Historical Linguistics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Historical Linguistics

Description:

Think of lexical meaning as a set of words expressing the entire range of ... bekommen, Goth. biquiman); it drove out O.E. weor an (http://www.etymonline.com) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:227
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: suss
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Historical Linguistics


1
Historical Linguistics
  • Lexical Change
  • Lecture 6, Week 7
  • Lynne Cahill
  • February 2008

2
Lexical change
  • Think of lexical meaning as a set of words
    expressing the entire range of meanings required
    by a speech community
  • Changes in meaning
  • when new meanings required
  • when meanings no longer required
  • when words increase the range of their
    application
  • when words decrease the range of their
    application
  • when words change their distribution

3
Micro and macro-dynamic change
  • Nerlich and Clarke (1988)
  • Micro-dynamic changes (or short-term semantic
    changes) apply to individual speech event
  • Macro-dynamic changes have long-term consequences
  • All changes start as micro-dynamic
  • Only some develop into macro-dynamic
  • Later in the course we'll look more at why some
    changes stick and others don't

4
New words
  • Derivation, compounding
  • language specific, rule-governed, variable
    productivity
  • back formations (reanalysis)
  • Borrowings
  • may undergo changes in meaning
  • may undergo assimilation to phonology and/or
    morphology of host language
  • Blends, clippings, brand names, acronyms
  • range of mechanisms for creating new words
  • do not necessarily obey existing rules (spelling,
    phonology, morphology)

5
Meanings lost
  • Words may go out of use (brougham)
  • Or they may take on different meanings (pen from
    Latin penna 'feather')
  • Original meaning relates to physical properties
  • Associated meaning from function (as quill)
  • Associated meaning becomes more important
  • Functional meaning remains when physical
    characteristics changed/lost

6
Increase of application
  • A word with a very restricted meaning begins to
    apply more widely
  • clog fasten wood to gt encumber by adhesion
  • Happens a lot with body parts
  • foot of mountain, league table ...
  • mouth of river
  • May be more or less concrete
  • sharp of musical note, remark
  • dark of emotions

7
Decrease of application
  • Word with relatively broad meaning takes on
    narrower meaning
  • meat flesh for eating lt food
  • Can happen because of introduction of words with
    similar meanings
  • Or because of creeping change in usage
  • As with virtually all meaning change, usage is
    key
  • if a word is frequently used in a particular way,
    that becomes its accepted usage and therefore
    dictates its meaning

8
Change in distribution
  • Some semantic shifts just involve change in
    distribution of words across meanings
  • English become and German bekommen
  • O.E. becuman "happen, come about," from P.Gmc.
    bikweman "become" (cf. Ger. bekommen, Goth.
    biquiman) it drove out O.E. weorðan
    (http//www.etymonline.com)
  • German werden now means become, bekommen means
    receive
  • English receive from French recevoir

9
Words and senses
  • Approaches to lexicology
  • Semasiological words ? senses (as in a
    dictionary)
  • Onomasiological senses ? words (as in a
    thesaurus)
  • Structural relationships between senses,
    including synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy
  • Changes in meaning can be mapped along all three
    lines

10
Ullmann's classification
  • (Ullmann 1957 220 ff.)
  • A. Changes due to linguistic conservatism
  • B. Changes due to linguistic innovation
  • i. Transfer of names
  • a) through similarity between senses
  • b) through contiguity between senses
  • ii. Transfer of senses
  • a) through similarity between names
  • b) through contiguity between names
  • iii. Composite changes
  • N.B. for similarity, cf. Anttilas iconic
    for contiguity, cf. Anttilas indexical

11
Ullmann's classification A
  • A words with a functional meaning,
    characteristics of the referent may change
    radically
  • E.g.
  • pen lt Latin penna feather
  • meaning as quill becomes primary
  • functional meaning extends
  • car lt Latin carrum lt OCelt karrom waggon

12
Ullmann's classification Bia
  • Bia metaphor, e.g. body part metaphors applied
    to other objects
  • foot (of mountain, league table ...)
  • mouth (of river)
  • tongue (of shoe)
  • Other things applied to body parts
  • Kopf (German lt cup)
  • tête (French lt Latin testa pot)
  • Emotive rather than objective
  • sharp of musical note, remark
  • dark of emotion

13
Ullmann's classification Bib
  • Bib metonymy (substitute for something
    associated), synecdoche (part for whole and vice
    versa)
  • cheek lt jaw
  • French joue cheek lt jaw
  • French bouche mouth lt Latin bucca cheek
  • bureau baize gt desk covered with baize gt
    office gt staff of an office gt institution
    employing staff (as e.g. FBI)

14
Ullmann's classification Bii
  • Biia sometimes from folk etymology
  • obnoxious originally liable to harm, influenced
    by noxious and ob- (as in objectionable)
  • belfry bell tower lt ME berfrey movable siege
    tower lt OFr berfrei lt Frankish bergfrið
    defensive place of shelter bell not
    originally part of the sense, or the form
  • Biib ellipsis (clipping?)
  • tabloid newspaper
  • internet
  • laptop computer

15
Ullmann's classification Biii
  • Biii anything that can't be classified
    definitively under one of the other headings
  • a Rembrandt may be ellipsis (painting) or
    metonymy
  • a Rioja similar (ellipsis of wine)
  • belfry example also, similarity of both form and
    sense involved
  • There are problems with Ullmann's classification

16
Limitations of Ullmann
  • Type A not really different from Bia (transfer
    through similarity of senses)
  • Difficult to see why justifies a whole new
    category
  • Approach is purely semasiological (like a
    dictionary)
  • No place for onomasiological view (like a
    thesaurus)
  • Especially lexical innovation consisting of
    development of new senses

17
Limitations of Ullmann
  • Notions of similarity and contiguity too
    restricting
  • Specialisation of meaning
  • e.g. corner has a much more restricted meaning in
    its football sense
  • legal terminology accessory someone who aids
    or contributes to a crime
  • Emotive factors euphemism/taboo, connotative
    meaning ...

18
Taboo/Euphemism
  • Words with meanings that inspire fear replaced
    with euphemisms or descriptive terms
  • E.g. bears in Northern Europe large and scary
  • Inherited word (from PIE) Latin ursus, Sanskrit
    rksas
  • Many N. European languages replaced this with
    words meaning brown one, (bear, bruin)
  • Slavic medved related to med ('honey') the
    honey-eater
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com