Using the Missouri P index - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Using the Missouri P index

Description:

Using the Missouri P index. John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences ... Many streams and lakes are phosphorus limited. Jones and Knowlton 1993 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:158
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Lor57
Category:
Tags: index | lory | missouri | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using the Missouri P index


1
Using the Missouri P index
  • John A. Lory, Ph.D.
  • Division of Plant Sciences
  • Commercial Agriculture Program
  • University of Missouri

2
Many streams and lakes are phosphorus limited.
Missouri reservoirs
Water Clarity as measured by Secchi depth (m)
Jones and Knowlton 1993
3
Challenge Where, when, and how to
apply manure to minimize P loss to surface
water.
4
Nutrient planners are required to assess
phosphorus loss on all fields receiving manure.
5
Phosphorus Loss Assessment
No Manure Applications
Very High
High
P-based Applications
N-based Applications
Medium
N-based Applications
Low
6
You choose the method
  • Agronomic soil test recommendation
  • Objective does the crop need P?
  • Phosphorus threshold
  • Phosphorus Index
  • Objective will applied P be vulnerable to
    losses?

7
Missouris approach 2 choices
  • Agronomic soil test recommendation
  • Objective does the crop need P?
  • Phosphorus threshold
  • Phosphorus Index
  • Objective will applied P be vulnerable to
    losses?

8
Soil testing objective
Determine crop needs for phosphorus (P) to
maximize yield.
Dry Matter (g)
Critical value 43 lb/ac
Soil Test P (lb acre-1)
9
Soil testing objective
The critical value is the lowest soil test
level where no response to fertilizer is expected.
Critical Value
High
Very High
Low
Medium
Yield
Soil test P
10
Soil testing objective
Critical soil test P 40 or 45 lbs P/acre
Critical Value
High
Very High
Low
Medium
Yield
Soil test P
11
Soil testing objective
Critical soil test P 40 or 45 lbs P/acre
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
No Manure Applications
Very High
High
P-based Applications
N-based Applications
Medium
N-based Applications
Low
17
Missouris approach 2 choices
  • Agronomic soil test recommendation
  • Objective does the crop need P?
  • Phosphorus threshold
  • Phosphorus Index
  • Objective will applied P be vulnerable to
    losses?

18
Factors affecting runoff of P
  • Runoff volume
  • Method of application
  • Time since application
  • Application rate
  • Soil test P
  • Soil type
  • Cultivation
  • Vegetative cover

19
P indexes are state specific.
Index Target
  • Runoff
  • Leaching
  • Runoff
  • Irrigation
  • Runoff
  • Irrigation

Long-term Runoff
20
P indexes are state specific.
Approach
Simplified model
Multiplicative tabular factors
Additive tabular factors
Simplified model
21
Do Differences Between StatesMake Sense?
?
22
  • P index developed cooperatively by MU and NRCS.
  • Based on best professional judgment.
  • Available as a spreadsheet at http//nmplanner.mi
    ssouri.edu/

23
(No Transcript)
24
Missouri P index objectives
  • Strategic planning tool for use in writing a
    5-year nutrient management plan.
  • Identify fields where field characteristics are
    likely to result in high P loss in runoff.
  • Simple to use with readily available information
    for people with an NRCS conservation plan.

25
6 Factors in the Missouri P index
  • Soil test result
  • include units and sampling depth
  • Tillage
  • Tilled vs. notill and forages
  • RUSLE estimate of erosion
  • Land cover
  • Soil hydrologic group
  • A, B, C or D
  • Distance from water feature

26
Simple model approach
  • Sediment P
  • Function of RUSLE-2 erosion, soil test P and
    sediment delivery ratio.
  • Soluble P
  • Function of runoff volume (curve number approach)
    and soil test P.

27
(No Transcript)
28
Higher standard in the clear-water region of the
state.
29
P index rating system
Rating Clear-water region
Other Low lt1 lt3 Medium gt1 and lt5
gt3 and lt7 High gt5 and lt10 gt7 and lt12 Very
High gt10 gt12
30
Higher standard in the clear-water region of the
state.
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Surface applications require a tactical tool.
  • Educational tools being developed to identify
    times of year runoff least likely
  • Inputs
  • Ground cover - County
  • Soil hydrologic group - Soil condition
  • Soil moisture
  • Output
  • Evaluation of runoff risk (low, medium, high)
  • Predicted rainfall amount needed to initiate
    runoff

35
Future
  • P index integrated into RUSLE 2
  • Email notification system to help evaluate timing
    of manure applications.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com