Concurrent Interests Unit 2: Cotenant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Concurrent Interests Unit 2: Cotenant

Description:

Nature of fractional individual unitary (held. Interest share ... the lessee (lease does not bind or impair the legal rights of the non-leasing cotenant) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: brucek2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Concurrent Interests Unit 2: Cotenant


1
Concurrent InterestsUnit 2 Cotenant Third
Party Problems
  • 2009 edition

2
Six Topics
  • 1. Types Nature of Ownership Interests
  • 2. Creation
  • 3. Attributes
  • 4. Cotenant Problems
  • 5. Third Party Problems
  • 6. Termination

3
Types Nature of Ownership Interests
  • TIC JTWROS TBE
  • Nature of fractional individual unitary (held
  • Interest share joint in marriage)
  • Attributes 1 unity 4 unities 5 unities
  • Survivorship N Y
    Y
  • Severable? Y Y N
  • Partitionable? Y Y
    N

4
Cotenant Problems TIC JTWROS - SEVERANCE
  • 1. Effect of Severance
  • . TIC (cotenant substitution)
  • . JTWROS (ends ROS re severed share)
  • 2. Acts constituting severance
  • . Both - Voluntary conveyance
  • . Both - Involuntary creditor execution
  • . JT - Straw-man transfer
  • . JT - Self transfer - Riddle
  • . JT - Acts short of conveyance Harms

5
Cotenant Problems TIC JTWROS - PARTITION
  • 1. Effect of Partition
  • 2. Types (kind/sale/rent)
  • 3. Substantive standard
  • a. Default method Delfino
  • b. Factors favoring sale
  • 4. Evidentiary issues
  • 5. Special problems Fallout from a Partition
  • a. Repairs, improvements, taxes etc

6
Cotenant Problems Possession Rent
  • 1. Cotenant Possession Rent Spiller
  • a. Possession - can be exclusive per cotenant
    agreement
  • b. Rent - Not due by possessory cotenant
    unless
  • 1) rent agreement or 2) ouster
    (ouster denial of use)
  • c. Cotenant ouster cotenant rent fmv of the
    ousted

  • tenants possession

  • of premises

7
Cotenant Problems Adverse Possession
  • 2. Cotenant - Adverse Possession
  • a. Possession presumed permissive til ouster
  • (ouster denial of cotenants title)
  • b. Only after clear ouster does adverse
    possession BEGIN

8
Cotenant Third Party Problems - Rent
  • 2. Third party lease Swartzbaugh
  • a. Scenario 1 Cotenant A executes an exclusive
    lease on the premises
  • 1. Lease is not void - Cotenant B cannot cancel
    lease (or oust the lessee)
  • 2. Lease is valid only to extent of
    transferring the interest of cotenant A to the
    lessee (lease does not bind or impair the legal
    rights of the non-leasing cotenant)
  • . Cotenant B has continued possessory rights
  • . If ousted, Cotenant B is entitled to rent

9
Cotenant Third Party Problems - Rent
  • 2. Third party lease Swartzbaugh
  • a. Scenario 1 Cotenant A executes an exclusive
    lease on the premises
  • Mrss Ss options
  • 1. partition
  • 2a. co-possess the land with lessee (Samson)
  • 2b. attempt to co-possess, if ousted, Mrs S is
    entitled
  • to rent fmv of her interest in
    the leased land
  • 3. affirm Mr Ss contract and demand ½ of the
    actual
  • rent received by Mr S.
  • 4. lease her interest in the cotenant
    property to
  • Samson at a (considerably higher) rent

10
Cotenant Third Party Problems - Rent
  • 2. Third party lease Swartzbaugh
  • b. Scenario 2 Cotenant A executes an
  • non-exclusive lease on the premises (that
    transfers only his interest in the land
  • Mrss Ss options
  • 1. partition
  • 2a. co-possess the land with lessee (Samson)
  • 2b. attempt to co-possess, if ousted, Mrs S is
    entitled
  • to rent fmv of her interest in
    the leased land
  • 3. lease her interest in the cotenant
    property to
  • Samson at a (considerably higher) rent

11
Cotenant Problems Profits Nonrenewable
Extractions
  • 3. Profits (A Prendre) Nonrenewable
    extractions
  • a. Example Cotenant A mines and sells sand from
    premises extraction permanently reduces value
    of land
  • b. Usual Rule Cotenant must share NET profits
    after deducting her reasonable expenses
    (including her labor).

12
Cotenant Problems Profits Renewable Resources
  • 4. Other uses - Renewable resources
  • a. Cotenant A exclusively uses premises to grow
    corn
  • b. Usual rule Cotenant A liable to fellows for
    reasonable rental value of crop land not net
    profit on the crop.

13
Cotenant Problems Mortgage Foreclosure
  • 5. Mortgage Foreclosure. Scenario A, B C
    jointly mortgage land and later default on loan.
    Bank forecloses on mortgage and sells property at
    a foreclosure sale.
  • At the sale, cotenant A buys premises.
  • Rule Cotenant purchases property for benefit of
    all cotenants so cotenant A can demand
    contribution from B C.
  • Only if B and/or C refuse to contribute, then A
    can eject non-contributing fellow (subject to
    other rights of redemption).

14
Cotenant Problems Mortgage/Tax Payments
  • 6. Mortgage Interest/Taxes Payments
  • a. General Rule each cotenant must pay
    proportionate share
  • 1. Cotenant who may pays more entitled to
    reimbursement from fellows

15
Cotenant Problems Mortgage/Tax Payments
  • 6. Mortgage Interest/Taxes Payments
  • a. General Rule each cotenant must pay
    proportionate share
  • b. Special Rule for Cotenant in sole possession
  • 1. That cotenant responsible for carrying
    charges necessary to keep up property up to
    rental value of property after this level
    reimbursement
  • 2. Carrying charges include a) taxes, b)
    mortgage interest c) and some jurs - repairs

16
Repairs to Cotenant Property
  • Context
  • Contribution Demand
  • Rule No reimbursement
  • allowed
  • Logic Repairs voluntary
  • (business judgment)
  • Contexts
  • Accounting Action
  • Partition Action
  • Rule Reimbursement
  • allowed
  • Logic Equitable

17
Improvements to Cotenant Property
  • General Rules
  • Context
  • Contribution
  • Accounting
  • Partition
  • Rule - No reimbursement allowed
  • Logic Improvements voluntary
  • Three Special Contexts
  • 1. Rent accounting - Improver may get extra
    amount to extent improvement increases rental
    value of property
  • 2. Partition in kind Improver may get improved
    parcel
  • 3. Partition by sale - improver may get extra
    value attributable to improvement
  • Logic avoid unjust enrichment

18
A Small Cotenant Problem
  • A, B C own a house as JTWROS and the house
    has a bad
  • bathroom. Before they sell it, the house
    appraises at 150K.
  • Then cotenant A refurbishes the bathroom for 15K.
    The
  • house is then reappraised at 160K.
  • Q1 If A sues for a contribution from B and C
    how much will A recover?
  • Q2 If the house is sold in a partition by sale
    at the reappraisal
  • price how should the proceeds be divided?
  • A
  • B
  • C

19
A Small Cotenant Problem
  • A, B C own a house as JTWROS and the house
    has a bad
  • bathroom. Before they sell it, the house
    appraises at 150K.
  • Then cotenant A refurbishes the bathroom for 15K.
    The
  • house is then reappraised at 160K.
  • Q1 If A sues for a contribution from B and C
    how much will A recover? nothing
  • Q2 If the house is sold in a partition by sale
    at the reappraisal
  • price how should the proceeds be divided?
  • A 50K 10K (value - not cost)
  • B 50K
  • C 50K

20
A Larger Cotenant Problem
  • A, B and C own Blackacre as JTWROS and they
    jointly
  • mortgage the property to M Bank to build a house
    on the
  • premises. Initially all reside in the house but
    after recurring
  • fights, B and C leave. A is in sole possession
    for a year.
  • During this time A 1) cuts down 80 year old
    walnut trees and
  • sells the wood (net profit 4.5K), 2 ) plants and
    harvests a crop
  • of winter wheat on the back 40 (costs land
    3K, weed seed
  • 1K, labor 7K net profits 5K) and 3) adds a sauna
    at his own
  • expense (9K). During this time, A pays the
    mortgage (12K)
  • and taxes (3K). The annual value of As
    possession is 9K.
  • Before the sauna, the house appraises at 270K
    after 275K.
  • If A, sues for an accounting and partition by
    sale. What sums
  • are A, B and C are entitled to?

21
Cotenant Problems
  • A B C
  • Re As benefits A pays B C
  • . Rent for As Possession
  • . Tree Harvest
  • . Wheat Harvest
  • Re As burdens - B C each pay A
  • . Mortgage Payment
  • .Tax Payments
  • .Sauna (Improvement)
  • Partition

22
Cotenant Problems
  • A B C
  • Re As benefits A pays B C
  • . Rent for As Possession
    0 0
  • . Tree Harvest
    1.5 1.5 1.5
  • . Wheat Harvest
    1 1 1
  • Re As burdens - B C each pay A
  • . Mortgage Payment
    2 2 2
  • .Tax Payments (12K 3K 15K carrying
    charges 9K 6K)
  • .Sauna (Improvement)
    9 0 0
  • Partition
    95 90 90

23
  • End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com