Title: WP4'4: Sources of predictability in current and future climates Laurent Terray CERFACS
1WP4.4 Sources of predictability in current and
future climatesLaurent Terray (CERFACS)
- Participants CERFACS, CGAM, CNRM, DMI(nc),
ECMWF, IfM, IPSL, ISAC(nc)
Thanks to R.Sutton (CGAM), H.Douville (CNRM),
F.Doblas-reyes (ECMWF), S.Corti (ISAC),
B.Christiansen (DMI), J.P.Duvel (IPSL)
2Main objectives
- To develop methodologies and tools to exploit
existing seasonal to decadal hindcasts for
identifying and understanding the sources of
predictability in current and future climates - To assess and understand the main factors which
influence the predictability of the climate
system at different time scales - To improve the understanding of the interaction
between anthropogenic climate change and natural
climate variability modes and of the possible
changes in predictability at all time scales
3Work Plan for months 1-18
- T4.4a design a general framework for the
analysis of participating models (ALL) - T4.4b assess the role of snow and soil moisture
in the predictability of climate (CNRM) - T4.4c assess the potential predictability of the
North Atlantic region at seasonal to decadal
timescales (ALL) - T4.4d investigate the vertical structure of
weather and climate regimes in several
re-analysis products and the potential role of
the stratosphere (DMI, ISAC, CERFACS) - D4.4.1 Synthesis of current estimates and
mechanisms of predictability on seasonal to
decadal timescales, including understanding the
influence of ocean initial conditions, and with a
focus on the North Atlantic European sector
(month 18) - M4.4.1 development of methodologies to explore
climate variability and predictability, for use
with the ENSEMBLES system - (month 18)
- M4.4.2 Assessment of climate variability and
predictability in exixting simulations to provide
benchmark against which the ENSEMBLES system can
be judged (month 18)
4CGAM contribution to WP4.4
5Initial condition information is ignored in
current climate forecasts
Northern European temperatures
R.Sutton
Source Anne Pardaens, Hadley Centre / PREDICATE
6Evidence from FP5 PREDICATE project of decadal
predictability in the THC
Control simulations
Perturbed runs
Source Mat Collins,
What mechanisms determine the extent of
predictability in ocean and atmosphere variables?
R.Sutton
7Questions and Methods
- What mechanisms determine the predictability of
the Atlantic THC, and related aspects of climate,
in current climate models? - To which aspects of the ocean initial conditions
are forecasts of the THC, and related aspects of
climate, most sensitive? - and later in the project
- How do initial conditions and changing external
forcings combine to determine the evolution of
climate on decadal timescales? - Methods
- Further analysis of PREDICATE ensemble
integrations - New ensemble integrations with HadCM3 model
(larger ensembles) - A new methodology to estimate empirical singular
vectors for the THC. (addresses question 2.)
R.Sutton
8CNRM contribution to WP4.4
9Questions and Methods
- Explore the predictability associated to land
surface anomalies - What is the influence of soil moisture
conditions on atmospheric seasonal
predictability? - And later in the project
- Assess the influence of snow conditions on
seasonal (to interannual?) predictability - Methods
- Preliminary step produce a 10-yr global monthly
mean soil moisture climatology using the 3-hourly
atmospheric forcing provided by GSWP-2. - run ensembles of global atmospheric simulations
with the ARPEGE AGCM(prescribed observed SSTs
from 1986 to 1995 and with GSWP-2 vs
climatological initial conditions).
10Influence of soil moisture relaxation towards
GSWP-1 on the JJAS Z500 stationary eddy anomalies
simulated by the ARPEGE AGCM
Douville Chauvin (2000), Climate
Dyn.,16,719-736 Douville H. (2OO2),
J.Climate,15,701-720
11(No Transcript)
12ECMWF contribution to WP4.4
13Questions and Methods
- Focus on predictability of current climates
- Influence of anthropogenic forcing upon the
seasonal-to interannual predictability of natural
modes of variability (ENSO, NAO, PNA) to explain
the latest results (see below) - ECMWFs effort will take place after month 18
- Links to WP5.3 (Assessment of forecast quality)
2-4 months lead time (DJF)
14Southern Europe DEMETER hindcasts
Precipitation
T2m
Nov start date
2-4 (DJF)
4-6 (FMA)
15IPSL contribution to WP4.4
16Questions and Methods
- Intraseasonal convective and dynamical
perturbations have a large impact on the Asian
monsoon activity and on the triggering of ENSO - What is the predictability of the intra-seasonal
activity in the Indo-Pacific region - Study the seasonal predictability of the
intra-seasonal oscillation in the Indo-Pacific
region in current and future climates - Methods
- Develop an operational tool to test the seasonal
forecast of the intraseasonal oscillation in the
tropics and use this tool to assess the skill of
the different global ESMs - First 18 months (RT5) Use DEMETER simulations
to develop a diagnostic tool (based on the Local
Mode Analysis) to infer the skill of seasonal
hindcasts in describing the intraseasonal
oscillation in the Indo-Pacific region. - Remaining time up to 5 years (WP4.4) Analysis
of the seasonal predictability in current and
future climates using the core ENSEMBLES
simulations (links with potential changes in ENSO
activity)
17Variability of the ISO patterns between hindcasts
members Internal Variability
OLR-NOAA
- Example for the CNRM model in January 2002
- One member (member 9) give a reasonable pattern
- One member (member 5) with low organisation (weak
var), unrealistic pattern at too short time scale
Member 9
Member 5
18DMI contribution to WP4.4
19Questions and Methods
-
- Evidence for nonlinear regime behaviour has been
found in both the stratosphere and the
troposphere and strong evidence has been reported
for a stratospheric regime shift in the late half
of the 1970ies - What is the atmospheric regime behaviour in the
recent period ? What is the vertical extent of
the regimes ? - Are there any connections between the
stratospheric and tropospheric regimes (polar
vortex strength and the NAO-AO)? - Methods
- Critical assessment of the standard algorithms
(k-means, mixture models) used to perform
clustering (nature of the underlying probability
distribution) - link with WP4.3, KNMI ? - Use of the ERA40 dataset
- Later in the project analysis of the core
ENSEMBLES simulations for current and future
climate (Any of the core ENSEMBLES models - with high-res in the stratosphere ??)
20Bimodality in the tropospheric wave amplitude
index
Christiansen JAS 2005
Wave amplitude index defined by Hansen and Sutera
Change in 1990
Bimodality in the strength of the stratospheric
vortex
Christiansen 2003 J. Climate
Change in 1979
What is the connection?
21ISAC contribution to WP4.4
22Questions and Methods
- What is the vertical and thermal structure of
(global, hemispheric-scale) - circulation regimes for the current climate?
- Explore the potential role of weather regimes and
non-linearity in the - emerging anthropogenic signal.
- Later in the project
- Verification of regime structure in present and
future climate core ENSEMBLES - simulations.
- Interaction between natural and forced
variability - Regime response to anthropogenic forcing and SST
anomalies - Troposphere-stratosphere connection
Collaboration with DMI - Methods
- Study of the extended winter(Oct-Apr) with
reanalysis datasets (NCEP - and ERA40)
- Diagnostic tools multivariate EOF analysis, Pdf
estimators and clustering - techniques
23Multivariate combined EOF analysis Data NCEP
reanalysis Clustering in the first 2-EOFs phase
space K-means algorithm 3-cluster
partition positive NAM
Changes in cluster frequency and significance
when different periods (corresponding to
different external forcings ENSO and climate
signal) are considered.
It suggests that the associated tropical heating
anomalies reorganize the mid-latitude
circulation sufficiently to disrupt the normal
regime behaviour.
24CERFACS contribution to WP4.4
25Questions and Methods
- What are the physical processes associated to
climate predictability of the North Atlantic
European sector at various timescales ? (Focus on
SST influence and interaction between the
different ocean basins) (months 1-18) - What is the influence of anthropogenic forcing
upon the levels of predictability of the major
climate modes ? (months 19-60) - Methods
- Analyses of existing integrations (e.g PREDICATE
and DEMETER) and coordinated experiments (to be
discussed) - Assess the relevance of various predictability
measures to improve the understanding of physical
mechanisms (e.g relative entropy Kleeman 2002
Stephenson and Doblas-reyes 2000) - Analyses of the core ENSEMBLES integrations
26Weather regimes and local climate
2003 heat wave a process study
Summer (JJA) weather regimes (daily timescale)
from NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis (1950-2002)
A
represent 80 Of 2003 summer days
Tropical Atlantic forcing?
A
associated to an increase of warm days
(exceeding the 95 percentile) over France (data
from Météo-France)
OLR anomalies for June 2003
Two ensembles of 40 members with the NCAR
AGCM One CTRL and one forced with 2003 TATL
diabatic heating
Simulated changes Of warm regime occurrence For
JJA 2003 in response To the tropical Atlantic
diabatic heating forcing Cassou et al. 2004
A
Percentage of days exceeding the 95
climatological threshold for a given regime
27Influence of anthropogenic forcing on the NAO
Perturbed climate
Current climate
GHG forcing
NAO-
NAO
PRUDENCE simulations series of Time-slice exp.
With ARPEGE (high res. Over Europe, 50 km)
forced by Observed SST and GHG (1960-1999)
And SST (from 2 CGCMs) and SRES Scenarios
(2070-2099) Terray et al. Jclimate 2004
28Remarks
- Existing simulations PREDICATE, DEMETER, AR4,
Others Need a list of available model data - Coordinated experiments to be discussed soon
- Need good coordination with WP4.2 and WP5.3
- Utility and limitations of regime analysis
algorithms (interaction with WP4.3, others e.g
downscaling)