The effects of trans-nationalism on infant development: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

The effects of trans-nationalism on infant development:

Description:

Satellite babies ... I'm feeling that the baby and I are attached together. I would feel really bad (if the baby had to go to China), if it has to be, then ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: psyc82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The effects of trans-nationalism on infant development:


1
  • The effects of trans-nationalism on infant
    development
  • are we meeting the mental health needs of our
    youngest victims of globalization?
  • Yvonne Bohr
  • La Marsh Research Centre, York University ,
    Toronto, Canada
  • Presented at Transcultural mental health in a
    changing world Building a global response
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota, October 29 31, 2007.

2
Acknowledgments
  • The parents who shared their stories
  • York University lab
  • Natasha Mullen
  • Jessica Chan
  • At Aisling Discoveries Child Family Centre
  • Connie Tse
  • Sadie Kwong
  • The La Marsh Research Centre

3
Context
  • Primary relationships can be disrupted by
    population mobility
  • In an era of intensifying globalization, even
    very young children are facing increasingly
    complex challenges due to this mobility

4
The stories
  • On the second Thursday in July, the woman, Xiu,
    finally did it. Wrapping a tiny gold bracelet
    around his wrist, she placed her son in the arms
    of a friend of a friend, who, for 1,000, agreed
    to take him to China. Xiu's parent is raising him
    there now, along with the 10-year-old daughter
    left behind last year when Xiu joined her husband
    in New York. She plans to bring Henry back when
    he reaches school age. But until then, she
    remains here, waiting to be a parent to her
    child.

Sengupta, 1999, p.1
5
Context
  • Trans-nationalism the development by expatriates
    or immigrants of multi-stranded social relations
    that link together their societies of origin and
    settlement
  • Trans-nationalism has changed peoples relations
    to space particularly by creating social fields
    that connect and position some actors in more
    than one country.
  • Basch, Glick Schiller, Blanc-Szanton , 1994

6
Context
  • Geographical and cultural duality are adding a
    layer of complexity to understanding immigrant
    families who live a trans-national life
  • Practices and cultural meanings derived from
    specific geographical and historical points of
    origin have been transferred and re-grounded in
    new cultural settings¹

¹Vertovec, 1999
7
Satellite babies
  • Some new immigrant parents engage in the practice
    of sending infants back to their country of
    origin, to be raised by members of their extended
    family.
  • This custom is particularly prevalent amongst
    Chinese immigrants to the United States and
    Canada
  • satellite children¹
  • ¹Waters, 2002

8
Satellite babies
  • The children return to their parents in time to
    begin schooling, having endured multiple
    separations
  • Does this have serious repercussions for
    social-emotional development?

9
When infants are separated from their families
  • Studies deal primarily with adolescents' or young
    adults' perceptions and feelings about earlier
    separations from their parents
  • Few studies available are mostly retrospective
  • We know little about outcomes for younger,
    children exposed to serial separations

Glasgow Ghouse-Sheese,1995 Smith, Lalonde
Johnson, 2004
10
When infants are separated from their families
  • Many potential problems are associated with major
    disruptions and losses in the caregiver-baby
    relationship
  • Greatest concern is threat to the bilateral
    attachment relationship

Bowlby, 1951/1969 Cassidy, 1999 Karen, 1994
Kobak, 1999 Miranda, Siddique, Der-Martirosian
Belin, 2005 Smith et al., 2004 Suarez-Orozco
Suarez-Orozco, 2001
11
When infants are separated from their families
  • The problem
  • Models of child mental health are based on First
    World, Western research¹

¹Liu Clay, 2002 Sue, Casas, Fouad, 1998
12
Attachment across cultures
  • Infants are certainly able to engage in multiple,
    functional attachment relationships¹
  • Alternative attachment styles, e.g., avoidance,
    may in fact maximize survival in less
    supportive contexts²
  • Numerous examples of infants having to fit into
    the culture at the expense of comfort and
    happiness of both child and mother³

¹ van Ijzendoorn, Sagi Lambermon, 1992 ²Main,
1990 ³Hinde, 1991
13
Attachment studies from the Chinese community
  • Concept of attachment very applicable to this
    cultural context¹
  • Attachment classifications has been remarkably
    similar to the global distribution²
  • indifferent attachment³
  • Chinese youngsters are more apprehensive or
    inhibited towards strangers than European
    American children?

¹Posada, 1995 ²van Ijzendoorn Kroonenberg,
1988 ³Hu Meng,1996 ?Hsu, 1985
14
Objectives of this study
  • To study infants and their parents who are
    entangled in the complexities of a transnational
    lifestyle, and are subjected to multiple
    separations
  • To generate useful information for mental health
    clinicians

15
Objectives of the study
  • To explore the cultural, socio-economic, and
    individual factors that contribute to new
    immigrant parents decision to send their child
    overseas to be cared for by relatives, in the
    face of strong bio-evolutionary drives that would
    dictate proximity
  • To describe parents decision-making process and
    propose a culturally sensitive decision-making
    model

16
Method
  • Qualitative study
  • Recruitment through a childrens mental health
    center in Toronto
  • Semi-structured interviews with 12 mothers (5 of
    whom were joined by their husbands), who had
    expressed an interest in, or were attending, a
    parenting group for Chinese Canadian families.
  • All were struggling with the decision of whether
    or not to send their infants back to their home
    country, to be raised by relatives.
  • All participants were recent (6 months- 3 years)
    immigrants from mainland China, and ranged in age
    from 24 to 36 (mean26).
  • All were university educated.
  • 1-1½ hour in home interview.
  • Individual interviews modified grounded theory
    approach.

17
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
18
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
19
Ambivalence
  • I have been thinking about sending my child to
    China to live with grandparents... I havent made
    up my mind yet, so my child is still here. I have
    to spend quite a lot of time on the child. I
    still havent made the decisionwe are having the
    strong feeling of keeping the child here (Li
    Wen)

20
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
21
Cultural and Economic value of career
  • Because of the family financial situation, we
    need to send her back to China for parents to
    take care of her I have to send my child back to
    China. At least for a couple of years. (Lee)

22
Cultural and Economic value of career
  • I've been here for three years, I want to have
    my own career I had a good job in China but I am
    starting over, hereI feel like I have to start
    all over because of the baby I can't go back to
    workI want to work harder to get a houseis hard
    to afford the most important factor is
    financial It's bad to rent an apartment with the
    baby, so we can have a house when the baby comes
    back home, so the baby will have her own room for
    studying that she doesn't have to share with
    anyone else. (Monica)

23
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
24
Preservation of Cultural traditions My
grandparents took care of me
  • My parents they also want us to send the baby
    back, they also want to play with the grandchild
    in China grandparents are taking care of the baby
    (Lee)

25
Preservation of Cultural traditions
  • There are different cultures for China Canada.
    If my baby grows up here and he just picks up the
    Canadian culture maybe he will have so many
    different ideas than us. I don't want my child
    just to grow up in Canada and just talk Canadian
    (Connie)

26
Preservation of Cultural traditions
  • He will not be able to understand Chinese.
    That is a big problem. He will not be able to
    speak Chinese or read or write any Chinese. He
    will not be able to understand his Chinese
    name (Lynn)

27
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
28
Extended family systems needsFor the good of
the family
  • For the child herself I dont think theres any
    advantage for her, but just for the consideration
    of the family, for the whole family, (we) have to
    think of it as an advantage (Lee)

29
Extended family systems needs
  • But the relationship with relatives and friends,
    they are in Bejing, so child will feel more the
    family ties, that is what's most important

30
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
31
Affectively charged attachment schemas
  • My baby is now 9 months, I'm afraid that baby
    will forget about us. Seeing her grow up, every
    day, I feel I can't be separated from the baby.
    I'm feeling that the baby and I are attached
    together. I would feel really bad (if the baby
    had to go to China), if it has to be, then it has
    to be, but I would feel very bad (Sue)

32
Affectively charged attachment schemas
  • The relationship would be blocked I would feel
    guilty and self-blame, it's the responsibility of
    the parents to be with their baby (Lee)

33
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
34
Acculturation and educational benefitsLosing
out in the new culture
  • The language barrier when they come back to
    here. It is sometimes hard for them to speak
    English so the child can communicate with the
    others. they also have to learn to study
    (Hui).

35
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
36
Nuclear family bias
  • I'm strongly opposed to sending the baby back,
    have to be separated. No one can replace the
    parent. (Zhi)

37
Mitigating and compensatory factors(Developmen
tal knowledge)
  • I would send her for three years. But she will
    come back here before she is 4 years old.
    (Jen)
  • When we are separated we will continue to have
    contact on telephone and the internet. (Lynn)
  • We will use the webcam (Connie)

38
Ambivalence
Decision-Making Process
Opposition to SEPARATION
39
Conclusions
  • The custom of trans-national parenting of
    satellite babies exists at the interface of
    globalization and parent-child relationships
  • An examination of parents decision-making about
    separating from their infants reveals complex
    layers of rational considerations that are
    suffused with ambivalence and often resignation.

40
Conclusions
  • Parents who have one foot in the old and one foot
    in their new culture appear to use familiar
    models of roles and traditions flexibly in the
    service of economic need. Meanwhile, cultural,
    collectivist claims clearly keep pace with
    attachment and other psycho-biological needs of
    child and parent, and often override them.

41
Conclusions
  • These claims may be adaptive, productive and
    protective
  • As clinicians, we have very little, and
    incomplete information on which to base our
    interventions

42
Conclusions
  • It is clear that a multi-systemic cost/ benefit
    ratios should be considered when clinically
    addressing practices that are considered harmful
    by Western standards, and that research needs to
    identify and define both these benefits and costs
    in a socio-cultural context.

43
Parent-child Separation
44
Parent-child Separation
45
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com