Title: Ivica TRUMBIC UNEPMAP PAPRAC
1Ivica TRUMBICUNEP/MAP PAP/RAC
- THE MEDITERRANEAN PROTOCOL ON ICZM IMPACTS ON
NATIONAL COASTAL PLANNING PROCESSES
2SUMMARY OF ISSUES IN MEDITERRANEAN COASTAL AREAS
3- More than 200 large oil tankers permanently in
navigation
- Fragile ecosystems, many rare and endemic
species, most of them endangered, some
disappearing
- Limited and declining agricultural resources
- Forests covering only 5 of the region, forest
fires
- Many deltas and lowlands to be highly affected by
the climatic changes impact
- Increased fresh water demand, particularly in the
South and East
- Coastal erosion cultural heritage
coastal landscape
4CRITICAL ISSUES
- Desire to get as close to the coastline as
possible - Incompatibility of various land uses which cannot
exist in juxtaposition - Private ownership of coastal land which prevents
public from the free access to the coastline - The long-term goals for conservation of coastal
resources is often incompatible with the desire
for a short-term economic profit interests - The provision of environmental services is
often not in accordance with the rate of economic
development
5SPATIAL IMPACTS
- Large urban agglomerations
- Free spaces outside the protected areas (65 of
the accessible part of the coast has already been
urbanised) - Protected natural areas (the surface area of
wetlands has been reduced from 3 million ha in
the Roman times to 200 thousand at present) - Wider river basins in which most of the
land-based sources of pollution of the coastal
sea are located - Zones of intensive mariculture
6ACHIEVEMENTS
- National efforts towards legislation on coastal
areas Egypt, Tunisia, France, Spain, Italy,
Greece, Algeria, Israel, Croatia - Improved institutions for ICZM Conservatoire de
littoral, APAL, ISMAL, Israel Coastal Committee - Better monitoring indicators for sustainable
development, national observatories, coastal
observatories - MCSD involvement of civil society, ICZM a
priority - Establishment of protected areas
- Improved funding METAP, EU/MEDA/SMAP, GEF
- Sub-regional initiatives Northern Adriatic,
Adriatic-Ionian Initiative, RAMOGE - Coastal projects MAP, METAP, EU, national
initiatives
7BARRIERS TO MORE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF ICZM
- A strategic view of the Mediterranean coastal
areas is still missing - Resource management versus traditional land-use
planning - Traditional administrative systems
- Weak integration of environmental concerns in
development planning - Insufficient national financial support for
coastal programmes. - Indicators developed, but still no adequate
mechanism for utilising these within a long-term
policy-making process. - Civil society not yet fully involved in ICZM
8MAJOR LEGAL BREAKTHROUGH
- Protocol on Integrated Coastal Zone Management
9NEED FOR A NEW REGIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENT
- ICZM policies were translated mainly into various
guidelines, recommendations and action plans -
soft laws, not usually binding for the States. - More effective application in the field of ICZM
was needed - In November 2001, CPs recommended to prepare a
Feasibility Study on regional legal instrument
on the sustainable coastal zone management. - The Study carried out in 2002 and 2003
10- Protocol was signed in Madrid on 21 January 2008
at the Conference of the Plenipotentiaries on the
Integrated Coastal Zone Management Protocol.
Fourteen Contracting Parties to the Barcelona
Convention signed the Protocol at the Conference,
and the others announced to do so in very near
future. The Parties are now urged to ratify the
Protocol so that it enters into force as soon as
possible. -
11STRUCTURE OF THE ICZM PROTOCOL
- Part I General Provisions
- Part II Elements of Integrated Coastal Zone
Management - Part III Instruments for Integrated Coastal Zone
Management - Part IV Risks Affecting the Coastal Zone
- Part V International Cooperation
- Part VI Institutional Provisions
- Part VII Final Provisions
12MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS
- Bold
- Innovative
- Forward-looking and proactive
- Comprehensive
- Integrated
13PROTOCOL IS VERY PRECISE IN
- defining the coastal zone
- defining the Integrated Coastal Zone Management
- defining the coastal setback
- formulation and development of coastal strategies
- formulation of Environmental Impact Assessment
and Strategic Environmental Assessment - developing policies for preventing natural
hazards, particularly those resulting from the
climate change - applying the ecosystems approach to coastal
planning and management - reporting on the implementation of the Protocol
14NATIONAL COASTAL STRATEGIES, PLANS AND PROGRAMMES
- National strategy, based on an analysis of the
existing situation, shall - Set objectives,
- Determine priorities with an indication of the
reasons, - Identify coastal ecosystems needing management,
- Identify relevant actors and processes,
- Enumerate the measures to be taken and their cost
as well as the institutional instruments and
legal and financial means available, and - Set an implementation schedule.
- Coastal plans and programmes
- specify the orientations of the national
strategy, - implement it at an appropriate territorial level,
- determine the carrying capacities and conditions
for the allocation and use of the respective
marine and land parts of coastal zones - Indicators
15ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
- Environmental Impact Assessment for public and
private projects likely to have significant
environmental effects on the coastal zones, and
in particular on their ecosystems, take into
consideration the specific sensitivity of the
environment and the inter-relationships between
the marine and terrestrial parts of the coastal
zone. - Strategic Environmental Assessment of plans and
programmes affecting the coastal zone. - The environmental assessments should take into
consideration the cumulative impacts on the
coastal zones, paying due attention to their
carrying capacities.
16LAND POLICY
- Mechanisms for the acquisition, cession,
donation or transfer of land to the public domain
and institute easements on properties.
17ECONOMIC, FINANCIAL AND FISCAL INSTRUMENTS
- Economic, financial and/or fiscal instruments
intended to support local, regional and national
initiatives for the integrated management of
coastal zones.
18VALUE ADDED
- help mitigate the risk of status quo, which is
reflected in - the danger that the environmental deterioration
will continue - the fact that states would not voluntarily adopt
ICZM guidelines in their national legislation - the need for collective and global measures to
change the prevailing coastal development trends
and - the need to have a clear regional coastal
sustainable development strategy. - process of the protocol development
- more than six years since the formal inception of
the idea that a regional legal instrument is
needed - states have shown a great degree of willingness
to have such a document - flexibility in negotiation
- they wanted a protocol and not recommendation or
guidelines - they wanted a protocol as a legal measure with
all the repercussions it might bring - protocol is a unique endeavour on a world scale
- why have the Parties undertaken this task?
- ICZM is a process which is costly technically,
institutionally and administratively very
complicated time consuming not always easily
understood by all the actors and creating many
opponents and scepticism. - in spite of all the odds against ICZM, there is a
common understanding that ICZM is not an option
but a necessity - protocol is something the Parties want and not
something that has been imposed on them
19EMERGING ISSUES
- Improving integrated coastal governance
- Local management and sustainable development of
coastal zones - Marine spatial planning
- Integration of cultural identity issues
20United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean
Action Plan Priority Actions Programme Regional
Activity Centre (PAP/RAC) Kraj Sv. Ivana 11 21000
Split, CROATIA tel (385) (21) 34 04 70 fax
(385) (21) 34 04 90 e-mail pap_at_gradst.hr http//w
ww. pap-thecoastcentre.org