Title: Funding the Future of eGovernment
1Funding the Future of e-Government
Alternative Funding Strategies for Electronic
Commerce Projects
2Agenda
- Background
- Project Descriptions
- Interviews
- Alternative Funding Strategies
- Evaluation of Funding Strategies
- Recommendations
3Background
4Project Description
- Our mission
- Identify and evaluate agency funding strategies
-
- Our methods
- Document review
- General research
- Interviews
5Interviews
- Thirty-two Interviews
- Seven Agencies
- Five Private Companies
- White House and Congressional Staff
- Leaders on the issue of funding IT Projects
6Alternative Funding Strategies
7Funding Strategies
- Budget Appropriation
- Working Capital Funds
- Innovation Funds
- Fee for Service
- Rebate Funds
- Capital Funding
- Share-in-Savings
- Public-Private
- CIO Czar Model
- Hybrid Approach
8Budget Appropriation
- Direct appropriation from Congress, coordinated
through 3-year budget cycle - Critical Success Factors
- Presidential and Congressional Support
- Planned annual budget
9Working Capital Funds
- Funds may come from direct appropriation or from
uncommitted funds - Critical Success Factors
- Top-level support
- Management capability
10Innovation Funds
- Directly appropriated or surcharge on existing
revenue streams - Critical Success Factors
- Identification of a source of initial funding
- Top-level support
- Oversight management
11Fee for Service
- Agency business unit that provides services
internally and to other government agencies for a
set fee - Critical Success Factors
- Leadership from within the government
- Internally developed core competencies within the
agency - Identified revenue streams
12Rebate Funds
- Percentage of purchases that is refunded by the
vendor to the government - Critical Success Factors
- Coordination between organizations
- Top-level support
13Capital Funding
- Funds are generated through IT bonds and are
managed by a central authority - Critical Success Factors
- Top-level support
- Repayment plan
- Public backing
- Standard policies
14Share-in-Savings
- Contractors are paid out of the savings or new
revenues generated from the project - Critical Success Factors
- Specific historical data on costs
- Metric for determining the costs savings or
revenues generated from the project - Mechanism to approve, capture, control, monitor,
report on, and share revenues
15Public-Private Partnership
- Non-profit consortium of private firms brings
expertise and funding - Critical Success Factors
- Leadership by public-sector Champion
- Top-level support
- Participant commitment
- Agency technological maturity
16CIO Czar Model
- Government-wide fund is established and one
authority oversees the funds - Critical Success Factors
- Strong leadership and credibility
- Sense of crisis
- Top-level support
17Hybrid Approach
- A combination of two or more of the above
strategies - Critical Success Factors
- Strong Management
- Clearly identified project segments
18Evaluation of Funding Strategies
19Practical Considerations
- Agency Technological Maturity
- Stage of Project Lifecycle
- Degree of Required Inter-
- Organizational Collaboration
20Agency Technological Maturity
Cutting-edge innovators
1
Have infrastructure - exploring e-commerce
2
Poor infrastructure - compatibility issues
3
21Poor Infrastructure - Compatibility Issues
- Appropriate funding strategies include
- Budget appropriation
- Working capital fund
22Have Infrastructure - Exploring e-Commerce
- Appropriate funding strategies include
- Innovation fund
- Capital funding
23Cutting-Edge Innovators
- Appropriate funding strategies include
- Share-in-savings
- Public-private partnerships
- Hybrid models
24Stage of Project Life-Cycle
Pilot
Production
Proof-of- concept
On-going operations
25Stage of Project Life-Cycle Pilot Phase
- Appropriate funding strategies include
- Budget Appropriation
- Working Capital Fund
- Innovation Fund
- Capital Funding
- Public-Private Partnerships
26Stage of Project Life-CycleProduction Phase
- Appropriate funding strategies include
- Working Capital Funds
- Fee for Service/Franchising Model
- Share-in-Savings
- Rebate Funds
27Degree of Required Collaboration
28Practical Considerations
Phase of Project Lifecycle
Agency Technological Maturity
Degree of Required Collaboration
29Recommendations
30Current Funding Strategies are Workable - but
Flawed
- Inherently stove-piped process
- Leads to divergent results
- Current strategies are work-arounds
- Difficult to achieve economies of scale
- e-commerce not viewed as mission critical
- Hindered by uneven infrastructure development
31A Unified Approach
- Highest priority to funding infrastructure
development - Uniformity, standardization, economies of scale
- Appropriations, Capital Funding, CIO Czar
- Higher priority to moving pilot to production
- Working Capital Funds, Share-in-Savings
- High priority to ongoing funding of innovation
- Innovation Fund, Rebate Funds, Share-in-Savings,
CIO Czar
32Managerial and Organizational
- Identification of best practices
- Improved flow of ideas and information both
intra- and inter-agency - Translation across similar agencies (citizen
service or process) - Overarching leadership and vision
- Agency top management support
- Direct responsibility and accountability
33Organizational Structure
- National CIO Board
- Builds on the success of CIO Council
- Strong Chair position
- Coordinating role
34Final Comments
- E-gov is not a luxury, its a necessity
- Current approach is flawed
- Consensus A common planning and oversight
mechanism is imperative for e-commerce projects
35Discussion