Marriage Public Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Marriage Public Policy

Description:

'Single men who are heading toward marriage reduce their drinking up to a year ... Getting married moves men away from destructive and unhealthy drinking behavior ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: erikki
Category:
Tags: marriage | men | policy | public

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marriage Public Policy


1
MarriagePublic Policy
  • Why Public Officials Should
  • Support Marriage

By James E. Sheridan
2
Single vs. Married Men
  • Single men who are heading toward marriage
    reduce their drinking up to a year before the
    ceremony, so that although they start with the
    same heavy drinking patterns as their friends who
    stay single, by the time they marry they drink
    much less than they did a year earlier.
  • Apparently young mens values change as they
    move from bachelors to husbands, with the change
    taking place gradually as they develop a closer
    relationship with the woman they will marry.
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher)

3
Single vs. Married Men (2)
  • Young men who were light drinkers,
    moderate drinkers and heavy drinkers prior to
    marrying, all drink less after they marry than
    they did before (Bachman, Wadsworth, OMalley,
    Honson, and Schulenberg, 1997 Miller-Tutzauer et
    al., 1991). This evidence saysthat marriage
    causes these changes in mens behavior. Getting
    married moves men away from destructive and
    unhealthy drinking behavior and towards
    moderation or abstinence. (The Case For
    Marriage, Waite and Gallagher)

4
Single vs. Married Men (3)
  • And, its not just alcohol. Both young
    men and women smoked less,and snorted less
    cocaine, during the year before marriage.
    Marijuana use, which tends to drop after high
    school anyway, drops 2 to 3 times more rapidly
    for those who marry compared to those who do not.
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher)

5
Married and Engaged Couples are Less Likely to be
Violent
  • 3-4 of married couples
  • 11-12 of engaged cohabitors
  • 13-15 of disengaged cohabitors
  • Tabulations from the
    National Survey of Families and Households,
    1987-88

6
Dr. Linda Waite
  • The research clearly shows that, outside of
    hying thee to a nunnery, the safest place for a
    woman is inside marriage.
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher,
    page 152)

7
Married Women are Safer
  • Single and divorced women
  • 4-5 times more likely to be victims of crimes of
    violence.
  • 10 times more likely to be raped
  • 3 times more likely to be victims of aggravated
    assault than wives.
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher ,
    page 152)

8
Married Men are Safer
  • Bachelors are 4 times more likely to be victims
    of crimes of violence than husbands.
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher,
    page 152)

9
Fatal Abuse of Children in Canadian study
  • Children two years of age and younger are 70
    to 100 times more likely to be killed at the
    hands of their stepparents than by their
    biological parents. (Younger children, because of
    their small size, are much more vulnerable.)
  • The Heritage Foundation,
    Backgrounder

10
Fatal Abuse of Childrenin British study
  • The data from Britain predict a smaller
    risk, but this research is not as rigorous as the
    Canadian study. The British study reports that
    fatal abuse of children of all ages occurs three
    times more frequently in stepfamilies than in
    intact married families.
  • The Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder

11
Neglected Children
  • Neglect of childrenis twice as high among
    separated and divorced parents.
  • The Heritage Foundation,
    Backgrounder

12
Rate of Sexual Abuseof Girls
  • The rate of sexual abuse of girls by their
    stepfathers is at least six or seven times
    higherthan sexual abuse of daughters by their
    biological fathers who remain in intact
    families.
  • The Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder

13
Families in the U.S. where the father is absent
make up
  • 63 of youth suicides
  • 71 of all high school dropouts
  • 75 of all adolescent substance abuse patients
  • 70 of juveniles in state-operated institutions.
  • The Critical Importance Of Responsible
    Fatherhood, Murray Davis, Chairman, Dads of
    Michigan, to the Joint House Committee Hearings,
    November 5, 2001, Detroit, Michigan

14
Families in the U.S. where the father is absent
make up
  • 85 of all persons incarcerated in prisons
  • 85 of children exhibiting behavior disorders
  • 90 of all homeless and runaway children
  • The Critical Importance Of Responsible
    Fatherhood, Murray Davis, Chairman, Dads of
    Michigan, to the Joint House Committee Hearings,
    November 5, 2001, Detroit, Michigan

15
Absent Biological FatherAnd Criminal Behavior
  • A (1998) U.S. longitudinal study which
    tracked over 6,400 boys over a period of 20 years
    (well into their adult years) found that children
    without biological fathers in the home are
    roughly three times more likely to commit a crime
    that leads to incarceration than are children
    from intact families.
  • The Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder, page 6

16
Impact on Daughters
  • Daughters raised outside of intact marriages
    are approximately three times more likely to end
    up young, unwed mothers than are children whose
    parents married and stayed married.
  • Why Marriage Matters, page 3

17
Dr. Judith Wallerstein
  • Early sex was very common among girls in the
    divorced families and has been described in
    several national studies. In our study, one in
    five had her first sexual experience before the
    age of 14. Over half were sexually active with
    multiple partners during their high school years.
    In the comparison group, the great majority of
    girls postponed sex until the last year of high
    school or their early years of college.
  • The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce, Judith
    Wallerstein, PhD, p. 189

18
Children with Married ParentsDo Better
  • Half as likely to drop out of high school
  • More likely to go to college to graduate
  • Half as likely to have a teen birth
  • Less likely to have emotional problems

19
Children in Poverty
  • Children 0-6 Years Old Living in Poverty
  • Overall 1 in 10 live in poverty
  • Living in 1 in 3 live in poverty
  • Female-headed
  • Households
  • Environmental Scan of Lenawee County (MI),
    Lenawee United Way and Volunteer Center, 2003

20
Is Povertya Selection Effect?
  • Women with a first premarital pregnancy leading
    to birth experienced a poverty rate of
  • Those with shotgun weddings 20
  • Those who did not marry 47
  • (CLASP Policy Brief, Couples and Marriage
    Series, Brief No. 3, P. 5)

21
Selection Effect (2)
  • Divorce and unmarried childbearing increase
    poverty for both children and mothers.
  • Child poverty rates are very high primarily
    because of growth of single-parent families.

22
Selection Effect (3)
  • When parents fail to marry and stay married,
    children are more likely to experience deep and
    persistent poverty, even after controlling for
    race and family background.

23
Selection Effect (4)
  • The majority of children who grow up outside of
    intact married families experience at least one
    year of dire poverty (family incomes less than
    half the official poverty threshold). Divorce as
    well as unmarried childbearing plays a role
    Between one-fifth and one-third of divorcing
    women end up in poverty following the divorce.
  • Why Marriage Matters, page 9

24
Graduation Rate(Nationally)
  • High School 88
  • 4 Years of College 25.6
  • Environmental Scan of Lenawee County (MI),
    Lenawee United Way and Volunteer Center, 2003,
    page 15

25
Graduation Rates (2)
  • Studies have linked graduation rates to the
    number of times a child moves while attending
    school, with one move decreasing the average
    graduation rate to 68, two moves to 56, and
    three moves to 30.
  • Environmental Scan of Lenawee County (MI),
    Lenawee United Way and Volunteer Center, 2003,
    page 15

26
Graduation Rates Linkedto Household Moves
  • The number of times a child moves while
    attending school decreases the graduation rate
    from high school
  • Number of Moves Rate Reduces To
  • 1 68
  • 2 56
  • 3 30
  • Environmental Scan of Lenawee County (MI),
    Lenawee United Way and Volunteer Center, 2003,
    page 15

27
Life Expectancy ofAdult Children of Divorce
  • The parents divorce lowered the life expectancy
    of the adult children by 4 years.
  • Forty-year-olds from divorced homes were three
    times as likely to dire from all causes as
    forty-year-olds whose parents stayed married.
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and
    Gallagher)

28
Adult Children fromDivorced Parents are
  • 70 more likely to have circulatory problems
  • 56 more likely to show signs of mental illness
  • 27 more likely to report chronic aches and pains
  • 26 more likely to rate their overall health as
    poor
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher)

29
Stability in Childrens LivesBy Family Makeup
  • Children living with both biological parents at
    birth compared to the percent of children who
    will not be living with biological parents after
  • 1 Year 5 Years 10 Years
  • Cohabiting Parents 15 50 66
  • Married Parents 4 15 33
  • (The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher)

30
Number of Alcohol-Related Problems
SOURCE Umberson (1987) Figure 5. Reports of
Problem Drinking in the Past Year, by Marital
Status and Sex
31
Physical Aggression DuringArguments(NSFH
1987-1988)
Net of the effect of education, gender of
respondent, age, race, and ethnicity
32
In Britain, the Serious Abuse of Children in
Stepfamilies Was Six Times More Likely than for
Children of Intact Married Families
Comparative Risk Ratios for Serious Abuse,
1982-1988
Note No U.S. data by family structure
availableSource Robert Whelian, Broken Homes
and Battered Children, 1994.
33
In Wisconsin, Juvenile Incarceration Rates for
Children of Divorced Parents are 12 TimesHigher
than for Children in Two-Parent Families
Juvenile Incarceration Rate, Two-Parent Family
Rate 1
Source Heritage calculations, based on 1993 data
from Wisconsin Department of Health and Human
Services and U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current
Population Survey.
34
Percent of Families with ChildrenLiving in
Poverty by Family Structure
Source Heritage Center for Data Analysis
calculations based on data from 1995 Survey of
Consumer Finance, Federal Reserve Board.
35
Poverty Rates
SOURCE McLanahan and Sandefur (199482)
Figure 14. Percentages of Children in Poverty at
Age 16, by Race and Family Structure
36
Impact of Divorce on Incomeof Families with
Children
1993 Average Annual Income
Source Mary E. Corcoran and Ajay Chaudray, The
Dynamics of Childhood Poverty, Future of
Children, 1997.
37
Median Household Wealth ofPersons Aged 51-61, by
Marital Status
1993 Household Capital Wealth
Source James P. Smith, Marriage, Assets and
Savings, Rand Corporation, 1995.
38
Percentages of Dropouts
SOURCE McLanahan and Sandefur (199441)
Figure 13. Percentages of Adult Children Who Did
Not Complete High School by Childhood
Family Structure
39
Cohabitation Rates of Young Adults by Parents
Marital Status
Percent Ever Cohabited
Age of Young Adults
Source Paul Amato and Alan Booth, A Generation
at Risk, 1997, p. 112.
40
Married Women Live Longer
Probability of Survival
Age
Lillard, L.A., Waite, L.J. (1995). Til Death
Do Us Part Marital Disruption and Morality.
American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1131-1156
41
So Do Married Men
Probability of Survival
Age
Lillard, L.A., Waite, L.J. (1995). Til Death
Do Us Part Marital Disruption and Morality.
American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1131-1156
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com