Applying Creativity to Research in Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Applying Creativity to Research in Ethics

Description:

Audra, Greg, Jay, Liana. Case 5: Students' Little Helper. Alex, Carter, Evan, Korey ... Audra, Carter, Korey, Liana, Miki. Case 10: Off the Field. Chris R. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: artsa55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applying Creativity to Research in Ethics


1
(No Transcript)
2
Applying Creativity to Research in Ethics
3
What is Ethics?
  • According to Weston, ethics is to be defined as
    a concern with the basic needs and legitimate
    expectations of others as well as our own. See A
    21st Century Ethical Toolbox, 5.
  • Ethical problem-solving is not just a matter of
    finding a way out of a specific, practical fix.
    It is also an occasion to better live out our
    values and, indeed, to better the world itself.
    That is the very essence of ethics! Weston,
    Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics, 6.
  • Note the contrasting view found in Rachels, where
    the essence of morality is to let our feeling
    be guided as much as possible by reason (11).
    Rachels also provides a definition of morality
    that provides quite a different emphasis when
    contrasted with Westons definition above
    Morality is, at the very least, the effort to
    guide ones conduct by reasonthat is, to do what
    there are the best reasons for doingwhile giving
    equal weight to the interests of each individual
    affected by ones decision (13). Although not
    necessarily opposed, Westons emphases are on
    concern and creativity, while Rachels focuses on
    reason and judgment.

4
What Impedes Creativity in Ethics?
  • Relativism
  • Subjectivism
  • Dogmatism
  • Religious
  • Philosophical
  • Ethical theory?!
  • The is/ought distinction

5
The End of Ethics
  • The end of ethics does not mean that all hell
    has broken loose. It does not mean that the
    philosophers have decided to lend their voice to
    the general anarchy, to unchecked greed, the free
    flow of drugs, and widespread violence. The end
    of ethics does not mean that anything goes,
    which can now be taken to be official, because
    even the philosophers concur. The end of ethics
    means instead that for certain philosophers the
    business as usual of ethics has given out and the
    ethical verities that we all like to think are
    true, the beliefs and practices we all cherish,
    are now seen to be in a more difficult spot than
    we liked to think. The end of ethics is thus a
    moment of unvarnished honesty in which we are
    forced to concede that in ethics we are more
    likely to begin with the conclusions, with the
    ends or triumphant ethical finales we had in
    mind all along, and worry about the premises
    later. The end of ethics means that the
    premises invoked in ethical theory always come
    too late, after the fact. So if there are
    cases in the end of ethics, the cases are
    casualties, falls (casus), stumbling over
    unforeseen difficulties and obstacles, the
    accidents that strikes at us in daily life, that
    sometimes strike us down.
  • See John D. Caputo, The End of Ethics, in The
    Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, edited by Hugh
    LaFollette (Oxford Blackwell Publishing, 2000),
    111.

6
Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics
  • Chapters 2 3 Ethical Explorations
    Provocations
  • (1) get a fuller picture
  • (2) watch for suggestive facts
  • (3) get help from others including brainstorming
  • (4) compare and contrast
  • (5) invite exotic associations
  • (6) go to extremes

7
Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics
  • Chapter 4 Reframing Ethical Problems
  • (7) revisit outlying aspects of the problem
  • (8) the problem is the opportunity
  • (9) think prevention

8
For Practice Group Discussion on a Specific Case
  • 1. What are the most significant facts? What
    facts do you need to get a fuller picture? Are
    there any suggestive facts?
  • 2. What are the ethical issues or questions
    raised by this case?
  • 3. Apply the methods in Weston to your discussion
    of the case. In what ways do they open up
    alternative possibilities of thinking about the
    case? Be prepared to explain.

9
  • 4. What are the various possible positions on
    your case?
  • 5. What the arguments for these positions? Are
    they sound?
  • 6. How do you think we should best deal with this
    case?

10
UCF Ethics Bowl Teams
  • Team?
  • John-Mark, Korey, Liana, Lisa
  • Team?
  • Carter, Chris B., Greg, John B.,
  • Team?
  • Alex, Audra, Chris R., Rose, Ross
  • Team?
  • Evan, Jay, Mark, Miki

11
Discussion Groups
  • Case 3 Christian Bashing?
  • Audra, Greg, Jay, Liana
  • Case 5 Students Little Helper
  • Alex, Carter, Evan, Korey
  • Case 9 Imaginary Pundit
  • Chris B., Lisa, Miki, Ross
  • Case 12 Synthetic Meat
  • Chris R., John B., John-Mark, Mark, Rose

12
Ethical Arguments
13
Ethical Arguments
  • are not verbal fistfights in which you state
    your prejudices in a new form.
  • are not angry, contentious disputes.
  • are not personal attacks.
  • -----------------------------------------
  • are means of inquiry.
  • are amiable conversations into the truth.
  • are evaluations of ideas and a weighing of
    evidence to come to the best beliefs.

14
  • Think of argument as a way to make your own
    place within these unfolding, ongoing dialogues.
    What could be better than that? (RA xiii)
  • a research report written for any audience, is
    a conversation, imagined to be sure, but still a
    cooperative but rigorous inquiry into what we
    should and should not belief. (A Manual for
    Writers 130)
  • Research is a profoundly social activity. (The
    Craft of Research 273)
  • Thus it has a moral dimension.
  • Rule 39 Modesty, please!

15
Parts of an Argumentative Essay and Oral Argument
  • Question What is the problem?
  • What is the central ethical question raised by
    this case and how should it best be answered?
  • Claim(s) What are you claiming?
  • Rule 34 Jump right in
  • Rule 35 Make a definite claim or proposal
  • Reasons What are your reasons?
  • Evidence What evidence supports your reasons?
  • Acknowledgements/Objections and Responses But
    what about other points of view?
  • Warrants How are your reasons relevant to your
    claims?

16
For Practice Group Discussion on a Specific Case
  • 1. What is the central ethical question raised by
    this case? Are there related ethical issues?
  • 2. What are the most significant facts? What
    facts do you need to get a fuller picture? Are
    there any suggestive facts?
  • 3. Apply the methods in Weston to your discussion
    of the case. In what ways do they open up
    alternative possibilities of thinking about the
    case?
  • 4. What are the various possible positions on
    your case?
  • 5. What the arguments for these positions? Are
    they sound?
  • 6. How do you think we should best deal with this
    case? In other words, what do you claim is the
    answer to the question?

17
Discussion Groups
  • Case 1 Sexting
  • Alex, John-Mark, Mark, Ross,
  • Case 4 Testing Virtue
  • Audra, Carter, Korey, Liana, Miki
  • Case 10 Off the Field
  • Chris R., Evan, Greg, Rose
  • Case 13 Medical Pros Role in Torture
  • Chris B., Jay, John, Lisa

18
UCF Ethics Bowl Teams
  • Team?
  • John-Mark, Korey, Liana, Lisa
  • Team?
  • Carter, Chris B., Greg, John B.,
  • Team?
  • Alex, Audra, Chris R., Rose, Ross
  • Team?
  • Evan, Jay, Mark, Miki

19
UCF Ethics Bowl Teams
  • What is your team name?
  • Who will have primary responsibility for each
    case? Secondary responsibility?
  • What will your strategy be?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com