Radiation Kilo Curie - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Radiation Kilo Curie

Description:

'First radiograph of the human brain' 1896 ... Effective dose - 'average' dose over whole body, weighted for organ radiosensitivity (Sv) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: Hull97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radiation Kilo Curie


1
Do not adjust your set
2
Hazards of X-RaysJohn SaundersonRadiation
Protection Adviser .
3
Wilhelm Roentgen
  • Discovered X-rays on 8th November 1895 .

4
Colles fracture 1896 .
Frau Roentgens hand, 1895
5
Dr Rome Wagner and assistant
6
First radiograph of the human brain 1896
In reality a pan of cat intestines photographed
by H.A. Falk (1896) .
7
First Reports of Injury
  • Late 1896
  • Elihu Thomson - burn from deliberate exposure of
    finger

Edisons assistant - hair fell out scalp became
inflamed ulcerated .
8
(No Transcript)
9
Mihran Kassabian (1870-1910)
10
Do not adjust your set
11
Two Types of Effect
  • Deterministic effects (threshold effects)
  • Stochastic effect (chance effects) .

12
(No Transcript)
13
Deterministic Effects
  • Caused by significant cell necrosis
  • Not seen below a threshold dose
  • Above the threshold, the bigger the dose, the
    worse the effect .

14
(No Transcript)
15
Radiation-Induced Skin Injuries, from FDA, Sept
1994, Avoidance of serious x-ray induced skin
injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guide
d procedures
16
Dose Units
  • Absorbed dose - Gray (Gy)
  • Dose equivalence - Sieverts (Sv)
  • (for X-rays 1 Gy 1 Sv)
  • Effective dose - average dose over whole body,
    weighted for organ radiosensitivity (Sv) .

17
Tissue Weighting Factors
18
Stochastic Effects
  • Caused by cell mutation leading to cancer or
    hereditary disease
  • Current theory says, no threshold
  • The bigger the dose, the more likely effect.

19
(No Transcript)
20
Data Sources for Risk Estimates
  • North American patients - breast, thyroid, skin
  • German patients with Ra-224 - bone
  • Euro. Patients with Thorotrast - liver
  • Oxford study - in utero induced cancer
  • Atomic bomb survivors - leukaemia, lung, colon,
    stomach, remainder .

21
ICRP risk factors
5.0 x 10-5 per mGy ? 1 in 20,000 chance .
22
Example of Radiation Injury in Cardiology
  • 40 year old male
  • coronary angiography
  • coronary angioplasty
  • second angiography procedure due to complications
  • coronary artery by-pass graft
  • all on 29 March 1990 .

23
Fig. A 6-8 weeks after multiple coronary
angiography and angioplasty procedures
24
Fig. B 16 to 21 weeks after procedure, with small
ulcerated area present
25
Fig. C 18-21 months after procedure, evidencing
tissue necrosis
26
Fig. D Close up of lession in Fig. C
From injury, dose probably in excess of 20 Gy .
27
Fig. E Appearance after skin grafting procedure .
28
Doses in CardiologyTaken from Real-time
quantification and display of skin radiation
during coronary angiography and intervention,
den Boer A, et al., Oct 2001
  • 332 patients
  • 25 - 99 Gy.cm2 dose-area product
  • 4 - 18 mGy effective dose
  • 15000 - 11100 risk of inducing fatal cancer .

29
Dose Area Product
  • Stochastic risks approx. proportional to DAP
  • Skin dose is DAP / area irradiated
  • 1 Gy.cm2 ? 3 mGy skin dose
  • 1 Gy.cm2 ? 0.2 mSv effective dose .

30
20/11/96
31
Pregnancy - Radiation Risks
32
(No Transcript)
33
ICRP Basic Principles
  • Justification
  • Optimisation
  • Limitations .

34
Fin
35
Do not adjust your set
36
Equipment PerformanceImage Quality Patient
SafetyJohn SaundersonRadiation Protection
Adviser
37
(No Transcript)
38
Entrance Dose Rates for Standard Phantom
39
Time to Reach 2 Gy for Standard Phantom
40
Skin dose rate (mGy/min)
Remedial level 50 mGy/min for largest
field Suspension level 100 mGy/min
41
(No Transcript)
42
Image Quality Test Objects
43
Spatial Resolution
(Number of bar sets seen)
44
Threshold Contrast
45
Tube Voltage (kV)
  • Higher kV lower patient dose
  • e.g. changing from 100 to 110 kV leads to 12
    reduction in skin dose
  • Higher kV less contrast
  • e.g. changing from 100 to 110 kV reduces
    spine/soft tissue contrast from 1.48 to 1.34 (9
    drop).

46
Filtration
  • More filtration lower patient dose
  • e.g. ? 0.1 mm Cu ? ? 33 skin dose
  • More filtration less contrast
  • e.g. ? 0.1 mm Cu ? ? spine/soft tissue contrast
    at 80 kV from 2.76 to 2.46 (11 drop).

47
Tube to Patient Distance
  • Greater FSD lower patient dose
  • e.g. ? from 50 to 70 cm ? ? 49 skin dose
  • Greater FSD less magnification
  • (so fewer distortions).

48
(No Transcript)
49
Do not adjust your set
50
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com