Title: Board Liability Under Intermediate Sanctions
1Board Liability UnderIntermediate Sanctions
- Presented by
- Deborah Z. Read
- July 29, 2002
2What Are Intermediate Sanctions?
- Intermediate level of penalty
- In the form of excise taxes imposed by the IRS
- Apply when certain tax exempt organizations
engage in transactions that provide excess
benefits to insiders
3Why Have Intermediate Sanctions?
- Prior to intermediate sanctions, the only stick
the IRS had was revocation of exempt status - An intermediate penalty facilitates enforcement
- More enforcement of exempt organization
principles results in more self-policing the law
has more credibility - Revoking a charitys exempt status for
transactions that result in improper benefits to
insiders penalizes the wrong person
4When do Intermediate Sanctions Apply?
- You need three elements for intermediate
sanctions to apply - An excess benefit transaction
- An applicable tax exempt organization
- A disqualified person
- When an applicable tax exempt organization
engages in an excess benefit transaction with a
disqualified person, the IRS can invoke
intermediate sanctions
5What is an Excess Benefit Transaction?
- A transaction in which an applicable tax exempt
organization provides an economic benefit to a
disqualified person and the value of the economic
benefit provided exceeds the value of the
consideration received - Must take into account
- All consideration and benefits
- Whether exchanged by or with the applicable tax
exempt organization or any entity that
organization controls
6What is an Applicable Tax Exempt Organization?
- An IRC 501(c)(3) public charity
- Does not include a private foundation
- Does not include governmental entities not
subject to tax - Does not include public colleges and universities
- An IRC 501(c)(4) social welfare organization
7Who is a Disqualified Person?
- Any person in a position to exercise substantial
influence over the affairs of an applicable tax
exempt organization at any time during the
five-year period ending on the date of the
transaction
8Who is a Disqualified Person?
- The statute identifies certain per se
disqualified persons and certain persons deemed
not to be disqualified persons - Classification of anyone else as a disqualified
person is based on all the facts and circumstances
9Who is a Disqualified Person?
- Examples of per se disqualified persons
- Voting members of the organization's governing
body - Presidents
- CEOs
- COOs
- Treasurers
- CFOs
- Any person holding the powers, responsibilities,
or interests of someone in these positions
10Who is a Disqualified Person?
- A family member of a disqualified person, e.g.,
the spouse of the president - Corporations, if more than 35 of the voting
rights are owned by disqualified persons - Partnerships, if more than 35 of the profits
interests are owned by disqualified persons - Trusts or estates, if more than 35 of the
beneficial interests are owned by disqualified
persons
11Who is not a Disqualified Person?
- Another tax exempt charity
- Non-highly compensated employees of an applicable
tax exempt organization, i.e., employees making
less than approximately 80,000 per year (if not
otherwise described as a disqualified person)
12Who is a Disqualified Person?
- Generally a person who is (or was during the
five-year look back period) in a position to
exercise substantial influence over the
organizations affairs - Facts and circumstances govern
- Regulations contain guidance on the specific
facts and circumstances that tend to show
substantial influence and those that do not
13Who is a Disqualified Person?
- Factors tending to show that a person is a
disqualified person - The persons compensation is based primarily on
revenues derived from activities of the
organization, or of a particular department or
function of the organization, that the person
controls - The person has authority to control or determine
a substantial portion of the organizations
capital expenditures, operating budget, or
compensation for employees
14Who is a Disqualified Person?
- Factors tending to show that a person is a
disqualified person - The person manages a discrete segment or activity
of the organization that represents a substantial
portion of the activities or income/expense of
the organization
15What is the Penalty Tax?
- On the disqualified person
- First tier tax of 25 of the excess of the value
of the benefit received over the consideration
provided, i.e., the excess benefit - Second tier tax of 200 of the excess benefit
- In addition, the excess benefit transaction must
be corrected - Second tier tax applies if the IRS issues a
notice of deficiency for, or assesses, the first
tier tax before the excess benefit transaction is
corrected
16What is the Penalty Tax?
- On the organization manager
- Imposed on any organization manager who knowingly
participates in or approves an excess benefit
transaction, unless participation is not willful
and is due to reasonable cause - Tax is personal liability to the organization
manager - Tax equals 10 of the excess benefit
- Maximum tax among all participating organization
managers is 10,000 per transaction - Each participating manager is jointly and
severally liable - An individual can be taxed as both a disqualified
person and an organization manager
17What Are Examples of Excess Benefit Transactions?
- Payment of excessive compensation
- Purchase of assets by a disqualified person from
an applicable tax exempt organization at price
below fair market value - Purchase of assets by an applicable tax exempt
organization from a disqualified person at a
price above fair market value - Transfer of ownership or use of assets without
valid consideration
18What Are Examples of Excess Benefit Transactions?
- Payment of large severance packages
- Below-market loans
- Spousal employment
- Payment of excessive service or transaction fees
to entities owned by disqualified persons
19Is There Any Relief?
- Initial contract exception
- Intermediate sanctions do not apply to any fixed
payment made to a person under an initial
contract - Fixed payment amount of cash or property
specified in the contract or determined by a
fixed formula specified in the contract to be
paid in exchange for specified services or
property - Initial contract binding written contract
between an applicable tax exempt organization and
a person who was not a disqualified
person immediately before entering the contract
20Is There Any Relief?
- Initial contract exception
- Material changes to the contract cause the
contract to be treated as a new one as of the
date of the material change - Material change includes most extensions or
renewals of the contract
21Is There Any Relief?
- The rebuttal presumption
- Payments under a compensation arrangement or in
exchange for property are presumed to be at fair
market value if the following three conditions
are satisfied - The transaction is approved in advance by an
authorized body comprised entirely of individuals
who do not have a conflict of interest with
respect to the transaction - The authorized body obtained and relied on
appropriate data as to comparability prior to
making its determination and - The authorized body contemporaneously documented
the basis for its determination
22Is There Any Relief?
- The rebuttal presumption
- If the three described conditions are met, the
IRS can rebut the presumption only if it compiles
sufficient contrary evidence to negate the
probative value of the comparability data relied
on by the approving body - The presumption applies to all payments made
under a contract authorized by the rebuttal
presumption procedures - Failure to follow the rebuttal presumption
procedures creates no negative or positive
inference about the transaction
23Is There Any Relief?
- Reasoned written opinions
- Organization managers can avoid intermediate
sanctions liability for approving transactions
with disqualified persons if they rely on a
reasoned written opinion of a professional when
they approve the transaction - Full disclosure of the facts of the transaction
must be made to the opining professional - The opinion must be within the professionals
expertise - The absence of a professional opinion creates no
negative or positive inference about the
transaction
24What Can be Done to Avoid Intermediate Sanctions?
- Use the initial contract exception whenever
practicable - Consider longer term initial contracts to protect
payments as long as practicable - Use valuations or comparability studies before
entering into transactions with disqualified
persons - Utilize the rebuttal presumption procedures
whenever practicable or rely on written
professional opinions - Educate your board about the potential excise tax
personal liability
25What Can be Done to Avoid Intermediate Sanctions?
- Use caps or ceilings to prevent runaway benefits
- Structure compensation elements to achieve
objectives for the organization - Adopt and enforce a conflict of interest policy