Title: More Dealer Termination
1More Dealer Termination
- Sharp Electronics MSRP rival dealer complained
of discounting/gave ultimatum to fire or I quit
handling the line - 30 days later Pl is terminated
- Jury verdict for Pl based on per se instruction
- Since no agreement with surviving dealer to hold
price, use Rule of Reason - Majority distinguish Klors as being horizontal
Was there free riding? - Was there agreement? Cf. Hawaiian Oke
2Vertically Imposed Territorial or Customer
Restraints
- Exclusive territory exclusive dealership
location clause customer limits (resale to
discounter sale to mega-customer) - From White Motor (R of R for non-price) to
Schwinn (per se for territorial) back to GTE
Sylvania (Rule of Reason if non-price) - Schwinn conceded R of R for consignments
- GTE location clause to strengthen interbrand
comp. since losing mkt share
3Manufacturers Motives for Vertical Restraints
- Point of Sale Service (pre demo, image, customer
edu post warranty maint) - Better margins to push line (interbrand)
- Eliminate free-riding on local brand-name
advertising - Safety (Tripoli v. Wella)
- Greater expertise for mega-customers
- Efficient delivery some dlr. protection