Title: How Does Iowas Water Quality Rate
1How Does Iowas Water Quality Rate?
- The Development of an Improved Water Quality
Index Specific to the State of Iowa - Katie Foreman
- IOWATER Snapshot Coordinator
- 6th Annual Water Monitoring Conference
- February 16-17, 2006
- Ames, IA
2What does this mean?
(Iowa Geological Survey 2004,1)
3What is NeededA Yardstick for Measuring Water
Quality
- Large quantities of water quality data on their
own do not inform water resources decision making - A quick way to draw meaning from data is needed
- What is clearly needed is a yardstick of water
quality. (Brown et al. 1970, 339)
4Value of WQIs
- In 1972, the Council on Environmental Quality
stated that accurate and timely information on
the state of the environment was essential to
forming policy - Indices are one of the most effective tools to
compare and evaluate environmental conditions - Examples include Water Quality Index, Air
Quality Index, Index of Biotic Integrity, Trophic
State Index, and Species Diversity Index -
-
5Process of WQI Calculation
6Example of a Subindex Rating Curve
7Qualitative Rating
8Motivation
- National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality
Index (NSFWQI) - Most respected and utilized WQI in U.S.
- One size fits all structure criticized for
overlooking regional water quality concerns - When applied to 3 years of Iowa data
- Rated streams/rivers 79 medium and 21 good
-
9Does Iowa have waters that can be categorized
on the extremes?
- What about the impaired waters (303 (d) list)???
(25) - How about our excellent waters
- (Reference sites)??
10Index Development
- IWQI developed in 2005 by custom-fitting the
NSFWQI to Iowa. - Geographically specific water quality index to
represent a full range of water quality
conditions in Iowa. - Index was validated with data of known water
quality - Statistics used to answer the question is the
IWQI better than the NSFWQI at characterizing
Iowas water quality?
11Attributes of NSFWQI IWQI
12Geographically-Specific Subindex Rating Curves
TDS and TSS
13Index Performance
- Is the IWQI better than the NSFWQI at rating
Iowas water quality? - Subset of the validation datasets chosen
- Most pristine and most impaired water quality
records - Hypothesis test used to determine relative
performance of the two indices
14Comparative Analysis Statistics
Most Pristine Water Quality as Rated by the IWQI
and the NSFWQI
Most Impaired Water Quality as Rated by the IWQI
and the NSFWQI
15- Is the IWQI better than the NSFWQI at rating
Iowas water quality? - YES!
- Statistical analysis suggests that IWQI rates the
most impaired water quality worse and the most
pristine water quality better than does the
NSFWQI - Why?
- Index Design Parameters, Subindex Rating Curves
and Aggregation Function
16Reason 1 Parameters Included
- Non point source pollution is the
- 1 water quality challenge in Iowa
- IWQI includes two more non point source
pollutants in the index compared to NSFWQI - 84 of Iowas stream miles have major sediment
impacts (TSS) - 81 of Iowas surface water samples have
detectable levels of pesticides (total
pesticides) - Temperature change excluded
17Reason 2 Subindex Rating Curves
- IWQI has geographically specific subindex rating
curves - Distinguishes background from impaired conditions
- IWQI has consistent maximum (100) and minimum
(10) values - No artificial over or under-estimation of water
quality conditions - Subindex curves appropriate for Iowas waters
- Phosphorus, DO, and BOD rated more stringently
(accounts for eutrophication risk) - TDS is not rated as stringently (climate and
geologic variability) -
18Reason 3 Aggregation Function
- NSFWQI uses the weighted linear sum
- Eclipsing problems, averages out low numbers
- Tends to overestimate water quality conditions
- Arbitrary weights
- IWQI uses the unweighted harmonic square mean
- Eclipsing problems minimal
- Gives high statistical value to lowest number
- Index score determined with all parameters in
mind, no arbitrary weights
19NSFWQI vs. IWQI (2000-2004)
20Uses for the IWQI
- Evaluating changes in water quality over time
- Quantify the effectiveness of water quality
regulations and protection programs - BMPs
- Comparing water quality conditions in different
locations ? resource prioritization - Determining the extent to which existing water
quality standards are met ? informing policy - Developing reports required by the Clean Water
Act (305(b) and 303 (d) list)
21Acknowledgements
- Dr. R. Rajagopal (University of Iowa)
- Dr. Mary Skopec (Iowa Geological Survey)
- Dr. David Bennett (University of Iowa)
- Rick Langel (Iowa Geological Survey)
- Tom Wilton (Iowa Department of Natural Resources)
- Malini De (University of Iowa)
- Dr. Ed Brands (University of Iowa)
- Lynette Seigley (Iowa Geological Survey)
- Eric OBrien (Iowa Geological Survey)