Chapter 9 Replacement Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 9 Replacement Analysis

Description:

Planned replacements can be scheduled to minimize the time and cost of disruptions. ... Any other expenses that occurs during that year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:717
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: eng1152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 9 Replacement Analysis


1
Chapter 9Replacement Analysis
2
Replacement Analysis
  • Should the existing equipment be retained or
    replaced?
  • The Defender is the existing equipment.
  • The Challenger is the best available
    replacement equipment.
  • If the defender proves more economical, it will
    be retained. If the challenger proves more
    economical, it will be installed.

3
The Replacement Problem
  • Obsolescence occurs when an assets technology is
    surpassed by newer and/or different technologies
    (PC)
  • Depletion is the gradual loss of market value of
    an asset as it is being consumed or exhausted
    (Oil well, Timber)
  • Deterioration is the general loss in value of an
    asset due to aging process (Production machinery)

4
The Replacement Problem
  • Planned replacements can be scheduled to minimize
    the time and cost of disruptions.
  • Variations of replacement problems, such as
    abandonment, retirement, improvements of defender
    or keeping defender as spare, can be considered
    as potential new challenger.
  • Since replacement problems usually are considered
    with fixed output, only costs of defender and
    challengers are analyzed.
  • Due to the lives of the defender and challengers
    are usually different, most calculations focus on
    annual marginal costs or on EUAC.

5
Replacement Analysis Decision Map
Identify Alternatives
6
Minimum Cost Life of a New Asset
  • The minimum cost life of any new asset is the
    number of years at which the EUAC of ownership is
    minimized.
  • Because of increasing operating and maintenance
    costs, the minimum cost life is often shorter
    than the assets useful life.
  • EUAC for each possible life, less than or equal
    to the useful life, is determined. The number of
    years at which the EUAC is minimum can then be
    identified.

7
Example 9AMinimum Cost Life of a New Asset
8
Example 9AMinimum Cost Life of a New Asset
Total EUAC
OM
Capital Recovery
9
Replacement Analysis Decision Map
Identify Alternatives
10
Defenders Marginal Cost Data
  • Are the Defender marginal cost data available?
  • Are the Defender marginal cost increasing?
  • The total marginal cost for any year can include
  • Capital Recovery Cost (loss in market value and
    loss interest for the year)
  • Yearly operating and maintenance costs
  • Yearly taxes and insurance
  • Any other expenses that occurs during that year
  • The marginal cost is calculated as an equivalent
    end-of-year cash flow

11
Example 9B Marginal Cost Calculation
Capital Recovery Cost MVN-1(A/P, 15, 1)
MVN(A/F, 15, 1) MVN-1(115) MVN(1)
(MVN-1 MVN) MVN-1(15)
12
Example 9C Marginal Cost Calculation
Capital Recovery Cost MVN-1(A/P, 15, 1)
MVN(A/F, 15, 1) MVN-1(115) MVN(1)
(MVN-1 MVN) MVN-1(15)
13
Replacement Analysis Technique 1Defender
Marginal Cost Increasing
  • Maintain the Defender as long as the marginal
    cost of ownership for one more year is less than
    the Challengers minimum EUAC.
  • When the Defenders marginal cost becomes greater
    than the Challengers minimum EUAC, then replace
    the Defender with the Challenger.

14
Example 9D Replacement Analysis Technique 1
15
Replacement Repeatability Assumption
  • Currently available best Challenger will continue
    to be available in subsequent years and will be
    unchanged in its economic costs. When the
    Defender is ultimately replaced, it will be
    replaced with this Challenger.
  • The period of needed services of the asset is
    indefinitely long.

16
Replacement Analysis Technique 2Defender
Marginal Cost Not Increasing
  • Calculate the Defenders minimum EUAC.
  • If the Defenders minimum EUAC exceeds the
    Challengers minimum EUAC, then replace
    immediately.
  • If the Defenders minimum EUAC is lower than the
    Challengers minimum EUAC, then the Defender will
    be kept at least the minimum cost life.
  • After the minimum cost life, then replace when
    the Defenders increasing marginal cost exceeds
    the Challengers minimum EUAC.

17
Example 9E Replacement Analysis Technique 2
18
Example 9FFinding Minimum Cost Life
19
Example 9G Replacement Analysis Technique 2
20
Replacement Analysis Technique 3Defender
Marginal Cost Not Available
  • Calculate the Defenders EUAC over its stated
    useful life.
  • If the Defenders EUAC exceeds the Challengers
    minimum EUAC, then replace immediately.
  • If the Defenders EUAC is lower than the
    Challengers minimum EUAC, then the Defender will
    be kept.

21
Defining First Costs of Defender and Challenger
  • Present market value, not the trade-in value,
    should be assigned as the first cost of the
    Defender.
  • The first cost of the Challenger should include
    the purchase price, sales tax, installation cost,
    and other items that occur initially on a
    one-time basis if the Challenger is selected.
  • The Defenders potential market (or salvage)
    value should not be subtracted from the
    Challengers first cost.

22
Example 9H Defining Defender First Cost
  • Defender SK-30, purchased 2 years ago for 1600,
    was depreciated with SL using 4-year life and 0
    salvage.
  • Challenger EL-40, 1200 with a trade-in
    allowance of 350 for the SK-30 1050 without a
    trade-in.
  • Current price for new SK-30 is 995.
  • Defender SK-30,
  • Original cost 1600 (Basis for SL depreciation)
  • Present cost 995 (Irrelevant)
  • Book value 800 (Useful in determining
    depreciation
  • recapture or loss)
  • Trade-in value 350 (Irrelevant)
  • Market value 200 (First cost assigned to
    Defender)

23
Repeatability Assumption Not Acceptable
  • Circumstances that Repeatability Assumption may
    not apply
  • When there is a specific study period instead of
    an indefinite need for the asset
  • When future Challengers are not assumed to be
    identical to the current best Challenger

24
A Closer Look at Future Challengers
  • It seems likely that future challengers will be
    better than the present Challenger
  • The prospect of better future challengers may
    make it more desirable to retain the Defender and
    to reject the present Challenger
  • Selecting the current best Challenger could be
    risky if 1) high cost and/or 2) long economic
    life

25
After-Tax Replacement Analysis
  • Ordinary taxes
  • Gains and losses due to asset disposal

26
Example 9IMarginal Costs on After-Tax Basis
27
Example 9IMarginal Costs on After-Tax Basis
28
Example 9JAfter-tax Minimum Cost Life
29
Example 9JAfter-tax Minimum Cost Life
30
Example 9KBefore-tax Minimum Cost Life
31
Example 9KBefore-tax Minimum Cost Life
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com