The economics of forest management

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The economics of forest management

Description:

Temperate deforestation. Biodiversity loss. Habitat for endangered species (NW Spotted Owl) ... Tradeoff often between forest and agriculture ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The economics of forest management


1
The economics of forest management
  • National and international forest policy

2
Hypothetical Group Project
  • Spotted owl habitat is on lands that are highly
    productive for timber. Can rules be developed to
    change timbering practices to protect owl with
    minimal impact on timber harvest?

3
Why manage forests?
  • Manage deforestation
  • Global forest down 40 since pre-ag times.
  • Tropical deforestation
  • Benefits--Biodiversity, carbon sequestration
  • Often commons issue incomplete property rights
  • Losses 130,000 km2 per year (200x200 miles)
  • Temperate deforestation
  • Biodiversity loss
  • Habitat for endangered species (NW Spotted Owl)
  • Timber supply
  • Often publicly owned, privately harvested
    mismatch of incentives

4
Forest management policies account for
external benefits of forests
  • Common policies
  • Subsidies, taxes, technology standards,
    silvicultural practice regulations.
  • Relatively new policies
  • Forest certification, carbon offsets, property
    rights

5
Subsidies
  • Free seedlings, management assistance, financial
    aid common in developing world
  • Tradeoff often between forest and agriculture
  • Success depends on relative prices of forest vs.
    agricultural products
  • Developing world
  • Collection of wood for fuel a major problem.
  • Some success with subsidies for woodlots.

6
Taxes
  • Used on private forestland to
  • Capture scarcity rent for govt and/or
  • Correct for externalities
  • Monitoring information problems pose
    challenges, especially in developing world
  • Statistics on harvested timber underestimates
  • High-grading can result
  • High-grading taking only the highest quality,
    leaving the rest (not optimal)

7
Regulations
  • Government may dictate silvicultural method
  • Seed-tree, shade-tree, even aged, clear-cut
  • Regulations mitigate environmental harm
  • Buffer strips, wood in streams, structured
    canopy, reforestation requirements, road
    stipulations

8
Forest concessions
  • Government-owned forests (e.g. Natl Forest in
    US) grant concessions to private forestry
    companies.
  • Typically auction off right to harvest a certain
    tract of forest, may be corrupt.
  • Fees usually not market value (unless auction)
  • Property rights problem no incentive to care
    for land since dont own it.
  • May require environmental bond.

9
Forest certification
  • A form of green labeling
  • Provides information to consumers
  • Consumers will be paying for a public good
  • Internationally-recognized certifiers
  • Forest Stewardship Council
  • Certified 30 million hectares in 56 countries
  • Acts like distinct (substitute) market

10
Carbon offsets
  • Financial incentives to increase storage of
    carbon by keeping trees in ground, reforesting,
    or planting high C-sequestering species.
  • Problem usually ignores biodiversity
    considerations (e.g. native vs. exotic fast
    growth)
  • Several global carbon payment funds to which
    countries can apply.
  • Hard to verify what country would have done
  • Called the counterfactual

11
Enhanced property rights
  • Most countries state is largest forest landowner
  • Problems monitoring, ignorant of local needs,
    poor revenue collection, poaching (open access),
    limited info
  • Problems when govt takes over from community
    management ignores local customs and laws
  • Property rights can be shared with locals
  • Panchayat forestry (Nepal), joint forest
    management (India), community-based forestry
    (Philippines, others), communal tenure
    (advocated by World Bank).
  • Combination with other instruments (e.g. taxes)

12
US Natl Forests Grasslands
13
(No Transcript)
14
Public forest management (US)
  • USFS 156 Natl Forests, 194 million acres
  • Concessions terms of contract affect
  • Rotation interval, nature of harvest, non-timber
    values, depletion of forest
  • Pricing of concessions
  • Often p lt market value, sometimes p lt mc
  • Infrastructure often provided free
  • (1) few buyers, (2) external costs ignored
  • Tenure length lt rotation interval (implication??)

15
A biological model
  • Managing tract of trees of certain age (all the
    same age).
  • Choose rotation interval (how long before
    cutting) to maximize total volume per unit time
    (max sustainable yield)?
  • Q(t) quantity of wood at age t.
  • Harvest at time T and start process again
  • What should be T?

16
Shape of Q(t)
Vol. Q(t)
Time, t
17
Alternatively
Look Familiar?
Change in Volume, dQ(t)/dt
Time, t
18
Management What should our objective be?
  • Physical Average growth of the forest stand
  • Economic Net present value of the forest stand
  • Full economic managing for a sustainable and
    infinitely-lived forest

19
Naive model pick rotation to maximize average
annual forest growth
  • Problem maxT Q(T)/T
  • Solution (TQ Q)/T2 0
  • ?Q(T)/T Q(T)
  • Average growth rate marginal growth
  • Not quite right since we have neglected
    discounting payoff 50 years from now not the
    same as today.

20
Graphically
Q(T)/T Q(T)
Vol. Q(t)
Q(t)
Marginal growth at time T1 is slope of Q(t) at
time T1
Average growth at time T1 is slope of line from
origin to Q(T1)
T1
T
Time, t
21
Add economics A bio-economic model
  • Incorporate price, harvest cost, discounting.
  • p price per MBF, c cost per MBF, rdiscount
    rate ? (p-c) rent
  • maxT (p-c)Q(T)/(1r)t
  • Or, since trees grow continuously, we could
    discount continuously 1/(1r)t ? e-rt
  • maxT (p-c)Q(T)e-rT

Harvest when rent peaks
22
Result of bio-economic model
  • Take derivative, set 0.
  • T is place where growth rate equal discount
    rate (continuous discounting)
  • Q(T)/Q(T) r
  • Return on trees (Q(T)) equals interest on
    trees rQ(t)
  • Harvest when tree growth rate equals rate of
    growth of next best alternative.
  • Think of trees as money in the bank when bank
    payoff drops below interest rate, withdraw your
    money.

23
Extensions of this model
  • Can include
  • Multiple rotations
  • Replanting costs
  • Non-timber values of forest (water, recreation,
    biodiversity, etc.)
  • Extended models will allow us to analyze
    different economic policies (e.g. tax, site fees,
    license fees, etc.)

24
Multiple Rotations An infinitely lived forest
  • Let V be the value of the plot of land with the
    forest
  • VmaxT (p-c)Q(T) Ve-rT
  • Need to first find T by differentiating
  • How does this differ from before?
  • Is T larger or smaller than before?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)