparing Price-Taker and Price-Searcher Markets
  • Below we illustrate the long-run equilibrium
    conditions in price taker and price searcher
    markets when entry barriers are low.
  • In both cases P ATC, and economic profits are
    equal to zero.
  • Because the price-searcher confronts a
    downward-sloping demand curve for its product,
    its profit-maximizing price exceeds marginal
    cost. In contrast with the price-takers
    market, the price-searchers output is not large
    enough to minimize ATC when the market is in
    long-run equilibrium.
  • Even though the two markets have the same cost
    structure, the price in the price-searchers
    market is higher than that for the price-taker (
    P2 gt P1 ).
  • The higher price in monopolistically competitive
    markets may simply be the premium society
    pays for variety (product differentiation).

P2
P1
q2
q1
11
Price Searcher Pricing Tactics
  • Have shown that when a price searcher charges a
    single price, not all gains from trade are
    realized
  • MC lt MV for some units that are not produced
  • Price searcher could not reap al the gains from
    trade because lowering price to increase sales
    would mean lowering price to all customers and
    decreasing profit
  • if not constrained to charge a single price, may
    be able to increase profits

12
Capturing Consumer Surplus
/Q
If price is raised above P, the firm will lose
sales and reduce profit.
Quantity
13
Capturing Consumer Surplus
  • PQ single P Q _at_ MCMR
  • A consumer surplus with P
  • B PgtMC consumer would buy
  • at a lower price
  • P1 less sales and profits
  • P2 increase sales and reduce
  • profits
  • PC competitive price

14
Capturing Consumer Surplus
Question How can the firm capture the consumer
surplus in A and sell profitably in B?
/Q
Pmax
A
P1
P
B
Answer Multipart Pricing Price Discrimination
P2
MC
PC
D
MR
Quantity
Q
15
Multipart Pricing to a Single Customer
  • Definition
  • charging lower prices for additional units (to a
    given consumer) without lowering the price on
    previous units
  • Can increase profit of firm and consumer surplus
    as well
  • efficient since both consumer and seller gain

16
Multipart Pricing to a Single Customer
/Q
Quantity
17
Multipart Pricing to a Single customer
18
Multipart pricing to a single customer
  • problems
  • need to have information about consumer demand
  • must prevent resale
  • incentive to buy additional units and sell to
    those who have not bought any

19
Multipart pricing to a single customer
  • perfect multipart pricing
  • if knew demand precisely, would want to charge
    most consumers are willing to pay for each unit

P
MC
DAR
MR
Q
20
Multipart pricing to a single customer
  • perfect multipart pricing
  • all units for which MVMC are produced and sold
  • welfare loss is eliminated
  • consumer surplus is eliminated
  • all gains from trade go to the producer

21
Multipart pricing to a single customer
  • two-part tariffs
  • similar to perfect multipart pricing
  • way of collecting all of the gains from trade
  • charge a lump-sum admission fee plus MC for
    each unit

P
Admission fee
MCAC
DAR
Q
Q
Per unit price
22
Multipart pricing to a single customer
  • two-part tariffs
  • examples
  • amusement park
  • pay to enter
  • pay for rides and food within the park
  • country club
  • pay to join
  • pay greens fee to play golf
  • problems
  • must know demand curves
  • optimal admission fee is different for consumers
    with different demands

23
(Inter-customer) Price Discrimination
  • Definition
  • charging different people different prices for
    the same good or service where the price
    differences are not based on differences in cost
  • Rationale
  • if different groups of people have different
    demands then the profit-maximizing price will be
    different for each
  • want to operate where MRMC for each group and
    charge the appropriate price to each

24
(Inter-customer) Price Discrimination
  • Rationale
  • charge higher price to group with the more
    inelastic demand
  • the more elastic the demand, the closer price is
    to MR, so that equal MR means charging lower
    prices for more elastic demanders
  • intuitively, if groups demand is more inelastic
    than average, can raise price to them without
    losing much business, so optimum price is higher

25
Example Movie Theater Pricing
/Q
Quantity
26
(Inter-customer) Price Discrimination
  • welfare effects
  • elastic group of consumers gains
  • inelastic group of consumers is made worse off
  • net effect on all consumers as a whole is
    uncertain
  • producer can potentially increase profits

27
The Economics of Price Driscrimination
  • Consider the market for airline travel where the
    MC per traveler is 100.
  • If the airline charges all customers the same
    price, profits will be maximized where MC MR
    (P 400 and q 100). Net Operating Revenue is
    equal to TR (40,000) - operating costs
    (10,000).
  • If the airline charges different prices (price
    discrimination), it will be able to increase
    net revenues. If the firm charges a higher price
    (600) to business travelers (who have a
    highly inelastic demand) and a lower price (300)
    to other travelers (who have a more elastic
    demand), it is able to increase Net Operating
    Revenue to 42,000.
  • If sellers can segment their market, they can
    gain by charging higher prices to consumers
    with a less elastic demand and offering discounts
    to those with a more elastic demand.

100
60
120
28
(Inter-customer) Price Discrimination
  • producers problems in trying to price
    discriminate
  • must be able to distinguish groups with different
    demand elasticities and determine appropriate
    price for each
  • must prevent low-price group from reselling to
    high-price group

29
(Inter-customer) Price Discrimination
  • methods of carrying out price discrimination
  • demographic characteristics
  • time of service
  • valuation of other goods

30
EndLecture 17
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com