Webpage Evaluation Basics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Webpage Evaluation Basics

Description:

Everything on the Internet is true! Web sites are so much easier ... Without quotes. Enclosed in quotes. Enclosed in quotes with * between first and last names ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: weblin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Webpage Evaluation Basics


1
  • Webpage Evaluation Basics
  • Prepared by Laurie LeFever, LMS
  • Frazer School

2
What do you think?
Everything on the Internet is true!
Web sites are so much easier to use than books!
3
Not necessarily!
  • So what should we be looking for when we are
    using the Internet for research?
  • 1. Reliability
  • 2. Ease of Use

4
Checking Out the Reliability
  • URL (address)
  • Domain
  • Page Perimeter
  • Link Search
  • Page History
  • Author Info.
  • Directories

5
Whats in a URL?
jsmith personal name investigate!
http//jsmith.pein.org
.org non-profit organization
  • Is there a personal name (i.e., jsmith) in the
    URL? If so, you need to carefully investigate
    the author.
  • Is the site commercial (.com)? If so, watch out
    for bias. Remember, the company is trying to
    make a profit from the page.

6
Deciphering the Domain Name
  • Think about it What source would provide the
    best information for your research topic?
  • Government .gov, .mil, .us
  • (or other country code, such as .uk)
  • Education .edu
  • Non-profit organizations .org
  • Commercial .com, .net (Remember, these ISPs are
    trying to make . Their information could be
    biased in order to help them do so!

7
Scan the Page Perimeter
  • What can you find out about the author?
  • Is there contact information for him/her?
  • When was the page last updated?
  • Who is sponsoring the site?
  • Does the page link to other reliable sites?
  • Does the page include citations to reputable
    information sources?

8
Get the inside scoop!
  • Checkout the history of the Web site
  • Go to the Wayback Machine
  • (http//www.archive.org/web/web.php)
  • Enter the URL of the site in question.
  • Evaluate the results of the archive search.
  • Find out who links to the Web site
  • Go to Google or Yahoo!
  • Type link in the search box.
  • Enter the URL of the site in question.
  • Evaluate the results.

9
How reputable is the author and/or site?
  • Check the Directories
  • Directories offer links that have been evaluated
    by librarians and academics
  • Librarians Index (http//lii.org/)
  • Infomine (http//infomine.ucr.edu/)
  • About.com (http//about.com/)
  • AcademicInfo (http//www.academicinfo.net/)
  • Google the Author
  • Search the authors name
  • in 3 ways
  • Without quotes
  • Enclosed in quotes
  • Enclosed in quotes with between first and last
    names

10
Is it user-friendly?
  • Navigation
  • Is it easy to move around in the site?
  • Can you control how fast you move around?
  • Are hyperlinks/buttons active?
  • Can you control what you see on the page?
  • Organization
  • Is the purpose of the site clear? Information?
    Sales? Share? Disclose? Explain?
  • Is the page well-organized?
  • Support
  • Is there a help function?
  • Content
  • Are their clear graphics visuals to support
    text?
  • Do content/graphics download in a timely manner?
  • Can you read and understand content information?
  • Does content meet your information needs?

Rate it
10 Awesome! 8-9 Good 7 Average
6 and under Needs Work
11
Lets Review
  • Usage Checklist
  • Easy to Navigate
  • Well Organized
  • Support Available
  • Useful Content
  • Reliability Checklist
  • URL
  • Domain
  • Page Perimeter
  • Page History
  • Link Search
  • Author Information
  • Directories

Try these bogus Web sites for practice http//www
.andoverhs.anoka.k12.mn.us/IMC/bogus.html
12
This presentation was created based on
information from
  • Barker, Joe. Evaluating Web Pages Techniques to
    Apply Questions to Ask. Finding Information on
    the Internet A Tutorial. Regents of the
    University of California. 15 Jul. 2005
    http//www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Int
    ernet/Evaluate.html.
  • Microsoft Clip Art.
  • Small, Ruth V. Designing Digital Literacy
    Programs with IM-PACT. New York Neal Schuman
    Publishers, Inc., 2005.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com