Board Liability Under Intermediate Sanctions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Board Liability Under Intermediate Sanctions

Description:

Does not include public colleges and universities ... The person's compensation is based primarily on revenues derived from activities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Youd7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Board Liability Under Intermediate Sanctions


1
Board Liability UnderIntermediate Sanctions
  • Presented by
  • Deborah Z. Read
  • July 29, 2002

2
What Are Intermediate Sanctions?
  • Intermediate level of penalty
  • In the form of excise taxes imposed by the IRS
  • Apply when certain tax exempt organizations
    engage in transactions that provide excess
    benefits to insiders

3
Why Have Intermediate Sanctions?
  • Prior to intermediate sanctions, the only stick
    the IRS had was revocation of exempt status
  • An intermediate penalty facilitates enforcement
  • More enforcement of exempt organization
    principles results in more self-policing the law
    has more credibility
  • Revoking a charitys exempt status for
    transactions that result in improper benefits to
    insiders penalizes the wrong person

4
When do Intermediate Sanctions Apply?
  • You need three elements for intermediate
    sanctions to apply
  • An excess benefit transaction
  • An applicable tax exempt organization
  • A disqualified person
  • When an applicable tax exempt organization
    engages in an excess benefit transaction with a
    disqualified person, the IRS can invoke
    intermediate sanctions

5
What is an Excess Benefit Transaction?
  • A transaction in which an applicable tax exempt
    organization provides an economic benefit to a
    disqualified person and the value of the economic
    benefit provided exceeds the value of the
    consideration received
  • Must take into account
  • All consideration and benefits
  • Whether exchanged by or with the applicable tax
    exempt organization or any entity that
    organization controls

6
What is an Applicable Tax Exempt Organization?
  • An IRC 501(c)(3) public charity
  • Does not include a private foundation
  • Does not include governmental entities not
    subject to tax
  • Does not include public colleges and universities
  • An IRC 501(c)(4) social welfare organization

7
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • Any person in a position to exercise substantial
    influence over the affairs of an applicable tax
    exempt organization at any time during the
    five-year period ending on the date of the
    transaction

8
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • The statute identifies certain per se
    disqualified persons and certain persons deemed
    not to be disqualified persons
  • Classification of anyone else as a disqualified
    person is based on all the facts and circumstances

9
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • Examples of per se disqualified persons
  • Voting members of the organization's governing
    body
  • Presidents
  • CEOs
  • COOs
  • Treasurers
  • CFOs
  • Any person holding the powers, responsibilities,
    or interests of someone in these positions

10
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • A family member of a disqualified person, e.g.,
    the spouse of the president
  • Corporations, if more than 35 of the voting
    rights are owned by disqualified persons
  • Partnerships, if more than 35 of the profits
    interests are owned by disqualified persons
  • Trusts or estates, if more than 35 of the
    beneficial interests are owned by disqualified
    persons

11
Who is not a Disqualified Person?
  • Another tax exempt charity
  • Non-highly compensated employees of an applicable
    tax exempt organization, i.e., employees making
    less than approximately 80,000 per year (if not
    otherwise described as a disqualified person)

12
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • Generally a person who is (or was during the
    five-year look back period) in a position to
    exercise substantial influence over the
    organizations affairs
  • Facts and circumstances govern
  • Regulations contain guidance on the specific
    facts and circumstances that tend to show
    substantial influence and those that do not

13
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • Factors tending to show that a person is a
    disqualified person
  • The persons compensation is based primarily on
    revenues derived from activities of the
    organization, or of a particular department or
    function of the organization, that the person
    controls
  • The person has authority to control or determine
    a substantial portion of the organizations
    capital expenditures, operating budget, or
    compensation for employees

14
Who is a Disqualified Person?
  • Factors tending to show that a person is a
    disqualified person
  • The person manages a discrete segment or activity
    of the organization that represents a substantial
    portion of the activities or income/expense of
    the organization

15
What is the Penalty Tax?
  • On the disqualified person
  • First tier tax of 25 of the excess of the value
    of the benefit received over the consideration
    provided, i.e., the excess benefit
  • Second tier tax of 200 of the excess benefit
  • In addition, the excess benefit transaction must
    be corrected
  • Second tier tax applies if the IRS issues a
    notice of deficiency for, or assesses, the first
    tier tax before the excess benefit transaction is
    corrected

16
What is the Penalty Tax?
  • On the organization manager
  • Imposed on any organization manager who knowingly
    participates in or approves an excess benefit
    transaction, unless participation is not willful
    and is due to reasonable cause
  • Tax is personal liability to the organization
    manager
  • Tax equals 10 of the excess benefit
  • Maximum tax among all participating organization
    managers is 10,000 per transaction
  • Each participating manager is jointly and
    severally liable
  • An individual can be taxed as both a disqualified
    person and an organization manager

17
What Are Examples of Excess Benefit Transactions?
  • Payment of excessive compensation
  • Purchase of assets by a disqualified person from
    an applicable tax exempt organization at price
    below fair market value
  • Purchase of assets by an applicable tax exempt
    organization from a disqualified person at a
    price above fair market value
  • Transfer of ownership or use of assets without
    valid consideration

18
What Are Examples of Excess Benefit Transactions?
  • Payment of large severance packages
  • Below-market loans
  • Spousal employment
  • Payment of excessive service or transaction fees
    to entities owned by disqualified persons

19
Is There Any Relief?
  • Initial contract exception
  • Intermediate sanctions do not apply to any fixed
    payment made to a person under an initial
    contract
  • Fixed payment amount of cash or property
    specified in the contract or determined by a
    fixed formula specified in the contract to be
    paid in exchange for specified services or
    property
  • Initial contract binding written contract
    between an applicable tax exempt organization and
    a person who was not a disqualified
    person immediately before entering the contract

20
Is There Any Relief?
  • Initial contract exception
  • Material changes to the contract cause the
    contract to be treated as a new one as of the
    date of the material change
  • Material change includes most extensions or
    renewals of the contract

21
Is There Any Relief?
  • The rebuttal presumption
  • Payments under a compensation arrangement or in
    exchange for property are presumed to be at fair
    market value if the following three conditions
    are satisfied
  • The transaction is approved in advance by an
    authorized body comprised entirely of individuals
    who do not have a conflict of interest with
    respect to the transaction
  • The authorized body obtained and relied on
    appropriate data as to comparability prior to
    making its determination and
  • The authorized body contemporaneously documented
    the basis for its determination

22
Is There Any Relief?
  • The rebuttal presumption
  • If the three described conditions are met, the
    IRS can rebut the presumption only if it compiles
    sufficient contrary evidence to negate the
    probative value of the comparability data relied
    on by the approving body
  • The presumption applies to all payments made
    under a contract authorized by the rebuttal
    presumption procedures
  • Failure to follow the rebuttal presumption
    procedures creates no negative or positive
    inference about the transaction

23
Is There Any Relief?
  • Reasoned written opinions
  • Organization managers can avoid intermediate
    sanctions liability for approving transactions
    with disqualified persons if they rely on a
    reasoned written opinion of a professional when
    they approve the transaction
  • Full disclosure of the facts of the transaction
    must be made to the opining professional
  • The opinion must be within the professionals
    expertise
  • The absence of a professional opinion creates no
    negative or positive inference about the
    transaction

24
What Can be Done to Avoid Intermediate Sanctions?
  • Use the initial contract exception whenever
    practicable
  • Consider longer term initial contracts to protect
    payments as long as practicable
  • Use valuations or comparability studies before
    entering into transactions with disqualified
    persons
  • Utilize the rebuttal presumption procedures
    whenever practicable or rely on written
    professional opinions
  • Educate your board about the potential excise tax
    personal liability

25
What Can be Done to Avoid Intermediate Sanctions?
  • Use caps or ceilings to prevent runaway benefits
  • Structure compensation elements to achieve
    objectives for the organization
  • Adopt and enforce a conflict of interest policy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com