Snmek 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Snmek 1

Description:

Snmek 1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: sou94
Category:
Tags: age | snmek

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Snmek 1


1
Efficacy and selectivity of pre-emergence
herbicides in sunflower as influenced by soil
water conditions
Miroslav Jursík Jirí Andr Veronika Venclová Josef
Soukup E-mail jursik_at_af.czu.cz
2
Typical sunflower weeds in the Czech Republic
Echinochloa crus-galli
Polygonum lapathifolium
Chenopodium album
Amaranthus retroflexus
3
Locally occurring sunflower weeds in the Czech
Republic
Solanum nigrum
Abutilon Theophrasti
Mercurialis annua
Datura stramonium
4
Weed control in sunflower in Czech Republic
  • 90 of sunflower area is treated by
    pre-emergence soil herbicides
  • sunflower is very sensitive to many herbicides
    metabolic type of selectivity is usually low
  • intensive precipitation after herbicide
    application (especially on sandy soil) may cause
    vertical movement of herbicide into the zone with
    germinating seeds of sunflower and damage them
    (phytotoxicity)

5
Pre-emergence weed control in sunflower in the
Czech Republic
  • widely used tank-mix combinations
  • of herbicides
  • linuron
  • prosulfocarb
  • oxyfluorfen
  • pendimethalin
  • flurochloridone
  • bifenox
  • acetochlor
  • alachlor
  • dimethenamid
  • metolachlor


grass weeds
dicot weeds
6
Material and methodsTrial layout
  • tested herbicides

Half of each plot was irrigated by simulation of
30 mm precipitations (2-3 weeks after herbicide
application)
7
Material and methods
  • experimental years 2008 and 2009
  • soil characteristic chernozem, clay content 46
    , soil pH (KCl) 7.5, sorption capacity of soil
    209 mmol(), 87 ppm P, 203 ppm K, 197 ppm Mg,
    8073 ppm Ca
  • occurring weeds Echinochloa crus-galli,
    Amaranthus retroflexus, Chenopodium album and
    Mercurialis annua

8
Materials and methods
Soil moisture conditions
dry condition natural precipitation 25 mm
within 4 WAT wet condition intensive natural
precipitation (65 mm within 4 WAT) simulated
rainfall (natural precipitation 25 mm within 4
WAT 30 mm irrigation)
9
Efficacy of tested herbicides on Amaranthus
retroflexus under different rainfall conditions
low efficacy in dry condition
low efficacy in dry condition
10
Efficacy of tested herbicides on Chenopodium
album under different rainfall conditions
efficacy was not influenced by rainfall
11
Efficacy of tested herbicides on Echinochloa
crus-galli under different rainfall conditions
efficacy was not influenced by rainfall
efficacy was not influenced by rainfall
12
Efficacy of tested herbicides on Mercurialis
annua in different dry condition
efficacy was not influenced by soil moisture
13
Selectivity of tested herbicides to sunflower in
different dry condition4 week after application
no phytotoxicity in all tested rainfall conditions
phytotoxicity influenced by size of rain drops
14
Conclusions
acetochlor
  • excellent and long-term residual efficacy on E.
    crus-galli and A. retroflexus
  • efficacy was not affected by rainfall

15
Conclusions
acetochlor
Chenopodium album
Mercurialis annua
wet conditions
dry conditions
16
Conclusions
acetochlor
  • excellent and long-term residual efficacy to E.
    crus-galli and A. retroflexus
  • efficacy was not affected by soil moisture
  • slow metabolism by sunflower - risk if used on
    sandy soil
  • sunflower injury is often hidden and cause a grow
    retardation

17
Conclusions
oxyfluorfen
  • excellent efficacy on A. retroflexus and very
    good efficacy on M. annua not very influenced
    by rainfall

18
Conclusions
oxyfluorfen
Chenopodium album
E. crus-galli
wet conditions
dry conditions
only in
19
Conclusions
oxyfluorfen
  • excellent efficacy on A. retroflexus and very
    good efficacy on M. annua not very influenced
    by rainfall conditions
  • short residual activity
  • slow metabolism by sunflower phytotoxicity was
    caused by rain drops which reflected from soil
    surface necrosis and deformation of leaves

20
Conclusions
linuron
  • good efficacy on all tested weeds, but only in
    wet conditions
  • very low efficacy in dry conditions

21
Conclusion
linuron
wet condition
dry condition
22
Conclusion
linuron
  • good efficacy on all tested weeds, but only in
    wet conditions
  • low efficacy in dry conditions
  • relative short residual activity (up to 2 months
    after application) fast development of
    sunflower leaf coverage is necessary
  • high selectivity to sunflower possibility of
    use on sandy soils

23
Conclusion
flurochloridone
  • Lower selectivity to sunflower risk if used on
    sandy soils
  • phytotoxicity symptom on sunflower is bleaching
  • excellent efficacy on all tested weeds, but only
    in wet conditions
  • reduced efficacy mainly on E. crus-galli and M.
    annua in dry conditions
  • long-term residual activity

24
Conclusion
flurochloridone
wet conditions
dry conditions
25
Conclusions
prosulfocarb
  • excellent efficacy on all tested weeds, but only
    in wet conditions
  • in dry soil conditions, good efficacy was found
    only on A. retroflexus

26
Conclusion
prosulfocarb
wet condition
dry condition
27
Conclusions
prosulfocarb
  • excellent efficacy on all tested weeds, but only
    in wet conditions
  • in dry conditions good efficacy only on A.
    retroflexus was found
  • relative short residual activity
  • high selectivity to sunflower possibility of
    use on sandy soils

28
Conclusions
pendimethalin
  • excellent and long-term efficacy on C. album in
    all tested wet conditions
  • for other assessed weeds - short residual
    activity and efficacy is partially influenced by
    soil water conditions

29
Conclusion
pendimethalin
wet conditions
dry conditions
30
Conclusion
pendimethalin
  • excellent and long-term efficacy on C. album in
    all tested conditions
  • for other tested weeds - short residual activity
    and efficacy is partially influenced by soil
    watter conditions
  • breaking and lodging of stems may occurr as a
    result of callus creation on stem base

31
Thank you for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com