Search Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Search Results

Description:

1960s Electronically searched info on computer. 1971 End-user search system was ... Dogpile, Metacrawler, Cnet Search, Search.com, ProFusion, Mamma, Ixquick. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: rog650
Category:
Tags: mamma | results | search

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Search Results


1
Search Results
LIS 385T Information Architecture and Design
  • By Roger C. Wei
  • 10/22/2002

2
History of e-Info Searching
  • 1960s Electronically searched info on computer.
  • 1971 End-user search system was introduced.
  • 1985 First commercial CD-ROM appeared.
  • 1991 Emergence of the World Wide Web.
  • 1992 Gopher was fully functional.
  • 1994 Emergence of first Web search engine
    (WebCrawler).

3
What is Search Results
  • Search results refer to presentation of content
    that matches the users search query (Rosenfeld
    Morville, 2002).
  • Consist of individual hits.

4
Search Tools on the Web
  • About 85 of web users surveyed use search
    engines to find specific information.
  • Results of a web search depend on the selected
    search engine.

5
Searching and Ranking Process
  • (1) match the search words
  • (2) process the search syntax
  • (3) construct a set of documents
  • (4) assign a weight
  • (5) use the assigned weights to rank
  • (6) display the search results

6
Relevance
  • An abstract measure of how well a document
    satisfy the users info need.
  • A subjective notion and difficult to quantify.

7
Factors of Ranking (1/2)
  • Popularity of the page
  • Frequency of terms
  • Number of query terms matched
  • Rarity of terms
  • Weighting by field
  • Proximity of terms
  • Word variants

8
Factors of Ranking (2/2)
  • Weighting according to the order where the
    searcher entered terms
  • Case-sensitivity
  • Analysis of documents in the database
  • Relevance feedback applied to retrieved records
  • Date

9
What re-ranking search results are
User
User Interface
Database Selector
Doc Selector
Result Merger
Query Dispatcher
Search Engine
Search Engine
Search Engine
10
Measure of IR tool Effectiveness
  • Recall
  • the number of retrieved relevant documents
  • the number of relevant documents
  • Precision
  • the number of retrieved relevant documents
  • the number of retrieved documents

11
Recall vs. Precision
Recall
Precision
12
Search Evaluation
  • Must be examined in pairs.
  • Two Issues
  • Not easy to define relevancy
  • Difficult to know the of relevant doc that have
    not been retrieved.

13
Survey of Existing Engines (1/2)
  • Major Search Engines Google, Teoma,
    AllTheWeb.com (FAST), Yahoo, MSN Search, Lycos,
    Ask Jeeves, AOL Search, WiseNut, Inktomi,
    LookSmart, Open Directory, Overture, AltaVista,
    HotBot, Netscape Search.
  • News Search Engines AltaVista News
  • Specialty Search Engines Ask Jeeves
  • Kids Search Engines AOL Kids Only

14
Survey of Existing Engines (2/2)
  • Metacrawlers Dogpile, Metacrawler, Cnet Search,
    Search.com, ProFusion, Mamma, Ixquick.
  • Multimedia Search Engines MP3.com.
  • Regional Search Engines Mosaique.
  • Paid Listings Search Engines Overture.
  • Search Utilities Copernic.

15
Search Results Info Architecture
  • -IA, organization info to reach info needs.
  • IA provides more considerations for the way
    engines display results.
  • IA indirectly increase users satisfaction in
    info needs, when IR dont have a major
    breakthrough.

16
Interface Design at the Search results page
Farkas (2002)
  • Display a number indicating the total number of
    results.
  • Provide a query form on the results page.
  • Offer some tips on searching if no results.
  • Hits must provide sufficient information.

17
Interface Design at the Search results page Van
Duyne (2002)
  • Provide relevant summaries
  • Offer clear organization
  • Provide good hyperlinked titles for each hit
  • Use log files to tailor results for the most
    common search terms
  • Compensate for common misspellings
  • Provide support for common search tasks

18
Interface Design at the Search results page
Rosenfeld (2002)
  • -variables to consider
  • The level of searching expertise users have.
  • The type of results users want.
  • The type of information being searched.
  • The amount of information being searched.

19
Search Results Interface
  • Google vs. Hotbot.

20
  • References
  • Baeza-Yates, R. Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999) Modern
    Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, Reading,
    MA, USA.
  • Chowdhury, A. Soboroff, I. (2002) Automatic
    Evaluation of World Wide Web Search Services,
    Proceeding of the twenty-fifth annual
    international conference on research and
    development in information retrieval, August
    11-15, 2002, 421-422, Tampere, Finland.
  • Chowdhury G. G. Chowdhury S. (2001) information
    sources and searching on the world wide web.
    Library Association Publishing. London, UK.
  • Farkas, D. K., Farkas J. B. (2002) Principles
    of Web Design. Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Glossbrenner, A. Glossbrenner, E. (1999) Search
    engines for the world wide web, 2nd edn, Peachpit
    Press.
  • Google How to Interpret your Search Results
    (2002). Retrieved October 18, 2002, from
    http//www.google.com/help/interpret.html.
  • Hagedorn, K. (2000) Information Architecture
    Glossary. Retrieved October 18, 2002, from
    http//argus-acia.com/
  • Henninger, M. (1999) Dont Just Surf effective
    reserch strategies for the Net, 2nd Edition,
    Univeristy of New South Wales Press, Australia.
  • Hock, R. E. (2001) The extreme searchers guide
    to web search engines a handbook for the serious
    searcher, 2nd Edition. CyberAge Books,
    Information Today, Inc. New Jersey, USA.

21
  • Jansen, B. J. 2000. An investigation into the use
    of simple queries on Web IR systems. Information
    Research An Electronic Journal. 6(1).
  • Kobayashi, M. Takeda, K. (2000) Information
    Retrieval on the Web. ACM Computing Surveys,
    32(2), June 2000, 144-174.
  • Meng, W., Yu, C. Liu K. (2002) Building
    Efficient and Effective Metasearch Engines. ACM
    Computing Surveys, 34(1), March 2002, 4889.
  • Morville, P., Rosenfeld, L. B. Janes, J. (1999)
    The Internet searchers handbook locating
    information, people, and software. 2nd Edition.
    Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc. NY, USA.
  • Poulter, A., Tseng, G. Sargent, G. (1999) The
    Library and Information Professionals Guide to
    the World Wide Web, Library Association
    Publishing.
  • Rosenfeld, L. Morville P. (2002). Information
    Architecture for the World Wide Web, 2nd Edition.
    OReilly, Sebastopol, CA, USA.
  • Search Terms Glossary (1998). Retrieved October
    20, 2002, from http//www.searchtools.com/info/gl
    ossary.html.
  • Sullivan, D. (2002) Search Engine Watch.
    Retrieved October 10, 2002, from
    http//searchenginewatch.com/. Van Duyne, D. K.,
    Landay, J. A. Hong, J. I. (2002) The Desing of
    Sites patterns, principles, and processes for
    crafting a customer-centered Web experience.
    Addison-Wesley.
  • Weiss, S. (1997) Glossary for Information
    Retrieval. Retrieved October 10, 2002, from
    http//www.cs.jhu.edu/7Eweiss/glossary.html.
  • Yang, R. (1998) Relationship between Precision
    and Recall ratios and other evaluation methods.
    Retrieved July 10, 1999, from http//www.staff.ui
    uc.edu/pare/rong.html.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com