Domestic Violence and Boys - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Domestic Violence and Boys

Description:

Domestic violence, also called 'intimate partner violence,' 'battering,' or ' ... Gay/bisexual: 'Happened because I'm gay/bisexual? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: informat869
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Domestic Violence and Boys


1
Domestic Violence and Boys
  • Examining the Life Experience of Boys
  • Ed Clarke, Ph.D.

2
Overview Boys Violence
  • My Purpose
  • Not My Intention
  • Domestic Violence Defined
  • Perpetuating Domestic Violence
  • Consequences of Victimization
  • Where do we go from here?
  • To minimize the abuses of women either outside or
    inside of the family.
  • To defend men who use violent means within the
    family.

3
Domestic Violence Defined
  • Domestic violence, also called intimate partner
    violence, battering, or wife-beating, refers
    to physical, sexual, psychological, and economic
    abuse that takes place in the context of an
    intimate relationship, including marriage.
  • Domestic violence is one of the most common forms
    of gender-based violence and is often
    characterized by long-term patterns of abusive
    behavior and control.
  • This definition contributes to a myopic view of
    family violence.
  • References the family in using the term
    Domestic but focuses on only one of the many
    relationships within families.
  • Defining "domestic violence" in this way also
    tends to overlook male victims and violence
    between same-sex partners.
  • The more specific term "intimate partner
    violence (IPV) is utilized more and is defined
    as actual or threatened physical or sexual
    violence, or psychological/emotional abuse by a
    spouse, ex-spouse, boyfriend/ girlfriend,
    ex-boyfriend/ ex-girlfriend, or date.
  • In recent years, the term Domestic Violence" has
    begun to include other forms of violence
    including abuse of elders, children, and
    siblings.

4
Children Violence and the Social Context
  • SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of
    Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization
    Survey. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform
    Crime Reporting Program, Supplementary Homicide
    Reports.
  • In 2005, the rate at which youth were victims of
    serious violent crimes was 14 crimes per 1,000
    juveniles ages 1217, totaling about 350,600 such
    crimes. Youth ages 1217 were more than twice as
    likely as adults to be victims of serious violent
    crimes.
  • Serious violent crime involving juvenile victims
    stayed about the same between 2004 and 2005.
    However, rates are still significantly lower than
    their peak in 1993. In 1993, the serious violent
    crime victimization rate was 44 per 1,000
    juveniles, compared to the 2005 rate of 14 per
    1,000 juveniles.
  • Males are more than twice as likely as females to
    be victims of serious violent crimes. In 2005,
    the serious violent crime victimization rate was
    19 per 1,000 male youth, compared with 9 per
    1,000 female youth.
  • In 2005, Black youth were more likely than White
    youth to be victims of a serious violent crime
    and over twice as likely as youth of other races
    to be victims of serious violence.
  • Older teens (ages 1517) were more likely to be
    victims of a serious violent crime than younger
    teens (ages 1214) in 2005. Older teens also had
    higher rates of serious violent crime
    victimization in 2005 (17 victims per 1,000) than
    in 2004 (11 victims per 1,000).

5
Rate of serious violent crime victimization of
youth ages 1217 by gender, 19802005
NOTE Serious violent crimes include aggravated
assault, rape, robbery (stealing by force or
threat of violence), and homicide. Because of
changes, data prior to 1992 are adjusted to make
them comparable with data collected under the
redesigned methodology. The 2005 data were
collected during the calendar year and include
some incidents that occurred during the previous
year. Data for previous years are of
victimizations experienced in the calendar year.
This was done because the full data for 2005 were
not yet available. Analyses comparing these data
show only a small difference between the two
methods.
SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization
Survey. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform
Crime Reporting Program, Supplementary Homicide
Reports.
6
Children Objects of Family Violence
  • 44 of Daughters and 58.2 of Sons were hit at
    least once by a father or mother.
  • Mothers and Fathers hit more sons than daughters.
  • Mothers 43.5 of sons 35.6 of daughters.
  • Fathers 44.8 of sons 26.7 of daughters.
  • Mothers and Fathers hit sons more often than
    daughters.
  • Mothers hit 6 or more times 31.3 of sons 25.9
    of daughters.
  • Fathers hit 6 or more times 25 of sons 19.6
    of fathers.
  • The 1993 case-level data on perpetrators of
    substantiated or indicated maltreatment were
    provided by seven States. This information showed
    that
  • 62 of perpetrators were female.
  • Most perpetrators under age 40 were female (65),
    while most perpetrators over 40 were male (55).
  • 63 of perpetrators were associated with only one
    victim, 19 were associated with two victims, 10
    with three victims, and 8 with four or more
    victims.

7
(No Transcript)
8
Perpetuating Domestic Violence
  • Veneration of Violence in American Culture
  • Seen as pragmaticto solve problemsfrom the
    National/international level to the family.
  • Normal possible strategy for resolving conflict
    (especially for males).
  • Males are expected (and may be encouraged) to
    engage in violence at some point.
  • Continued faith in the effectiveness and
    efficiency of violent strategies.

9
Perpetuating Domestic Violence
  • Legitimating Violence in Families
  • 2002 Result of meta-analysis of 88 studies
    Elizabeth Thompson Gershoff of the National
    Center for Children in Poverty at Columbia
    University, a large-scale, meta-analysis of 88
    studies on spanking of children, The American
    Psychological Association.
  • She searched for associations between parental
    use of corporal punishment and eleven factors,
    including
  • In childhood immediate compliance, moral
    internalization, quality of relationship with
    parent, and physical abuse by that parent, child
    aggression
  • In adulthood abuse of ones own children, abuse
    of one's spouse and
  • In both childhood and adulthood mental health,
    aggression, and criminal or antisocial behavior.
  • She found "strong associations" in each case. One
    factor -- immediate compliance by the child --
    was positive the other ten factors were
    negative. She suggests that these observations
    give insight into why corporal punishment is such
    a controversial matter
  • Many parents strongly support spanking because
    they are rewarded with immediate compliance by
    the child whenever this discipline technique is
    used.
  • Many researchers strongly oppose spanking because
    of serious negative affects on the child during
    childhood and later in life.
  • Sanctity of the family
  • Child vs. Parental Rights in Law

10
A Boys World Becoming Male
  • Emotions
  • Male infants are biologically wired to be more
    emotionally reactive and expressive than females
  • Startle more easily
  • Excite more quickly
  • Less tolerance of tension and frustration
  • Distressed more quickly
  • Cry sooner and more often
  • From age 2 onward, more physically active but
    less emotionally mature

11
Becoming Male Gender Socialization of Emotion
  • From infancy into adulthood, males and females
    are conditioned to experience and respond to
    emotions very differently.
  • How parents respond to childrens emotions.
  • Responses from peers, the games children play
    and how they play them.
  • Responses from adultsteachers, coaches, etc.
  • Media messages and role models (e.g. sports
    commentators descriptions of athletes as
    fearless, etc.)
  • By middle of grade school boys are
  • Less aware of their emotions
  • Less expressive of their emotions
  • Less empathic toward others and toward
    themselves

12
Moral Values and Gender Identity
  • Moral values Good ways to be a ______.
  • We cant help but evaluate ourselves
  • How close or far am I from how I should be?
  • Am I moving toward or away from my ideal self?
  • Predisposed to pursue valued goals.
  • Gender is moral (seen as good/right) and
    fundamental to identity.
  • Being feminine and masculine are important
    elements of self-identity or self-concept.

13
Male Identity Emotions and Values
Male Identity
Less Empathy
Dominate aggressive
Less Emotional Awareness
Avoid unmanly
Experience
Behavior
Anger Good/Safe
Fear vulnerability Bad/unsafe
Suppress vulnerable emotions
Thoughts
Beliefs about relationships
Beliefs about masculinity, esp. emotional
expression
Beliefs about self
14
Becoming Male Conditioning Masculine Identity
  • Most conditioning is not conscious
  • Conditioned to
  • Not experience vulnerable emotions, but ignore
    them.
  • Not express vulnerable emotions, but suppress
    them.
  • Not empathize with vulnerable emotions, but fear
    and have contempt for them.
  • Skip vulnerable feelings and go straight to
    anger.
  • Thoughts and beliefs are important, but not the
    core.
  • Conditioning wires and re-wires the brain.
  • Less emotional awareness, expressiveness, and
    empathy conditioning can shape the way our
    brains work (i.e. combat veterans).

15
Most Effective Conditioning
  • High arousal
  • Intense positive or negative emotions
  • Threat to life or physical integrity (PTSD
    criterion)
  • Threat to moral identity
  • Brain chemicals that modulate learning and memory
  • Deep needs
  • Safety
  • Respect and acceptance
  • Relationships and trust
  • Relationship with God or that which is seen as
    transcendentTo be a good ________, worthy of
    ________
  • Repetition with clear rewards and punishments

16
Assault as Emotional Conditioning
  • Massive arousal Memory (fragments) and emotions
    burned into the brain
  • Basic needs Safety, respect, relationships and
    trust are all threatened and suspended.
  • Vulnerability Fear, helplessness, humiliation,
    etc.
  • Outcomes, including PTSD
  • Reliving traumatic memories, emotions, body
    reactions
  • Automatic triggering by associated stimuli
  • Emotions as all-or-nothing, unregulated
  • Avoid reminders and triggers
  • Lose positive emotions and motivation to engage
  • Hyperarousal Sleep problems, irritability,
    startle, etc.

17
Assault Conditioning vs. Male Identity
  • Experience and effects of assault, especially
    sexual assault, totally contradict male identity
  • Victim
  • Vulnerable
  • Submissive
  • Overwhelmed
  • Intense and inescapable emotions
  • Normal male gender identity not an option
  • Can shatter male identity extreme negative
    beliefs and judgments about oneself
  • How to (try to) deal with the vulnerable
    emotions?

18
Experiencing Sexual AssaultLisak, D. (1994). The
psychological impact of sexual abuse Content
analysis of interviews with male survivors.
Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 525-548.
  • Themes Shared with Female Sexual Assault Victims
  • Themes and Beliefs Unique to Male Sexual Assault
    Victims
  • Legitimacy
  • Men cant be sexual assault victims.
  • No one will believe me.
  • Masculinity issues
  • I cant be a real man if I let this happen to
    me.
  • My manhood has been destroyed, stolen from me.
  • Homosexuality issues
  • Do I look gay? Am I gay?
  • Homosexuality is perverted and evil.
  • Gay/bisexual Happened because Im
    gay/bisexual?
  • Fear
  • Betrayal
  • Helplessness
  • Isolation and alienation
  • Loss
  • Negative beliefs about people
  • Negative beliefs about oneself
  • Problems with sexuality
  • Self blame/guilt
  • Shame/humiliation

19
Male Emotional Conditioning vs. Healing from
Sexual Assault
  • The cultures rigid gender norms harmed these
    men beyond creating feelings of insecurity and
    inadequacy. They also impeded the process of
    healing from sexual abuse by forcefully warning
    survivors away from the very capacities they
    needed to foster their own healing. Like all
    males, survivors hear from numerous sources one
    of the codes of masculinity Dont acknowledge
    your pain, dont express it, and dont talk about
    it with anyone else. Thus, they are compelled to
    reject their capacities to feel and empathize
    with their own pain, thereby dramatically
    reducing their ability to begin the process of
    healing the legacy of abuse.
  • Choice aspect
  • Option A Challenge masculine norms, create own
    identity
  • Option B Become hyper-masculine
  • Option C Resigned to non-masculine identity
  • Conditioning aspect
  • Beyond choice beyond what you think or decide
    Emotional functioning is deeply conditioned,
    involves brain structures and processes outside
    of awareness
  • Many men simply lack capacities to deal with
    strong vulnerable emotions
  • Lisak, D. (1994). The psychological impact of
    sexual abuse Content analysis of interviews with
    male survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7,
    525-548.

20
Consequences Religion Related Abuse
  • Personal responsibility mantra, therefore child
    must be changed.
  • Defined
  • the perpetrator of the physical abuse was a
    religious leader or religious teacher, believed
    he or she was directed by God or a religious
    text, and/or perpetrated the abuse in a religious
    context, all of which are circumstances that
    could lead victims to feel as though the abuse
    was sanctioned by a church or even God.
  • Obligatory Violence
  • Forced Allegiance
  • victims of religion-related abuse were more
    likely than victims of other physical abuse to
    say that their experience had lasting positive
    spiritual effects. This becomes part of the
    folklore.
  • Results indicate that
  • Although the basic characteristics of
    religion-related physical abuse are similar to
    non religion-related physical abuse,
    religion-related abuse has significantly more
    negative implications for its victims' long-term
    psychological well-being.
  • victims of religion-related abuse displayed more
    depression, anxiety, hostility, psychoticism,
    phobic anxiety, and paranoid ideation (although
    the latter two effects weakened after covarying
    for proxy measures of abuse severity). Those
    victims were also higher in somatization than
    victims of non-religion-related abuse, but did
    not differ from the control group in that regard.
  • Religion-related Child Physical Abuse
    Characteristics and Psychological Outcomes, Bette
    L. Bottoms, University of Illinois at Chicago,
    Michael Nielsen and Rebecca Murray, Georgia
    Southern University, Henrietta Filipas,
    University of Illinois at Chicago

21
Consequences of Victimization
  • What is Learned?
  • Obedience requires violence.
  • Love sometimes requires violence.
  • Violence produces compliance.
  • What is experienced?
  • Self deprecation.
  • An act of carrying at the least, an act of love
    at the most.

22
Where do we go from here?
  • Call things by their real name! A Hit is a Hit.
    If hitting is violent, spanking is violence.
  • Believe there can be, and desire a different
    male image.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com