Title: State Farms Dangerous Intersections Initiative
1State Farms Dangerous Intersections Initiative
- John Nepomuceno, P.Eng., MBA
- International Forum on Traffic Records
- Highway Information Systems
- August 2002
- Orlando, Florida
2Outline
- Study objectives and strategies
- Data sources
- Results
- Next steps
3Causes of crashes
Road-related causes account for approximately 35
of crashes
4Under-reporting of crashes
5Minimum Reporting Thresholds
2
Injury
1
Towaway
1
Between 2000 and 3000
0
Between 1000 and 2000
18
Between 750 and 1000
Minimum Reporting Thresholds
5
Between 500 and 750
18
Between 250 and 500
5
Between 0 and 250
1
No reporting
Number of states (incl. D.C.)
6Dangerous Intersections Initiative
- Goal
- To reduce the frequency and severity of crashes
at high-crash locations and raise public
awareness about the risks of everyday driving - Strategies
- Use own claims data to identify crash-prone
locations around the country - Provide funding to improve intersection safety
- Use the popular media to raise awareness
7State Farm Insurance
- Detailed cost information on vehicles
- Largest claims database in the country
- In 1998, our research databases were amended to
include a location field - Date, time and facts-of-loss fields
8Dangerous Intersections Initiative
- Sorted according to location field
- Frequency-based claim frequencies factored up to
reflect market share locally - Location confirmed against facts-of-loss data
- In 1999, limited to 1 year of data 2 years in
2001
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14Dangerous Intersections Initiative
- Rates vs. Collision Frequency
- Intersection volume data is not consistently
available throughout the country - Prioritization based on rates would increase work
at least ten-fold - Collision rates often result in low volume roads
being prioritized - Collision frequency is easier to convey to public
15Dangerous Intersections Initiative
- Better business case for State Farm
- Insurance premiums are a function of frequency
and severity of crashes
Frequency x severity policyholders x premium
16Dangerous Intersections Initiative
AR1 c1/v1 AR2 c2/v2 AR1 AR2
17Dangerous Intersections Initiative
- Identified Top 10 nationally
- Provided up to 20,000 for a study
- For Top 10 nationally, 100,000 for improvements
- 1999 - 172 locations identified
- 2001 - 224 locations identified
18Evolution since 1999
- Crash index weighted score to reflect higher
severity - Two years of data (1999 and 2000)
- Assistance from the Advocates for Highway and
Auto Safety - Advance contact to notify affected communities
19State Farm Danger Index
20Results
- Communities representing 92 of the 172 locations
identified in 1999 applied for and received
grants - Received approximately grant applications
representing 120 of the 224 intersections named
in 2001
21Next Steps
- Conduct an E-B evaluation of those intersections
that were studied and improved in the 1999
Initiative (Q4 of 2002) - Support national initiatives in intersection
safety - Support research initiatives in highway safety
22Final Words
- Traffic engineering can be very effective in
reducing crashes - There is often less data available to those who
can make a difference - The data that is available may be biased towards
higher-severity crashes
23Final Words
- Last year, SF lost more than 5B
- Need to do what we can to reduce the frequency
and severity of crashes - Auto insurance is becoming commoditized
- Raising rates is an unattractive alternative
- To remain competitive, we must do more to manage
losses - Traffic engineering can be very effective in
reducing crashes
24Contact Information
- John Nepomuceno, P.Eng., MBA
- State Farm Insurance Companies
- Bloomington, IL 61710-0001
- Tel (309) 763-5706
- John.Nepomuceno.LUJD_at_statefarm.com