Beam In Gap Design Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Beam In Gap Design Review

Description:

John Holmes, ORNL. Diagnostics Review - March 26 & 27, 2003. 10. BIG Holmes 1 ... BIG Holmes 2. Diagnostics Review - March 26 & 27, 2003. 12. Gap Cleaning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: MW82
Category:
Tags: beam | design | gap | holmes | john | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Beam In Gap Design Review


1
Beam In Gap Design Review
  • Michelle Wilinski
  • March 26, 2003

2
Outline
  • Action items from July 2002 Review
  • Motivation
  • Overview
  • AP Analysis Cousineau, et al
  • Process Variables
  • Acceptance Criteria
  • Summary

3
July Review Action Items Critical Findings
  • Disconnect between diagnostics AP regarding
    magnitude of cleaning kick
  • Consensus reached that magnitude should be /-
    7kV
  • Number of kicker modules not determined
  • Using 3 stripline kickers of 1.5m each in one
    location

4
Action Items Observations/Recommendations
  • Gap cleaning stripline kickers should be designed
    for 50 ohm impedance in differential mode
  • They are designed in this manner
  • Pay attention to effective rise time of kicker
    system as multiple kicker modules are powered
    electrically in series
  • Done
  • Measure of beam in gap to 20 accuracy will be
    difficult
  • Working on calibration methods for such
  • Gated phototube system will probably be required
  • Design has either gated PMT or MCP (R. Witkover)
  • Concern regarding achievable absolute accuracy of
    BIG calibration using method of kicking out a
    known quantity of beam not in the gap
  • It is a practical method (R. Witkover)

5
Motivation
  • Should be no beam in the gap from linac
  • Chopper should be 100 efficient
  • Linac team claims nothing can make it from one
    end of the Linac to the other, and at the same
    time find its way from the mini-bunch to the gap
  • However, nuclear scattering, foil losses, RF
    noise, collimation inefficiency, etc. exist
  • Experience has taught us that in existing
    machines there is beam in the gap, claimed to
    sometimes be at the percent level
  • Loss budget is 10-4. Dont use it up in the gap!

6
BIG/Halo Overview
  • Hardware used pulser, kicker, FBLM (gated PMT
    or MCP) associated processing electronics,
    collimator and/or scraper and associated motion
    controls
  • Gap/Halo calculations performed in LabVIEW
  • AP range 0-0.1A
  • AP required accuracy 20
  • Operated during last 100 turns of accumulation
    cycle

7
BIG Block Diagram
8
Principle of Operation
  • Kick the gap beam onto collimators/scraper
    during last 60-100 turns of accumulation pulser
    duty cycle limited to 100 kicks/machine cycle
  • Measure with fast loss monitors (PMT or MCP)
  • Function as both gap monitor and gap cleaner
    (reduce activation of extraction region)
  • Scraper will be located at wire scanner
    location immediately adjacent to the IPM
  • Cross calibrate losses
  • Greater sensitivity than collimator

9
Gap Cleaning Analysis
  • SNS Beam-In-Gap Cleaning and Collimation
  • EPAC 2002
  • Sarah Cousineau, Indiana
  • Daniele Davino, BNL
  • Nuria Catalan-Lasheras, BNL/CERN
  • John Holmes, ORNL

10
BIG Holmes 1
11
BIG Holmes 2
12
Gap Cleaning Simulation S. Cousineau
13
Loss Locations
14
Process Variables System Inputs
  • Kick polarity
  • Determines output polarity of kick (/- or -/)
  • Plane to kick
  • Determines plane to kick (horizontal or vertical)
  • Kick trigger
  • When to trigger the pulser for kick(s)
  • Tune
  • Feedback for proper BIG cleaning
  • Power supply on/off
  • Remote control for the power supply
  • RTDL
  • Event Link

15
Process Variables - System Outputs
  • Kick mode
  • Determines mode of pulser operation (Tune or BIG)
  • Power supply remote/local
  • Readback to determine mode
  • Power supply on/off
  • Readback to determine if supply is on/off
  • Capacitor bank voltage
  • Readback to assure power supply is charged as
    expected
  • Gap Current
  • Amount of beam measured in the gap
  • PMT or MCP voltage

16
Acceptance Criteria
  • List still in development
  • Meets applicable FBLM acceptance criteria
  • Meets AP specifications
  • Range 0-0.1A
  • Accuracy 20
  • Pulser meets requirements
  • Output /- 7kV
  • Polarity change turn-by-turn
  • Select plane to kick
  • 1MHz burst of 60-100 pulses
  • System integration demonstrated

17
Summary
  • One pulser unit kicker to be shared between
    Beam in Gap and Coherent Tune systems
  • PC containing standard NI motion control, FDAQ
    digitizer, LabVIEW (Wims template)
  • Using gated FBLM for data acquisition
    presentation by R. Witkover to follow

18
extras
19
Pulser Block Diagram
20
Schedule - BIG
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com