Z Production at CMS with vs 10 TeV - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Z Production at CMS with vs 10 TeV

Description:

Z Production at CMS with vs 10 TeV – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: adrienn51
Category:
Tags: cms | tev | production | taz

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Z Production at CMS with vs 10 TeV


1
Z? Production at CMS with vs 10 TeV
  • Lindsey Gray
  • University of Wisconsin at Madison
  • Preliminary Exam

2
Outline
  • Standard Model
  • Z? Production
  • Large Hadron Collider
  • Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment
  • Z? Event Simulation Analysis
  • Previous Results
  • CMS MC Studies
  • Summary and Future Steps

3
The Standard Model
  • 24 fundamental matter particles anti-particles
  • Spin ½
  • Describes 3 forces
  • Mediated by spin 1 particles
  • Z photon do not couple
  • Tree level ZZZ ZZ? cross sections are zero
  • Higgs boson
  • Not experimentally found
  • Gives mass to other SM particles

4
Z? Production
  • Direct Z? coupling zero
  • In Standard Model
  • Two Channels
  • Photon radiated by lepton
  • Inner Z?
  • Useful for calibration
  • Mz Mll?
  • Photon radiated by quark
  • Outer Z?
  • Rate affected by Trilinear Gauge Coupling
  • Rate accurately predicted in SM
  • Look for excess outer Z?

Inner Z?
l e, µ
Outer Z?
Signal ?
5
New Physics Accessible With Z?
If excess is observed, possible causes are
  • Composite vector boson models
  • Could give electric dipole moment to Z
  • Higgs ? Z?
  • Any model which adds particles that decay into
    Z?.
  • 4th Generation of Quarks

?
?
Leads to increase in cross section.
6
Anomalous Electric Dipole Moment
is the center of mass energy.
O is the combination of interacting fields j
denotes vector or axial vector couplings n is
the order of the correction f is the Anomalous
Coupling constant (AC) ? is the scale of new
physics interactions
  • Standard Model Z?
  • 3.3 pb per lepton channel
  • Shown anomalous electric dipole moment. (f63
    .08)
  • Enhanced rate of Z?
  • 4.3 pb per lepton channel
  • ? 5 TeV
  • 3.4 pb per lepton channel
  • ? 1 TeV

vs 10 TeV
? 5 TeV
? 1 TeV
Standard Model Outer Z?
Plots generated with program described in U.
Baur, T. Han, J. Ohnemus Phys. Rev. D 57, 2923
(1998)
7
Search for Excess Energetic Photons from Outer Z?
  • Anomalous couplings and new resonances enhance Z?
    production cross-section
  • Enhancement occurs for events with energetic
    photons
  • Rare in SM Outer Z?
  • Excess of high ET photons compared to standard
    model indicates new physics

vs 10 TeV
? 5 TeV
? 1 TeV
Standard Model Outer Z?
8
Previous Z? Studies
  • Experiments based at FNAL
  • Tevatron Collider
  • Proton-antiproton
  • vs 1.96 TeV
  • Both make Z? cross section measurement
  • Place exclusions on Z? anomalous coupling
    strength

9
Current Anomalous Coupling Limits
  • Place limits by modeling Z? photon ET of various
    anomalous coupling strengths
  • Determine what range of coupling strengths is
    consistent with ET distribution seen in data
  • Tevatron measured limits on anomalous couplings
  • New Physics Scale ? gt 1 TeV
  • Determined by Tevatron mass reach.
  • Anomalous Coupling f63 lt .083
  • At ? 1 TeV

Anomalous Coupling
2.0 fb-1
Limits on CP Conserving Vector (h3) and Axial
Vector (h4) Couplings
Jianrong Deng, Al Goshaw, Thomas Phillips Jan 31,
2008 http//www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/ewk/2008/Zgam
ma/
10
The Large Hadron Collider
11
Proton Interactions at LHC
(5 TeV, 2009-10)
7
Design
2009-10 Luminosity lt 1032 cm-2s-1
2009-10 Expect pb-1
Luminosity L particle flux/time Interaction
rate Cross section ? effective area of
interacting particles sZ? 6.7 pb
Plan analysis for 200 pb-1
12
The Compact Muon Solenoid
13
Particle Detection in CMS
  • Photons
  • Isolated deposits in ECAL
  • Quiet HCAL
  • No nearby track
  • Electrons
  • Isolated deposits in ECAL
  • Quiet HCAL
  • Nearby Track
  • Muons
  • Track in Tracker and Muon System
  • Minimum Ionizing in Calorimeters

14
Silicon Tracker
  • Used to measure curvature of charged particles
    for ? lt 2.5
  • Si pixel detectors closest to IP
  • Si strip detectors in outer barrel and endcap
    discs
  • 200m2 of Si strip detectors
  • Immersed in 3.8T magnetic field
  • L 1.2m radius
  • Resolution
  • dMZ .566, 45 GeV Muon Tracks
  • Used to isolate photons, electrons and muons

T
15
Electromagnetic Calorimeter
  • 76,000 PbWO4 crystals
  • High density (8.6 g cm-3)
  • Small radiation length (9 mm)
  • 26 ?0 per crystal
  • Small Moliere radius (22 mm)
  • Coverage for ? lt 3
  • Used to find ? and e
  • Low noise
  • Resolution
  • dMZ 1.3 for 45 GeV Electrons
  • Calorimeter only

Noise
Intrinsic
Stochastic
16
Hadronic Calorimeter
  • Sampling calorimeter for measuring jets and
    missing energy
  • Hermetic coverage for ? lt 5.0
  • Brass scintillator sampling calorimeter for ?
    lt 3.0
  • Steel quartz fiber forward calorimeter for 3.0
    lt ? lt 5.0
  • Completes missing energy measurement
  • Scintillating tile outside magnet
  • Samples uncontained showers
  • Used to isolate leptons and photons

Barrel Endcap resolution
HF
Forward resolution
17
Muon System
  • 3 Technologies
  • Resistive Plate Chambers
  • 0 lt ? lt 2.5
  • Cathode Strip Chambers
  • 0.9 lt ? lt 2.5
  • Drift Tubes
  • 0 lt ? lt 1.2
  • Operates in return field
  • 1.8T
  • Protected by calorimeters
  • 10 ? before muon system
  • .8 standalone resolution for 45 GeV muons
  • Tracks in muon system matched to tracker
  • High efficiency for Z -gt µµ

CSC
DT
RPC
18
Trigger
  • Level 1 Trigger
  • Custom hardware operating at crossing frequency
  • 3µs decision latency
  • 100 KHz output
  • High Level Trigger
  • Run on commodity computing farm
  • Use robust fast versions of offline
    reconstruction.
  • Better rejection
  • Improved measurement of Level-1-tagged particles
  • Output rate of 100 Hz

_at_ 1034 cm-2s-1
19
Level One Trigger
  • Triggers
  • e/?
  • Jet
  • Missing ET
  • Muon

20
L1 e/? Trigger
21
L1 Muon Trigger
  • RPC muon trigger
  • Match RPC hits to trigger patterns.
  • CSC DT Chamber Level
  • Combine hits into segments and find segment
    directions
  • CSC DT muon triggers
  • Look for set of segments in muon system which
    have the same ?.
  • Measure ?f between segments.
  • Global muon trigger
  • Combines results of subsystems.
  • Best four L1 muons chosen.

CSCs 0.9 lt ? lt 2.4
DTs ? lt 1.2
22
High Level Electron Trigger
  • Electron HLT
  • Find groups of energy in ECAL
  • Reconstruct tracks near deposit
  • Match energy deposit to tracks
  • Recover energy losses to bremsstrahlung by
    extending included calorimeter area in phi
    direction.
  • For Z? study at LHC startup
  • Use isolated electron trigger to tag possible Z?
    events.
  • Isolate electrons by summing nearby calorimeter
    deposits to check for activity.
  • Electron pT gt15 GeV

23
Muon High Level Trigger
  • Muon HLT
  • Find track in muon system
  • Reconstruct tracks in tracker pointing towards
    muon system track
  • Match muon system track to tracker track
  • For Z? study at LHC startup
  • Z? events use non-isolated muon trigger to tag
    possible events.
  • Muon pT gt 5 GeV

µ-
24
Photon Reconstruction
  • Photons reconstructed from collections of
    associated crystals with energy in ECAL called
    SuperClusters.
  • Starts from a seed crystal of gt 1 GeV
  • Make 5x5 crystal seed cluster if seed crystal
    is local maximum
  • Add up to 17 1x5 rows in each direction in phi,
    keeping rows with energy sum gt .1 GeV
  • All SuperClusters are Photon candidates
  • ET gt 10 GeV
  • H/E lt .2
  • Requires no matched pixel detector hit.

R9
Crystals in Seed Cluster Other crystals
within Supercluster --- Supercluster boundary
25
Photon Identification
  • Photon reconstruction begins with
    SuperCluster gt 10 GeV.
  • Other particles can create a 10 GeV
    SuperCluster.
  • Jets fragmenting primarily to p0
  • .001 of jets fake photons (jetsphotons 10001)
  • Electrons
  • Photon ID selects reconstructed photons passing
    various isolation cuts.
  • HCAL lt 10 GeV, near reconstructed photon.
  • ECAL lt 10 GeV near reconstructed photon.
  • Require lt 3 tracks near reconstructed photon.
  • Require that 80 of ECAL energy is within 3x3
    crystals.
  • Electrons appear more spread out in phi than
    direct photons due to bending in magnetic field.

Crystals in Seed Cluster Other crystals
within Supercluster --- 3x3 region ---
Supercluster boundary
26
Electron Reconstruction
  • Calorimeter Reconstruction
  • Create superclusters of ECAL energy to include
    bremmstrahlung photons.
  • ET gt 4 GeV
  • H/E lt .1
  • Tracker Reconstruction
  • Require calorimeter deposit matched to
    reconstructed track, ?R lt .15
  • pT gt 3 GeV

27
Muon Reconstruction
  • Standalone Reconstruction
  • Muon system only
  • Tracker Reconstruction
  • Match tracks to regions in the calorimeter
    consistent with a minimum ionizing particle.
  • Match within
  • Global Reconstruction
  • Match tracker tracks to muon system tracks by
    minimizing a quality variable.
  • ?d is distance between end of tracker track
    extrapolation and beginning of muon track

28
Z? Perturbation Theory
  • M2 is related to the probability of a hard
    scatter interaction.
  • Order is determined by power of coupling constant
    kept in S matrix expansion
  • Leading Order (LO) Outer Z? Matrix Element
  • Only contributing graph is photon emission
  • Next-to-Leading Order (NLO) Outer Z? Matrix
    Element
  • Radiative Corrections
  • Vertex Correction

29
Z? ZJets Event Simulation
  • Z? generated with Pythia 6.409
  • LO matrix element cross section calculation
  • Higher order initial (final) state radiation is
    approximated
  • Zjets background generated with MadGraph
  • Matrix element cross section calculation for Z
    N 4 Jets
  • Detector simulated using Full Simulation (GEANT)
    for signal and FastSim for background.
  • GEANT simulates passage of particles through
    matter.
  • FastSim is a parameterization of GEANT CMS
    simulation with faster execution time.

Detector simulation GEANT 4 FastSim
Hard scattering Pythia MadGraph
Hadronization, showers, IFSR PYTHIA
Reconstruction of event CMSSW
30
Z? Generator Comparison
  • Baur Z? Generator
  • Developed by Dr. Ulrich Baur (U. Buffalo) et al.
  • Calculates NLO Z? cross section using Monte Carlo
  • Tunable anomalous couplings new physics
    scale ?
  • Accurately models photon ET for outer Z?

Baur SM Outer Z? Pythia SM Outer Z?
31
Comparing Baur to Tevatron Data
Baur
  • CDF measures inner outer Z?
  • 4.6 0.2 (stat) 0.3 (sys) pb
  • 1.2 0.1 (stat) .17 (sys) pb
  • D0 measures inner outer Z? as well
  • 4.4 .27 (stat) .27 (sys) pb
  • All measurements agree with Baur MC predictions
  • 4.5 0.4 pb (Inner Outer Z?)
  • 1.21 0.1 pb (Outer Z? Only)

2.0 fb-1
Baur
Anomalous Coupling
1.1 fb-1
32
ZJets Background to Outer Z?
  • Zjets
  • 1 in 1000 jets fragment primarily to p0
  • sZJets 251 pb _at_ Tevatron (to leptons)
  • sZJets 3700 pb _at_ LHC (to leptons)
  • Similar kinematics to Outer Z?
  • CDF ZJets pT measurement matches NLO MCFM well.
  • MCFM Monte Carlo for Femtobarn Measurement (dev.
    by CDF Collab.)
  • Give accurate background prediction for CDF Z?
    measurement
  • CMS ZJets will be measured in 200 pb-1
  • Expect more Z multiple jets

33
Z? Signal and ZJets Background
  • Require electrons, muons and photons to be within
    the tracker and to pass trigger. (-2.5 lt ? lt 2.5)
  • Require e ET gt 15 GeV µ pT gt 5 GeV
  • Removes poorly reconstructed e and µ.

Starting With 105 Signal 28k Bkg 200pb-1
Z? -gt ee? MC Zjets MC
Z?-gtµµ? MC Zjets MC
200pb-1
200pb-1
µ
e
34
Cut on Dilepton Invariant Mass
  • Require dilepton mass near Z peak (70 lt Mll lt
    100)
  • Majority of signal Zs are on shell
  • Suppresses Inner Z?

Whats Left 85 Signal, 81 21k Background, 75
e
µ
Z? -gt ee? MC Zjets MC
Z?-gtµµ? MC Zjets MC
35
Selecting Signal Photons H/E
  • Hcal-to-Ecal energy ratio of a reconstructed
    photon.
  • Jets have a larger hadronic energy fraction.
  • Hence, so do many jets that fake photons.
  • Cut at H/E .025

Whats Left 75 Signal, 74 9k Background, 33
Zjets Z?
EM Supercluster
ECAL
g
jet
ECAL HCAL
reject
Supercluster
36
Selecting Signal Photons R9
  • Cut on ratio of E3x3 to Esupercluster ( R9)
  • EM deposits from Jets will be more spread out.
  • Except energetic p0s
  • Cut at r9 .90

Whats Left 45 Signal, 43 2k Background, 7.9
Zjets Z?
200pb-1
f
h
reject
37
Selecting Signal Photons Track Isolation
  • Count number of reconstructed tracks in a cone
    near the photon with pT gt .5 GeV
  • Faked photons have more tracks in .4 ?R cone.
  • Cut at Number of Tracks 2

Whats Left 41 Signal, 39 1.5k Background, 5.3
Zjets Z?
reject
38
Selecting Signal Photons ET Isolation
  • S (Hcal ET Ecal ET Track pT)/ET, Supercluster
    in annulus around reconstructed photon.
  • Faked photons have more energy and tracks in the
    .06 lt ?R lt .4 annulus.
  • Cut at (Isolation Sum)/ET .4

Whats Left 25 Signal, 24 480 Background, 1.5
Zjets Z?
reject
39
Selecting Signal Photons Phi Width
  • Since p0 -gt ??, faked photons will appear wider
    in phi due to the opening angle between the
    photons.
  • Cut at Phi Width lt .015

Whats Left 17 Signal, 16 300 Background, 1.0
Zjets Z?
f
h
reject
40
Selecting Signal PhotonsMinimum ?Rl?
  • ?Rl? gt 1.3 cut applied after previous photon
    cuts.
  • Further rejects ZJets background and Inner Z?
  • Added advantage of avoiding singularity in the Z?
    cross section from photon collinearity
  • Improves cross section prediction

Whats Left 9 Signal, 8.5 38 Background .13
e
reject
reject
Zjets Z?
Zjets Z?
µ
41
Cut on ll? Invariant Mass
  • Inner Z? events with large photon ET can pass
    ?Rl? cut.
  • Dileptonphoton invariant mass will be near Z
    mass.
  • Majority of outer Z? will be outside of Z peak.
  • Cut at Mll? gt 105 GeV

Whats Left 8 Signal, 7.6 10 Background .035
Zjets Z?
Zjets Z?
e
µ
reject
reject
42
Summary of Signal Background
Signal
Background
Zjets SM Z? Anom. Coup.
200pb-1
43
Conclusion and Next Steps
  • Signal to background is roughly 11 on Z peak.
  • 8 (11, with Anom. Coup.) Events 10 Background
  • Next Steps
  • Optimize cut based analysis
  • Implement multivariate analysis
  • Will improve Signal-to-Background to 21
  • 200 pb-1 analysis allows SM Z? measurement
  • Sensitive to new physics
  • Assuming maximum allowed anomalous coupling,
    3 events 1 background (NLO prediction)
  • Using current analysis but require photon ET gt
    100 GeV

44
Backup Slides
45
Anomalous Coupling Helicity Angle
  • Sensitive to new physics
  • Introduction of new physics can change favored
    polarization.
  • Angle between Z momentum in lab frame and
    daughter lepton in rest frame.
  • Spins of daughter particles related to Z
    polarization.
  • Different distributions for longitudinal and
    transverse Z
  • Different daughter spin combinations required.

_at_ 10 TeV Standard Model Tevatron Limit ? 5
TeV scale
46
Resonance Search Dalitz Plot
  • New physics manifests as bands in the Dalitz
    Plot.
  • Shown SM Z?
  • Higgs -gt Z?
  • Would appear as an enhanced segment along the Z
    band.

47
Higgs Branching Ratios
  • Higgs branching ratio to Z? is phase space
    heavily suppressed.
  • Dominated by vector boson pair production
  • Probability for all three particles to be in
    fiducial region small.

48
Selecting Signal Photons ECAL Isolation
  • S (Ecal ET) in annulus around reconstructed
    photon.
  • As jets are more spread out than photons, the ET
    sum will be larger for jets with a large EM
    fraction.
  • Cut at 80 signal acceptance -gt Ecal Isolation lt
    7.5 GeV

Isolation 7.5 GeV
Zjets Z?
Scaled to 100pb-1
reject
49
Selecting Signal Photons Track ET Isolation
  • S (Track ET) in annulus around reconstructed
    photon.
  • Prompt and converted photons will have fewer
    energetic tracks near than a jet.
  • Cut at 75 signal acceptance -gt Track Isolation
    lt 3 GeV

Isolation 3 GeV
Zjets Z?
Scaled to 100pb-1
reject
50
Selecting Signal Photons Number of Nearby Tracks
  • Reconstructed photons embedded within jets will
    have more nearby tracks than isolated photons.
  • Cut at 80 signal acceptance -gt Tracks lt 3

Tracks 3
Zjets Z?
Scaled to 100pb-1
reject
51
LHC 2009-2010 Expected Yield
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com