Applications of molecular modeling in catalysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Applications of molecular modeling in catalysis

Description:

How do we apply molecular modeling to homogeneous system? e.g: Mn-salen (Jacobsen's catalyst) ... and dihedral angles. Properties of system of molecules ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:364
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: iit56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applications of molecular modeling in catalysis


1
Applications of molecular modeling in
catalysis From homogeneous to heterogeneous
by Dr. R. Mahalakshmy Young Scientist NCCR
1
2
Contents
  • What is molecular modeling?
  • How do we apply molecular modeling to homogeneous
    system?
  • e.g Mn-salen (Jacobsens catalyst)
    catalysed epoxidation of olefin
  • How do we apply molecular modeling to
    heterogeneous system?
  • e.g Epoxidation of olefin by immobilized
    Mnsalen catalyst in MCM-41

2
3
Introduction
  • What is molecular modeling?
  • It is a broadly generic term that defines the
    use of computers to study chemical systems, with
    an emphasis on the structure, properties, and
    activities of molecules.
  • Who is molecular modeler or computational
    chemist?
  • Those scientist who are specially trained in
    the technologies, techniques and tools of
    molecular modeling.
  • Computational tools
  • Both software and computer hardware
  • Computing platform Ranging from simple desktop
    computers to the use of very high performance
    super computers
  • Support tools Interface to the codes, data
    visualizers (programs that create images from the
    computed data)


3
4
Methods
  • Molecular mechanics (MM)
  • Properties of the molecule can be
    calculated by measuring the motion of the atoms
    and the changing energies of the spring.
  • ab initio quantum chemical methods
  • Based on the results of calculating the
    wavefunction, other chemical properties and
    activities can be determined.
  • (iii) Semi-empirical quantum chemical methods
  • A portion of the calculation comes from
    experimental data and the rest comes from
    mathematics.
  • (iv) Density Functional Theory (DFT)
  • Determines molecular properties from
    calculating the electron density rather than from
    the wavefunction.
  • Depending on how broadly one defines
    molecular modeling or computational chemistry,
    there are a number of other methods that can be
    considered.

4
5
Types of calculations that can be performed on
the molecule
  • Single point energies (molecular energies)
  • Molecular orbital calculations, including
    determination of
  • frontier orbitals
  • Vibrational frequency calculations
  • Reaction mechanisms and reaction path following
    studies
  • Determination of IR and UV-Vis spectra
  • Transition structures and activation energy
    diagrams
  • Electron and charge distributions
  • Potential energy surfaces (PES)
  • Thermodynamic calculations

5
6
Fundamental Uses
  • Chemical structure, or geometry of the molecule
  • Number and type of atoms, bonds, bond
    lengths, angles,
  • and dihedral angles.
  • Properties of system of molecules
  • Basic characteristics of the molecule, such as
    its
  • molecular energy, enthalpy, and vibrational
    frequencies.
  • The activity or reactivity of a molecule
  • Those characteristics that describe how the
    molecule
  • behaves in the presence of other molecules,
    such as its
  • nucleophilicity, electrophilicity, and
    electrostatic potentials.

6
7
Other uses
  • To model a molecular system prior to
    synthesizing that
  • molecule in the laboratory.
  • Understanding a problem more completely.
  • Some properties of molecule can be obtained
    computationally
  • more easily than by experimental means.
  • e.g. Molecular bonding

Anyone can do calculations nowadays. Anyone can
also operate a scalpel. That doesnt mean all
our medical problems are solved.

-Karl Irikura
7
8
Jacobsen epoxidation
Jacobsen Epoxidation Enantioselective synthesis
of epoxides from isolated alkene.
  • Jacobsen's catalyst
  • The commercially available '1994 reagent of the
    year.
  • Converts achiral olefins to chiral epoxides with
    enantiomeric
  • excesses regularly better than 90 and
    sometimes exceeding
  • 98.
  • To date, the origin of this dramatic selectivity
    has not
  • been explained.

8
9
Catalytic cycle involved in the epoxidation
Step1An oxidant transfers atomic oxygen to the
MnIII catalyst (the oxygen presumably
coordinates to the metal in a site
normal to the salen plane) Step2The activated
oxygen is then delivered to the alkene.
9
10
Three possible modes of oxygen delivery
Mechanisms of oxygen transfer from the catalyst
to the olefin
Step A Attack of an oxygen radical intermediate
on the double bond Step B
Concerted oxygen delivery Step C Formation of
a metallaoxetane intermediate
10
11
Investigation of the stereoselectivity of the
Mn(III)salen catalysed epoxidation reaction
mechanism by DFT
Highly enantioselective!!! What is its origin???
  • How can the relatively flat catalyst give such
    impressive
  • selectivity?
  • (2) What is the trajectory of approach of alkenes
    (top, side, or
  • bottom on 1) to the MnO intermediate?
  • (3) What is the timing of bond formation between
    the alkene
  • and transferred oxygen?

The above issues can be explored in more details
by computing the geometries of the
manganese-Oxo intermediate as a prelude to
transition state searches.
11
12
Computational details
Program Gaussian-94 TheoryDFT FunctionalB3LYP B
asis set Split valence double ? (DZ) basis set
3-21G Double ? plus polarisation basis set
6-31G DZ and TZ valence basis set for Mn
(C, H, Cl, N,O)
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 3, 1999
12
13
Model systems employed in calculation
2-Mn(V)
1 - Mn(III)
3 -Mn(III)
4-Mn(V)
13
13
14
Spin multiplicity
Mn(0) 3d7
Oxidation state range II to VII
Mn(III) d4 (Oh)
Low spin singlet (S0)
Intermediate spin Triplet (S1)
High spin Quintet (S2)
Mn(III) d4 (Oh)
Mn(V) d2(Oh)
Quintet (S2)
Singlet (S1)
Triplet (S1
14
15
Quintet and triplet state geometries of the
Manganese(III) model systems
1 H.S (q)
1 L.S (t)
3 H.S (t)
3 H.S (q)
15
16
Manganese(V) model compounds calculated by
the manganese triple-? basis/Becke3LYP/6-31G
2 (s) 0 kcal/mol
2 (q) 11.2 kcal/mol
2(t) 3.5 kcal/mol
4 (q) 2.0 kcal/mol
4 (s) 10.2 kcal/mol
4 (t) 0 kcal/mol
16
17
Comparison of X-ray data to calculated values
for model systems
17
18
Becke3LYP/3-21G relative energies (kcal/mol) for
model systems 1-4
The ltS2gt values measure whether the spin state is
pure singlet, triplet or quintet (S2 0, 2, 6,
resp)
18
19
Becke3LYP/6-31G (CHClNO)/DZ (Mn) relative
energies (kcal/mol) for model systems 1-4
19
20
Becke3LYP/6-31G (CHClNO)/TZ (Mn) Relative
energies (kcal/mol) for model systems 1-4
  • The Mn(III) catalysts are predicted to be high
    spin (i.e Quintet)
  • The ligand field does not split the degeneracy
    of the d orbitals significantly - No spin pairing
  • Mn(V)Oxo is predicted to have nearly degenerate
    singlet and
  • triplet states.

20
21
Conclusion
  • A low spin ( s or t) complex is favoured with
    weak coordination or
  • absence of a 6th ligand
  • A high spin (t or q) state occurs upon
    association of a stronger
  • ligand.
  • High spin oxo intermediate could lead directly
    to high spin product
  • in a concerted fashion with conservation of
    spin.
  • Low spin species would have to undergo a change
    of spin
  • multiplicity during reaction which could give
    stepwise processes.
  • Nature of the ligand will influence spin
    multiplicities and
  • potentially the relative rates of stereo
    specific concerted and
  • stepwise nonconcerted processes.

21
22
Investigation of the origin of enantioselectivity
in the epoxidation of alkenes catalysed by
anchored oxo Mn(V)-salen into MCM-41 channels
DFT and QM/MM approach
Journal of molecular catalysis A Chemical
271(2007) 98-104
22
23
Objective
  • Based on DFT and QM/MM calculations,
  • To rationalise the effect of immobilization and
    show how that
  • correlates with the linker and substrate
    choices.
  • To evaluate the enantioselectivity of the
    catalyst with respect to the
  • energy surfaces along the epoxidation
    reaction pathway.

23
24
Model systems employed in calculation
I
II
The full (I) and truncated (II) models of the
Mn-salen complex
L(axial linker) Cl-, Phenoxyl
24
25
Model systems employed in calculation
(b) The model for the immobilized Mn-salen
complexes using phenoxyl axial linkage.
  • Visualized Mn-salen complexes
  • anchored inside a MCM-41 channel
  • using phenoxyl group as the
  • immobilizing linker

25
26
Relative energies of spin states for oxo-Mn-salen
II complex vs. axial linkage (Calculated by
Mn(tz) basis using B3LYP/6-31G functional)
  • The triplet state is found to be the ground state
    for both Cl- and
  • phenoxyl linkers.
  • Epoxidation reaction for both homogeneous
    catalyst (i.e., Cl- is
  • the axial ligand) and heterogeneous catalysts
    (i.e., phenoxyl group
  • is the axial ligand) occurs on a triplet
    surface.

26
27
Effect of axial linkage on the geometry of
oxo-Mn-salen II for the triplet spin sate using
B3LYP method distances in A , angles in degrees
27
28
DFT-calculated structures for the truncated
Oxo-Mn-salen II with Cl-
Optimised structure
HOMO
LUMO
28
29
Optimized geometry of TS1 and TS2 corresponding
to the attack of TBMS for homogeneous Mn-salen
catalyst
29
30
General mechanism scheme for asymmetric
epoxidation of olefins using Mn-salen complexes,
L axial linker
30
31
Reaction profiles for the oxygen transfer
reaction on the triplet surface for homogeneous
Mn-salen catalyst
1. It is the mixture of CBMS and the catalyst in
gas phase without any interaction in
between. 2.Olefin enters the coordination sphere
of complex from the MnO center. Activation
energy for TS122 kJmol 3. Formation of radical
intermediate.(90 kJ/mol more stable than
2) Activation energy for TS235
kJ/mol 4.Formation of Epoxide complex.
Trans-?-methyl styrene (TBMS)
Cis-?-methyl styrene (CBMS)
31
32
Results of DFT calculation
  • The attack of TBMS is overall about 7 kJ/mol
    less in favour
  • compared to that in CBMS.
  • The epoxide complex formed by TBMS lies 2.5
    kJ/mol below
  • the epoxide complex formed by CBMS.
  • These findings are in agreement with a general
    assumption in
  • homogeneous Mn-salen catalyst that TBMS is a
    less suitable
  • substrate than CBMS.
  • The more stable t rans-epoxide complex 4 is in
    qualitative
  • agreement with the experimental observation that
    epoxidation of
  • CBMS leads to a thermodynamically more stable
    trans-epoxide

32
33
DFT-calculated structures for the truncated
oxo-Mn(II)salen with phenoxyl, located trans- to
the oxo group
HOMO
LUMO
33
34
Optimised geometry of the transition states TS1
and TS2 corresponding to the attack of TBMS at
the MnO center of heterogeneous Mn-salen catalyst
34
35
Energy profile for the epoxidation reaction of
CBMS and TBMS catalyzed by immobilized Mn-salen
complex.
TBMS
CBMS
35
36
Result DFT calculation for the attack of CBMS
  • The activation barrier for the formation of
    adsorbed CBMS radical is overall
  • 8 kJ/mol less than that for the homogeneous
    salen catalyst.
  • (Homogeneous catalyst 22 kJ/mol heterogeneous
    catalyst14 kJ/mol)
  • The activation energy for epoxide complex
    formation is about 5 kJ/mol
  • lowered for the immobilized Mn-salen complex
    than that for the homogeneous
  • salen catalyst.
  • (Homogeneous catalyst35 kJ/mol heterogeneous
    catalyst30 kJ/mol)
  • On the triplet energy surface, the calculations
    suggest that epoxide formation
  • is clearly more preferred by the immobilized
    catalyst compared to the
  • homogeneous catalyst.
  • These observations provide an explanation for the
    effectiveness and
  • importance of additional ligand as the
    immobilizing linker.

36
37
DFT calculation for the attack of TBMS
  • In contrast to the homogeneous epoxidation
    reaction, a trans olefin
  • can be a suitable substrate for epoxidation by
    immobilized Mn-salen catalysts.
  • Epoxide complex 4 formed of CBMS is slightly (3
    kJ/mol) more stable than its
  • trans-epoxide counterpart, despite of the fact
    that there is a lower barrier
  • (5 kJ/mol) towards epoxide formation starting
    from TBMS radical adsorbed
  • on MnO center.
  • The energy profile strongly depends on electron
    donor/acceptor properties of the
  • axial linker.

37
38
Modelling of MCM-41 silica channel
  • MCM-41 silica channel was modelled based on a
    straight, three-dimensional channel.

Pore length 3.4 nm
  • The structure was represented by the pseudo cell,
    Si6O12, consists of hexagon arrangements of
    SiOSi units.
  • Oxygen atoms saturate all silicon atoms at the
    pore surface.
  • Oxygen atoms with fewer than two silicon atoms
    attached to them (at the inlet, outlet and outer
    surface) were then saturated by hydrogen atoms.

38
39
Modelling of MCM-41 silica channel
  • This model places the silicon and oxygen atoms in
    a simple geometrical arrangement and does not
    reproduce the real amorphous structure of
    MCM-41.
  • In this MCM-41 model, all hydroxyl groups were
    located at the outer surface.
  • The pore length is 3.4 nm and the pore diameter
    is 2.3 nm.
  • Immobilization was performed by attaching the Si
    atom of the linker to oxygen atoms connected to
    two Si atoms on the wall (SiLinkerOSiMCM).

39
40
Model used for ONIUM based QM/MM calculation
  • A two-layer ONIOM protocol was used to couple
    the QM and MM parts in the full Mn-salen-L (L
    pheoxyl) calculations as well as for the
    immobilized Mn-salen catalyst into MCM-41
    channel.
  • The high-level model system includes Mn, N, O,
    carbon atoms at the bridge and the full substrate
    and linker atoms.
  • The low level calculation includes the rest of
    salen ligand and the atoms of MCM-41 channel.

40
41
Reaction profiles for the epoxidation of CBMS on
the triplet surface for Mn-salen immobilized into
MCM-41 channel using a phenoxyl linker
  • Energy barrier are lower because of the
    confinement effect inside MCM-41 channel.
  • The more restricted space inside the mesopore in
    combination with the effect of immobilizing
    linker hinders the free-movement of the attached
    olefin.
  • Besides, a full-salen ligand with substituents
    at 5, 5- and 3, 3-positions exhibits stronger
    steric influences compared to that for the model
    complex II.

41
42
Conclusions
Catalyst Suitable substrate
Main product Homogeneous
cis-olefin trans-epoxide
Heterogeneous Trans-olefin
cis-epoxide
  • Comparison of the optimized structure of the
    intermediate oxo-Mn-salen with the
  • chloride and phenoxyl linker at the
    trans-position leads to the following
  • suggestions
  • Any coordination in the trans-position causes the
    Mn atom to move into the plane
  • of the ligand.
  • The movement of the Mn atom can improve the
    enantioselectivity in view of the
  • shielding of the oxygen by the equatorial
    ligands.
  • The MnO bond becomes lengthened facilitates
    oxygen transfer to the olefin.
  • A trans-substrate has a higher level of
    asymmetric induction to the immobilized
  • Mn-salen complex than that to a homogeneous
    catalyst, but the reaction path is
  • more in favor of the cis-substrate.
  • The MCM-41 channel reduces the energy barriers
    and enhances the
  • enantioselectivity by influencing geometrical
    distortions of the Mn-salen
  • complex.

42
43
Thank U
43
44
Questions?
44
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com