Title: PublicPrivate Partnership to Improve Access to and Quality of Secondary Education in Bangladesh Md'
1Public-Private Partnership to Improve Access to
and Quality of Secondary Educationin
BangladeshMd. Ashraful MoqbulAdditional
SecretaryMinistry of Education,
BangladeshConference on Quality Education for
AllOctober 2007, New Delhi
2The Secondary Education Scenario
- An interesting case of public-private
partnership. 98 of provision of secondary
education is private. Still, 95 school funds
come from Government in the form of subvention. - The positive aspect Community initiated,
community owned and managed, potential for
comprehensive country-wide coverage
3The Secondary Education Scenario
- The issues
- Regulations and systemic arrangements to
facilitate better performance of the system and
quality improvement in an environment of
ever-expanding provision - Ensuring incentives for expansion of secondary
education in disadvantaged areas and communities - Warding off bad political interference in
establishing schools, getting subvention support
and recruiting teachers - Measuring and monitoring performance of
institutions - Poor quality is still a huge issue in secondary
education.
4GOB Initiatives
- GOB has taken a number of initiatives focusing
on - Governance and systemic improvement for better
and more equitable allocation of resources and to
enhance quality and access - Provision of incentives to institutions for
better performance and for private provision of
education in disadvantaged areas - Provision of incentives to children and families
to access secondary education - Measures to improve teacher quality
- Improvement of the quality of textbooks and
curriculum - Assessing and monitoring performance of
institutions - In these efforts, GOB is supported by a number of
DPs.
5A. Governance and Systemic Improvement
- The objectives are
- To establish transparency in the use and
allocation of resources to schools and colleges, - To make resource allocation more equitable and
targeted to the poor - To increase the accountability of non-government
institutions, and - To develop a more efficient management of
secondary and higher secondary education with
greater stakeholder involvement.
6A. Governance and Systemic Improvement
- Issue School recognition and subvention
- Although there were comprehensive quality and
access criteria for granting recognition and
providing subvention to new schools, they were
not adhered to, due to lack of evaluation
capacity of Education Boards and political
pressures on the MOE officials. - Action
- Evaluation of non-government schools/colleges for
recognition and subventions are now left to
independent evaluating agencies. These agencies
themselves are evaluated from time to time.
7A. Governance and Systemic Improvement
- Issue
- Tightening and better monitoring of criteria for
financing schools may lead to greater inequity in
access, with the poorer areas being most
adversely affected. - Action
- MOE is catalyzing community initiatives to
establish new schools/expand existing schools in
underserved areas with due attention to the
realities on the ground.
8B. Incentives for better performance
- Issue
- Tying subvention to performance. Absence of this
practice led to a situation where schools lacked
incentive to improve performance in the past. - Action
- MOE issued an administrative order amending the
criteria for receiving subvention. Schools not
meeting revised performance criteria are notified
that their subvention would be stopped unless
they improve performance within two years.
Schools not performing well are then provided
needed support and well performing schools
receive rewards and recognition.
9B. Incentives for better performance
- A number of measures taken to further improve
performance of students and institutions - Incentive for school improvement plans
- SSC incentive awards and recognition to schools
- Achievement awards and recognition to best
performing students - Achievement awards and recognition to most
improving students
10C. Incentives to Enhance Access
- A country wide stipend to promote girls
education - Now being extended also to boys
- Being targeted to the poor based on a set of
poverty criteria - Girl students supported by Family Attractiveness
Program - New School Program for disadvantaged and
underserved areas and communities.
11D. Improving Quality of Teachers
- The objective is
- to develop a transparent and high-quality system
of teacher recruitment and teacher training.
12D. Improving Quality of Teachers
- Issue
- In the past, the existing rules and regulations
for teacher recruitment were not followed
strictly. This led to rent-seeking, nepotism and
political interferences in recruiting teachers. - Action
- To combat this, the Government has established
an autonomous Non-government Teacher Registration
and Certification Authority (NTRCA) responsible
for pre-qualifying teacher-candidates based on
academic qualification and standardized
examination. SMCs are to recruit from a
pre-qualified pool of teachers.
13D. Improving Quality of Teachers
- GOB is establishing a National Council for
Teacher Education (NCTE) to coordinate,
streamline and define standards for teacher
education. - Beginning 2008, all new teachers to be accredited
will need at least one year B. Ed. training. - Under a five-year plan, all untrained teachers
existing in the system are being provided
in-service training - 40 Mobile Training Resource Teams (MTRT) are
providing hands-on training to teachers at their
institutions.
14E. Textbooks and Curriculum
- The main objective is
- To improve transparency in selection and approval
of textbooks, competitive production of better
quality textbooks in a cost-effective and timely
manner. - To revise curriculum to meet the changing demand
15E. Textbooks Curriculum
- Issue
- NCTB was not transparent in evaluation of
textbook manuscript, especially in case of
private publishers. This led to rent-seeking,
poor quality textbook production, high production
cost and unavailability of textbooks on time. -
- Action
- Production of textbooks for all grades from 6 to
12 is open to competition. -
16F. Assessing and Monitoring Performance
- Issue
- Inadequate data collection, monitoring
evaluation constrained policy-making. - Action
- MOE is tracking education performance and
public expenditures. It is working on
institutionalizing data collection, enhancing
data collection capacity all geared toward
helping better policy and planning.
17F. Assessing and Monitoring Performance
- Assessment of students
- At entry level Grade 6 to see the quality at
entry - At Grade 8 to see how the system is performing in
terms of student achievement - At terminal exams at Grades 10 and 12
- Also performance of Bangladeshi students is
benchmarked against international standards
(e.g., TIMSS) to help policy formulation,
planning and needed intervention - Still a long way to go, but the process has been
initiated
18Some Preliminary Evidence on Impact
- 1300 institutions were served warning regarding
suspension of subventions. Subventions of 368 of
worse performing institutions suspended in 2005
and 2006. - 2608 schools showed significant improvement in
performance - 57 new schools have been established in
disadvantaged areas - Pass rates in SSC exam rise to 59 in 2006 from a
baseline of 40 in 2002. Pass rates in HSC
examinations rise to 64 in 2006 from a baseline
of 38 in 2002. - Teacher absenteeism in 2005 was down to 11 from
a baseline of 17 in 2002. Political interference
and nepotism in teacher recruitment are
reportedly substantially reduced. - 27 of public resources are now targeted to the
poor against a baseline of 24 in 2003
19Some Preliminary Evidence on Impact
- 21 in-service teachers trained against the
baseline of 10 in 2003 - Significant decline in cheating in standardized
examinations - Competitive process followed for production and
publication of all textbooks at secondary and
higher secondary levels. - For the last few years, books have been delivered
to students on time.
20A long journey, which has started, hopefully
in the right directionThank you