Title: GRB Physics Progenitors
1GRB Physics / Progenitors
- Nobuyuki Kawai
- Tokyo Tech
2GRB outstanding problems
- Long GRBs
- progenitors and environments
- launching ultra-relativistic jets
- highly efficient gamma-ray emission
- GRB subclasses
- Short GRBs
- X-ray flashes
- sub-luminous SN-GRBs
- distance
- population
- mechanism
3EDGE capabilites for GRB study
- Fast localization and pointing (cf. Swift)
- precise location ? ground follow-up
- Wide-band trigger (cf. BeppoSAX, HETE-2)
- Epeak (Spectral Energy Peak) determination
- Sensitivity for X-ray flashes and short hard GRBs
- Large effective area and moderate energy
resolution (cf. XMM, Suzaku) - faint subclass (short GRB, XRF, )
- spectral features
- Superior spectral resolution
4Long GRBs
- Distance (known for 25 of Swift GRB) z06.3
- Associated with death of massive stars
- 410 GRBs associated with core-collapse SN
- whats special? ( rate 0.2 of ordinary ccSN)
- Mass
- occur at regions with vigorous star formation
- Wolf-Rayet wind shell
- Rotation
- ALL theoretical models require rotation for
launching jets - no observational evidence
- Metallicity
- optical/UV absorption lines
- X-ray low-energy absorption
5GRB Environment
galaxy ISM
Molecular Cloud
H II Region
SN ejecta
WR Wind Shell
IGM
6NHI(optical) vs. NH(X-ray)
- No correlation
- Gas cloud ionized by GRB UV light
- HI cloud at gt3 pc
Watson et al. 2007
7NH in X-ray afterglow of GRB050904
- decrease with time
- ? photoionization
- Inconsistency with (lack of) optical extinction
- ? no carbon dust?
- EDGE can test Photoionization model
Campana et al. 2007
8Absorption spectroscopy of CSM
- absorption edges/lines
- ionization state
- time variable? density structure
- velocity (radiative acceleration?)
- need for independent redshift ? opt/NIR afterglow
- chemical composition
- progenitor wind shell or primordial molecular
cloud - comparison with optical absorption
- ? dust/gas ratio
OVII and O VIII of warm absorber
9Emission lines
- 3-4 s detections, significance questioned
- visible when non-thermal continuum is weak
- late phase (104 s)
- early afterglow or flares of sub-luminous events
- Best targets X-ray flashes and local SN-GRBs
- need triggers at low energies (?soft X-ray
sensitivity) - Possible mechanism
- Shock/cocoon breakouts
- fluorescence on SN ejecta
- Need independent (i.e. optical) redshifts for
identification and velocity measurements
10Fe lines/RRC in late afterglow
GRB 970507 BeppoSAX, t30000s Piro et al. 1999
GRB 991214 Chandra, t9700 s Piro et al. 2000
GRB 970828 ASCA, T10000s Yoshida et al. 1999
- seen only at late limited time intervals (T0104
s) - statistical significance (3 s) questioned
- Fe emission line and/or radiative recombination
edge - requires 0.1 Msun of iron pre-ejected at 0.1 c
11Line emission in late X-Ray Afterglow of
GRB030227 by XMM
Watson et al. 2003
- line flux increase with time
- Si, S, Ar, Ca, but no Fe photoionized?
- statistical significance (3 s) questioned
- z1.36 no independent redshift measurements
12Early X-ray afterglow
Butler 2007
- gt70 X-ray afterglow of Swift GRBs
- 1000 spectra examined
- Mostly power-law, a few notable outliers
13Possible line detections in Swift afterglows
Butler 2007
GRB 060218 2 Fe-L lines, 4-s
GRB 050822 flare 5 lines (Si, S, Ar) 4.4-s
GRB 050714B flare 4 lines (Si, S, Ar, Ca) 4.2-s
- found in early afterglow of 4 GRBs with soft
thermal continuum - (sub-luminous class of GRB/XRF?)
- breakout of GRB shock or mildly relativistic
cocoon (?) - only GRB060218 has established redshift
14Break out of a relativistic jet from a WR star
beamed emission
off-axis emission (XRF?)
thermal emission (break out)
Zhang, Woosley Heger 2004
15Short GRBs
- first 3 SGRBs with X-ray afterglows (2005)
- in elliptical or at a region with little star
formation - ? old population
- ? NS-NS merger!
- However
- some SGRBs at high z
- Swift detection rate low
- many without X-ray afterglows
- ambiguous events what are they? heterogeneous?
- EDGE will provide more locations and afterglow
light curves for faint afterglows (WFI)
16The first 3 short GRBs with afterglows
GRB 050509B (Subaru) z0.225 ?
GRB 050724 (VLT) z0.258
GRB 050709 (HST) z0.16
- Hosts at low z, sites of little star formation
- x 10-3 less luminous than typical long GRBs
17Remarks
- Need optical/NIR follow-up for position, spectra,
and redshifts - power thermal design for anti-sun pointing
- Soft X-ray response of WFM and/or GBD
- current goal is 5 keV for WFM LD
- cf 2 keV for HETE WXM
- easy to extend down to 2 keV if non-imaging
- WFI astrometry accuracy
18Swift GRBs (with redshifts) vs. Sun angle
50
20
prepared by Taka Sakamoto
19Locations of HETE Short- and Long- Duration
Bursts in (T90,SE)-Plane
Donaghy, Lamb, Sakamoto, Norris, et al. (2006)
20Summary (1)
- Absorption spectroscopy of afterglows
- CSM density /metallicity profile ?progenitor
- mass loss history
- metallicity
- More detections/identification of subclass
- short GRBs
- XRFs, local SN-GRBs
- Emission lines
- if breakouts ? jet mechanism
- if SN ejecta ? supranova (SN preceding GRB)
- Others fireball physics, prompt emission
mechanism,
21Summary (2)
- There is a huge discovery space for EDGE in GRB
physics - High resolution spectra of X-ray afterglow
- GRB subclasses (short, sub-luminous, soft)
- Interpretation of spectra may be ambiguous
- Velocity
- Ionization state
- Optical follow-up observations are complementary
and extremely important - redshift, location, abundance,
- Spacecraft and instrument design (thermal and
power) must accommodate anti-sun pointing
22absorption spectroscopy of CSM
Warm absorber similar to WHIM absorption
Cold ISM
- OVII, OIII absorption lines/edges from CSM
photoionized by GRB emission - Time variable ?density and metallicity profile
of CSM - velocity shift due to radiative acceleration
23Metallicity GRB-DLA vs. QSO-DLA
Prochaska et al. 2007
- GRB DLAs have generally larger metallicities
than cosmic mean