Title: Presidency
1Presidency
2The President As LegislatorThe Veto
- Perhaps the presidents most formidable tool in
dealing with Congress is the veto. - Constitution defines the veto precisely.
- Used relatively rarely most used by Gerald
Ford. In the past 50 years, the average is fewer
than 10 vetoes a year. - The veto allows the president to block
congressional action, but does not allow the
president to substitute his own policy
preferences.
3Presidential Vetoes Over Time
4The Process Reviewed
5Presidential Power
- Leadership gravitates to presidents during
crisis, but then dissipates quickly as the - crisis recedes.
- Source of Power - Delegation of power from
Congress and successful presidential assertions
of authority (e.g. War Powers Act 1973) - President as commander in chief and head diplomat
6(No Transcript)
7Presidential Popularity
8Bushs Approval Ratings
9Bushs Approval Ratings
10Approval by Party Identification
11The Economy
12Voters Focus on Presidents
- Voters expect president to act in area of foreign
affairs. - Support the president in crisis situations.
- Rally round the flag effect The tendency for
the public to back presidents in moments of
crisis. - While voters are supportive initially, they tend
to demand quick results, and often forget foreign
policy accomplishments, particularly if domestic
economic issues become concerns.
13Handling Situation with Iraq
14(No Transcript)
15Terrorism
16How popularity can influence Congress
- Opposition party can substantially increase
support (1/3rd of total support) - Presidents may behave differently (less willing
to compromise?) - Who gets credit
17Reasons for Influence on Own Party Members
- Policy agreement
- Successful president helps party
- Small favors
- Fundraisers, photo op
18Reasons for Less Influence on Own Party Members
- No sanctions
- Little personal contact between president and
rank and file members - Different constituencies
- National vs. district/state
19War Power
- Presidents have more constitutional discretion
with respect to foreign policy. But, presidents
may not act contrary to the expressed will of
Congress.
20War Power
- Prior to Civil War presidents seldom acted on
their own on military matters. - Abraham Lincoln first to action based on an
expanded interpretation of commander in chief. - Theodore Roosevelt sent ships to Japan without
Congressional approval of cost - Not since WWII has Congress officially declared
war. - Truman fought the Korean War without any
congressional declaration at all.
21Vietnam
- Focused attention on the issue of executive
authority - Eisenhower and Kennedy sent advisors
- Johnson asked for Tonkin Bay Resolution
- Authorized response to attack with armed force
(was told that U.S. had NOT invaded N. Vietnams
territorial waters but in reality they had) - Gave president the authority to take all
necessary measures to repel any attacks and to
prevent further aggression. - Resolution was legal basis for a war that would
last 8 more years but based on misinformation
from the Johnson administration.
22War Powers Resolution
- 1973 congressional resolution requiring the
president to notify Congress formally upon
ordering U.S. troops into military action. - Troops must be withdrawn unless Congress approves
the presidential decision within 60 days after
notice of the military action has been received.
23War Powers Resolution 9/11
- At Bushs request passed war on terrorism
resolution. - One dissenting vote in the House.
- President authorized to use all necessary and
appropriate force against those nations,
organizations, or persons he determines planned,
authorized, committed or aided the terrorist
attacks that occurred on Sept 11, or harbored
such organizations or persons, in order to
prevent any future acts of international
terrorism. - No limit placed on time period in which president
may act. - Second resolution focused continuing threat posed
by Iraq. But required Bush to exhaust diplomatic
or other peaceful means of resolving the
conflict prior to resorting to force.
24Treaty Power
- Treaties are official agreements with foreign
countries that are ratified by the Senate (by
2/3rds). - Because a small number of Senators can block a
treaty, Presidents opt instead for executive
agreements - These are agreements with foreign countries that
require only a presidential signature. Power not
found explicitly in the Constitution. - Most executive agreements either are extensions
of treaties ratified by the Senate or involve
routine presidential actions that have been
authorized by Congress.
25Policy Responses to 9/11
0
- Military Response
- Invasion of Afghanistan
- War in Iraq
- Economic
- Airline relief bill (October 2001)
- National Security
- Joint resolution on 14 Sept. to use all
necessary and appropriate force against
nationsthat he determines plannedthe terrorist
attacks - Patriot Act (October 2001)
- Department of Homeland Security
26Patriot Act Provisions
0
- Relaxes restrictions on information sharing
between U.S. law enforcement and intelligence
officers about suspected terrorists. - Makes it illegal to knowingly harbor a terrorist
- Authorizes "roving wiretaps,"
- Allows the federal government to detain non-U.S.
citizens suspected of terrorism for up to seven
days without specific charges. - Allows law enforcement officials greater subpoena
power for e-mail records of terrorist suspects. - Triples the number of Border Patrol, Customs
Service Inspectors and Immigration and
Naturalization Service inspectors - Expands measures against money laundering
- Eliminates the statute of limitations for
prosecuting the most egregious terrorist acts
27The Patriot Act A Threat to Civil Liberties?
0
- Change in protections from unreasonable search
and seizure - Detention of non-citizens, immigrants
- Racial profiling
28Civil Liberties
- We classify as civil liberties the Constitutions
protections from government power. - Freedom of speech, religion and the right to
privacy are examples. - Typically violations of these liberties occur
when some government agency, at any level,
oversteps its authority.
29Who protects civil liberties?
- Does the constitution guarantee certain absolute
civil liberties? - Truth is that our interpretations of these
freedoms constantly change. - Question of how to balance individual liberties
with societal rights
30Courts and Civil liberties
- What power does the Supreme Court have?
- Judicial Review
- Marbury v. Madison (1803)
- The midnight appointments by Adams, Jeffersons
response, the request for writ of madamus (a
court order) under the Judiciary Act of 1789 and
the decision.
31SC hears cases on Enemy Combatants
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Rumsfeld v. Padilla
- The key figures in the cases are both American
citizens Yaser Hamdi is a U.S.-born
Saudi-American who was captured during fighting
in Afghanistan in 2001 and Jose Padilla is a
former Chicago gang member who traveled to
Afghanistan and Pakistan before being arrested at
a Chicago airport in 2002 on suspicion of
plotting to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb"
in the United States. - At issue is Habeas Corpus an individuals right
not to be imprisoned unless charged with a crime,
except in time of rebellion or invasion
32Supreme Court Decision
- On Hamdi, the Court (8-9 decision) agreed that
the Executive Branch does not have the power to
hold indefinitely a U.S. citizen without basic
due process protections enforceable through
judicial review. - The Court did not reach a decision in the Padilla
case because it found that it was improperly
filed. On April 3, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court
declined to hear Padilla's appeal that the
President had the power to designate him and
detain him as an "enemy combatant" without
charges and with disregard to habeas corpus.
33Cases Involving Civil Liberties
- Free Speech, Schenck v. United States (1919)
- clear and present danger
- Freedom of Press, New York Times v. Sullivan
(1964) - Libel violates 1st Amendment
- Obscenity, Roth v. United States (1957)
- Court attempts to define obscenity
- Establishment Clause, Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
- Three part test for judging constitutionality of
division between church and state - Gun Control, United States v. Miller (1939)
- 2nd Amendment does not provide for absolute
guarantee - Right to Privacy, Roe v. Wade (1973)
- Landmark case on abortion
34Checks on the Judiciary
- Executive Checks
- Appointments
- Legislative Checks
- Appropriation of funds
- Constitutional amendments
- Amending laws to overturn courts rulings
- Public Opinion
- Influence judicial opinions
- enforcement
- The Court
- stare decisis
- Judicial restraint