WP4'4: Sources of predictability in current and future climates Laurent Terray CERFACS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

WP4'4: Sources of predictability in current and future climates Laurent Terray CERFACS

Description:

... predictability of the intra-seasonal oscillation in the Indo-Pacific region in ... operational tool to test the seasonal forecast of the intraseasonal oscillation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: ncasclima
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WP4'4: Sources of predictability in current and future climates Laurent Terray CERFACS


1
WP4.4 Sources of predictability in current and
future climatesLaurent Terray (CERFACS)
  • Participants CERFACS, CGAM, CNRM, DMI(nc),
    ECMWF, IfM, IPSL, ISAC(nc)

Thanks to R.Sutton (CGAM), H.Douville (CNRM),
F.Doblas-reyes (ECMWF), S.Corti (ISAC),
B.Christiansen (DMI), J.P.Duvel (IPSL)
2
Main objectives
  • To develop methodologies and tools to exploit
    existing seasonal to decadal hindcasts for
    identifying and understanding the sources of
    predictability in current and future climates
  • To assess and understand the main factors which
    influence the predictability of the climate
    system at different time scales
  • To improve the understanding of the interaction
    between anthropogenic climate change and natural
    climate variability modes and of the possible
    changes in predictability at all time scales

3
Work Plan for months 1-18
  • T4.4a design a general framework for the
    analysis of participating models (ALL)
  • T4.4b assess the role of snow and soil moisture
    in the predictability of climate (CNRM)
  • T4.4c assess the potential predictability of the
    North Atlantic region at seasonal to decadal
    timescales (ALL)
  • T4.4d investigate the vertical structure of
    weather and climate regimes in several
    re-analysis products and the potential role of
    the stratosphere (DMI, ISAC, CERFACS)
  • D4.4.1 Synthesis of current estimates and
    mechanisms of predictability on seasonal to
    decadal timescales, including understanding the
    influence of ocean initial conditions, and with a
    focus on the North Atlantic European sector
    (month 18)
  • M4.4.1 development of methodologies to explore
    climate variability and predictability, for use
    with the ENSEMBLES system
  • (month 18)
  • M4.4.2 Assessment of climate variability and
    predictability in exixting simulations to provide
    benchmark against which the ENSEMBLES system can
    be judged (month 18)

4
CGAM contribution to WP4.4
5
Initial condition information is ignored in
current climate forecasts
Northern European temperatures
R.Sutton
Source Anne Pardaens, Hadley Centre / PREDICATE
6
Evidence from FP5 PREDICATE project of decadal
predictability in the THC
Control simulations
Perturbed runs
Source Mat Collins,
What mechanisms determine the extent of
predictability in ocean and atmosphere variables?
R.Sutton
7
Questions and Methods
  • What mechanisms determine the predictability of
    the Atlantic THC, and related aspects of climate,
    in current climate models?
  • To which aspects of the ocean initial conditions
    are forecasts of the THC, and related aspects of
    climate, most sensitive?
  • and later in the project
  • How do initial conditions and changing external
    forcings combine to determine the evolution of
    climate on decadal timescales?
  • Methods
  • Further analysis of PREDICATE ensemble
    integrations
  • New ensemble integrations with HadCM3 model
    (larger ensembles)
  • A new methodology to estimate empirical singular
    vectors for the THC. (addresses question 2.)

R.Sutton
8
CNRM contribution to WP4.4
9
Questions and Methods
  • Explore the predictability associated to land
    surface anomalies
  • What is the influence of soil moisture
    conditions on atmospheric seasonal
    predictability?
  • And later in the project
  • Assess the influence of snow conditions on
    seasonal (to interannual?) predictability
  • Methods
  • Preliminary step produce a 10-yr global monthly
    mean soil moisture climatology using the 3-hourly
    atmospheric forcing provided by GSWP-2.
  • run ensembles of global atmospheric simulations
    with the ARPEGE AGCM(prescribed observed SSTs
    from 1986 to 1995 and with GSWP-2 vs
    climatological initial conditions).

10
Influence of soil moisture relaxation towards
GSWP-1 on the JJAS Z500 stationary eddy anomalies
simulated by the ARPEGE AGCM
Douville Chauvin (2000), Climate
Dyn.,16,719-736 Douville H. (2OO2),
J.Climate,15,701-720
11
(No Transcript)
12
ECMWF contribution to WP4.4
13
Questions and Methods
  • Focus on predictability of current climates
  • Influence of anthropogenic forcing upon the
    seasonal-to interannual predictability of natural
    modes of variability (ENSO, NAO, PNA) to explain
    the latest results (see below)
  • ECMWFs effort will take place after month 18
  • Links to WP5.3 (Assessment of forecast quality)

2-4 months lead time (DJF)
14
Southern Europe DEMETER hindcasts
Precipitation
T2m
Nov start date
2-4 (DJF)
4-6 (FMA)
15
IPSL contribution to WP4.4
16
Questions and Methods
  • Intraseasonal convective and dynamical
    perturbations have a large impact on the Asian
    monsoon activity and on the triggering of ENSO
  • What is the predictability of the intra-seasonal
    activity in the Indo-Pacific region
  • Study the seasonal predictability of the
    intra-seasonal oscillation in the Indo-Pacific
    region in current and future climates
  • Methods
  • Develop an operational tool to test the seasonal
    forecast of the intraseasonal oscillation in the
    tropics and use this tool to assess the skill of
    the different global ESMs
  • First 18 months (RT5) Use DEMETER simulations
    to develop a diagnostic tool (based on the Local
    Mode Analysis) to infer the skill of seasonal
    hindcasts in describing the intraseasonal
    oscillation in the Indo-Pacific region.
  • Remaining time up to 5 years (WP4.4) Analysis
    of the seasonal predictability in current and
    future climates using the core ENSEMBLES
    simulations (links with potential changes in ENSO
    activity)

17
Variability of the ISO patterns between hindcasts
members Internal Variability
OLR-NOAA
  • Example for the CNRM model in January 2002
  • One member (member 9) give a reasonable pattern
  • One member (member 5) with low organisation (weak
    var), unrealistic pattern at too short time scale

Member 9
Member 5
18
DMI contribution to WP4.4
19
Questions and Methods
  • Evidence for nonlinear regime behaviour has been
    found in both the stratosphere and the
    troposphere and strong evidence has been reported
    for a stratospheric regime shift in the late half
    of the 1970ies
  • What is the atmospheric regime behaviour in the
    recent period ? What is the vertical extent of
    the regimes ?
  • Are there any connections between the
    stratospheric and tropospheric regimes (polar
    vortex strength and the NAO-AO)?
  • Methods
  • Critical assessment of the standard algorithms
    (k-means, mixture models) used to perform
    clustering (nature of the underlying probability
    distribution) - link with WP4.3, KNMI ?
  • Use of the ERA40 dataset
  • Later in the project analysis of the core
    ENSEMBLES simulations for current and future
    climate (Any of the core ENSEMBLES models
  • with high-res in the stratosphere ??)

20
Bimodality in the tropospheric wave amplitude
index
Christiansen JAS 2005
Wave amplitude index defined by Hansen and Sutera
Change in 1990
Bimodality in the strength of the stratospheric
vortex
Christiansen 2003 J. Climate
Change in 1979
What is the connection?
21
ISAC contribution to WP4.4
22
Questions and Methods
  • What is the vertical and thermal structure of
    (global, hemispheric-scale)
  • circulation regimes for the current climate?
  • Explore the potential role of weather regimes and
    non-linearity in the
  • emerging anthropogenic signal.
  • Later in the project
  • Verification of regime structure in present and
    future climate core ENSEMBLES
  • simulations.
  • Interaction between natural and forced
    variability
  • Regime response to anthropogenic forcing and SST
    anomalies
  • Troposphere-stratosphere connection
    Collaboration with DMI
  • Methods
  • Study of the extended winter(Oct-Apr) with
    reanalysis datasets (NCEP
  • and ERA40)
  • Diagnostic tools multivariate EOF analysis, Pdf
    estimators and clustering
  • techniques

23
Multivariate combined EOF analysis Data NCEP
reanalysis Clustering in the first 2-EOFs phase
space K-means algorithm 3-cluster
partition positive NAM
Changes in cluster frequency and significance
when different periods (corresponding to
different external forcings ENSO and climate
signal) are considered.
It suggests that the associated tropical heating
anomalies reorganize the mid-latitude
circulation sufficiently to disrupt the normal
regime behaviour.
24
CERFACS contribution to WP4.4
25
Questions and Methods
  • What are the physical processes associated to
    climate predictability of the North Atlantic
    European sector at various timescales ? (Focus on
    SST influence and interaction between the
    different ocean basins) (months 1-18)
  • What is the influence of anthropogenic forcing
    upon the levels of predictability of the major
    climate modes ? (months 19-60)
  • Methods
  • Analyses of existing integrations (e.g PREDICATE
    and DEMETER) and coordinated experiments (to be
    discussed)
  • Assess the relevance of various predictability
    measures to improve the understanding of physical
    mechanisms (e.g relative entropy Kleeman 2002
    Stephenson and Doblas-reyes 2000)
  • Analyses of the core ENSEMBLES integrations

26
Weather regimes and local climate
2003 heat wave a process study
Summer (JJA) weather regimes (daily timescale)
from NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis (1950-2002)
A

represent 80 Of 2003 summer days
Tropical Atlantic forcing?
A
associated to an increase of warm days
(exceeding the 95 percentile) over France (data
from Météo-France)
OLR anomalies for June 2003
Two ensembles of 40 members with the NCAR
AGCM One CTRL and one forced with 2003 TATL
diabatic heating
Simulated changes Of warm regime occurrence For
JJA 2003 in response To the tropical Atlantic
diabatic heating forcing Cassou et al. 2004
A
Percentage of days exceeding the 95
climatological threshold for a given regime
27
Influence of anthropogenic forcing on the NAO
Perturbed climate
Current climate
GHG forcing
NAO-
NAO
PRUDENCE simulations series of Time-slice exp.
With ARPEGE (high res. Over Europe, 50 km)
forced by Observed SST and GHG (1960-1999)
And SST (from 2 CGCMs) and SRES Scenarios
(2070-2099) Terray et al. Jclimate 2004
28
Remarks
  • Existing simulations PREDICATE, DEMETER, AR4,
    Others Need a list of available model data
  • Coordinated experiments to be discussed soon
  • Need good coordination with WP4.2 and WP5.3
  • Utility and limitations of regime analysis
    algorithms (interaction with WP4.3, others e.g
    downscaling)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com