Title: Using the Missouri P index
1Using the Missouri P index
- John A. Lory, Ph.D.
- Division of Plant Sciences
- Commercial Agriculture Program
- University of Missouri
2Many streams and lakes are phosphorus limited.
Missouri reservoirs
Water Clarity as measured by Secchi depth (m)
Jones and Knowlton 1993
3Challenge Where, when, and how to
apply manure to minimize P loss to surface
water.
4Nutrient planners are required to assess
phosphorus loss on all fields receiving manure.
5Phosphorus Loss Assessment
No Manure Applications
Very High
High
P-based Applications
N-based Applications
Medium
N-based Applications
Low
6You choose the method
- Agronomic soil test recommendation
- Objective does the crop need P?
- Phosphorus threshold
- Phosphorus Index
- Objective will applied P be vulnerable to
losses?
7Missouris approach 2 choices
- Agronomic soil test recommendation
- Objective does the crop need P?
- Phosphorus threshold
- Phosphorus Index
- Objective will applied P be vulnerable to
losses?
8Soil testing objective
Determine crop needs for phosphorus (P) to
maximize yield.
Dry Matter (g)
Critical value 43 lb/ac
Soil Test P (lb acre-1)
9Soil testing objective
The critical value is the lowest soil test
level where no response to fertilizer is expected.
Critical Value
High
Very High
Low
Medium
Yield
Soil test P
10Soil testing objective
Critical soil test P 40 or 45 lbs P/acre
Critical Value
High
Very High
Low
Medium
Yield
Soil test P
11Soil testing objective
Critical soil test P 40 or 45 lbs P/acre
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16No Manure Applications
Very High
High
P-based Applications
N-based Applications
Medium
N-based Applications
Low
17Missouris approach 2 choices
- Agronomic soil test recommendation
- Objective does the crop need P?
- Phosphorus threshold
- Phosphorus Index
- Objective will applied P be vulnerable to
losses?
18Factors affecting runoff of P
- Runoff volume
- Method of application
- Time since application
- Application rate
- Soil test P
- Soil type
- Cultivation
- Vegetative cover
19P indexes are state specific.
Index Target
Long-term Runoff
20P indexes are state specific.
Approach
Simplified model
Multiplicative tabular factors
Additive tabular factors
Simplified model
21Do Differences Between StatesMake Sense?
?
22- P index developed cooperatively by MU and NRCS.
- Based on best professional judgment.
- Available as a spreadsheet at http//nmplanner.mi
ssouri.edu/
23(No Transcript)
24Missouri P index objectives
- Strategic planning tool for use in writing a
5-year nutrient management plan. - Identify fields where field characteristics are
likely to result in high P loss in runoff. - Simple to use with readily available information
for people with an NRCS conservation plan.
256 Factors in the Missouri P index
- Soil test result
- include units and sampling depth
- Tillage
- Tilled vs. notill and forages
- RUSLE estimate of erosion
- Land cover
- Soil hydrologic group
- A, B, C or D
- Distance from water feature
26Simple model approach
- Sediment P
- Function of RUSLE-2 erosion, soil test P and
sediment delivery ratio. - Soluble P
- Function of runoff volume (curve number approach)
and soil test P.
27(No Transcript)
28Higher standard in the clear-water region of the
state.
29P index rating system
Rating Clear-water region
Other Low lt1 lt3 Medium gt1 and lt5
gt3 and lt7 High gt5 and lt10 gt7 and lt12 Very
High gt10 gt12
30Higher standard in the clear-water region of the
state.
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34Surface applications require a tactical tool.
- Educational tools being developed to identify
times of year runoff least likely - Inputs
- Ground cover - County
- Soil hydrologic group - Soil condition
- Soil moisture
- Output
- Evaluation of runoff risk (low, medium, high)
- Predicted rainfall amount needed to initiate
runoff
35Future
- P index integrated into RUSLE 2
- Email notification system to help evaluate timing
of manure applications.