Winter Advisory Forum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Winter Advisory Forum

Description:

... have jargon; instead of principles, slogans; and, instead of genuine ideas, Bright ideas ... haven't we been here before? Principles-based regulation is not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: AndrewB56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Winter Advisory Forum


1
Winter Advisory Forum
  • 19 November 2007
  • Dali Universe
  • County Hall Gallery
  • Modern Masters

2
Principles-based regulation a broad-brush
approach?
Martyn Hopper Herbert Smith LLP
3
  • Ours is an age of substitutes instead of
    language we have jargon instead of principles,
    slogans and, instead of genuine ideas, Bright
    ideas
  • Eric Bentley, New Republic (1952)

4
Background havent we been here before?
  • Principles-based regulation is not new
  • Takeover code
  • Other forms of professional regulation
  • Power to make Principles introduced in financial
    regulation by Companies Act 1989 New Settlement
  • FSA implemented current Principles as rules under
    Financial Services Markets Act 2000
  • The scheme of the FSA Handbook at N2
  • Tiered structure principles fleshed out by
    rules and guidance
  • Principles, rules and standing guidance subject
    to consultation and cost-benefit analysis
  • Enforcement on the basis of principles would be
    rare

5
What is more principles-based regulation?
  • Standard setting
  • A move towards greater reliance on broad-based
    standards rather than detailed rules
  • Greater reliance on informal FSA guidance
  • FSA confirmation of industry guidance
  • Outcomes-based regulation
  • Increased focus on outcomes
  • Outcomes specified in the Principles and by the
    FSA informally
  • Greater freedom/flexibility for firms as to how
    those outcomes are achieved
  • A more managerial approach to regulation
  • Greater onus on firms/senior management to
    determine
  • what the Principles / outcomes mean for their
    business
  • what particular processes and procedures are
    required to deliver those outcomes
  • Construction, implementation and documentation of
    internal review processes is increasingly
    important

6
Why is this happening? What are the benefits?
  • Drivers for change
  • Better regulation agenda
  • Perceived failure of prescriptive regulation
  • PBR has achieved some success
  • Benefits
  • Focus on regulatory goals rather than box
    ticking
  • Flexibility for firms
  • Better fit with business practices
  • More engagement from senior management and
    business
  • More efficient regulatory outcomes
  • Responsive to changing, innovative markets

7
Challenges and pitfalls
  • Certainty, predictability and consistency
  • In standard setting
  • In supervision
  • In enforcement
  • Proliferation of guidance
  • Increased reliance on informal guidance from FSA
  • Confirmation of industry guidance
  • Increased significance of enforcement actions
  • Accountability and regulatory creep
  • Prescription by the back door?
  • Use of informal guidance to effect significant
    change without formal consultation or CBA?
  • Blurring the line between minimum standards and
    best practice?

8
Challenges and pitfalls (2)
  • Legal obstacles
  • EC law (eg need to implement detailed MiFID
    requirements)
  • Possible public law challenge to guidance
  • Risk of divergent interpretations of Principles
    by
  • FSA
  • Financial Services and Markets Tribunal
  • Financial Ombudsman
  • The Courts
  • Section 150 FSMA
  • CP07/9 proposals are controversial
  • MiFID derived principles-based requirements would
    be in scope
  • Will this lead to more litigation?
  • Will the Principles remain outside section 150?

9
Does the Emperor have any clothes?
  • FSA Principle 2 due skill, care and diligence
  • Behavioural not outcome based
  • Fault based
  • How is it enforced?
  • Self-assessment / Supervision / Enforcement
  • In an enforcement action, FSA must particularise
    breach
  • Where does FSA look for standards?
  • Other rules and guidance?
  • Old rules and guidance?
  • Informal guidance / confirmed industry guidance?
  • The firms own policies?
  • Experts?
  • Past enforcement cases?

10
What will PBR mean in practice?
  • Establishing FSAs expectations is more
    challenging
  • Need to keep abreast of broader range of sources
    of guidance DPs, FSA reports on thematic work,
    Dear CEO letters, speeches, industry guidance,
    enforcement decisions etc
  • Changes in regulatory policy through
    re-interpretation of Principles
  • Change in nature of supervisory relationship
  • Developing compliance policies and procedures is
    more
  • challenging
  • Simply hard-wiring specific FSA rules into
    internal processes is not enough
  • A more holistic, judgemental process
  • Engagement of senior management and the business
    is even more critical
  • Enforcement
  • Use of informal FSA/industry guidance
  • Use of firms own internal policies and
    procedures
  • Use of industry experts
  • Scope for greater debate as to what the
    Principles mean

11
PBR a new approach to compliance?
12
An integrated approach to compliance?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com