Title: Executive Compensation for the NotforProfit Entity
1Executive Compensation for the Not-for-Profit
Entity
Susan Clark, CPA, FHFMA Tax Manager
Babush, Neiman, Kornman Johnson, LLP 5909
Peachtree Dunwoody Road Suite 800 Atlanta, GA
30328 www.bnkj.com (770) 261-1900
2Executive Compensation for the Not-for-Profit
Entity
- Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Form 990 Reporting and other changes
- IRS Executive Compensation Project
3Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Added as IRC 4958 in 1996
- Final Regulations issued January 2002
- Concept provide a monetary penalty short of
revocation of exempt status for abusive dealings - Applies to all 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4)
organizations (except Private Foundations)
4Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Penalty tax imposed on disqualified person who
participates in excess benefit transaction as
well on management - Penalty tax computed based on amount of excess
benefit received
5Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Disqualified Person
- Any person who was, at any time during the 5 year
period ending on the date of the transaction, in
a position to exercise substantial influence
over the organization
6Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Excess Benefit Transaction
- Any transaction in which the value of the
economic benefit provided by an applicable
tax-exempt organization directly or indirectly to
or for the use of any disqualified person if FMV
provided exceeds FMV of consideration received.
7Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Excess Benefit Transaction
- Examples (not all-inclusive)
- Excess Compensation
- Lease arrangements
- Revenue sharing incentive comp
- Insurance coverage
- Minimum Income guarantees
- Loans
- Non-FMV rents, services, sales
- Spousal travel
8Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Penalties
- Penalties for organization managers limited to
10,000 per transaction
9Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness
- Establishes a presumption that the transaction
was reasonable (i.e. not an excess benefit) - Shifts burden of proof to IRS
10Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness
- Exists if transaction was approved by the board
of directors or trustees or independent board
committee that - Was composed entirely of individuals unrelated to
the disqualified person involved, and - Obtained and relied upon appropriate
comparability data, and - Adequately documented the basis for determination
11Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness
- Relevant Comparability data
- Compensation levels paid by similar organizations
(both taxable and tax-exempt) - Availability of similar services in the
geographic area - Independent compensation surveys and appraisals
prepared by independent firms - Actual written offers from similar institutions
competing for the services
12Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness
- Adequate documentation
- Written or electronic record reflecting
- the terms of the transaction,
- date of approval,
- governing body members present during debate and
those who voted - Comparability data obtained and relied upon
- Basis for determination of compensation outside
range of comparability data - Actions of members with conflict of interest
13Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness
- Adequate documentation
- Must be prepared by later of
- Next meeting of body approving the transaction
- 60 days after final approval of the arrangement
or transfer
14Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness
- Implement a PROCESS and STICK TO IT!!!
- 3 most important things
- DOCUMENTATION
- DOCUMENTATION
- DOCUMENTATION
15Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- IRS Proposed Regulations
- Issued 9/8/2005
- Comment period open until 12/8/2005
- Regs under 501(c)(3) examples of operating for
private vs public interest - Regs under 4958 when revocation of exempt
status warranted
16Intermediate Sanctions Rules
- Proposed Regulations
- Revocation of exempt status
- Facts Circumstances Test
- Size scope of regular exempt activities
- Size scope of excess benefit transactions
- If organization has repeated EBTs
- If organization has implemented safeguards to
prevent future violations - If EBTs have been corrected
17Reasonable Compensation
- What is included in determining -
- Cash and noncash compensation including severance
paid - Deferred compensation earned
- Premiums paid for liability or other insurance,
- Indemnification payments,
- Payments to welfare benefit plans
- Taxable and nontaxable fringes
- Benefit provided directly or indirectly by
affiliated entity
18Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- Part V, Question 75, and Schedule A
- Part V Officers, directors, trustees, and key
employees - Key employee person having responsibilities
similar to officers, directors, and trustees.
CFO, CEO and COO generally included - Schedule A, Part I Five highest Paid
19Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- Compensation (Column C)
- Salary, fees, bonuses, and severance payments
paid - Include current year payments of amount reported
as deferred in prior years
20Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- Contributions to benefit plans (Column D)
- All forms of deferred compensation and future
severance payments - Include elective deferrals to 403(b)/401(k)
- Include payments to welfare benefit plans on
behalf of the officers - Report salaries and other compensation earned
during the year but not yet paid
21Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- Expense Allowances (Column E)
- Include both taxable and nontaxable fringe
benefits - Such as club dues, spousal travel
- Include expense account allowance
- Housing, auto, cell phone, etc.
22Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- From related organizations
- Officer, director, trustee, or key employee
- more than 10,000 from related organizations
- total compensation exceeds 100,000
- Related organization any entity that the
filing organization owns or controls, or that
owns or controls the filing organization
23Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- Related organizations
- Owns means holding 50 or more of voting rights,
voting stock, profits or beneficial interest - Control means
- 50 or more of officers, directors, trustees, or
key employees are also officers, directors,
trustees, or key employees of second organization - 50 or more of officers, directors, trustees, or
key employees are appointed by second
organization
24Form 990 Reporting
- Compensation Disclosures
- Compensation from related organizations
- Control means (cont.)
- Organization appoints 50 or more of officers,
directors, trustees, or key employees of second
organization - Supporting organizations are considered related
for purposes of these rules - Information disclosure is same as in Part V
- Must also list the organization paying the
compensation
25Form 990 Reporting
- Schedule A, Part III requires disclosure of all
transactions between an exempt organization and
its officers, directors, trustees, key employees,
members of their families or organizations owned
or controlled by such individuals - Applies to both sides of the transaction -
whether organization is payer/payee,
buyer/seller, lender/borrower
26Form 990 Reporting
- Must describe details of transaction.
- Who
- What position
- Type of transaction
- How approved
27New Developments
- Panel on Nonprofit Sector Report
- Recommendations to Congress, IRS and nonprofits
- Goal greater transparency, governance, and
accountability of charitable organizations
28New Developments
- Panel on Nonprofit Sector Report
- Board Compensation
- Discouraged paying board members for service
serve on volunteer basis - If do pay, disclosures on full amount and reasons
for compensation including how determined - Increase the penalties for approving excess
benefit transactions
29New Developments
- Panel on Nonprofit Sector Report
- Executive Compensation
- Expand the disclosures required for compensation
- Distinguish between base salary, benefits,
bonuses, incentive compensation, etc. (similar to
SEC reporting on proxy statements) - Require disclosure of compensation paid to
employees related to board member or officer if
paid gt 50,000 - Increase the penalties for approving excess
benefit transactions
30New Developments
- Panel on Nonprofit Sector Report
- Executive Compensation
- Not pay or reimburse for spousal or dependent
travel - Adopt, enforce, and disclose adoption of a
conflict of interest policy
31New Developments
- IRS EO Compensation Project
- Letters send to more than 2,000 charities
- Contact does not imply improper activity
- Selected based on total compensation in Part V
- Ask nonprofits to demonstrate they have developed
compensation programs that meet guidelines
(Rebuttable Presumption) - If no program, nonprofit asked to provide
documentation supporting FMV of compensation
32New Developments
- IRS EO Compensation Project
- Specific Questions
- Focus on those listed on 990 in Part V or as five
highest paid - How compensation was established
- What are its component parts
- What are duties of individual
- Did organization meet rebuttable presumption, and
if not, what documentation exists to support
compensation - If compensation was included on W-2 or 1099
33New Developments
- IRS EO Compensation Project
- Broader Questions
- Focus on Best Practice issues
- Does the organization have a conflicts of
interest policy - Did insiders participate in compensation process
- What kind of comparable data was relied on
- If side contracts with insiders exist
- Did the organization make any loans to insiders
34Recommendations
- If you havent developed compensation review
program do so. - Review existing compensation arrangements
- Employment agreements
- Severance Packages
- Loans, income guarantees
- Disclose all aspects of compensation as required
on Form 990
35Questions??
36Executive Compensation for the Not-for-Profit
Entity
Susan Clark, CPA, FHFMA Tax Manager
Babush, Neiman, Kornman Johnson, LLP 5909
Peachtree Dunwoody Road Suite 800 Atlanta, GA
30328 www.bnkj.com (770) 261-1900