Social Behavior - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Behavior

Description:

... of people in various social positions (e.g. daughter, mother, teacher, President ... Often, we must stand within intimate distance of others in crowds, buses, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: drand46
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Behavior


1
Chapter 18
  • Social Behavior

2
What is Social Psychology? Some Definitions
  • Social Psychology Scientific study of how
    individuals behave, think, and feel in social
    situations how people act in the presence
    (actual or implied) of others
  • Culture Ongoing pattern of life that is passed
    from one generation to another

3
Social Roles
  • Social Role Patterns of behavior expected of
    people in various social positions (e.g.
    daughter, mother, teacher, President (!))
  • Ascribed Role Assigned to a person or not under
    personal control
  • Achieved Role Attained voluntarily or by special
    effort teacher, mayor, President
  • Role Conflict When two or more roles make
    conflicting demands on behavior

4
Groups
  • Group Structure Network of roles, communication,
    pathways, and power in a group
  • Group Cohesiveness Degree of attraction among
    group members or their commitment to remaining in
    the group
  • Cohesive groups work better together
  • What kind of groups did you see on Survivor,
    Big Brother, Road Rules, and Real World?
  • Status Level of social power and importance
  • Norm Accepted, but usually unspoken, standard of
    appropriate behavior

5
Fig. 18.1 Results of an experiment on norms
concerning littering. The prior existence of
litter in a public setting implies that littering
is acceptable. This encourages others to trash
the area. (From Cialdini, Reno, Kallgren,
1990.)
6
Personal Space
  • Area surrounding the body that is defined as
    private and is subject to personal control

7
Spatial Norms
  • Proxemics Systematic study of human use of
    personal space, especially in social settings
  • Intimate Distance Most private space immediately
    surrounding the body 18 inches from the skin.
    Reserved for special people or special
    circumstances
  • Personal Distance Maintained in interactions
    with friends. 18 inches to 4 feet from body
    arms length
  • Social Distance Impersonal interaction takes
    place 4 to 12 feet
  • Public Distance Formal interactions take place
    (like giving a speech) 12 feet or more

8
Fig. 18.2 Typical spatial zones (in feet) for
face-to-face interactions in North America.
Often, we must stand within intimate distance of
others in crowds, buses, subways, elevators, and
other public places. At such times, privacy is
maintained by avoiding eye contact, by standing
shoulder to shoulder or back to back, and by
positioning a purse, bag, package, or coat as a
barrier to spatial intrusions.
9
Social Perception
  • Attribution Theory Making inferences about the
    causes of ones own behavior and others behavior
  • Consistency Persons behavior changes very
    little in many different circumstances
  • Distinctiveness Noticing that a behavior only
    occurs under certain circumstances

10
Social Perception (cont.)
  • Actor Person whose behavior is being interpreted
  • Object Aim, motive, or target of an action
  • Setting Social and/or physical environment in
    which action occurs
  • Situational Demands Pressures to behave in
    certain ways in particular settings and social
    situations

11
Other Attribution Concepts
  • Discounting Downgrading internal explanations of
    behavior when a persons actions seem to have
    strong external causes
  • Consensus Degree to which people respond alike.
    In attribution, implies that responses are
    externally caused
  • Self-Handicapping Arranging to perform under
    conditions that impair performance, so as to have
    an excuse for a poor performance
  • Lisa said, I took 3 classes while my foot hurt
    all semester thats why I got a 0.5 average!

12
More Attribution Concepts
  • Fundamental Attribution Error Tendency to
    attribute behavior of others to internal causes
    (personality, likes, and so on). We believe this
    even if they really have external causes!
  • Actor-Observer Bias Tendency to attribute
    behavior of others to internal causes, while
    attributing the behavior of ourselves to external
    causes (situations and circumstances)

13
Affiliation
  • Need to Affiliate Desire to associate with other
    people appears to be a basic human trait
  • Social Comparison Making judgments about
    ourselves by comparing ourselves to others. E.g.
    comparing our feelings and abilities to those of
    other people
  • Downward Comparison Comparing yourself with
    someone who ranks lower than you on some area
    (e.g. money, attractiveness)
  • Upward Comparison Comparing ourselves to someone
    who ranks higher than we do on some area may be
    used for self-improvement (something we strive
    for)

14
Interpersonal Attraction
  • Social attraction to another person
  • Physical Proximity Physical nearness to another
    person in terms of housing, school, work, and so
    on
  • Physical Attractiveness Persons degree of
    physical beauty as defined by his or her culture
  • Halo Effect Tendency to generalize a favorable
    impression to unrelated personal characteristics

15
Interpersonal Attraction (cont.)
  • Similarity Extent to which two people are alike
    in terms of age, education, attitudes, and so on
  • Similar people are attracted to each other
  • Homogamy Tendency to marry someone who is like
    us in almost every way

16
CNN Fan Psyche
17
Self-Disclosure
  • Process of revealing private thoughts, attitudes,
    feelings and ones history to others
  • Should be used cautiously and sparingly when you
    are the therapist performing therapy
  • May lead to countertransference in therapy
  • Reciprocity Return in kind reciprocal exchange
  • Overdisclosure Self-disclosure that exceeds what
    is appropriate for a relationship or social
    situation

18
Social Exchange Theory
  • Social Exchange Theory Rewards must exceed costs
    for relationships to endure we unconsciously
    weigh social rewards and costs
  • Comparison Level Personal standard used to
    evaluate social rewards and costs in a social
    exchange
  • Relationship needs to be profitable enough to
    maintain it

19
Love and Attachment
  • Romantic Love Marked by high levels of
    interpersonal attraction, sexual desire, and
    heightened arousal
  • Liking Relationship based on intimacy but
    lacking passion and commitment
  • Mutual Absorption When two lovers almost always
    attend only to each other
  • Avoidant Attachment Fear of intimacy and a
    tendency to resist commitment to others
  • Ambivalent Attachment Mixed emotions about
    relationships conflicting feelings of affection,
    anger and emotional turmoil

20
Fig. 18.4 What do people look for when
considering potential dating partners? Here are
the results of a study in which personal ads were
placed in newspapers. As you can see, men were
more influenced by looks, and women by success
(Goode, 1996). According to evolutionary
psychologists, women tend to be concerned with
whether mates will devote time and resources to a
relationship. Men place more emphasis on physical
attractiveness and sexual fidelity.
21
Social Influence
  • Changes in a persons behavior induced by the
    actions of another person
  • Someone else influences your decision husband,
    wife, mother, peer, etc.
  • Peer pressure Rudy is swayed by Fanny to go see
    The Matrix Reloaded when he really wanted to
    see Terminator 3

22
Conformity
  • Bringing ones behavior into agreement with norms
    or the behavior of others
  • Solomon Aschs Experiment You must select (from
    a group of three) the line that most closely
    matches the standard line. All lines are shown
    to a group of six people (including you)
  • Other five were accomplices and at times all
    would select the wrong line
  • In 33 of the trials, the real subject conformed
    to group pressure even when the groups answers
    were obviously incorrect!

23
Fig. 18.5 Stimuli used in Solomon Aschs
conformity experiments.
24
Group Factors in Conformity
  • Groupthink Compulsion by decision makers to
    maintain each others approval, even at the cost
    of critical thinking
  • Group Sanctions Rewards and punishments
    administered by groups to enforce conformity
  • Unanimity Unanimous agreement

25
Power
  • Social Power Capacity to control, alter or
    influence the behavior of another person
  • Reward Power Rewarding a person for complying
    with desired behavior
  • Coercive Power Based on ability to punish a
    person for failure to comply

26
More Power Concepts
  • Legitimate Power Accepting a person as an agent
    of an established social order
  • Referent Power Respect for, or identification
    with, a person or a group
  • Expert Power Based on possession of knowledge or
    expertise

27
Obedience (Milgram)
  • Conformity to the demands of an authority
  • Would you shock a man with a known heart
    condition who is screaming and asking to be
    released?
  • Milgram studied this the man with a heart
    condition was an accomplice and the teacher was
    a real volunteer. The goal was to teach the
    learner word pairs.

28
Fig. 18.6 Scenes from Stanley Milgrams study of
obedience the shock generator, strapping a
learner into his chair, and a teacher being
told to administer a severe shock to the learner.
29
Milgrams Results
  • 65 obeyed by going all the way to 450 volts on
    the shock machine even though the learner
    eventually could not answer any more questions
  • The learner screamed and provided no further
    answers once 300 volts (Severe Shock) was
    reached
  • Group support can reduce destructive obedience

30
Fig. 18.7 Results of Milgrams obedience
experiment. Only a minority of subjects refused
to provide shocks, even at the most extreme
intensities. The first substantial drop in
obedience occurred at the 300-volt level
(Milgram, 1963).
31
Fig. 18.8 Physical distance from the learner
had a significant effect on the percentage of
subjects obeying orders.
32
Compliance
  • Bending to the requests of one person who has
    little or no authority or social power
  • Foot-in-the-Door Effect A person who has agreed
    to a small request is more likely later to agree
    to a larger demand.
  • Once you get a foot in the door, then a sale is
    almost a sure thing
  • Door-in-the-Face Technique A person who has
    refused a major request will be more likely later
    on to comply with a smaller request
  • After the door has been slammed in your face
    (major request refused), person may be more
    likely to agree to a smaller request

33
Compliance (cont.)
  • Low-Ball Technique Commitment is gained first to
    reasonable or desirable terms, which are then
    made less reasonable or desirable
  • Henry accepts the price he states for a new car.
    Then, later, Tillie the saleswoman tells Henry
    The business would lose too much money on that
    price cant you take a bit less and add all
    these options?
  • Passive Compliance Passively bending to
    unreasonable demands or circumstances

34
Assertiveness Training
  • Instruction in how to be self-assertive
  • Self-Assertion Standing up for your rights by
    speaking out on your own behalf direct, honest
    expression of feelings and desires
  • Aggression Hurting another person or achieving
    ones goals at the expense of another person
  • Attempt to get ones way no matter what
  • No regard for other people's feelings
  • Broken Record Self-assertion technique that
    involves repeating a request until it is
    acknowledged
  • Good way to be assertive without being aggressive

35
Fig. 18.9 In an experiment done at an airport, a
smoker intentionally sat or stood near
non-smokers. Only 9 percent of the non-smokers
asked the smoker to stop smoking, even when
no-smoking signs were clearly visible nearby
(Gibson Werner, 1994).
36
Social Traps
  • Any social situation that rewards individual
    actions that will have undesired effects in the
    long run
  • Anya buys things on credit for immediate
    satisfaction and then gets a HUGE bill later,
    which she cannot afford
  • Tragedy of the Commons Type of social trap where
    individuals share a scarce resource. Each person
    acts in his or her self-interest, which causes
    the resource to be used up, so eventually
    everyone suffers
  • No efforts made, for example, to conserve water,
    gasoline, electricity, or food
  • Some social behaviors produce immediate rewards
    but have significant consequences in the long run
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com